MARY HAD OTHER CHILDREN...? Or did she?
MATTHEW 13:55-56, and MARK 6:3, both say, "Is not this the carpenter, the Son of Mary, the brother of JAMES, and JO'SES (JOSEPH), and of JUDE and SIMON? And are not His sisters here with us?" (Note! Only the 'carpenter' is called 'THE Son of Mary', not 'A Son of Mary') Some people refer to these verses as 'proof', that Mary had other children. See also: Mt 12:46, Mk 3:31, Lk 8:19, Jn 7:5.
The word: 'Brethren'...appears over 530 times in the Bible.
'Brother'....appears over 350 times.
'Brothers'...appears only once, in Num 36:11.
'Sister'.....appears over 100 times.
'Sisters'....appears over 15 times.
BRETHREN: This is a plural word for 'brother' as shown in dictionaries.
BROTHER: The Hebrew word 'ACH', is ordinarily translated 'brother'. Since Hebrew, and Aramaic in which the Gospel of Matthew was written, had fewer words than our English, the Jews at that time, used it in a broader sense to expresses kinship. The Hebrew terms for different levels and degrees of relationship did not exist. 'Brother' meant the sons of the same father, and all the male members of the same clan or tribe. In Greek, in which the Gospel of Mark was written, the word "brother" is "adelphos" (adelphos), meaning a blood brother, or belonging to the same people, or a countryman, or a fellow believer. Even today, the word is used in a larger meaning, so that friends, allies, fellow believers, and fellow citizens can be included in the same brotherhood. It was no different in the time of Christ. Four dictionaries I have checked list three or four classes of meanings of the word 'brother'. The first class concerns sons of the same parents. The other two or three classes say, kinsman, fellow man, a close friend, a pal, a member of a religious order, a fellow member of a Christian Church, etc. How many times have you seen T.V. Evangelists address their audiences as 'Our brothers and sisters'? Marian detractors accept the last three meanings to suit themselves, but when it comes to Mary, the mother of GOD, they always refer to the first meaning. Is this fair to her? How do you explain this?
In the words of Jesus Christ Himself, look at John 20:17, where He said to Mary Magdalen, "Do not touch Me, for I have not yet ascended to My Father, but go to My 'BRETHREN' ('BROTHERS' in some Bibles) and say to them, 'I ascend to My Father and to your Father, to My GOD and your GOD.'"
Now in the very next verse, to whom did she go?
John 20:18,
"Mary Magdalene came, and announced to the "DISCIPLES", "I have seen the Lord,
and these things He said to me."
When Jesus said "BRETHREN", He meant
His "DISCIPLES", and not blood brothers.
See Matt 28:10, Then Jesus said to them, "Do not be afraid; go, take word to My BRETHREN that they are to set out for Galilee; there they shall see Me."
Now who did go to Galilee to meet Jesus?
Matt 28:16, "But the
eleven DISCIPLES went into Galilee, to the mountain where Jesus had directed
them to go."
Yet again, when Jesus said "BRETHREN", He meant His
"DISCIPLES", and not blood brothers.
Matt 23:8, Jesus said,
"...and you are all brothers."
Are we all blood brothers?
Lk
22:31-32, "Simon, Simon, behold, Satan demanded to have you, that he might sift
you like wheat, but I have prayed for you that your faith may not fail; and when
you have turned again, strengthen your brethren."
Jesus spoke to Simon Peter
here and the word "brethren" is plural. Did Jesus mean Peter's blood brothers or
the other Apostles?
Another example of the words of Jesus Christ... See also: Num 8:26, 1Sam 30:23, 2Sam 1:26, 1King 9:13, 2Chron 29:34, Acts
2:37, Acts 3:22, Acts 7:23.
If you will read Gen 29:15, "And Laban said to Jacob, because thou art my
brother..." At first you would think Jacob and Laban are blood brothers. Now
compare Gen 29:5, "..know ye Laban, the son of Nahor..." Compare Gen 25:21-26,
and you will see Jacob was the son of Isaac and Rebekah. Laban was the son of
Nahor. They were not blood brothers but fellow citizens. Christ tells the
Multitude and His disciples in Mt 23:1-8, "AND ALL YE ARE BRETHREN." Did He mean
they were all blood brothers? Of course not. In 1Cor 15:6, Jesus appeared to five hundred 'brothers' at one time. Could
all of these be blood brothers? Hardly. Then there is Peter speaking before one
hundred and twenty brothers in Acts 1:15-16. Paul speaks of one 'called a
brother', in 1Cor 5:11 and 1Cor 8:11-13. Paul asks 'BRETHREN, pray for us. Greet
all the BRETHREN with a holy kiss', in 1Thes 5:25-26. The Bible has many more
similar verses. No one has a problem with these verses. Why then do they have a
problem when 'Mary' is introduced into the verse? Now we have four 'brothers', JAMES, JO'SES, SIMON, and JUDE to account for
as written in Mk 6:3... Mk 15:40, "There were also women looking on afar off: among whom were Mary
Magdalene, and Mary the mother of JAMES the less and of JO'SES, and Salome."
These people were at the crucifixion. Jn 19:25, "Now there stood by the cross of Jesus His mother (Mary) and His
mothers sister, Mary the wife of Cleophas, and Mary Magdalene." Mt 10:2-3, "...'JAMES' the son of Alphaeus, and Lebbaeus, whose surname
was Thaddeus." Alphaeus is an alternate translation of Cleophas (Clophas) and so
he is the same person. Acts 1:13, "...JAMES, the son of Alphaeus, and SIMON Zelo'tes, and JUDE
the brother of JAMES." From these four passages, we see we have another 'Mary', who was the wife
of Cleophas (Alphaeus), and the mother of three of Jesus's 'brethren', JAMES
(the less), and JO'SES, and JUDE. This clearly shows that Mary, the mother of
Jesus, was not the mother of JAMES, JO'SES, and JUDE of Mk 6:3. To keep Mk 6:3
in harmony, since three are not children of Mary, the mother of Jesus, then
SIMON is not either. SIMON is the Canaanite Mk 3:18, also called the 'Zealot'
(Zelo'tes), Mt 10:4, Lk 6:15, Acts 1:13. Jude, who authored the Epistle of Jude,
says he is the brother of James in Jude 1:1. Jude was also called 'Thaddeus' in
Mt 10:3, and in Mk 3:18. This was to distinguish him from Judas Iscariot. Lk
6:16 further distinguishes the two by saying, "And Judas (Jude) the brother of
James, and Judas Iscariot, which also was the traitor." More on the topic of 'Mary's other children', I have another point to
make... Jn 19:26-27, "When Jesus therefore saw His mother, and the disciple
standing by, whom He loved..." The disciple was John, the author of the Gospel
of John. "Then He said to the disciple, BEHOLD THY MOTHER." Read the following verses to see... Mk 1:19, "...He saw James, the son of Zebedee, and 'JOHN', his
brother." Mk 3:17, "And James the son of Zebedee, and 'JOHN' the brother of
James." In neither of these passages is it said that Jesus saw a blood brother or
even recognized them as men that He knew. Mt 27:56, "Among which was Mary Magdalene, and Mary the mother of James,
(the less) and Jo'ses (Joseph), and the mother of Zebedee's children." Mt 20:20, "Then the mother of the sons of Zebedee came to him with her
sons..." Mk 15:40, "...among whom was Mary Magdalene, and Mary the mother of James
the Less and of Joseph, and Salome (the mother of Zebedee's children)." Lk 24:10, "It was Mary Magdalene...and Mary ('the other Mary') the mother
of James (the less)..." A comparison of Mt 27:56, and Mk 15:40, clearly shows that Zebedee had a
wife whose name was Salome. She is called the 'mother of Zebedee's children' in
Mt 27:56, and 'Salome' in Mk 15:40. They had two children, JOHN and JAMES, Mk
3:17. JOHN at the foot of the cross to whom Jesus gave His mother, was not a
child of Mary, the mother of Jesus, but of Zebedee and Salome. If Jesus had
blood brothers, why then did He not give His mother to them? Jewish law would
have demanded it... GENEALOGY:
+ >------begat--------James and John-------------------------
---Salome------------Mt 27:56, Mk 15:40--------------------
+ >------begat------James (the less), Joseph (Joses), and
Jude--------- ---Mary----the other Mary, Mt 27:56,61, 28:1, Jn 19:25------
+ >------begat------JESUS THE CHRIST-------------------- ---Mary---------------------Lk
1:30-38-----------------------
"Christ . . . was the only Son of Mary, and the Virgin Mary bore no
children besides Him . . . 'brothers' really means 'cousins' here, for Holy Writ
and the Jews always call cousins brothers."
Mt 1:25, "And knew her not till...". The meaning of the word 'till' or
'until', means an action did not occur up to a certain point. It does not imply
the action did occur later. Gen 8:7, "He sent forth a raven, which went forth to and fro, 'until' the
waters were dried up off the earth." Deut 34:6 , Moses died, "...and no one knows his grave 'until' this day."
Have we found Moses' grave? 2Sam 6:23, "...the daughter of Saul had no child 'until' the day of her
death." Did she have a child after she died? 1Cor 15:25, "For He must reign 'until' He has put all His enemies under
His feet." Does He stop reigning after He has put His enemies under His feet? If
you think so, then compare Luke 1:33, "and of His kingdom there shall be no
end". 1 Macc 5:54, "...not one of them was slain 'until' they had returned in
peace." Were they slain afterward? Luke 1:80, John the Baptist "...was in the deserts 'until' the day of his
manifestation to Israel." Did he stay in the desert? (Matt 3:1; Mark 1:3-4; Luke
3:2-4) Rom 8:22, "For we know that all creation groans and travails in pain
'until' now." Does it still groan? 1 Tim 4:13, "'Until' I come, be diligent in reading, in exhortation and in
teaching." When Paul has come is there no more reading, no more exhorting, and
no more teaching? 1 Tim 6:14, "....that you keep the commandment without stain, blameless
'until' the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ" When Jesus comes back, do we still
obey the commandment? Rev 2:25-26, "But that which you have hold fast 'til' I come. And to him
who overcomes, and who keeps My works 'until' the end, I will give authority
over the nations." Should we stop holding fast and stop keeping His works when
He returns? Lk 1:34, "Then said Mary unto the Angel, How shall this be, seeing I know
not a man?" This shows Mary had no relations with a man before and was
virgin. Lk 2:7, "And she brought forth her 'firstborn' Son and wrapped Him in
swaddling clothes..." Firstborn, at the time of the writing of the Gospels,
meant, 'the child that opened the womb'. See Ex 13:2 and Num 3:12. Firstborn
does not imply that Mary had other children, as an ONLY son, IS a 'FIRSTBORN
SON'. The author of this letter is one.
THE FIRST PERSON TO CALL MARY 'BLESSED' IS GOD, THROUGH THE ARCHANGEL
GABRIEL IN LK 1:28. MARY IS THE ONLY PERSON IN THE ENTIRE BIBLE TO BE CALLED "BLESSED ART THOU
AMONG WOMEN." YES, SHE IS A MOTHER LIKE ANY OTHER MOTHER, BUT WHAT A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN
THE SONS. LIKE ANY GOOD SON, JESUS CHRIST WILL DEFEND HIS MOTHER AGAINST ALL OF HER
DETRACTORS. THE BRIDE OF THE HOLY SPIRIT HAS MANY CHILDREN SPIRITUALLY, FOR SHE IS THE
MOTHER OF US ALL...
Jesus tells us
who his "Brothers" and "Sisters" are in Matt 12:50, and Mk 3:34-35, "For whoever
does the will of My Father in heaven, HE IS MY BROTHER AND SISTER AND
MOTHER."
So for those who insist that the word "brother" or
"sister" means blood siblings only, or from the same womb, they will have to
adjust their thinking to conform to what was said here. If not, then everyone in
the whole world will have to be seen as a blood brother or sister of Jesus
Christ.
Here is yet another important verse regarding "the
brothers":
Jn 7:5, "Even his brothers didn't believe in him."
Now if
those were blood brothers of Jesus as many non-Catholics claim they were,
then they must have lived with Him for much of His first 30 years on
earth. Those who claim He had brothers, know full well that His
mother and foster father knew who He was, and of course believed in Him.
Would they then also have us believe that His siblings did not know who He was
and did not believe in Him?
For Example...
Note
that if in this verse the word "sister" meant blood sister, that she is not
named here. The context and placement of the commas preclude that there were two
girls in the same family, both having the same name of Mary. Would not this
cause much confusion in the family? By careful comparison to Mk 15:40 it is seen
that Mary the Mother of Jesus is not mentioned, but Salome is. Also Salome is
indirectly mentioned in Matt 27:56 as the mother of the sons of Zebedee. It can
therefore be assumed that Salome is the unnamed sister of Mary in this
verse.
Was John
a child of Mary and blood brother of Jesus?
---Zebedee------Mt 4:21,Mk 1:19, Mk 3:17----------------
---Cleophas-(Alphaeus)--Mt 10:2-3, Jn 19:25, Acts 1:13------
---THE HOLY SPIRIT------Lk 1:35-38----------------------
This 'Genealogy' shows who the real parents of the 'brothers' in Mark 6:3,
and Matthew 13:55, are,
and makes the word 'brother' a
non-argument.
Martin Luther,
(Sermons on John, chapters 1-4, 1537-39).
Additional notes...
Did the raven stop flying
after?
NOWHERE IN THE BIBLE DOES IT SAY THAT MARY, THE MOTHER OF JESUS, HAD OTHER
CHILDREN. WHY THEN, DO SOME INSIST THAT SHE DID?
Bible References: Gen 8:7, Gen 25:21-26, Gen 29:5,15, Ex 13:2, Num 3:12, Num
8:26, Deut 23:7, 1Sam 30:23, 2Sam 1:26,6:23, 1King 9:13, 2King 10:13-14, 2Chron
29:34, Mt 1:25, Mt 4:21, Mt 10:2-4, Mt 12:46, Mt *12:48-50, Mt 13:55-56, Mt
20:20, Mt 26:26, Mt 27:56,61, Mt 28:1, Mk 1:19, Mk 2:14, Mk 3:17-21,31-35, Mk
6:3, Mk 15:40,47, Lk 1:34, Lk 2:7 Lk 2:41-51, Lk 5:10, Lk 6:16, Lk 8:19, Lk
24:10, Jn 7:2-7, Jn 19:25-27, Jn 20:17-18, Acts 1:13-16, Rom 8:29, 1Cor
5:11, 1Cor 8:11-13, 1Cor 9:5, 1Cor 15:6, Gal 1:19, 1Thes 5:25-26, 1Pet 5:12,
Jude 1:1
For those who still insist that the Mother of GOD had "other
children", you had better read this.
FEEL FREE TO COPY THIS FILE AND PASS IT ON, SO LONG AS
NOTHING IN IT IS CHANGED
©
Written by Bob Stanley,
1992
Updated on August 27,
2004
Return To Home Page