Round Table Meetings With No Agenda
THB NEW YORK TIMES, SUNDAY, JUNE 5, 1994
By CLAUDIA IL DEUTSCH
NAMES W. DEVLIN was baffled when he walked into the Rockport Company's
distribution center for a companywide meeting in October. The meeting
had
been billed as a powwow to discuss Rockport's mission, one considered
important enough to shutter the footwear company, a subsidiary of Reebok
International, for two days.
But here was this cavernous room some 20 miles from the company's
Marlboro, Mass, headquarters, with nothing in it but hundreds of chairs
arranged in a circle and an empty bulletin board. No keynote speakers,
no
agenda, no reading materials, nothing.
"All I could think was, how is this possibly going to work?" -Mr.
Devlin, a traffic and shipping supervisor, recalled.
Most of the 350 Rockport employees who milled into the room had
the same
reaction. And when Harrison Owen, a Potomac, Md., management consultant,
stepped into the circle and described the meeting's ground rules, the
skepticism and bafflement increased.
Anyone with a "passion" about any company-related subject, he
told them,
should write it at the top of a large piece of paper and tack it to
the
bulletin board. Other people could then sign up for a discussion group
about it.
Looking back, Rockport people are astonished at the many people
who did,
indeed, suggest topics, attend meetings and come up with ideas that
have,
in many ways, changed how Rockport is run today.
"We now have a book of ideas that vary from how to get suppliers
to send
shoelaces on time to how to find out what our competitors, are doing
to
how to help Rockport's women succeed better," said Richard Roessler,
the
human resources executive who set up the meeting.
Probably the only person who isn't stunned by the Rockport meeting's
success is Mr. Owen. An Episcopal priest and-self described individual
rights activist, he held various governmental posts before becoming
an
organizational consultant 15 years ago. And he developed the concept
of
"open space" meetings - where attendees break into ad hoc groups to
discuss anything they think is germane - after years of hearing people
wax eloquent about the good experiences they had at meetings outside
of
the prearranged sessions.
"The only times when people held adult conversations seemed to
be the
coffee breaks," Mr. Owen said recently, not even slightly In jest.
"So I
created a meeting format that was like one long coffee break." Open-space
meetings are unlike conventions, in that there are no predetermined
speakers or workshop topics. Nor are they like executive retreats,
which
normally are a mix of prearranged topical sessions and unstructured
"getting to know you" time for high-level executives who have been
sent
off to some remote enclave.
Open Space meetings can be held on site, provided there's a big
enough
room, and typically throw together executives and blue-collar workers.
They operate on two basic premises: the best people to discuss a subject
are the ones who want to, not the ones who are forced to; employees
who
have the chance to discuss things are the ones most likely to improve
them.
"People worry too much about motivating workers," said Seymour
S. Rao,
chairman of the marketing department at Long Island university's C.W.
Post campus, who recently changed his faculty evaluation policy after
an
open-space meeting he held with his staff. "Workers start off motivated.
You have to get rid of whatever is demotivating them."
Mr. Owen has made a tidy business but of his concept. He and a
handful
of other consultants he has tutored have held open-space meetings for
such diverse clients as the Presbyterian Church, Honeywell, the World
Bank and emergency medical services groups.
Most of the meetings are part of larger organizational consulting
assignments. But in the last year, Mr. Owen has done about a dozen
stand-alone meetings like Rockport's, it prices ranging from $6,000
for
one day to $10,000 for three days. And he has begun training corporate
executives to hold their own open-space meetings.
Thee logistics of an open-space meeting, If not the agenda, are
quite
carefully controlled. First, there is the circular layout of the chairs.
Mr. Owen got the idea from work he did in African villages, where
meetings were always held in a circle.
"Who ever heard of a family square, or a rectangle of friends?,"
he
said. "The circle is the natural form of communication. You are not
looking at the back of people's heads, or ignoring people at your
sides."
Then there is the meeting's length. Mr. Owen says that a one-day
session
can set the groundwork for interdepartmental communication. If a company
wants a comprehensive report, like at Rockport, two days are needed.
And
if it wants employees to immediately form groups to carry out their
ideas, Mr. Owen recommends three days.
Mr. Owen concedes that open space is no panacea. "It won't work
when
management is attached to a particular outcome," he said. "And it's
a
great way to design a new billing system, but a lousy way to implement
it." It also cannot guarantee that ideas won't be sidelined if the
employee who thought of them loses interest, or if management does
not
provide support to carry them out.
And it won't work for a management that is allergic to bad news.
Mr.
Owen tells this cautionary tale: "I held an open-space meeting for
one
company that wanted to discuss its future. The consensus after the
meeting was that there was no future." The company has since
liquidated.
BUT when open-space meetings do work, they can yield astonishing results.
Within a few minutes of the Rockport meeting's commencement, employees
started scurrying to write down topics. One wrote, "Who are Rockport's
people, and what do they really do?" Another asked why the headquarters
group had a better fitness program than the distribution center. Another
asked how compensation was set, another about the attendance policy.
Someone asked whether Rockport should have a formal management
training program, another whether paperwork could be reduced. Mr. Devlin,
the shipping supervisor, set up a workshop on writing a statement of
goals for the company.
Within 30 minutes, more than 100 signup sheets were tacked to
the wall.
The impromptu groups formed, with the people who wrote down the subjects
choosing the meeting times and serving as group leaders.
Afterward. the leaders typed into computers the recommendations
that
came out of their meetings. Later, back at work, many of them spearheaded
committees to see their recommendations through.
Since that meeting, Rockport has hired a training specialist.
It has
gotten discounts for distribution center employees at local health
clubs.
It has put in E-mail, in part to eliminate paper memos.
There's an employee directory, listing everyone's name, title
And phone
number. Company newsletters, which someone complained arrived
haphazardly, are.now delivered with Paychecks. And while Mr. Devlin's
high-minded idea of a corporate goal statement has fallen, by the
wayside, he has worked on one for his own department.
"The meeting brought to the forefront ideas on people's wish lists,"
Mr.
Devlin said.
And It continues to have ramifications. "The departments are inviting
people over to see how they work, what they do," said Kathleen A.
Preville, a human resources clerk. Moreover, Rockport people keep
referring to the book in which all of the suggestions of the meetings
were printed out.
"It's not a dead document at all," said Mr. Roessler, the human
resources executive.
For Rockport, which has a history of informal meetings and retreats,
open-space meetings were a natural evolution. They are a far more radical
approach for bureaucratic organizations, where support staffs are often
left out of the decision-making process.
That certainly was true at the quasi-governmental World Bank.
"They had
been trying for years to figure out better ways to use their resources,"
said Giles Hopkins, a consultant in Bethesda, Md., who with his wife,
Robbins, has held about 20 open-space meetings for World Bank
divisions.
World Bank executives, citing sensitivity to any publicity in
their 50th
anniversary year, declined to talk about the meetings. But the Hopkinses
offer numerous tangible proofs that the meetings yielded results.
One World Bank department responsible for helping a third world
country
develop power resources recognized that the money it was funneling
through the county's Government would be better invested in helping
the
Government Privatize the power system.
Another restructured its own bureaucracy so that projects that
were once
assigned to individuals are now assigned to teams. That way the person
in
charge of, say, enhancing a country's power supply cannot accidentally
sabotage the work of the person in charge of environmental protection.
Yet another group ranked the progress of continuing projects,
back-burnered the ones that seemed unwieldy and concentrated on the
two
that seemed winners.
"At a conventional meeting. the idea of putting a low priority
on a
project that the board had once approved would never have even come
up,"
M& Hopkins said.
Sorting through projects and setting priorities can be as difficult,
albeit for different reasons, in newly merged companies as in entrenched
bureaucracies. That's why Corporate Express, a rapidly growing office
products distributor based in Broomfield, Colo., has adopted open-space
meetings.
In February, the eight-year-old company bought Hanson Office Products,
a
competitor that was, in fact, larger than its new parent. It set up
a
three-day open-space meeting at Aspen Lodge in Estes Park, Colo., mainly
to shift the competitors-turned-colleagues in the same direction.
Computer issues, compensation issues, all the problems of combining
disparate company systems were discussed and tentatively worked out.
"They said, 'We won't change our name to yours, but everything else
is
fair game,'" recalled Gary Gonsalves, a former Hanson executive who
is
now vice president of sales for the Southern California division of
Corporate Express.
Mr. Gonsalves, one of 10 executives whom Corporate Express has
sent to
Mr. Owen for training, recently held an open-space meeting in Tennessee,
where three Corporate Express branches were being consolidated.
"The fidget factor was high at first, like it always is, but we
soon had
39 Issues written on the wall," Mr. Gonsalves said.
The meeting ended with the skeleton of a new system for reducing
installation costs by having sales representatives and installers visit
a
client's work site together, and with a workable compensation program
that combined the best of all three branch systems. Mr. Gonsalves also
believes that some problems were smoothed out without ever making it
into
the book of recommendations.
"Someone would state a problem, and someone else would say, 'Hey,
I can
solve. that for you,'" he said. "One thing you discover with open space
is your people know what changes they need to make. All you have to
do
after they've made their recommendations is say, 'Go.'"
Breaking an Organizational Logjam
Convincing people that an agendaless meeting will work requires
a leap
of faith that often is not made until desperation sets in.
For years the Presbyterian Church USA, the Chicago-based umbrella
group
that sets church policy, held annual meetings of some 600 elected church
officials from around the country, with the idea of setting priorities
for the church for the coming year. And every year the meetings would
end
without any long-term decisions being made.
"No one could seem to decide what the church priorities should
be,"
recalled Ruth McCreath, until recently the church's coordinator for
planning and resources.
So In 1992 Ms. McCreath and her staff arranged for about 500 church
members to gather for an open-space meeting in the ballroom of the
Westin
Hotel near O'Hare Airport. One by one, topics were written on the board
-
redevelopment of local congregations, survival of small churches, ending
discrimination against gays and lesbians, defining a mission to the
Muslim world. There were 143 topics in all, resulting in 349 pages
of raw
reports and 250 pages of edited ones.
The church has acted on many of those reports. It has gotten different
presbyteries, or regions, to cooperate on such things as bundling
services like insurance. It has set up spiritual retreats. It is setting
up ministries in inner cities.
"it used to be that If you didn't get something on the agenda
in
advance, it never got discussed," Ms. McCreath recalled. "This way,
everything got discussed, and finally acted on."
|