The questions remain: What are Masons? What do they do and what benefits do Masons obtain through their fellowship in this Order? What draws men to membership in a "secret" society? What are the origins of Masonry?
Let me start by explaining what first drew me to the order. I began my journey on the Path of Enlightenment over 25 years ago. About the same time I got involved in an outstanding youth group that happened to be sponsored by Freemasonry: the Order of DeMolay. There weren't any Masons in my family, nor were any of our family friends overtly involved in the order. (Even after I was raised to the Sublime Degree of Master Mason, and started asking around, only one family friend ended-up being a Mason.) My long association with the Order of DeMolay (seven years) gave me a splendid view of Masons and their good works. Their non-denominational approach to religion allowed me to explore alternative (read: non-Christian) faiths and never be false to myself or my vows. After college (and much experimentation with drugs and falling in with the wrong crowd) I decided that maybe being a Mason would be a good way to get business contacts. The good gentlemen who answered my questions about the Order were serious and very earnest in their desire to make themselves better men. I feel this was a very fortunate step for me. The initiations were quite profound and I quickly learned that Masonry is not a glorified forum for networking. My life was substantially changed for the better and the changes have never stopped. I have been a Mason for 20 years, and all along no one has ever presumed to tell me how to believe in God. My path has taken me deep into Wicca, Taoism, Druidism, Shamanism, Zen, Gnosticism, and Sufism. Recently I have returned to a primarily Christian approach, which has been vividly colored by all of the other places and states of mind that I have visited. I know who I am, and my Path before me is clear, though still quite difficult and uphill all the way. (That never seems to change!) I am a happy man, happily married with a wonderful family, and Masonry has played an integral role in helping me retain my focus and momentum. Enough about me. It is my purpose here to talk about Masonry.
Return to the top of the page.
Masonry is not a religion. It is not a substitute for religion. We demand a belief in God in order that we might know our Brother's vows are sincere, by holding them and their actions accountable to a higher power. For this reason atheists cannot be Masons. Masonry is not a cult. We insist on free-thinking and don't dictate ways to believe. We are not a "secret society", rather we are a society with secrets. Around 1720, when the Masons in England declared their existence (among other things), the organization went from secret to merely secretive. Our secrets are simply a few words, signs, and symbols whereby we might identify each other. Many have asked me why we have secrets at all? I like to explain that our teachings are some of the most important and valuable things in our lives. Like anyone who has something valuable (the Hope Diamond, several hundred shares in Microsoft, etc.) we take measures to keep the thing safe and secure. Instead of a bank vault or electronic security system, we lock our valuables away in the repository of our faithful hearts.
Return to the top of the page.
Return to the top of the page.
Return to the top of the page.
Return to the top of the page.
There is another theory gaining in popularity among the membership of our order. Distinguished Masonic and non- Masonic scholars (like John J. Robinson, the author of "Born in Blood" and "Dungeon, Fire and Sword" and Baigent and Leigh who wrote "The Temple and the Lodge" and "Holy Blood, Holy Grail") [These books are reviewed elsewhere in my pages.] have found evidence indicating the real roots of Masonry lie in the mysterious demise of the wealthy and powerful crusading order of the Knights of the Temple of Jerusalem (the Knights Templar). On Friday October 13th in 1307, greedy Philip the IV of France (ably assisted by the corrupt Pope Clement the V) arrested, and seized the property, of the "entire" Order of the Temple in France, on trumped-up charges of heresy. Philip apparently arrested only a token force (among them the last Grand Master of the Order, Jacques de Molay) and was unable to find the fleet of ships full of money and treasure that was commonly known to be in the Templars' possession. Other countries in Europe didn't comply as quickly or efficiently with the Pope's order of excommunication and arrest, so the lion's share of the membership of the order simply disappeared. Under the capable tutelage of the Spanish Inquisition ("No one expects the....." Sorry.) during the next five years, several heinous confessions were coerced out of the captured Templars (figure the odds). Meanwhile in England, Edward Longshanks had been having a few problems with this insignificant little commoner named William Wallace. Longshanks croaked (to the joy of millions) just a few months before Philip's gambit in France. His son, Edward the II (the first Queen of England), really admired those nice, handsome, young Templars firmly ensconced in his Kingdom. So he rather left them be. Meanwhile, Robert the Bruce, who had been excommunicated as well, was busying himself with wresting the Kingdom of Scotland away from the weak Edward II. A few months before Eddie was soundly trounced by the Scots forces at a little place called Bannockburn (there are rumors of an unidentified, seasoned fighting-force that entered the fray to turn the tide of battle Robert's way), Jacques de Molay had recanted all of his confessions and was burned (martyred) at the stake. So what does Bob and Ed have to do with Jack's gangstas and their troubles with Phil and Clem? The theory is that the Templars escaped to Scotland, bought some land, and settled down as petty lairds who really knew how to fight. These guys maintained their organization to help other knights who had been likewise excommunicated, and over the next 400 years evolved into "modern" Freemasonry. Is this why Masonry is widely hated and shunned by the largest and most dominant denomination of Christianity and certain other fundamentalist religious groups? Because Masonry is derived from an underground support network for excommunicated crusaders? It gives one pause to think. I have recently read the best answer to all of the naysayers and muck-rakers. John J. Robinson (in his last book before becoming a Mason himself) takes great pleasure in picking apart the arguments against Masonry in his fine book "The Pilgrim's Path". I recommend it to everyone as a treatise against propagandizing as well as a vindication of my beloved organization.
Return to the top of the page.