GRAVI-GEOMETRIC PARADOX
(explanation in simple pictures)

Let's consider a gas object, i.e. the model of a star. It is obvious, that for a star there is some radius r, for which the following condition is valid:

• deeper of this radius the particles have average thermal velocity bigger then the orbital velocity;
• upper of this radius the particles have average thermal velocity smaller then the orbital velocity.

If there were no particles having the speed below of orbital, then gas sphere would simply scattered. (It is the answer why there is no atmosphere on the Moon).

At the radiuses more than r, the molecules have average thermal velocities less than the orbital velocity for this radius and as a result, “they press" downward on the border between layers. At the radiuses less than r, the molecules have the larger velocities than the orbital velocity for this radius, and as a result, "they press" upward on border between layers. It means, that the pressure of gas grows up when we move deep into the object only to some radius r, and when we cross this radius, the pressure begins to decrease; and when we move nearer and nearer to the center, the pressure becomes less and less.

In addition to figures shown on the page the GTC Description, below there are the figures, called to help to understand the reason of occurrence of Gravigeometrical Paradox.

Even the fantastic black holes should be less dense at their centers, in comparison with the density at some radius r from their centers. By the way, there are only few solutions of the GRT equations, describing the interior of massive objects. The only such objects are the objects with constant density everywhere inside. The falsification of “black hole lovers" is opened simply. At the beginning of their theories they take the erroneous assumption that the black hole is made of an incompressible liquid with the constant density everywhere. They can be understood, it is impossible to solve the GRT equations in another way. But you see that this assumption is false. We should deduce the law of distribution of pressure and density in object, instead of development of the false preconditions in the base of the theory. Well, black holes are fairy tales; and we shall leave them in rest. We can see, that in astrophysics it is possible to be engaged in a juggling and to build the false theories on the unsteady base. The other, much more essential juggling is a statement about the greatest density and pressure at the centers of stars. This juggling was necessary "to start" the thermonuclear reactions as the source of star energy. And as we already have understood, what is the true source of energy of stars; this juggling about high density and pressure in the depths of stars is not necessary any more. But the truth is necessary.

In gas object the particles move along the complex trajectories. At first let’s assume, that between particles there occur the elastic collisions; and particles are simply interchanged the position and they will continue their movement along the trajectories of those particles with which have collide.

- What trajectories of particles will be?

- Ellipses.

- No. The ellipses would be only in the case, then all the mass of the object would be concentrated at the center, and some probe particles would fly around of this center and draw the ellipses. Though, for the beginning I’ll give “the black hole lovers” a start: let particles fly by ellipses. Even in this case the paradox works. At investigation of true trajectories, the paradox works more expressively, but its investigation is more difficult.

So, particles move on sections of curved lines, forming thus a set of ellipses. There are no straight sections, or they are very few. There are only pieces of circles and of ellipses. On the bottom figure there are two ellipses, red and blue. These ellipses cross an external circle under the same angle. Let's consider also two concentric circles (spheres) of radius r and r-dr. Let two particles will be closed between these spheres, that is, they collide with the same particles in points, laying on these concentric spheres, and consequently, come back into the space, closed by these spheres. One particle, which we shall name “cold”, moves by the sections of a blue (cold) ellipse, and another particle moves by the sections of a red (hot) ellipse.

Fig. 1

Both particles, colliding with spheres will draw trajectories similar to this: /\/\/\/\/\. But more close analysis shows, that the hot particle transfers a greater momentum to the top sphere, than to the bottom sphere. And the cold particle on the contrary, transfers a greater momentum to the bottom sphere, than on the top sphere. The cause is hidden in the following: the angles of collisions of both particles about the top sphere, a, formed by the radius of the object and by the trajectories, are equal, but the angle of collision of a cold particle about the bottom sphere b, is less then initial: b<a; and the angle of collision of a hot particle about the bottom sphere on the contrary: g>a. It is clearly shown on two bottom figures:

Fig. 2 Fig. 3

So, the "hot" particles transfer a greater momentum outside, than inside, and the "cold" particles - on the contrary. Accordingly, the pressure of "hot" gas grows as we move from the center, and the pressure of "cold" gas grows as we move to the center of the object. The concepts "cold" and "hot" in this case is not determined by any value of gas temperature. Thus, for any temperature and for any object with certain mass it is possible to find such radius, that below of which we name the gas as “hot”, and above which we name the same gas as “cold”.

Actually the external layers of any massive objects are colder than the internal layers of the object. Thus, it is possible to consider the external layers as "cold" layers, and the internal layers as "hot" ones. As soon as we shall find the radius at which the gas is considered as not "cold" and not "hot", that will be the radius, at which expected density and pressure are close to maximal. There are some reasons, on which the radius of sphere of the maximal pressure, the radius of sphere of maximal density, and the radius of sphere of "normal" gas a little bit differ from each other. We shall not try to penetrate into these labyrinths now.

On the bottom there is one more paradoxical figure. If we shall project an ellipse from a plane xOy, on a ray Or, we shall notice, that in any ellipse there is a zone, where the acceleration d²r/dt² is directed from the center of an object; and there is an area where this acceleration d²r/dt² is directed to the center of object. And it is known, that the force is proportional and directed in the same direction as acceleration. That means, that inside of any object and for any ellipse there is an area, where the gravitational force is directed to the center, and there is an area, where the gravitational force is directed outside from the center. But whether it is necessary now to name this force as "gravitational" force?

Fig. 4

Knowing the direction of acceleration, this ellipse can be divided on "cold" and "hot" areas. The particle moving along the cold section of the ellipse, presses downwards, and the particle moving along the hot section of the ellipse, presses upwards, devastating thus central areas of the object, and forcing pressure in some zone of the maximal pressure, located at some distance r from the center of the object.

Some of the posts, criticizing the Gravigeometric Paradox contain the following assertion:

To index of Space Genetics

Ivan Gorelik.

My Curriculum Vitae.

Extremely urgent note, 2009.

Attention! Magnetic trap of Devil!

There is a very big probability that magnetic trap will kill us all, if we will not stop powerful colliders.

Magnetic trap is an object, unifying hypothetical objects, connected primarily by magnetic forces: neutron drop / liquid; neutron hole; magnetic hole ...

It is probable that the microscopic magnetic trap can be created at the collider. Magnetic trap will grow capturing the normal substance. As a result, magnetic trap can destroy the Earth.

Magnetic hole is a magnetic analog of the black hole. The black hole is bounded by gravitational forces, and the magnetic hole is bounded by magnetic forces, which are many-many times stronger than gravity forces.

Magnetic hole is a magnetic dipole, in the form of a circle, where there is the critical magnetic field. The lines of magnetic induction are directed perpendicular to the plane of the circle. Nucleons are microscopic magnets, and they can be easily captured by the critical field of the hole. As a result the hole is growing.

The approximate computation shows that the minimal possible magnetic hole, which can capture a nucleon, has a mass slightly more than one thousand masses of nucleons. The Tevatron collider is now working near this region (1 TeV). The Large Hadron Collider will be able to create the particles with the rest mass, which are seven times more that the minimal possible mass of magnetic hole.

According to publications, LHC will create microscopic black holes. Most theorists suggest that these black holes will disappear, because of the Hawking evaporation. However, we know that there are several theories of gravity. Some theories did not even admit the existence of black holes. In addition, there are several theories of black holes. Therefore, confidence in the classical theory of black holes and in a process of evaporation of black holes is very poor.

For several years, some scientists argue and demand to ban the construction of powerful colliders. Among the known dangerous objects that may lead to global catastrophe are the following: microscopic black holes, strangelets, magnetic monopoles, vacuum bubbles. I learned about these disputes and concerns only in early September 2008. And then I immediately noticed that the objects, bounded by magnetic forces, were almost not analyzed.

In early September, I assumed that the probability of a global catastrophe is less than 0.000001. However, after three months of analysis of the objects, bounded by magnetic forces, and after the analysis of space observations, my assessment of the global disaster has surpassed dozens of percents.

Some theorists suggest that the Higgs bosons will be registered at the LHC. And, if these particles will not been found, the theorists would be very surprised; - this would prove that the Standard Model is wrong. Higgs boson had received a new name, "the God particle". We know that the most of particles have their corresponding antiparticles. So, if there is a particle of God, then there is a particle of Devil. Two colliding particles can give two more massive particles, - the particle and its antiparticle, for example, an electron and positron. By adding the colliding energy, we can get the the God particle and its anti-particle, the magnetic trap of Devil. Particles and antiparticles have diametrically opposed properties. Indeed, the Higgs boson causes the ordinary matter to have a mass. But the magnetic hole captures the substance and transforms its rest mass-energy into another form of matter, the magnetic field of the Devil's trap. Say me now, are we have the right to touch the particle of God?

Microscopic magnetic holes created at the collider, will move to the center of the Earth, absorbing the matter in their path. Eventually they will merge together into a single and much stronger magnetic hole. The thin shell of the Earth, together with us, will be ejected into cosmic space, but the rest of the Earth will turn into an electric current loop of several meters radius. For comparison, the radius of a black hole of the same mass is 9 millimeters. Half of Earth’s mass will be transformed into magnetic field of neutron hole, and another half will be transformed into radiation and kinetic energy of the released shell.

Magnetic hole will not decay if it was born in such cold place, as the collider, where the temperature is close to 0 K. If the magnetic hole is born in a collision of space particle with atmospheric particle, it has a speed, which is close to the speed of light. As a result, such magnetic hole will evaporate almost immediately after the capture of new atmospheric particles. Such decaying magnetic hole will form a cosmic-ray particle shower. Such showers are observable.

Huge magnetic holes are also observable is cosmos.

In the remnants of supernova SN 1987A we can see a system of rings, which remind us the magnetic hole. It is possible that this magnetic hole is decaying now.

It seems as if these rings embrace a hyperboloid. And now look at the electron, moving along two hyperboles in coordinates x, ict, in my electron model program. Each electron crosses the entire Universe in a period of time, which is equal to the classical period of the electron. This paradoxical conclusion is the consequence of the Special Relativity Theory. The ring structure of SN 1987A and our electron model have common visible properties. The Earth and the Sun can be turned into the same ring structure.

Magnetic collapse is much more rapid than the gravity collapse. At the process of magnetic collapse the nucleon turns such, that its magnetic dipole moment becomes parallel to magnetic dipole moment of a trap. Gravity collapse needs displacing of a matter inside the Schwarzschild radius. The time interval of neutrino registration at neutrino observatories had proved the reality of magnetic collapse of dying stars.

Particle's collision energies and bombs:

Several eV - chemical bomb;
Several MeV - nuclear bomb;
Several TeV - hyper bomb.

Chemical bomb is accompanied by the change of chemical structure of matter.
Nuclear bomb is accompanied by the change of nuclear structure of matter.
Hyper bomb is accompanied by the transformation of solid matter into a field.

Only crazy people can try to create the particles with the rest mass, more then 1000 nucleon masses. It is very possible that in the region from 1000 to 7000 aum, hundreds types of particles and resonances can be created. It is clear, that the most of them will decay. But some of them will grow, capturing the ordinary matter.

Academician Migdal wrote 30 years ago about pion condensation in the strong fields. As a result he had come to conclusion that neutron stars can have any masses. My approximate computation also shows that the minimal possible neutron star can have a mass, about one thousand of nucleon masses. Such embryo of neutron star can by made in collider.

Not long ago the new strange unexpected particle was discovered at the Tevatron collider. It decays at several muons, up to eight units. Somebody had already named it the Halloween particle. I named it the muon hole. What will be made the next? The magnetic trap of Devil? It will not decay, but it will transform us into its magnetic field.

Majority of contemporary physicists imagine quark-gluon plasma as a suck with peas. That is a very dangerous imagination. Particles are not points with labels, where their quantum properties were written. Particles are complex elements of space-time. Particles are not  material essences, independent of space-time; they are just space-time strings. 

Dear reader, the situation is extremely serious. The physics now is in the deep crisis. Theorists, in order to save their religious Big Bang theory, invented “the dark energy" as a new either. They want now to test their wretched theories at the powerful collider LHC.

One of the authors of such fairy tales, V.A. Rubakov, at the page The safety of the LHC wrote: "We can be sure that particle collisions at the LHC  cannot lead to a catastrophic consequences".  And at the page V.A.Rubakov we can read: "Thus already in his first famous work on proton decay monopole catalysis (1981) he theoretically predicted a qualitative physical effect (decay of baryon matter!) and made a thorough quantitative conclusion about the possibility and ways how it can be tested experimentally". But that is the magnetic hole, or magnetic dipole, made of two coupled monopoles.

Those persons, with high ranks and high scientific degrees, who cry about the safety of LHC, had already made a crime now. The LHC was launched despite the fact that there were court trials. The Earth could be exploded the 21 of September 2008, but the accident, which had happened two days earlier, had saved us. Scientists-criminals must be punished. But they continue to lie about the safety of the LHC, and are preparing the global terrorist crime now.

Dear reader! Big Bang adherents can lead the Earth to the utter destruction. Particle collisions with the energy more then 1 TeV must be prohibited by international law. The science must be cleared from the Big Bang delusion. Big-bangers want to touch the particle of God, but thus, they lead us into the magnetic trap of Devil. People, will you silently endure the massacre?

Some documents and links.

1. In November 2008, I arrived to Moscow in order to file a lawsuit against the Russian Academy of Sciences and against the most active propagandists of the LHC launch. Unfortunately, for lack of funds, I still (February 2009) can not to do it.
2. In late November at the "meeting of four" there was decided to hear my report "What LHC will give us?" at a workshop in one of the leading institutions of Moscow. Here are abstract (in Russian) of my speech. But later, I received from this institution the "retreat".
3. In early December, I sent a letter (in Russian) to the President of the Russian Federation. In early January, I received a letter in which it was stated that my letter was sent to the Russian Academy of Sciences.
4. In early December, I sent a letter (in Russian) to the Prosecutor’s Office of the Russian Federation. Soon after, I received the answer stating that my letter "was sent for review in the prescribed manner".
5. In the end of January I returned to Feodosia (Ukraine) and continued to inform about the risks of the global catastrophe. You can read some letters, which were send by me to the Google groups, - just click my Google-profile.
6. In February 2009 I wrote the page The Business Offer. Open and read it to know, what can You do to prevent the global catastrophe.

Reproduction of biospheres and civilizations. Who are you, dear reader: "a cell of good reason", "a curiosity cell", or "thoughtless muscular cell"?

Magnetic trap of Devil. Recent calculations show that it is not excluded that microscopic magnetic traps were already created, and they are growing now somewhere inside the Earth.

Arguments, proving that "The LHC will lead to global catastrophe"; "Magnetic holes exist"; "We will not be able to prevent the LHC launch and the following global catastrophe". Religious and mystic arguments.

Read the frequently updated page The Business Offer for more news, links and developments of this topic.

The end of Extremely urgent note, 2009.