This article is from Business India, November 12, 1989 and written
by
Naazneen Karmali
Intense Learning Experience
For those who subscribe to the limited view that the sole purpose
of business is to generate profits, the concept of business as a process
of learning would appear an alien one. That precisely was the theme
of
the five-day working conference organised by the Taj Continuing Education
Programmes earlier this month. The setting - a palm-fringed beach resort
in Goa -was perfect for exploring this seemingly abstract idea that
has
caught the attention of human resource development (HRD) managers and
management consultants worldwide.
The idea of this conference germinated in November last year when
V.S.
Mahesh, vice-president (human resources), Taj group met American
management guru Harrison Owen, at another conference in Mexico. "We
discovered," explains Mahesh, "that of the marny concerns of a CEO,
the
prime one for the nineties is the problem of lifelong learning".
Accordingly, the two got together and decided to have a working
conference which would endeavor to deal with this idea.
Owen, an Episcopal priest by training, has been a consultant
specialising in organisational transformation and development for the
last 10 years. For him, the conference theme seemed a logical extension
of a paper he had earlier written - 'The business of business is
learning'. According to him, "the global forces of change make it an
absolute demand that businesses should adopt a learning mode".
This means, in effect, that learning should become the core activity
around which everything else within the Organisation revolves. While
this
may appear to be an esoteric exercise, it does hold the promise of
concrete benefits: lower manpower turnover, high staff morale, a
collaborative and healthy union-management equation and better
productivity, profitability and growth.
The 30-odd participants were hand-picked - participation being
by
invitation only - and mainly from the personnel management field.
Practising managers in Indian companies, teachers, consultants and
management writers from both India and abroad, together formed a
formidable bank of knowledge and experience.
Invitees arrived with varying levels of expectation. Rajesh Vidyasagar,
general manager, personnel, VST Industries Itd, Hyderabad, came "to
meet
creative people from creative organisations and learn from them" The
venerable Dr. K.S. Basu, founder-director of the Jamnalal Bajaj Institute
of Management Studies, Bombay, approached it with some degree of
scepticism. Jagdish Parikh, managing director, Lee and Muirhead, being
a
businessman and the sole representative of the CEO community was curious
to see how his views would coincide with those of the others.
Multicultural Mix
Of the foreign visitors, Ronnie Lessem, author and management
teacher at
London's City University Business School, who was on his first visit
to
India, had a clear objective: to share western management perceptions
and
pick up eastern principles. For Anne Stadler, a TV producer with King
TV
in Seattle, who had made documentaries on India in the past, it was
being
back in familiar territory. The conference theme tied in with her
interest in organizational transformation. This multicultural mix was
to
throw up an interesting crossflow of ideas emanating from totally
different mind-sets and experiences.
Apart from its novel, forward looking theme, another unique facet
ofthe
conference was the technology employed. The facility of on-line
networking by computer made the conference a truly electronic one.
Developed by the Virginia based Meta System Design Inc, the Meta network
enabled, in theory, each participant to log in and communicate via
the
host computer in Virginia with their American counterparts. Sadly though,
the telephone lines in Goa refused to co-operate and the marvels of
the
technology at hand remained a mystery for most participants.
But by far, the most unique characteristic of the conference was
the
manner in which it was conducted. No advance agendas were set or keynote
addresses prepared or papers expected to be presented. Owen, as chief
orchestrator, opted for an approach which he calls "open space
technology" which gives people the option of creating their own time
and
space. In most conferences, Owen explains, people say it is the coffee
breaks that are the most enjoyable part. Therefore, he decided, creating
an environment of coffee breaks would evoke more response and
involvement.
How exactly does "open space" work? The circular seating arrangement,
sans tables, provided a clue. After an initial round of introductions,
Owen went on to explain that the agenda and structure would have to
be
created by the participants themselves, keeping in mind the four guiding
principles:
Whoever comes is the right person.
Whatever happens is the only thing that could have.
Whenever It happens is the right time.
When its over, its over.
Accordingly, the agenda evolved on the basis of the simple and
informal
practices followed in the village market place and the scout camp.
Any
participant who cared to share or explore a particular idea or concept
simply wrote it out in brief on a paper sheet which was tacked onto
the
wall. Those wishing to join a certain discussion group had only to
sign
up for it. The time and venue for the discussion were set by mutual
convenience. People were free to join or break off from any group and
set
their own pace of participation. The only musts were two meetings at
9 am
and 6.30 pm everyday to take stock of the day's proceedings. The summary
of each group discussion had to be logged into the computers located
in
the common conference room.
There was minor pandemonium as the group splintered into four
separate,
sub-groups. The topics of discussion ranged from the metaphysical -
"achieving self-actualisation through work" - to the practical - "how
to
renew an old and dying Organisation". A bold but none the less complex
question, "What is learning?" formed a part of one set of deliberations.
Another pertinent issue raised was that of "resolving the conflict
between teamwork and interpersonal competition". These discussions
took
place over the next three days - the final day being devoted to the
summary.
The deliberations of day one were confined to the conceptual.
The
intellectual process was put on display as participants presented a
series of alternative models and flow charts. Debates were heated but
there was a certain element missing. It soon became evident that merely
cerebral thinking would not do. Prasad Kaipa, employed with Apple
Computer Inc, admitted in dejected tones, "I don't feel I have learnt
anything." This not only echoed the feelings of the group, but also
precipitated a subtle transformation which took place in the discussions
of the following day.
As Owen reports, "It seemed as if we had entered on a common journey
in
which our collective and individual consciousness was both the vehicle
and the object of inquiry." Defences were totally let down and group
members shared experiences freely and openly. This flow was kept up
until
the final day. And the richness of thought and ideas that were generated
was evident from some of the findings.
Vision statement
Out of one group emerged a vision statement for the organization
of the
nineties and the specific strategic actions that business leaders should
take. The central feature of an evolved Organisation would be permitting
ordinary people to actively participate in core activities. The business
leader should, it was felt, play the role of an enabler and facilitator
by
providing a supportive environment, an atmosphere that is secure and
friendly.
A set of nine action plans were chalked out to make business leaders
learning community developers. An important plan that emerged was the
need to develop global learning centres for transformational management.
The human resource manager would, necessarily, have a key role to play
in
any learning system. Indeed the onus would be on him to make it happen.
The complex task of defining learning was taken up by another
group.
Here, a distinction was made between conceptual knowledge and that
gained
through experience. Quite often learning is associated with pain or
even
a sense of emptiness. Anxiety tends to create blocks to learning and
recall. Different kinds of learning modes and styles were discussed
as
well as how they could be integrated into executive development
programmes both in the US and India.
Intense debate was the hallmark of the group discussion on teamwork
versus interpersonal competition. Do people in pursuit of individual
recognition give their whole-hearted contribution to the team's goals?
Both views, negative and Positive, ,were expressed. But significantly,
the conclusion was that if people could be charged with a sense
of purpose, then each team member would strive to excel, at the same
time,
contributing considerably to the team.
This conclusion was arrived at by drawing on the example of the
conference itself. Though individuals were given open space, each one
got
deeply involved and gave his/her best. Therefore, much better results
could be obtained by creating such spaces within organizations. The
feasibility of the concept was argued, but the consensus was that by
demonstration and example - even though it may be in the face of
substantial opposition - an effort could be made.
Flood of Ideas
There was a veritable outpouring of ideas and the above represent just
some of them. Owen terms this, "an explosion of the spirit". Lessem
says
he was struck by the variety and calibre of the thinking: 'There was
a
marvelous give and take." For Anil Sachdev, general manager personnel,
Eicher Motor Itd, New Delhi, the conference broadened his global
perspective of business. A deep sense of achievement, of having arrived
at an important conclusion in their work lives, was felt by all.
The conference in Goa, termed the Fort Aguada Beach Resort, India
Conference (FABRIC), will be followed by its counterpart a month later
in
the hills of West Virginia, USA. The output of both these conferences
will eventually be compiled in the form of a book to be published in
January next year.
As Owen sums up: "We started on a quest. And it turned out to
be a
remarkable journey into a collective consciousness." In that, the
conference was a truly intense learning experience.
|