|
Sound brethren striving to “speak where the Bible speaks and be silent where the Bible is silent” have acquired another label from our
liberal brethren. A famous liberal preacher and author labeled some church of Christ members (which is assumed would be non-institutional) as being pedantic. The American Heritage Dictionary defines pedantic as, “Characterized by a narrow,
often ostentatious concern for book learning and formula rules”. Webster defines the word as, “overly concerned with minute details or formalisms”. While the preacher who made the statement meant it as a term of derision, some of it applies.
The definition from the American Heritage dictionary (highlighted) will be used to determine if sound brethren are truly “pedantic”. "CHARACTERIZED BY A NARROW..." Any Christians who stick to the values and doctrines
demanded in scripture will at some point in their life be called “narrow minded”. Therefore, in the test of pedantry, this would apply to conscientious Christians. Jesus said, “Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth
unto life, and few there be that find it” (Matt.7:14). Consider the alternative, “Enter ye in at the strait gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction, and many there be which go in thereat” (Matt.7:13).
From the teachings of Jesus he encourages a narrow walk, a restricted walk, not the loosening of doctrinal and moral practices that is seen among digressive brethren. So, I would rather be “characterized by a narrow” mindset when approaching
doctrine as opposed to the broad way that many are following today. "OFTEN OSTENTACIOUS CONCERN" The word ostentatious is defined by Webster as, “pretentious display meant to impress others; boastful showiness”. Brethren
concerned about the truth have received labels such as “watchdog”, “troublemaker”, “brotherhood guardian”, etc. Possibly this is why some have labeled these well-meaning men as pedantic. They confuse these men’s true convictions with
ostentation. Brethren have stood against false doctrine and sin since the beginning of the church and have suffered for it. It should be no surprise that the motives of honest men are impugned when proclaiming doctrinal error. Jesus addressed
this problem in the beatitudes, “Blessed are ye, when men shall revile you, and persecute you, and shall say all manner of evil against you falsely, for my sake” (Matt.5:11). Men who are God’s watchmen will not be popular, they will not be
the majority, they will not have the accolades of famous preachers and authors laid at their feet, but they can have the reward of God. The prophet Ezekiel faced the same problem in his day. God warned Ezekiel if he didn’t proclaim the
warning, the blood of the children of Israel would be on his head. If Ezekiel did warn them and they chose not to listen, their blood would be on their own head (see Ezek.33). "BOOK LEARNING" Christians are often criticized
for their desire to know “the Book”. Christians cite, “give me book, chapter and verse” for Bible authority. Or, “give me command, example and necessary inferenence” from the scripture. From this desire to have all authority from the Bible
comes the label “pedantic”. Christians should be studying and re-studying to make sure the things they are practicing are correct. It was this type of approach that caused Luke to call the Bereans “noble” (Acts 17:11). Luke’s inspired record
says that the Bereans “were more noble than those in Thessalonica…and searched the scriptures daily”. From Paul’s letter to the Thessalonians, it is understood that they had doctrinal problems. More than likely, from not searching the
scriptures daily! In that day, the Bereans might have earned the label of “pedantic” because of their habit of searching the scriptures to find out “whether those things were so”. Jesus told John, “Saying, I am Alpha and Omega, the first and
the last: and, What thou seest, write in a book” (Rev.1:11). By the Lord’s instructions this book was then to be sent to the seven churches of Asia. Would they also have been called “pedantic” for sticking to the words written in the Book?
“FORMULA RULES" As society becomes more sinful, brethren have moved away from “pattern theology”. God has given us patterns in the New Testament that His people are to follow. The plan of salvation is exactly that - a plan!
A plan is a pattern. But liberal brethren today are making statements such as, “Pattern theology has been the undoing of those who had committed themselves to following after Bible authority and trying to restore New Testament Christianity in
our times” (Rubel Shelly). There is a clear concise pattern in the New Testament for salvation and also for the church. One passage that needs highlighted for a pattern of the New Testament church is Hebrews 8:1-5. The Hebrews writer had this
to say about the tabernacle being a shadow of the church - “A minister of the sanctuary, and of the true tabernacle, which the Lord pitched, and not man…. Who serve unto the example and shadow of heavenly things…..make all things according to
the pattern showed to thee in the mount”. Therefore, Christians must follow these “formula rules” that are delineated throughout the New Testament. Jesus said, “If ye love me, keep my commandments” - which will we do? So, am I
pedantic? I guess if taking the narrow road instead of the broad road, and if crying “repent” when people stray off the path, and if asking folks to “open your Bible and show me” when something new comes along, and if expecting the church and
the Lord’s people to follow the formula’s laid out in scripture is pedantic, then yes, I must be pedantic.
|
|