from Berrett-Koehler's "At Work"
Publication
The creation of an Open Space Institute serves as a laboratory for learning
how to embody, as well as extend, the practice of Open Space.
The Open Space Institutes of the United States and Canada have
been formed to sustain and build on what has come before. The people involved
in forming the institutes began with a challenge: to mirror the essence
Let me begin by inviting you to imagine what's possible: a community dedicated to nurturing the growth of human spirit in action; access to a global network that provides extensive knowledge, possibilities, experience, and mentoring; a home that is always open to you; a safe space to exercise your wildest ideas; an organization that holds many contradictions: unbridled energy and spirit coupled with support and safety, individual autonomy coupled with the alignment of a community working together. This is what we strive to attain as we invent our Open Space Institute. I have drawn three basic lessons from our experience thus
far.
Staying close to the intent that inspires us is vital. We find that every time we drift from what the institute means to each of us personally, our desire to invest any time or energy in making it happen dissipates. Our early meetings on incorporation led to this discovery. As
a person schooled in good meeting practices, I would prepare a full agenda,
and we'd "slog" our way through, leaving everyone exhausted by the end
of the
This has a variety of implications. It puts a great deal of responsibility
on sub-teams to get things done. It means using a different vehicle for
keeping everyone informed. (Our thought is to rely heavily on e-mail for
this purpose.) It takes a leap of faith by each of us that things will
get done. It also means trusting that those areas
Open Space Technology makes four principles and one law explicit.
These principles, coupled with the intent or theme of the session, form
the boundary conditions that give an Open Space event its organization.
Whoever comes are the right people. Whatever happens is the only thing that could have. When it starts is the right time When it's over, it's over. Follow the Law of Two Feet by taking responsibility for what you
care about. If you are not contributing where you are, go somewhere else.
Inclusion is our lifeblood. Giving is our legacy. "Less is more" is our work ethic. Inclusion is our lifeblood. At the same time we were forming the
Open Space Institute in Seattle, another group was forming the Open Space
Institute of Canada. The seeds of competition were present as we compared
Giving is our legacy. The tradition of giving is at the heart of our founding. Harrison Owen facilitated the growth of a population of approximately 3,000 practitioners of Open Space. This has been a lesson to us concerning the value of generosity of spirit. When people spoke of the role of the institute, many expressed the desire to pass on to others what they had learned, just as Owen had supported them in learning about the power and use of Open Space. It was Harrison Owen who suggested the formation of the Open Space Institute. It is now his challenge to "let go of his baby." He has figuratively stepped from the center of the circle to join his colleagues on the perimeter. "Less is more" is our work ethic. When the practice of Open Space began, early practitioners, used to elaborating on a good idea, wanted to embellish it. Owen would always caution, "Less is more. What can we take away and remain true to the spirit of what we are doing?" We strive to keep it simple by constantly reminding ourselves of the essence of whatever we do. The genius of Open Space is that it puts no structure on the content;
the form is entirely shaped by intent and principle. This is probably the
most challenging part offorming the Open Space Institute because an institute
implies stability and order. We seek to reinvent institute as an adaptive
structure, a continually emerging community that expands itself through
learning and action.
When an idea does not yet belong to everyone, it requires at least one person to keep investing time and energy. This includes doing the mundane tasks of setting meeting times and distributing meeting minutes to help those at a distance to stay connected to the conversation. Ultimately, if the idea is viable, others catch the spirit and activity starts happening in many places. I have learned that while many think the idea of an Open Space
Institute is a good one, only a few have an interest in creating and holding
the space. If one or two of us were distracted, it is not clear that the
institute would continue. Open Space teaches us that organizations run
on passion and responsibility. How this moves from one to many is a lesson
we are still learning.
THE ESSENCE OF THE OPEN SPACE INSTITUTE
Our articles of incorporation describe the essence of the Open Space Institute: We believe that inspired (inspirited) behavior can be an everyday experience and that humanity is limited largely by its perceptions of the possible. We intend to grow that sense of possibility and make it a reality by focusing on three fundamental areas: * Expanding the learning and practice of self-organizing communities * Understanding and integrating what sustains self-organizing
communities * Using Open Space principles in creating and sustaining
the Open Space Institute
|