Date: Tue Dec 21 15:28:01 1999
From: petersr@U.ARIZONA.EDU (Robert Anthony Peters)
Subject: [wethepeople] Believing in people (fwd)
To: LIBERTARIANS@LISTSERV.ARIZONA.EDU
Reply-To: LIBERTARIANS@LISTSERV.ARIZONA.EDU (Libertarian Students at the University of Arizona)
I just want to know what the difference is between announcing your presidency and announcing when you will announce your presidency.
Sounds too politically mainstream to me. What a shock.
Robert Anthony Peters
Subject: [wethepeople] Believing in people
From: Mumpsimus <mumpsimus@netzero.net>
Believing in people by Harry Browne
In the Republican presidential debate Monday, each candidate tried to prove that he's qualified to run the country.
George W. Bush bragged about how well he has run Texas, and promised to do the same for America. John McCain wants to reform government by restricting your access to political campaigns. Gary Bauer and Alan Keyes want a moral revival. Steve Forbes wants to let you have school vouchers and a little of your retirement money. And Orrin Hatch -- well, Orrin Hatch just wants to be president.
I was the Libertarian presidential candidate in 1996, and in February I will announce my candidacy for 2000.
Unlike the Republican candidates, I don't believe I can run the country. I don't believe I can run your life. I don't believe I can know how much you should put aside for your retirement or what schools your children should attend.
And I don't believe any Republican or Democratic candidate can do these things either. America was founded on the principle that you are a sovereign individual capable of deciding what to do with your life -- how to spend the money you earn, how to raise your own children. The Founding Fathers would be astounded at the idea that the politicians should run your life, the economy, or the country.
But today virtually every politician presumes to know what's best for everyone. As a result, unless you're way below average, at least 47 percent of everything you earn is taxed and spent by federal, state, and local governments. And you must choose among candidates who actually are arguing over whether the government's share of your earnings should go up to 48 percent or down to 46 percent.
I have a different attitude.
I want to make the federal government so small that we don't need an income tax at all -- and we don't need anything to replace it. I want you to be free to keep every dollar you earn -- to spend it, save it, or give it away as you think best, not as the politicians decide.
I want you to be completely free of the 15 percent Social Security tax -- so you can use that money for a truly secure retirement that suits you, not the politicians.
I want you to be able to live in a safe city and a safe neighborhood -- free of the criminal black markets, gang warfare and drive-by shootings that are fueled by the politicians' great moral crusade to make America a drug-free zone.
In short, I believe you should decide for yourself what to do with the money you earn. I believe you're the one to decide how to raise your children. And I believe you know best how to live your own life.
I don't believe in vouchers or medical savings accounts. I don't believe in taking your money and giving it to "faith-based organizations" of my choice. I don't believe in Social Security or the income tax or the War on Drugs. I don't believe in politicians making decisions about your life.
I believe in you.