the webmaster asks:
why didnt linda chapman send this e-mail to mike ross?
she sent it to all the other ash members.
is linda chapman an officer in ash treating mike
different then all the other ash members?
is this unethical behavior on the part of linda chapman
an ash board member to single out mike ross and
treat him differently then other ash members?
mike ross certainly thinks so!
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 1999 19:24:47 -0500
From: "Linda K. Chapman" <103217.260@compuserve.com>
Subject: QUIZ - reference yellow pages
Sender: "Linda K. Chapman" <103217.260@compuserve.com>
To: 5ED-AZ/Phx-ASH/TheTorch <103217.260@compuserve.com>,
"ASH-\"Anne-Mardick\"" <lmardic@uswest.com>,"
ASH-AZTucA-HerbSchapiro <herb-s@webtv.net>,
ASHB-Putz-Paul <103665.3310@compuserve.com>,
ASH-AZTucACol-Ralph <ralphthegeezer@juno.com>,
ASH-Bea-Page <beap@aol.com>, ASH-Blazer-Bill <BLAZ426@goodnet.com>,
ASH-Christiani-Bill <GortNiktoe@aol.com>,
ASH-Dudley-Paul <Phudley3@juno.com>, ASH-File-Betty <rise9@juno.com>,
ASH-Goff-Elizabeth <EAGOFFCPA@worldnet.att.net>,
ASH-Grigals-Anne <anne_g@primenet.com>,
ASH-Harris-Glenn <gharris373@aol.com>,
ASH-Harris-Robert <BobHar100@aol.com>,
ASH-Helmstadter-Jerry <moffithelmstadter@msn.com>,
ASH-Hooks-William-M <wmhooks@worldnet.att.net>,
ASH-Johnson-Doug <dougjo@aol.com>,
ASH-Kadish-Lorain/Frank <LKADISH@juno.com>,
ASH-KammermanHerman/Ann <ANNETTE@aztec.asu.edu>,
ASH-Lantz-Louis <gamers@amug.org>,
ASH-Lyon-John <johnlyon@aztec.asu.edu>,
ASH-McFadden-Kevin <arizlaw1@aol.com>,
ASH-Pizer-John <johnpizer@juno.com>,
ASH-Ruckman-Lisa <LisaNan@hotmail.com>,
ASH-Speiser-Jim <Jimspeiser@aol.com>,
ASH-Staples-Grey <grey staples>,
ASHL-Rosenthal-Irene <irosenthal@compuserve.com>,
ASHN-GaitherMonty <mgaither@aol.com>,
ASHN-HSGP-PresGreen-Bill <marakelts@compuserve.com>,
ASHN-Lippard-Jim <lippard@primenet.com>,
ASHP-AL&PHYLLIS-STONE <astone0253@aol.com>,
ASHP-Ellen-Meier <JERM85206@aol.com>,
ASHP-LaManna-Rosella <rosella@goodnet.com>,
ASHP-MAMA97Rob-Dudley <docdud@aol.com>,
ASHP-N-D98Tarazon-Carlos <carlosmvx@aol.com>,
ASHP-Nasset-Samantha <amadeo@aztec.asu.edu>,
ASHP-Rocheleau-George <georvki@futureone.com>,
ASHP-Shurtz-Bill <dr-psyche@msn.com>,
ASHP-Sommers-Sandra <sandsom@aol.com>,
ASHP-Tempe-Garoutte-Rodd <roddg@primenet.com>,
ASHP-Walters-Ira <iwalters@wixnet.com>,
ASHPAzSig-Johnson-Larry <conner@aztec.asu.edu>,
ASHX-Huey-Bob <huey@doitnow.com>,
ASHX-JollyHart-Jani <piratewoman@hotmail.com>,
ASHX-Knudson-Jan <JBKaz@aol.com>, ASHX-LeBlanc-Jim <ateo@starlink.com>,
ASHX-McAfee-Ian <Doug.Ian@juno.com>
If you were looking or a Secular Humanist / Atheist / Freethinker
Organization, where is the first place you would look? I tried several
years ago, and looked under Churches....nothing. I had no idea where else
to look, so after checking the index of for Humanism, Atheism, I stopped
looking.
WHAT DO YOU THINK THE VALUE OF OUR AD IS IN LOCATING PEOPLE LOOKING FOR
US?________
If I had just asked you to find our ad, without having told you the exact
page it is listed on, could you have found it, KNOWING that the listing is
there SOMEWHERE? _______________
How many people do you think will see our ad?___________________
We members paid $715.00 to have our ad listed for a year in the CHURCH
ORGANIZATIONS which provides high visibility (the religious people would
know we're out there), and according to the majority of ASHiens who
responded to my questions, this is the place they most likely would *start*
looking for some type of heading regarding secular humanism. DO YOU THINK
THE AD, PLACED UNDER THE ERRONEOUS HEADING, IS WORTH THE SAME?
What should be done? Should ASH ask for complete reimbursement (we have
had three responses of a persons who contributed to the ad who say, "yes,"
placement of the ad under the correct heading CHURCH ORGANIZATIONS for next
year, free of charge, would be fair.)______________________
Linda Chapman
Arizona Secular Humanists
Visit the Crazy Atheist Libertarian
Visit my atheist friends at Arizona Secular Humanists
Some strange but true news about the government
Some strange but real news about religion
Interesting, funny but otherwise useless news!