Rediscovering The Truth About Creation

by James Thomas Lee, Jr. 11/06/96 Copyrighted 1995 by James Thomas Lee, Jr. Copyright Number: TXu 704-227


Chapter Contents

               Chapter 23.  The Canon Process {179 words}

               a.  Trusting the Disciples {196 words}

               b.  Accrediting Each Book {1,028 words}

               c.  Accrediting The Difficult Books {797 words}

               d.  An Interesting Exception {223 words}

               e.  The Uniqueness of Christianity {176 words}

               f.  A Faith That Is Real {315 words}


Part III - Examining The Better Evidence

Chapter 23. The Canon Process {179 words}

The above reasons for canonization are clear, and each one, in my opinion, is reasonable. The circumstances in the early Church called for immediate, sure action, and the leaders of the Church responded! But how did they canonize Scriptures? What criteria or criterion did they actually use to accept or reject certain writings? According to Misters Norman Geisler and William E. Nix, in their work, A General Introduction to the Bible, Apostolic authority was one standard [1]. The people of the early Church trusted the testimony of Jesus' disciples. According to Mr. John Murray, in his book, The Attestation of Scripture, the Lord, Himself, was another method, meaning that the early leaders of the Church also trusted the known testimony of the Lord [2]. Both of these sources, plus a few more which will be described later, were used to verify the Bible, but exactly how all of this was done is the next topic to be discussed.

RETURN TO TOP

a. Trusting the Disciples {196 words}

Recall one of the conclusions which was drawn earlier from the fact of Jesus' Resurrection! At that time, a statement was made which said that we can trust what Jesus did and said because His Resurrection shows that He was approved of God. One thing that He did was to select twelve close followers to be His disciples. Eleven of those men ultimately became His Apostles, meaning that they saw Him after His Resurrection. With the exception of Judas, who had betrayed the Lord and killed himself, we can trust these eleven because Jesus had selected them and also because, in John 16:13-15, He had promised that the truth would be revealed to them. Either directly or indirectly, the Lord and His Apostles authenticated many, even most of the Old and New Testament writers, in all accounting for fifty-six of the sixty-six Books. The steps of this certification process are listed below.

RETURN TO TOP

b. Accrediting Each Book {1,028 words}

  • 1. Jesus is approved because of His Resurrection. The twelve Apostles who were called by Jesus are identified, thus approved, in Matthew 10:1-4. Note that Judas is singled out as the traitor! The other eleven, however, were faithful to the end. Of these, Peter, John, and Matthew wrote Scriptures. Those three men accounted for the Gospels of Matthew and John and the Epistles of I and II Peter, I, II and III John, and Revelation, for a total of eight Books.
  • 2. The Apostle Peter, in II Peter 3:15, put his stamp of approval on Paul, and Peter was approved in step one. This gives credence to the Books of Romans, I and II Corinthians, Galatians, Ephesians, Philippians, Colossians, I and II Thessalonians, I and II Timothy, Titus, Philemon, and probably Hebrews, for a total of fourteen Books. The actual author of Hebrews is not known, but the evidence suggests that either Paul or one of his close followers, such as Luke, wrote it.
  • 3. Paul, who was approved in step two, gave credence to Mark and Luke in II Timothy 4:11. Mark wrote based on conversations with Peter, Luke, Paul, and other witnesses. He was the faithful reporter who, like the others, wrote under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit. This gives credence to the Book of Mark. Luke was the faithful physician who had accompanied Paul on many of his missionary journeys, thus giving credence to the Gospel of Luke and also to the Book of Acts, for a total of three Books.
  • 4. Jesus authenticated Moses in Mark 7:10. Jesus was approved in step one, and Mark was approved in step three. These accreditations give credence to the Books of Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy, for a total of five Books.
  • 5. Moses authenticated Joshua in Deuteronomy 31:7, and Moses was approved in step four. Some question whether Joshua actually wrote his own account, but the use of the words "we" and "us" in verses 5:1, 6 suggests that he did. These facts give credence to the Book of Joshua, for a total of one Book.
  • 6. Luke called Samuel a prophet in Acts 3:24 and Joel a prophet in Acts 2:16. Since Luke was approved in step three, this gives credence to the Books of Judges (by tradition), Ruth, and Joel. Luke, in Acts 13:22, says that David was a man after God's own heart. This gives credence to much of the Book of Psalms, for a total of four Books.
  • 7. Jesus called Daniel a prophet in Matthew 24:15. Jesus and Matthew were approved in step one. These accreditations give credence to the Book of Daniel, for a total of one Book.
  • 8. Daniel, who was approved in step seven, called Jeremiah a prophet in Daniel 9:2. This gives credence to the Books of I and II Kings (by Jewish tradition), Jeremiah, and Lamentations, for a total of four Books.
  • 9. Jeremiah credits Obadiah in I Kings 18:2-4 with being a devout believer and a protector of prophets. Jeremiah was approved in step eight. He called Zephaniah a priest in Jeremiah 21:1. He also identified Micah as a prophet in Jeremiah 26:18. These accounts give credence to the Books of Obadiah, Micah, and Zephaniah, for a total of three Books.
  • 10. In Matthew 12:39-42, Jesus called Jonah a prophet and Solomon wise. Since Jesus and Matthew were approved in step one, this gives credence to the Books of Jonah, Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, and Songs of Solomon, for a total of four Books.
  • 11. Jesus recognized Isaiah as a prophet in Matthew 13:14. Jesus and Matthew were approved in step one, thus certifying the Book of Isaiah, for a total of one Book.
  • 12. James, the half-brother of Jesus, was leader of the Assembly in Acts 15:12-15, showing that he was accepted by the Apostles. The Apostles were approved in step one, and Luke was approved in step three, giving credence to the Book of James, for a total of one Book.
  • 13. Jesus, saying "for it is written," went on to quote Zechariah 13:7 in Matthew 26:31. Jesus and Matthew were approved in step one. Thus, Zechariah is accepted, for a total of one Book.
  • 14. Paul, saying "As it is written," went on to quote Job 5:13 in I Corinthians 3:19. Paul was approved in step two. Hence, Job is approved, for a total of one Book.
  • 15. Paul, saying "just as it is written," went on to quote Habakkuk 2:4 in Romans 1:17. In Acts 13:41, Luke, saying "Take care that what the prophets have said does not happen to you," quoted Habakkuk 1:5. In addition to his work being referenced, Luke also called Habakkuk a prophet. Since Paul was approved in step two and Luke in step three, Habakkuk is accepted, for a total of one Book.
  • 16. Paul, saying "Just as it is written," went on to quote Malachi 1:2-3 in Romans 9:13. In Matthew 11:10, Jesus, saying "it is written," also goes on to quote Malachi 3:1. Paul was approved in step two. Jesus and Matthew were approved in step one. So, Malachi is accepted, for a total of one Book.
  • 17. In Romans 9:25-26, Paul, saying "As he [God] says in Hosea," then quoted Hosea 2:23 and Hosea 1:10. Matthew, saying "what the Lord had said through the prophet," goes on to quote Hosea 11:1 in Matthew 2:15. Paul called Hosea a prophet. Since Paul was approved in step two and Matthew in step one, Hosea is accepted, for a total of one Book.
  • 18. Luke, in Acts 7:42-43, saying "This agrees with what is written in the book of the prophets," then quoted Amos 5:25-27. Luke, who was approved in step three, called Amos a prophet, making that Book acceptable, for a total of one Book.
  • 19. Paul, saying "As it is written," goes on to quote Ezekiel 36:22 in Romans 2:24. Paul was approved in step two, so Ezekiel is accepted, for a total of one Book.
  • RETURN TO TOP

    c. Accrediting The Difficult Books {797 words}

    Only ten of the sixty-six Books do not trace to a specific, formal authorization by either Jesus or one of the Apostles. These remaining Books have been approved based on the following additional information. For convenience, the numbering will begin where it just left off, at twenty.

  • 20. Ezra was priest and leader of the Jewish people during the rebuilding of the Temple. He is credited with having written the historical Old Testament Books of I and II Chronicles, Ezra, and Nehemiah. Yet, he was not formally accredited by either Jesus or the Apostles. Other uncertified historical Old Testament authors include Nahum and Haggai. In Ezra 5:1, the author of that Book confirmed that Zechariah, who was earlier accepted in step thirteen, and Haggai were prophets. Of course, Ezra, himself, still is not certified, so Haggai cannot be either. To resolve this conflict over Ezra, Nahum, and Haggai, the Jewish historian Josephus is consulted. In his book, "Antiquities of the Jews", Book IX, Chapter XI, Section Three, he called Nahum a prophet [3]. In Book XI, Chapter IV, Section Five, he also corroborated Ezra by calling Haggai and Zechariah prophets [4]. In Chapter V, Section One, he indicated that Ezra was a righteous man with a good reputation, that he was very knowledgeable of the Law of Moses, and that he was a principle priest among the people [5]. On this testimony, six of the ten Books gain credibility, both because of their general acceptance by the people and also because of the reliable witness of a secular historian. That leaves only four Books and possibly as many as six authors to confirm.
  • 21. A few authors of Old Testament Books are not known, such as the writers of I and II Samuel and Esther. However, those Books were not questioned during their day, and they closely match the additional evidence provided by Josephus. In step 20, Josephus acknowledged Ezra and his position. In I Chronicles 29:29, assumed to have been written by Ezra, a reference is made to "the records of Samuel the seer, the records of Nathan the prophet and the records of Gad the seer." In I Chronicles 27:24, a similar reference is made to "the book of the annals of King David." Hence, through two separate references, Ezra was qualifying Samuel, Nathan, Gad, and David. By Jewish tradition, the Books of I and II Samuels are believed to have had multiple authors, namely Samuel and Nathan, possibly David and maybe even Gad. While absolute authorship is not clear, the chief priests, in saying "for this is what the prophet has written," quoted II Samuels 5:2 in Matthew 2:6. Consequently, this combination of events gives credence to I and II Samuels, leaving only two Books to question.
  • 22. Only Esther and Jude remain. According to the Introduction to the Book of Jude in the New International Version (NIV) Bible, Jude was accepted and referenced by the disciples of the Apostles and also by the biblical scholars of that period [6]. Clement, of Rome (96 A.D.), who was the disciple of the Apostle Paul, Clement of Alexandria (155-215), who was an early biblical scholar and teacher of Origen, Tertullian of Carthage (150-222), who was a distinguished Christian theologian, and Origen (185-254), who was referred to by Mr. F. F. Bruce, in The Canon of Scripture, as the greatest biblical scholar among the Greek fathers, all accepted Jude as canon Scripture [7]. Therefore, based on their joint testimony, Jude is accepted, leaving only Esther as a questionable Book in the canonized Scriptures.
  • 23. According to Mr. Bruce, the Book of Esther was the source of the text for the popular and sacred Jewish festival of Purim, a celebration of Yahweh's love for Israel [8]. He goes on to express the belief that this Book should be accepted if for no other reason than because of that unique distinction.
  • All sixty-six Books of the Bible have been carefully scrutinized and considered before being made a part of inspired Scriptures. As one can see, the process has been somewhat logical and for the most part foolproof. Those who came up with the Canon, in essence, began with the single, simple premise that Jesus is Lord. They, then, considered the writings of those whom He had chosen, hence the Apostles, plus the writings of those whom the Apostles had chosen. Eyewitness data was used. Even secular historians got into the act. One could say that many were involved, at least to some degree, and also that the process involved constructing an actual audit trail based on one credible individual's certification of another. Throughout the canonization process, these writers and the early Church leaders essentially cleared or confirmed each other.

    RETURN TO TOP

    d. An Interesting Exception {223 words}

    An interesting phenomenon arises from an investigation such as this one. Even though the Apocrypha, which are the books that comprise the Catholic Bible, was written before the time of Christ, no one has placed a formal stamp of approval on any of them. Misters Geisler and Nix point out that no one has recognized them as inspired [9]! One Alexandrian, Jewish philosopher who quoted Scriptures regularly, a man named Philo (20 B.C.- 40 A.D.), never referred to the Apocrypha as inspired. The Jewish historian, Josephus (30 - 100 A.D.), who has already been referenced several times in this text, never treated them as inspired, either.

    Neither Jesus nor any of the other New Testament writers ever referred to them. Numerous biblical scholars, including Origen, Jerome, Martin Luther, and even many Roman Catholic scholars, have actually opposed the canonicity of the Apocrypha. Given all these facts, there is no reason why anyone today should accept these books as inspired, either! It was not until 1546 A.D. that those writings were finally added to the Catholic Bible, and this time period is well beyond that time when the Canon was formally established.

    RETURN TO TOP

    e. The Uniqueness of Christianity {176 words}

    The sixty-six Books which make up the Christian Old and New Testament Bible are the only works available to mankind that are recognized to be both inspired by God and also a record of Jesus Christ. Jesus is the only man in history to have been resurrected. Not only do these facts make the Bible very unique and special, but all of these pieces put together make Christianity, itself, very unique and special. This Faith, unlike all the others, did not originate with man. It came from God! God, Who can be shown to exist in a current setting, sent Jesus to this earth in the form of a man, to die for us and then to resurrect Himself from the grave. These are not mere childhood fables. They are in many cases clear, level-headed reports filed by credible, devoted historians, both secular and non-secular.

    RETURN TO TOP

    f. A Faith That Is Real {315 words}

    During the days when Christ walked the earth, the Romans and Jews tried diligently to get rid of Him, but they failed! Later, the Romans tried with all their power and might to destroy the New Testament Church, but they failed at that, too! They tried to torture and kill Christians, and while many faithful Saints did die, the enemies of the early Church could not stop that which God had started. The Bible records numerous instances where early Christianity was opposed by Roman brutality, but in the long run, Rome failed, not Christianity! Now, many years and centuries later, not one piece of historical evidence can be found which casts serious doubt on any part of this fact-filled story. Christianity, the one true Christ-centered religion for all mankind, has survived the Ages for the simple reason that it is real!

    RETURN TO TOP

    ENDNOTES

    1. Norman L. Geisler and William E. Nix, A General Introduction to the Bible (Chicago: Moody Press, 1968), page 183. [Note that this reference was taken from Evidence That Demands A Verdict, volume I, page 36.]

    2. John Murray, The Attestation of Scripture, The Infallible Word (a symposium) (Philadelphia: Presbyterian and Reformed Publishing Co., 1946), page 18. [Note that this reference was taken from Evidence That Demands A Verdict, volume I, page 36.]

    3. Josephus, page 209.

    4. Ibid, page 233.

    5. Ibid, page 234.

    6. Kenneth Baker, general editor, The NIV Study Bible - New International Version (Grand Rapids: Zondervan Bible Publishers, 1985), page 1918.

    7. F. F. Bruce, The Canon of Scripture (llinois: InterVarsity Press, 1988), page 72.

    8. Ibid, page 35.

    9. Geisler and Nix, page 173. [Note that this reference was taken from Evidence That Demands A Verdict, volume I, pages 35-36.]

    Chapter 24. Confirmation Through Archaeology

    Back To The Table Of Contents

    Back To TLEE's Home Page

    RETURN TO TOP

    Send email to: tlee6040@aol.com 1