Those advocating an end to Australia's constitutional monarchy (republicans) base their arguments on several weak arguments. This page provides counter - arguments against these republican myths.

MYTH #1

Our head of state is a British foreigner, who does not reside in Australia.

This is the most common republican myth. While its true that Queen Elizabeth does not live in Australia, she cannot be labelled as a 'foreigner'. Historically, traditionally, and by law Elizabeth II is the Australian Queen of Australia. She knows and takes great measures to know everything about her Australian realm and citizens. 

Citizenship in Australia flows from the Crown. If the Crown grants citizenship, than surely the person wearing the Crown is herself a citizen. 

The Queen is not a foreigner, but rather a non-resident -- a professional, globe-trotting head of state for a society which enjoys its existence in a border-less world.

[ back to menu ]

 
MYTH #2

The Queen represents only Australians of British descent. Or the Australian Head of State can never be an Irish, French, Arab etc....

This happens to be one of the weakest republican arguments, and also one of the most widely used.

Elizabeth II is the Queen of countless different nations (i.e. Jamaica, the Bahamas, New Zealand etc....) and hundreds of different peoples and cultures.

Also due to the Queen's bloodlines, Elizabeth II is quite "multicultural". Among the strains that can be identified in the backgrounds of the Queen are: Arab, Armenian, Croatian, French, German, Greek, Italian, Persian etc... As such, the Queen is very capable of representing the great majority of Australians.

[ back to menu ]

MYTH #3

By having a monarch as head of state, democracy can never truly exist.

Rubbish! When was the last time the nations of the world identified Australia as non-democratic? Never!

By having a non-partisan monarch, democracy flourishes. By representing the people, the Queen has the authority to dismiss a government that abuses its power or acts illegally. By using her emergency powers, she can act if there is a vacuum of political power. Republicans label all this as constitutional fiction. They are wrong! Just because these powers are rarely used, it does not render them useless. These powers provide a safety guard, or Constitutional Fire Extinguisher  which safeguards democracy. 

Other republicans argue that a president can be non-partisan, or won't have any allegiance/ties to a political party. However, how could an elected or appointed President not be partisan, when he/she got their job with the backing of a political party?

In any event, most republics that have abolished their monarchies, have created simulated constitutional monarchies. These republics have abolished their royal government, yet have given their new republican governments the exact powers of the previous royal government. This begs the question of why change something to something exactly the same?

[ back to menu ]

MYTH #4

The appointment of both the Governor General, Governor is partisan.

Similar to the previous republican argument, this is the republican counter-argument to the monarchist's argument that presidents are partisan.

Republicans point out that most of the Governors-General over the past 15 years have been veteran politicians. While this is true, the Governor-General is not the Head of State. This position is held by the Queen.

[ back to menu ]

MYTH #5

History and tradition are just that, history! The monarchy is a part of Australia's history, not it's future.

Republicans use this argument to point out that history and tradition are not important as a nation's identity.

The Crown represents 200 years of tradition in Australia and 500 years in Canada. Considering that tradition and history are the two factors making up a nation's identity, arguing with republicans in this issue is rather pointless!

[ back to menu ]

MYTH #6

The monarchy promotes a lack of Australian identity. Or, the monarchy  promotes colonialism.

Not true! The monarchy is an important aspect of the Australian identity. It is part of Australia's history and tradition.

The monarchy also helps Australia distinguish itself from the United States of America. Republicans argue that this is nonsense. With careful consideration however, one realizes that Australia is already bombarded by American values, culture and media. The monarchy is one important difference between the two nations. 

The monarchy does not promote British colonialism in any way. Australians have shed their colonialist past by changing the national anthem, the flag, and by the Australian way of doing business in a global community. Australia shares a Queen with the United Kingdom, Canada, New Zealand and many more nations. What better way to be global than by sharing a monarchy with the many countries?

Finally, as most Australians can attest,  when a Australian travels to another nation, they are more likely to be thought of as an American rather than a British citizen.

[ back to menu ]

MYTH #7
 
Abolishing the monarchy would appease opportunists.

The opportunists in Australia do not want independence because of the monarchy. Any lack of respect for the monarchy arises from the fact that the Queen represents 'the rest' of Australia, and thus does not represent 'them'.  Of course it should be noted that the constitutional monarchy has checks and balances that prevent opportunists from taking further advantage.

That the republican movement is composed of opportunists has been confirmed by Steven Mayne and his cryky.com.

[ back to menu ]

MYTH #8

The monarchy costs Australians millions of dollars a year. Or, "Why should my taxes line the pockets of the Queen?"

This is generally a fairly weak republican argument. 

For the record: Australians do not, and have NEVER paid the Queen for her services. 

While the Governor-General and the Governor's expenses do rack-up a modest bill (less than one dollar/tax payer/year), having a President would cost even more!  As a comparison, in the United Kingdom the cost of the Queen's expenses are much less than that of the presidents of Germany, the United States and France. 

[ back to menu ]

MYTH #9
 
Abolishing the monarchy is essential since Prince Charles is not an ideal future King.

A favourite myth amongst republicans, especially with the old scandals in the media. 

One must always seem to remind republicans that their beloved republics are not always immune from scandal. Let us not forget about John F. Kennedy's many romantic interludes (sans Jackie), Richard Nixon and Watergate, Francois Mitterand (his connections with Nazis, and his many mistresses), and Mao-Zedong and his lust for young girls, but to name a few. 

Prince Charles has been born into duty, and has been raised to serve his people. He is an able father, and devoted to serve the people.

[ back to menu ]

MYTH #10
 
Australians no longer support the monarchy.

During the past several years, opinion polls have shifted in both directions. The last opinion poll shows that most Australians favour the monarchy. For now, it's safe to say that a change to a republic is not on the minds of most Australians.

In any case, the old saying: "Would you jump off the building if your friends do the same?" really applies well to this myth.

God save the Queen of Australia.