Reviews by Evelyn C. Leeper

Reviews by Evelyn C. Leeper

All reviews copyright 1984-2008 Evelyn C. Leeper.


"Two Hearts" by Peter S. Beagle:

[From "This Week's Reading", MT VOID, 05/19/2006]

"Two Hearts" by Peter S. Beagle (F&SF Oct/Nov 2005) is a well- written version of a rather basic "slaying the monster" sort of tale. It is good to see that Beagle is still writing, but it is hard to get too enthusiastic about this piece.


Tideline by Elizabeth Bear:

[From "This Week's Reading", MT VOID, 06/27/2008]

I found "Tideline" by Elizabeth Bear (ASIMOV'S Jun) a fairly bland post-holocaust story about a post-war robot and a boy. Maybe it was supposed to be touching or something, but it did nothing for me.


BLOOD MUSIC by Greg Bear:

[From "This Week's Reading", MT VOID, 03/09/2007]

Our science fiction group read BLOOD MUSIC by Greg Bear (ISBN-10 1-596-87106-7, ISBN-13 978-1-596-87106-9) this month. This was expanded from a shorter piece, and both won Hugos. Yet I found that the basic premise required too much of a suspension of disbelief on my part, even while enjoying parts of the book quite a bit. I suppose it is a sort of alternate history now, since a good-sized chunk of it takes place in the World Trade Center towers.

To order Blood Music from amazon.com, click here.


DINOSAUR SUMMER by Greg Bear (Warner Aspect, ISBN 0-446-52098-5, 1998, 325pp, hardback):

This is billed as an alternate history, and it is in the sense that its premise is that Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's LOST WORLD was non-fiction, and dinosaurs did survive on a Venezuelan plateau. But it's not alternate history in the sense of looking at what changes there would be in society because of the change.

This is not so much a complaint as a warning. If you like alternate histories for that sociological aspect, you will be disappointed in Dinosaur Summer. It is more aimed at the person who enjoyed The Lost World and wants to read more about dinosaurs and the lost plateau. The story starts out in a dinosaur circus, but that seems mostly to allow Bear to introduce his human, reptilian, and avian characters before heading back to the plateau. Some of the latter two are real, others are fictitious, and you probably can't tell the players without a scorecard, which Bear provides in an afterword.

I was really looking forward to this book, but found it a disappointment. Perhaps I was looking for more change in society than the fact that King Kong flopped. As an adventure novel, it starts off very slowly, and doesn't offer the reader much to carry hold her interest. I suppose if you really like dinosaurs, they will carry the book, but I found Dinosaur Summer a disappointment.

To order Dinosaur Summer from amazon.com, click here.


PRIDE AND PRESCIENCE (OR, A TRUTH UNIVERSALLY ACKNOWLEDGED) by Carrie Bebris:

[From "This Week's Reading", MT VOID, 12/08/2006]

PRIDE AND PRESCIENCE (OR, A TRUTH UNIVERSALLY ACKNOWLEDGED) by Carrie Bebris (ISBN 0-765-35071-8) is what is called a "biblio- mystery". In specific, it is about Mr. and Mrs. Darcy solving a mystery that arises shortly after their marriage at the end of Jane Austen's PRIDE AND PREJUDICE. It has the same flaw that the recent film version of PRIDE AND PREJUDICE had (at least in the American cut)--it is far too explicit in its references to sex. Note that when I say this in reference to Jane Austen's work, what I mean is that they even acknowledge it at all. In that film, we see the Darcys in their nightclothes on their balcony. In this book, there are constant references to Elizabeth's hair getting mussed, or their being late for appointments, or whatever, with knowing innuendoes. Jane Austen would spin in her grave. I thought the mystery itself was also a bit un-Austen, with more of the paranormal that one expects in that clergyman's daughter's works (although there are some echoes of NORTHANGER ABBEY). Also, the characters did not always ring true, and I thought I detected a couple of anachronistic word choices (which, alas, I failed to note down). But there was a certain talent in the writing, and readers must have liked it--it has been followed by SUSPENSE AND SENSIBILITY (OR, FIRST IMPRESSIONS REVISITED), and NORTH BY NORTHANGER (OR, SHADES OF PEMBERLY).

To order Pride and Prescience from amazon.com, click here.


WAITING FOR GODOT by Samuel Beckett:

[From "This Week's Reading", MT VOID, 01/31/2003]

We watched the Irish television production of Samuel Beckett's "Waiting for Godot." This is part of the series "Becket on Film", which will do all nineteen of Beckett's plays, and is running intermittently on PBS in the United States. I think that "Waiting for Godot" is a bi-model play--you will either love it or hate it. I loved it, maybe because it sounded so much like conversations that Mark and I have. :-) (I'm not sure which of us is which, though.) If you like Tom Stoppard (especially "Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead"), you'll probably like this.

To order Waiting for Godot from amazon.com, click here.


"Imaginary Books in Speculative Fiction" by Robert Bee:

[From "This Week's Reading", MT VOID, 09/05/2008]

For book-lovers, I have to recommend "Imaginary Books in Speculative Fiction" by Robert Bee ("New York Review of Science Fiction", June 2008). Jorge Luis Borges, Stanislaw Lem, and H. P. Lovecraft are the obvious authors to cover, but Bee covers many others as well.


MEN OF MATHEMATICS by Eric Temple Bell:

[From "This Week's Reading", MT VOID, 07/01/2005]

Eric Temple Bell's MEN OF MATHEMATICS (ISBN 0-671-62818-6) was the book for our general discussion group this month. I believe that this is considered the classic work of mathematical biography, but its age--and at times lack of scholarship--is showing. For example, no one today would write, "It was the wrong time of the month and Napoleon was enjoying one of his womanish tantrums." [page 244] And Bell first insists that Georg Cantor was "of pure Jewish descent on both sides" [page 558], and later says, "The aggressive clannishness of Jews has often been remarked, sometimes as an argument against employing them in academic work, but it has not been no generally observed that there is no more vicious academic hatred than that of one Jew for another when they disagree on purely scientific matters or when one is jealous or afraid of another. Gentiles either laugh these hatreds off or go at them in an efficient, underhand way which often enables them to accomplish their spiteful ends under the guise of sincere friendship. When two intellectual Jews fall out they disagree all over, throw reserve to the dogs, and do everything in their power to cut one anothers' throats or stab one another in the back."!) [page 562] Amazing today, yet apparently in 1937 the publisher saw no problem with that claim.

[Georg Cantor is the mathematician who found proof that there are precisely as many integers as even integers or rational numbers, but there are actually a lot more real numbers. -mrl]

If you don't recall reading this, or can't find it in your copy, that's because current editions (since about 1965) have been bowdlerized to change this to "When two academic specialists disagree violently on purely scientific matters, they have a choice, if discretion seems the better part of valor, of laughing their hatreds off and not making a fuss about them, or of acting in any of the number of belligerant ways that other people resort to when confronted with situations of antagonism. One way is to go at the other in an efficient, underhand manner, which often enables one to gain his spiteful end under the guise of sincere friendship. Nothing of the sort here! When Cantor and Kronecker fell out, they disagreed all over, threw reserve to the dogs, and do everything but slit the other's throat." Note that whoever changed this removed all references to religion. You can even tell what was changed, because the font for that part of the paragraph that was replaced has noticeably thinner lines than the rest!

In fact, searching for other changes based on ink color turns up two more. On page 559, Bell had referred to Cantor's brother's becoming a German army officer, saying "what a career for a Jew!" This has been changed to "very few Jews ever did." And on page 560, the editor was unable to come up with something that would take up exactly the same (or slightly less) space as the original, and has the change sticking out into the margin! The original reads, "Cantor could not see that the old man [his father] was merely rationalizing his own greed for money." The changed text says, " Cantor could not see that the old man [his father] was merely rationalizing his own absurd ambition."

The whole question of Cantor's Jewishness has been a subject for debate. For quite a while, it seemed as though Bell had made this up. However, in footnote 3 on the web page , it says, "In MEN OF MATHEMATICS, Eric Temple Bell described Cantor as being 'of pure Jewish descent on both sides,' although both parents were baptized. In a 1971 article entitled 'Towards a Biography of George Cantor,' the British historian of mathematics Ivor Grattan-Guinness claimed (ANNALS OF SCIENCE 27, pp. 345-391, 1971) to be unable to find any evidence of Jewish ancestry (although he conceded that Cantor's wife, Vally Guttmann, was Jewish). However, a letter written by Georg Cantor to Paul Tannery in 1896 (Paul Tannery, MEMOIRES SCIENTIFIQUE 13, CORRESPONDANCE, Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1934, p. 306) explicitly acknowledges that Cantor's paternal grandparents were members of the Sephardic community of Copenhagen. In a recent book, THE MYSTERY OF THE ALEPH: MATHEMATICS, THE KABBALAH, AND THE SEARCH FOR INFINITY (Four Walls Eight Windows, New York, 2000, pp. 94, 144), Amir Aczel provides new evidence in the form of a letter, recently uncovered by Nathalie Charraud, that was written by Georg Cantor's brother Louis to their mother. This letter seems to indicate that she was also of Jewish descent, as Bell had claimed originally."

However, in any case, Bell agrees that Cantor's mother was born a Roman Catholic, which would make Cantor non-Jewish by Jewish law. One suspects Cantor is using the definitions of the Nuremberg Laws instead. Bell's description of Galois's life is also considerably off the mark--see for a refutation.

Still, Bell's off-hand remarks are sometimes quite *on* the mark. On page 221, he says, "Shortly after his seventh birthday [1784] Gauss entered his first school, a squalid relic of the Middle Ages run by a vile brute . . . whose idea of teaching the hundred or so boys in his charge was to thrash them into such a state of terrified stupidity that they forgot their own names. More of the good old days for which sentimental reactionaries long."

Bell's explanations of the mathematics is not as clear as other have been. (Mark recommends William Dunham's JOURNEY THROUGH GENIUS [ISBN 0-140-14739-X] as a better alternative.) I actually skipped a lot of the mathematics while reading Bell (and we also read only selected chapters); I was reading more for the external forces on these mathematicians. (For example, Queen Christina may have had many good qualities, but she basically killed Rene Descartes by insisting he tutor her at five in the morning in an unheated room.) This may still be the classic work, but if you are going to read only one such work, it may not be the best one.

[See my comments on the modifications made to TEN LITTLE INDIANS for more on removing ethnic slurs from older works of literature. (.]

To order Men of Mathematics from amazon.com, click here.


LOOKING BACKWARD by Edward Bellamy (Signet, CT339, 1887 [1960], 222+xxii pp):

I have a special connection with this book, since Edward Bellamy was born in Chicopee Falls, Massachusetts, which was incorporated into my high school home town of Chicopee. (Chicopee's other claim to fame is that it is the home of the friction match. It is not, as Mark sometimes asserts, the home of the self-starting hamster.) And Bellamy was the editor of the Massachusetts newspaper where my brother is currently working as a sportswriter.

LOOKING BACKWARD is subtitled "2000-1887," which makes it especially topical this year. As to its accuracy, or even plausibility . . . well, we'll see.

Bellamy has a very optimistic view of people and their reaction to all the rules of this new society. He claims, for example, that "the fact that the stronger are selected for the leaders is in no way a reflection on the weaker, but in the interest of the common weal." But since Bellamy later has Dr. Leete admit, "A man able to duty, and persistently refusing, is sentenced to solitary imprisonment on bread and water until he consents," there is apparently some dissension in this "perfect" society.

There are other imperfections as well, though I suspect Bellamy did not even realize them. Dr. Leete says, "The great nations of Europe, as well as Australia, Mexico, and parts of South America, are now organized industrially like the United States. . . . An international council regulates . . . their joint policy toward the more backward races, which are gradually being educated up to civilized institutions." And no one that Bellamy meets is anything but white, or Christian. (One wonders if the fact that the narrator was found entombed on a Friday and fully awoke on a Sunday has additional meaning.) This easy racism probably went completely unnoticed in 1887; it is more obvious now.

Throughout the book, there are all sorts of "predictions" which are off. One obvious one is that people listen to live music by telephone, but there are no recording devices. On a larger scale, everything operates smoothly under a planned economy, and we've seen that that doesn't work that way either. But the interesting part is how all this is related.

Virginia Postrel's article in the "Wall Street Journal" (http://interactive.wsj.com/millennium/articles/ SB944517208522468175.htm) sums it up in one sentence: "The future, in fact, is made of surprise." Futurists, including Bellamy, "didn't factor in the power of vanity, self-expression, chance, novelty, or fun." In Bellamy's 2000, nothing is produced unless people have asked for it, and guaranteed a certian level of consumption. But, as Postrel notes, "no one fills out a request for rock music, Jacuzzis, or Vidal Sassoon-style blunt haircuts." Bellamy's characters can choose between listening to a waltz or organ music, but there are no Beatles, Philip Glass, or Ice T, nor are the inhabitants of Bellamy's 2000 likely to wait up one day and request them. (No one in 1900 was likely to request Van Gogh or Stravinsky either.)

(I will note that Bellamy has his narrator write on December 26, 2000, "Living as we do in the closing year of the twentieth century," indicating that *he* knew when centuries started and ended.)

The particular edition I read is no longer available, but this is available in a bunch of editions, including a "Dover Thrift Edition" and on-line at http://eserver.org/fiction/bellamy.

To order Looking Backward in a standard paperback edition from amazon.com, click here.

To order Looking Backward in a "thrift" paperback edition from amazon.com, click here.


FOUNDATION'S FEAR by Greg Benford:

[From "This Week's Reading", MT VOID, 12/13/2002]

I read Greg Benford's FOUNDATION'S FEAR, the first of the "Second Foundation Trilogy" (even though it precedes the first "Foundation Trilogy"). The Foundation parts were okay, but the "Voltaire/Joan of Arc" segments and the "pan" segment broke up the flow completely and had (apparently) little to do with the main story. I had heard that this was a problem with this volume, but that the other two (FOUNDATION AND CHAOS by Greg Bear and FOUNDATION'S TRIUMPH by David Brin) are much more focused. We'll see.

To order Foundation's Fear from amazon.com, click here.


MICROCOSMS edited by Gregory Benford:

[From "This Week's Reading", MT VOID, 07/30/2004]

In his introduction to the original anthology MICROCOSMS (ISBN 0-7564-0171-2), Gregory Benford mentions such classics of the sub-genre as Theodore Sturgeon's "Microcosmic God", Frederik Pohl's "The Tunnel Under the World", and James Blish's "Surface Tension"--all of which are must-reads. And the first story, Jack McDevitt's "Act of God", has definite echoes of Moskowitz's story. It is also one of the strongest stories. (This isn't a big surprise. The conventional wisdom for na anthology is to put the strongest story first, the second strongest last, and the rest in-between, in general trying to separate pairs of stories that are too similar.)

Geoffrey A. Landis's "Ouroboros" is computer-based, but unlike some of the other computer-based stories here, is a true microcosm (rather than just a virtual reality situation). While clever, it was also a bit obvious, and also dependent on what may at first appear to be proofreading problems.

Most of the stories in MICROCOSMS, however, seem more about something other than what I would consider microcosms. Robert J. Sawyer's "Kata Bindu" does seem to draw somewhat on "Surface Tension"--but also perhaps on David Brin's "The Crystal Spheres". Pamela Sargent's "Venus Flowers at Night" has a virtual reality that someone in our world experiences, not a microcosm in the sense I would use it. Russell Blackford's "The Name of the Beast Was Number" suggests the idea of a microcosm, but never goes anywhere with it. Robert Sheckley'a "A Spirit of Place" is a limited society, but not a microcosm as I would use the word. Tom Purdom's "Palace Resolution", George Zebrowski's "My First World', Paul Levinson's "Critical View"--they're all something *like* microcosms without actually being them. And Howard V. Hendrix's "Once Out of Nature" isn't even science fiction so far as I can tell.

Jamil Nasir's "Dream Walking" is somewhere on the border, and related, I think, to H. L. Gold's "Mind Partner"--though not quite as extreme. In fact, the whole idea of recursion seems to be connected to macrocosms, even since Augustus de Morgan wrote, "Great fleas have little fleas upon their backs to bite 'em, And little fleas have lesser fleas, and so ad infinitum, And the great fleas themselves, in turn, have greater fleas to go on, While these again have greater still, and greater still, and so on."

And in "The We Who Sing", Stephen Baxter seems to draw on Olaf Stapledon in what I suppose could technically be called a microcosm, although it could be considered a macrocosm just as easily.

To order Microcosms from amazon.com, click here.


THE UNCOMMON READER by Alan Bennett:

[From "This Week's Reading", MT VOID, 04/04/2008]

THE UNCOMMON READER by Alan Bennett (ISBN-13 978-0-374-28096-3, ISBN-10 0-374-28096-7) is a wonderful book. I love Bennett's writing in general, and he is at the top of his form here. This book postdates the film THE QUEEN, and seems to have taken some inspiration from it, though it may be that those elements I recognize are things the British already took for granted. The Queen is the eponymous character, one day coming upon a bookmobile outside one of the palace gates and feeling obliged to check out a book. She soon discovers that she likes reading, and finds her attitudes (toward everything) slowly changing. Bennett also observes that her position affects her reading in odd ways. For example, "`... she had handicaps as a reader of Jane Austen that were peculiarly her own. The essence of Jane Austen lies in minute social distinctions, distinctions which the Queen's unique position made it difficult for her to grasp. There was such a chasm between the monarch and even her grandest subject that the social differences beyond that were somewhat telescoped. So the social distinctions of which Jane Austen made so much seemed of even less consequence to the Queen than they did to the ordinary reader, thus making the novels much harder going." Highly recommended for those who love reading, books, libraries, and plain old good writing.

To order The Uncommon Reader from amazon.com, click here.


WHY TRUTH MATTERS by Ophelia Benson and Jeremy Stangroom:

[From "This Week's Reading", MT VOID, 03/02/2007]

WHY TRUTH MATTERS by Ophelia Benson and Jeremy Stangroom (ISBN-10 0-8264-7608-2, ISBN-13 978-0-826-47608-1) has what they claim as the answer on the back: "Truth matters because we are the only species we know of that has the ability to find it out." This is clarified inside as "we have the kind of brain that can conceptualize reality as existing independent of us." But first of all, whether we are the only species who can do this is certainly arguable, and second, having said this on page 21, the authors are left with the rest of the book to discuss the various ways in which people marginalize truth (e.g., wishful thinking, cultural relativism, etc.). It is all a bit unstructured, and with a lot of mentions of modern philosophers, scientists, and events that assume the reader is familiar with them. Continuum Press seems to publish books on philosophy, but I would say they are aimed more at the serious student of philosophy than at the general public.

To order Why Truth Matters from amazon.com, click here.


TRENT'S LAST CASE by E. C. Bentley:

[From "This Week's Reading", MT VOID, 10/28/2005]

TRENT'S LAST CASE by E. C. Bentley (0-06-080440-8) is one of the classics that Thompson discusses. Bentley was tired of the "infallible detective", so his Trent is definitely not infallible. And as part of my on-going cataloguing of anti- Semitism in early twentieth century English mysteries, I'll cite one sentence from this 1913 novel: "In Paris a well-known banker walked quietly out of the Bourse and fell dead upon the broad steps among the raving crowd of Jews, a phial crushed in his hand."

To order Trent's Last Case from amazon.com, click here.


WHEN LIFE NEARLY DIED by Michael J. Benton:

[From "This Week's Reading", MT VOID, 05/07/2004]

Michael J. Benton's WHEN LIFE NEARLY DIED is a rather dry discussion of mass extinctions in general and the Permian extinction in particular. I could never figure out how the information was arranged. Just when I had decided he was tracing the history of our understanding of extinctions chronologically, there would be a digression that threw off the continuity. Intriguing stuff, but hard to read.

[From "This Week's Reading", MT VOID, 05/21/2004]

Two weeks ago, I wrote about Michael J. Benton's book about the Permian mass extinction, WHEN LIFE NEARLY DIED. In the book, he attributed the extinction to volcanic eruptions, but new evidence may indicate that it was caused by an asteroid impact instead. See http://tinyurl.com/2lvyc for more details. For an article disputing the new evidence, see http://tinyurl.com/26my4.

To order When Life Nearly Died from amazon.com, click here.


BEOWULF:

[From "This Week's Reading", MT VOID, 12/07/2007]

Before seeing the film BEOWULF, I decided to re-read the poem BEOWULF. I read the translation by Burton Raffel, because that was one of the ones in the house, but I would recommend a more recent translation: Seamus Heaney's is highly recommended (ISBN-13 978-0-393-32097-8, ISBN-10 0-393-32097-0). Mark has reviewed the film in the 11/23/07 issue of the MT VOID, but I wanted to comment on the similarities and differences between the two. At first, I was reasonably impressed with how the film stuck to the poem. The arrival of the Geats was pretty much as written, and the swimming competition included, even though it was not critical to the main plot. It was, in fact, fairly faithful up until the moment that Beowulf walks into the cave to kill Grendel's mother. Well, except for adding a fair amount of sex, and having Beowulf completely naked during the fight with Grendel. The latter change resulted in a lot of austin-power- izing, with strategically placed elbows, tankards, and so on. And the original had no hint of Beowulf and Hrothgar's wife being interested in each other. But from the point Beowulf enters the cave, it all falls apart (from the point of view of faithfulness). Grendel's mother did not look like Angelina Jolie, and the various connections with Hrothgar, Beowulf, and her were non-existent in the poem. And the dragon episode in the poem was a completely separate episode that took place back in Sweden, not in Denmark, and was completely independent of the Grendel story.

Also, they changed the "attitude" of the story. In the original poem, Beowulf and others are boastful, but this is considered a good thing. Modesty was not prized in Beowulf's society. But in the film, after Beowulf recounts the story of the swimming competition, one of his warriors says to another something to the effect that the last time Beowulf told the story, he had killed three sea monsters, and this time he claimed nine--a very unlikely thing for a fellow warrior to do in Beowulf's time.

The film--with its special effects--is entertaining, but I felt that all the added love interests detracted from the epic nature of the tale.

To order Beowulf from amazon.com, click here.


Bibles:

[From "This Week's Reading", MT VOID, 01/05/2007]

I was reading a "New Yorker" article on Bible publishing (< http://www.newyorker.com/printables/fact/061218fa_fact1) which said "ninety-one per cent of American households own at least one Bible--the average household owns four." Well, we are not an average household: we have eleven--or so. "Or so" because I am not sure how to count partial Bibles. Does one copy of the Tanakh (Old Testament) and one copy of the New Testament count as one Bible or two? How do I count an abridged version? Does the Apocrypha count?

Okay, since you are probably wondering, the various versions are the King James Version, King James Version (Canongate, only some books), New King James Version (Extreme Word Study Bible), New International Version (travel edition), New International Version (Study Bible), New English Bible (New Testament only), Douai (Old Testament only, abridged), Jewish Translation Society (1917 and 1985 translations), U. S. Army Jewish Scriptures (abridged), and the "Black Bible Chronicles". Also the Apocrypha (Modern Library), and an interlinear New Testament.


"Extreme Word" edition of the Bible:

[From "This Week's Reading", MT VOID, 12/07/2007]

A few weeks ago, in the 11/02/07 issue of the MT VOID, I talked about how Sir Arthur Quiller-Couch explains the problems in reading the Bible as literature. Among other problems, he says that poetry is printed as prose, paragraphs and even sentences are broken into short verses, and then we "pepper the result all over with italics and numerals, print it in double columns, with a marginal gutter on each side, each gutter pouring down an inky flow of references and cross-references." Well, in pulling out books to read along with this course, I ran across the "Extreme Word" edition of the Bible, which attempts to address at least some of these problems. It reduces the chapter numbers to a light blue background design at the start of the chapter, and verse numbers to very small, faintly printed numbers. While it does have two columns, paragraphs look like paragraphs, and there are even topic heading (e.g. "Jeroboam II Reigns in Israel"). The marginal gutters are a function of trying to get an enormous book into a single volume (hence the tissue-thin paper in most editions as well), but footnotes have taken the place of marginal notes. The footnotes are no worse than a lot of non-fiction books these days, and the sidebars are presented in the same way that one finds in news magazines, etc. There are still some random italics, though.

To order "Extreme Word" edition of the Bible from amazon.com, click here.


FANTASTIC FABLES by Ambrose Bierce:

[From "This Week's Reading", MT VOID, 06/17/2005]

Ambrose Bierce's FANTASTIC FABLES (ISBN 0-486-22225-X) is full of cynical fables. A sample: "A Man Running for Office was overtaken by Lightning. "'You see,' said the Lightning, as it crept by him inch by inch, 'I can travel considerably faster than you.' 'Yes,' the Man Running for Office replied, 'but think how much longer I keep going.'"

There is also "Aesopus Emendatus", a collection of twists on Aesop's fables, such as: "A fox, seeing some sour grapes hanging within an inch of his nose, and being unwilling to admit that there was anything he would not eat, solemnly declared that they were out of his reach."

As noted, there is a very strong thread of cynicism in this collection. It wouldn't surprise me to learn that Bierce ended up so disillusioned with humanity that he went off to Mexico with a death wish.

To order Fantastic Fables from amazon.com, click here.


WEAPONS OF CHOICE by John Birmingham:

[From "This Week's Reading", MT VOID, 02/11/2005]

Most of what I said about Charles Stross's THE FAMILY TRADE goes for John Brimingham's WEAPONS OF CHOICE (ISBN 0-345-45712-9) as well. At least WEAPONS OF CHOICE is in trade paperback rather than hardback, but it is book one of a trilogy, so it's still $48 for the whole story. However, the Stross has "Book One of The Merchant Princes" right on the front in fairly large print; WEAPONS OF CHOICE has "The first novel in a three-book epic, the Axis of Time trilogy" in much smaller print on the back. The premise is that part of a multi-national naval task force from 2021 gets transmitted back to 1942 Midway. (Yes, it sounds a lot like THE PHILADELPHIA EXPERIMENT.) The reaction of the 1942 military to the diverse make-up of their 2021 counterparts is worth investigating up to a point, but Birmingham seems to want to deal with every possible permutation of problem and reaction, and it becomes repetitive after a while. In addition to the usual American "types", the multi-national aspect lets Birmingham have Japanese, Asians, and Russians as well. (I find it interesting that his 2021 military team has a high-ranking lesbian, but apparently no gay male personnel. I still haven't decided if 1942 personnel should have more problems dealing with a black lesbian commander or a gay male sailor.) One reason the story is/will be so long is that Birmingham is spening at least a novel's worth of exposition on the inter- personal relationships, at least another novel's worth of exposition on the military strategy, and another large chunk on the aspect of having the 2021 folks trying to 1) convince the 1942 folks that they really are from 2021, and 2) explain what will happen in the war, all the secret details the 1942 people don't know, etc. The problem is that my inter-weaving them, the whole thing seems stretched thin.

To order Weapons of Choice from amazon.com, click here.


AT THE CITY LIMITS OF FATE by Michael Bishop (Edgewood Press, ISBN 0-9629066-6-2, 1996, 328p):

Michael Bishop holds the somewhat ambiguous honor of having the most Hugo nominations without a win of any author (nine). But although three of his nominated short fiction pieces are in the time span covered by this book, none of them are included here. On the other hand, the book has a central theme of religion that, while not completely absent from any of Bishop's work (no pun intended), is better represented by the lesser-known works featured here.

The book starts out aptly enough with "Beginnings," with two thieves hanging on either side of Yeshua on Golgotha. It ends with the modern-day trial of Judas Iscariot in "I, Iscariot" (a concept echoed strangely in James Morrow's Blameless in Abaddon, where it is God on trial instead).

In between, Bishop looks at a snake-handling cult in "Among the Handlers," introduces Saint Augustine to a traveler who tells him about the science and technology to come in "For Thus Do I Remember Carthage," and combines God and the mass media in "God's Hour."

In addition to the theme of religion, Bishop also has a Japanese undercurrent to his work, from a discussion of Japanese Zeros in "000-00-0000" to Yukio Mishima in "At the City Limits of Fate" to "Reading the Silks." Yet although certain theme recur, each story is an individual. Unlike many authors, Bishop seems to produce something fresh each time. Well, okay, two of his Hugo-nominated works are sequels to other works--"The White Otters of Childhood" and Brittle Innings--but they are sequels to two classics in the field, and Bishop definitely gives each of them it a fresh viewpoint. Bishop can write derivative works that are not derivative, while most authors seem to write "new" works that are derivative.

Bishop uses a variety of styles here, a variety of voices, and a variety of techniques, and they all work. Again, I am reminded of the two very different styles he maintained throughout Brittle Innings. In any case, Bishop is living proof that in the battle of form versus substance, they can both be winners. I highly recommend this book (and indeed any of Bishop's work). Unless you live near a science fiction specialty shop, you will probably have to have it special-ordered. It's worth it.

(In case you're wondering, Bishop's nominated stories are "Death and Designation Among the Asadi" [1973], "The White Otters of Childhood" [1973], "Cathadonian Odyssey" [1974], "Rogue Tomato" [1975], "The Samurai and the Willows" [1976], "The Quickening" [1981], "A Gift from the Graylanders" [1985], "Cri de Coeur" [1994], and Brittle Innings [1994]. Now wouldn't that make a hell of a collection!]

To order At the City Limits of Fate from amazon.com, click here.


A CROSS OF CENTURIES edited by Michael Bishop:

[From "This Week's Reading", MT VOID, 10/12/2007]

A CROSS OF CENTURIES edited by Michael Bishop (ISBN-13 978-1-56025-926-8, ISBN-10 1-56025-926-4) is a collection of stories, mostly reprints, dealing with Jesus in some form or other. This is a collection that may appeal more to believers (although too specific a belief may also be an obstacle). Worth noting is that Bishop says in his introduction, "Finally, I want to acknowledge contributor Barry Malzberg's insightful objection to any and all theme anthologies: the loss of surprise and so of pleasure attending readers' awareness that at some point, in some way, the tale before them absolutely *must* deal with an aspect of that theme." (But this did not stop Malzberg from allowing the inclusion of his own story "Understanding Entropy"--nor is there any reason why it should.)

To order A Cross of Centuries from amazon.com, click here.


"The Orchid Forest: A Metafactual Narrative Introduction to THE CRYSTAL COSMOS by Rhys Hughes, by Miguel Obispo" by Michael Bishop:

[From "This Week's Reading", MT VOID, 06/01/2007]

If the traditional sources of short fiction are disappointing these days, one can occasionally find a gem in the most unlikely places. For example, "The New York Review of Science Fiction" does not usually publish fiction, but the February 2007 issue has a wonderful piece by Michael. A few weeks back (in the 04/27/07 issue of the MT VOID) I reviewed Rhys Hughes's A NEW UNIVERSAL HISTORY OF INFAMY. Well, "The Orchid Forest: A Metafactual Narrative Introduction to THE CRYSTAL COSMOS by Rhys Hughes, by Miguel Obispo" is described as "Rhys Hughes's 612th piece of fiction in his projected life's work of one thousand discrete, albeit subtly linked, items of fiction." Except, of course, it is written by Michael Bishop. Only about 5500 words long (placing in firmly in the Short Story category for Hugo, hint, hint!), it is chock-a-block with literary references, allusions, and in-jokes. Some are overt (Hughes the character says that all the ships in his latest work, THE CRYSTAL COSMOS, are named for Ian Watson novels), some are more subtle (Moby K. Dick, the Paranoia Whale), and others are downright obscure (I am sure that "an unpronounceable town in Finland" must be a reference to *something*). This is one of those stories that as soon as I finished it I wanted to read it again, and will definitely be on my Hugo ballot next year.


EASY RIDERS, RAGING BULLS by Peter Biskind:

[From "This Week's Reading", MT VOID, 01/30/2004]

Peter Biskind's EASY RIDERS, RAGING BULLS was recommended as a good summary of the 1970s in Hollywood. However, it seemed to spend more time on all the scandal and gossip than I was interested. Also Biskind has an annoying habit of referring to people sometimes by their first names and sometimes by their last, often in the same paragraph. This made it hard to keep track of what was going on. ("Who the heck is this 'Bob' he's talking about here?") (I found out later it was put together from a lot of articles which Biskind wrote for "Premiere" magazine, which would explain some of the inconsistencies in name references, as well as the very jerky writing style, where one feels one is being whipsawed around.)

To order Easy Riders, Raging Bulls from amazon.com, click here.


"It's a *Good* Life" by Jerome Bixby:

[From "This Week's Reading", MT VOID, 07/16/2004]

The short stories nominated for the Retro Hugo for Short Story were all of high-quality, and all award-worthy, but I would pick "It's a *Good* Life" by Jerome Bixby, and not just because it was made into a "Twilight Zone" story. It is a very effective horror piece on its own.


YEAR OF THE HANGMAN by Gary Blackwood:

[From "This Week's Reading", MT VOID, 11/22/2003]

Gary Blackwood's YEAR OF THE HANGMAN is a very well-done alternate history about a failed American Revolution. In fact, though it is a young adult book, it is still one of the best alternate histories I've read this year, in part because it deals with society and isn't just a sequence of alternate battle maneuvers.

To order Year of the Hangman from amazon.com, click here.


THREE VICTORIAN DETECTIVE NOVELS by Everett F. Bleiler:

Everett F. Bleiler's THREE VICTORIAN DETECTIVE NOVELS is a real bargain, with three for the price of one: Andrew Forrester's "The Unknown Weapon", Wilkie Collins's "My Lady's Money", and Israel Zangwill's "The Big Bow Mystery". "The Unknown Weapon" (1864) is probably the first modern detective story to have a female detective. Unfortunately, the denouement seems too much like pulling a rabbit out of a hat, although that may be a function of the more modern policy of providing all the necessary clues to the reader. "My Lady's Money" (1877) is a very early "drawing room" mystery, and more satisfying. And "The Big Bow Mystery" (1891) is the first real "locked room" mystery, and handles that aspect in a very deft manner. I will point out that although "The Big Bow Mystery" has its share of lower-class characters, it is not set in the London-Jewish milieu that Zangwill is best known for.

To order Three Victorian Detective Novels from amazon.com, click here.


"A Case of Conscience" by James Blish:

[From "This Week's Reading", MT VOID, 07/02/2004]

My first choice for the Novella Retro Hugo is the novella "A Case of Conscience" by James Blish, which forms the first part of the novel A CASE OF CONSCIENCE. I will admit a predilection for theological science fiction. I realize this seems to contradict my complaint about Connie Willis's Christmas fantasies last week, but theological discussion is not the same as religious content. And Blish leaves his readers to draw their own conclusions, rather than dictating a set explanation. Certainly the question of whether one can have a completely moral society without religion (or more specifically, at least in the story, without God) is still a topic of discussion.


"Earthman, Come Home" by James Blish:

[From "This Week's Reading", MT VOID, 07/16/2004]

James Blish's novelette "Earthman, Come Home" suffered by being a part of a larger cycle--it ended up as the last two chapters of the last book of CITIES IN FLIGHT. Since I was not familiar with what led up to it, I found it flat. (I still think, though, that the scene in DARK CITY when the city is revealed is the ultimate Blishian moment.)


CLASSIC HORROR WRITERS by Harold Bloom:

[From "This Week's Reading", MT VOID, 05/13/2005]

Harold Bloom's CLASSIC HORROR WRITERS (ISBN 0-7910-2201-3) has chapters on Ambrose Bierce, Charles Brockden Brown, Henry James, J. Sheridan LeFanu, "Monk" Lewis, Charles Robert Maturin, Edgar Allan Poe, Ann Radcliffe, Mary Shelley, Robert Louis Stevenson, Bram Stoker, and Horace Walpole. Each chapter has a brief biography, "critical extracts", and a bibliography. The critics' comments are obviously more meaningful if you are familiar with the authors and their major works, so this is more for someone who is already somewhat knowledgeable about 18th and 19th century horror fiction than for someone looking for an introductory work.

To order Classic Horror Writers from amazon.com, click here.


Go to Evelyn Leeper's home page. 1