Moderator: Welcome, Bret Easton Ellis! Thank you for joining us online this evening. How are you doing tonight?
BE: I am doing great.

John from JWC901@aol.com: How did you get your first book published? Is it true you were still in college?
BE: Yes, I published LESS THAN ZERO in the spring of 1985, while I was a junior at Bennington College. I wrote a draft for a tutorial, while I was a freshman, for my teacher, Joe McGinniss. He read it and thought it was a total mess -- you must understand that at this point it was 500 pages long and in the third person. He helped edit it, and I rewrote it a couple of times. Then he submitted it to his editor and agent. It took off from there.

Bryan from Aurora, CO: What was your initial reaction when your original publisher decided to can AMERICAN PSYCHO right before it was published?
BE: My initial reaction was shock and disbelief. Mostly because there really didn't seem to be any warning, and the publisher canceled it two months before publication. So even though there had been some prepub controversy, everyone assumed that it would be published by S&S. So when it was canceled it was the end of November 1990, and it was slated to be published in January 1991. It seemed the publication was going to happen, and it was canceled so close that it was a huge surprise and very dismaying, because I had published both my earlier books with S&S and thought we had a very good relationship. Also, losing my editor was very sad.

Hillary from Oak Park, IL: Are you a fan of Will Self?
BE: I always feel awkward talking about writers who I am friends with and their work. I have known Will for about three or four years, and I think he is a great guy, and I respect him very much as a writer. His ambitions, his use of metaphor, his intelligence. But I have had difficulty with some of his books, and sometimes I think he is a little too ambitious, a little too brainy, and at times a little too show-offy. But these are flaws that most writers would aspire to. I have to admit that at times I am not intelligent enough to grasp a lot of what he is saying, but I also think he is a wonderful journalist in addition to his work in novels and very fun on a night out.

Steven from Sacramento, CA: How many of your characters would you say you almost completely base on people you know or knew?
BE: I don't think that I have ever consciously written a character that is fully based on anyone I know or have met. Most of the characters in my work seem to be part of a group that is representative of something going on in the culture at the time. It is very hard for me to differentiate from any of the college kids in RULES OF ATTRACTION. I went to Bennington, and I knew a lot of people there. But when I wrote the book the characters were mostly composites, or there were things going on at the time in my generation that I thought were representative of something else. And so that is where my idea of character comes from. Again in LESS THAN ZERO, Clay, who everybody thought was my autobiographical alter ego, to me was a metaphor of the danger of passivity. So when I was writing this book, that is what I was thinking about. The same could go for Patrick Bateman of AMERICAN PSYCHO. He was representative of a lot of the ills in the culture at that moment, and Patrick became for me the embodiment for those social problems, so I would have to say as of yet, I really haven't written an autobiographical character or someone based on my friends.

Mike from Sudbury, MA: Why did you decide to end AMERICAN PSYCHO with the character still at large? What was that supposed to say about the '80s or culture in general?
BE: So many of the decisions one makes while writing a book don't necessarily become apparent until after you have actually written the book. And to me Patrick Bateman's not being caught or paying for his crimes at the time to me seemed to be an apt metaphor for the timelessness of evil. And I didn't know that that idea -- of Patrick Bateman's not being caught -- would cause as much controversy as it did. That people would be able to accept the violence if indeed he had been jailed. But I have always felt he is trapped in the world that he is a part of -- a world that seems to give him no pleasure. So when the last words were seen at the end, "This is not an exit," this seems to relate the hopelessness of Patrick's situation. And I think the book would ultimately become meaningless as satire, if Patrick were caught and had to pay for his crimes.

Pac87@aol.com: Good evening, Mr. Ellis. I can't wait to read your new book...have you been working on it since THE INFORMERS?
BE: I actually began GLAMORAMA the last week (I remember this very clearly) of December 1989, about two weeks after I finished the final draft of AMERICAN PSYCHO, and it took me now eight years to complete. I had not planned on taking eight years out of my life to write a book, but a lot of things happened during those eight years that distracted me, including the publication and controversy of AMERICAN PSYCHO, the death of my father, and the breakup of a long relationship I had been in. All of these things tended to conspire against the completion of GLAMORAMA. Add to this the fact that I owed a book to my publishers, who wanted me to put out a book in 1994, which was THE INFORMERS, a collection of short stories that I had written from about 1983 to 1992. And then touring for that book also took up a large chunk of time, and so what was supposed to have been maybe a three-year endeavor turned into -- quite rapidly -- an eight-year-long involvement with the book. So actually, GLAMORAMA is the first novel I will have published since AMERICAN PSYCHO.

Niki from Niki_palek@yahoo.com: Is Patrick Bateman based on either yourself or people you knew? Was a lot if it derived from what you saw in New York City or from what you heard?
BE: Patrick Bateman was initially based on a lot of real bad feelings I was getting living in New York City, at the height of the Reagan era. Manhattan at that time seemed to me to be a planet inhabited almost solely by yuppies and by this very greedy, status-oriented society. That depression and the anger and disgust I felt toward this society fueled the creation of Patrick Bateman, but I also have to admit that in many ways the creation of that character also had a lot to do with where I was at my life at the time. I can't really pull myself out of that gutter and say that I wasn't part of that world. I think in many ways I found myself quite easily slipping in and out of that place, and my reaction and self-loathing and horror helped me write that book. I wasn't killing prostitutes in my apartment, but there were definitely certain things about Patrick's life that I could relate to as a young man in New York City at that time.

Montana from Santa Monica, CA: Do you think heroin is to the '90s what coke was to the '80s? Judging from a majority of the media, it certainly seems that way.
BE: Hmmmm...a drug question...I can only speak for the world I see around me and the people I come in contact with and the cities that I lived in -- Los Angeles and New York. And I don't really think coke has left either city, it seems very prevalent in both places -- that could also have to do with the certain crowd that I interact with, but I meet a lot of people outside of my crowd, and it seems pretty prevalent there as well. Heroin didn't seem to jibe with the "rah-rah" decade of the '80s, where everyone was racing around accumulating things -- coke seemed to fit into that mode. I guess I come into contact with a lot of college students and am surprised continually and am surprised about heroin and that it is to them the drug of choice, in the way that coke was the drug of choice for my generation.

Dave Anderson from East Village, NYC: Whom would you consider the greatest satirist of the 20th century?
BE: What an interesting question. The greatest satirist of the 20th century...hmmm...no one comes to mind immediately. I just automatically think of the writers of the 20th century that I intensely admire, and I suppose to some degree I think most great writing has elements of satire in it. I think of John Updike's Rabbit series, and even though you wouldn't automatically think it is a satire, so much of the culture he describes is very critical, so I guess there is satire embedded in that work. Don DeLillo, who I think is the greatest American writer, but I wouldn't call him a satirist, despite the great deal of satire in his work. I think Joan Didion definitely uses elements of satire in describing people and events and things she witnessed, but I wouldn't consider her a satirist either. That is a question that I can't give you a list of names for, so you have stumped me. I have never been asked this, so this will probably haunt me for weeks to come.

Brad from Ontario, Canada: What do you know about the production company that bought the film rights to AMERICA PSYCHO?
BE: Very little. It is called Lions Gate, and they came into this project late in the game. I have never spoken to anyone connected with Lion's Gate Films, but they said that they would put up the money to make the movie this spring.

Ken from San Francisco, CA: Where did you get your ideas for the torturing of the people in AMERICAN PSYCHO? Just curious...
BE: Well, I knew when I was outlining AMERICAN PSYCHO that there would be violent pages and torture scenes. I knew that I couldn't think these scenes up on my own, nor did I want to go there, so I asked a reporter I know for advice. He gave me access to FBI textbooks that went into fairly graphic descriptions of what certain serial killers or murderers have done to their victims. I suppose you can also add the fact that I had read -- like most young people of my generation -- a lot of Stephen King, so it wasn't that difficult to write about violence. And I think you must understand that growing up in America as a teenager in the '80s there were two or three slasher films opening at the local multiplex. I don't think it was that difficult once I realized what I had to do with the scenes to actually write them, but being in the head of Patrick Bateman also helped a lot with the writing of these scenes.

Eugene from Westwood, CA: Do you prefer New York or Los Angeles? Why?
BE: I couldn't wait to get out of L.A. as a teenager, and I very consciously decided to go to college back east. L.A. for a long time, even after I left, seemed to me to be a very sinister, ominous place and a lot of my friends, I thought, got messed up because of the personality of the city. Though lately, I find myself returning more and more to L.A. and to actually, at 34, spending a little less than half the year living there, and my attitude about the city has changed considerably. I suppose it is because I am older and don't take the city as seriously as I once did. I think it is an almost childlike place that the 18-year-old in me found ominous, but the older person that I am now finds it actually quite playful and easy to live in -- especially after visiting the Getty Museum. It is actually the one city in the U.S. that I think is most representative of the millennium.

Mike Muntz from MMuntz@yahoo.com: I am a huge fan of your books...any plans in motion to make THE RULES OF ATTRACTION into a movie?
BE: Yes, as of now, THE RULES OF ATTRACTION is being rewritten by Roger Avary, who cowrote "Pulp Fiction," and he is slated to direct. This has also been a long, arduous road, but finally it looks like it might be happening quite soon.

Jones from Fairfield, CT: Good evening, Mr. Ellis. Whom would you consider some of your literary influences?
BE: Well, to take care of the obvious ones -- definitely Hemingway and Joan Didion. Increasingly, I have been influenced by Don DeLillo, James Joyce, and Thomas Pynchon -- not necessarily for stylistic reasons, but the breadth and scope of their vision is inspiring. At the same time, there are writers whom I simply love that haven't been major influences, such as Norman Mailer, John Updike, and Philip Roth, whom I just enjoy reading for pleasure.

Jonas from Boston, MA: Whom would you consider some of the best musical artists to come out of the '80s?
BE: My favorite band in the '80s was the Replacements -- but I understand (though maybe I am wrong) the tenor of that question -- because looking back there really wasn't that much great music being made. Of course there was R.E.M. and U2. But overall, it is not a decade that I remember fondly for its music. Actually, it is not a decade that I remember fondly at all. So during the '80s I discovered a lot of older music that I had missed out on -- so I guess that was cool.

Maria from Metaire, LA: How do you think your early success as a writer has affected your writing? Do you think it had a positive, negative, or no effect?
BE: I think a little bit of all three. I suppose the positive effect that early success can have is that it gives you an enormous amount of confidence, which every writer needs badly in order to get through the painful process of writing a novel. This also can apply to the negative side, which is that early success makes you feel invulnerable to any outside forces, and you tend to believe everything you write should be untouched by editors, and it is a masterpiece. I think early success for a writer doesn't necessarily warp his work. What it can do is warp the world you live in. It can play games with your head, but I always knew what I wanted to do with my fiction, and success or failure has really played no role in the writing of any the books I have completed so far. It might have screwed up my personal life to a degree, but it hasn't really affected the books.

Moderator: Thank you very much! Best of luck with GLAMORAMA, and we would love to have you again when that book is released.
BE: It was great being here. And I look forward to doing an online chat when GLAMORAMA is released.

Copyright 1997, 1998, 1999 barnesandnoble.com