Is Sahaja Yoga Good or Bad?
In 1992 my brother committed suicide, and my family blamed this on his
preoccupation with Sri Mataji's Sahaja Yoga (SY). I didn't think so, because
in my opinion SY made him more at peace with himself, more balanced. But on
the other hand, it's true that SY took a very big place in his life, a place
that most people will call disproportionately large. He drifted
away from us, his family; he lost interest in his job.
In 1995 I posted a message to Usenet trying to find
some answers. Some of the replies I got expressed mild disbelief that anyone would relate this to SY, some
pointed out that proscription of suicide is a
tenet of SY. Others were neutral and more analytical
or philosophical. Yet others were negative towards
SY, or even asked me whether SY would be good for
them (like I knew).
But all replies unvariably showed compassion and a feeling of sorrow for what
has befallen my brother. Not a single reply questioned what I have written,
and although some people perceived my writing as an attack on SY, none labeled
me as a "foe" or "negator" of SY. A rather intelligent discussion started amongst holders of opposing
opinions.
Later, in July 1997, Simon M came forward and wrote an article
that was quite openly against SY. He concluded with
"Please feel free to pass this information on to anybody that might be
interested or might benefit.
Feel free to write with your own Sahaja Yoga horror stories or questions."
Of course, it provoked an opposing response.
If you want to comment more on Simon's article, you can send email to the
mailing list described below, or to Gene Thursby who is hosting the
article (together with a lot more on new religions).
Later on I had an ongoing discussion with Simon. This
and other correspondence regarding SY that I received made me think that there
may be general interest in this subject. Having the technical resources at
hand, I was prompted to start a mailing list that discusses SY openly.
Is Sahaja Yoga a cult or not? This checklist may
give you some food for thought. Even if you believe that Sahaja Yoga is the
best thing on earth, please read it, for it may help you keep an open mind.
There are indications that Sahaja Yoga puts itself above common law. Indeed, it is in constant touch
with the Divine, why should it care?
I'm becoming interested in examining the material (non-spiritual) effects (and
claimed effects) of SY. For now, only a few references are available.
A Mailing List about Sri Mataji's Sahaja Yoga
A mailing list that discusses Sahaja Yoga is now available. In order to join
the list, please send me email
requesting that you be subscribed. In order to reach the list, mail to sahaja-yoga@onelist.com.
Currently there are 25 subscribers to the list.
The archives of the list from 4 Nov 1997 to 13 Apr 1998 are available as a
500kb text file in Unix mailbox format (all
messages are simply concatenated, a line starting with "From" indicates the
start of a new message). I will provide the archive as separate web pages in
hyperlinked form, as soon as I get around to it (which unfortunately won't
happen for another month).
My goal is to have a fair medium where everyone has a chance of expressing
their opinion on the subject. I'd like to add some references to "official" SY
pages here, so if you'd like, please send me a few.
List Policies
The mailing list sahaja-yoga@onelist.com is governed by the
following simple policies:
- Anyone can subscribe to the list.
- I will not give out the list of subscribers to anyone.
- Anyone can post to the list, even non-subscribers.
- Anonymous posting is allowed. If you don't post anonymously, everyone on
the list will know your address. One anonymous remailer that you could use
is Replay. Or see Bacard's page on
privacy.
- The list traffic will be archived, and the archives will be made
publicly available on the web. If you don't want your writing to be made
public, send email to me, not to the list. However, an author can always
request that his/her writing be removed from public view, for whatever
reason, including writing that's quoted in a response.
- Only quote from an article the bare minimum that's enough to indicate
what you are replying to. People have read the original posting, don't make
them read it twice.
- I reserve the right to remove a posting from the archives if I find that
it's it's off-topic, if it's a commercial
advertisement, if it exposes information that a third party has sent to the
poster in confidence (private email is sent in confidence unless indicated
otherwise), or if I find it unacceptable for any other reason. I
will notify the author if possible, and I will hear arguments for keeping
the article.
- I reserve the right to deny posting privileges to a person if they
regularly
send bad articles as described in the previous item. I will hear their case
and will re-allow submission if they promise to behave.
- No flaming please. Differences of opinion are highly valued, personal
attacks are undesirable.
- This policy can be amended as needed. I am open to suggestions for
improvement. I reserve the right
for final decision upon any conflicts, but I will try my best to act fairly.
Vladimir Alexiev <vladimir@worklogic.com>
Last modified: 4-May-1998