Alpha Omega

It was mentioned earlier that the wound in President Kennedy’s back was not a bullet wound and that the body of President Kennedy was tampered with before the autopsy. One can only wonder then, what caused the wound in his back and what happened to his body? In order to answer these questions and get an insight into how the conspirators succeeded in the massive cover-up of the assassination one needs to review the proceedings surrounding the autopsy of John F. Kennedy.

Before doing so, one should note that it is a rule of law that evidence which cannot be demonstrably proven not to have been tampered with is irrelevant and cannot be used. To state this in positive terminology: Evidence that has been altered, appears to have been altered or is even rumored to have been altered is worthless and cannot be used in a court of law.

Eyewitness testimony is not the most reliable of evidence because people often have their own interpretation of events when witnessing a crime. Because of this, the autopsy report is considered the best evidence in murder cases. A person should therefore think that one only needs to look at the autopsy report in the murder of John Kennedy to determine the facts about the trajectory of the bullets and other relevant information about the assassination.

However, the autopsy report of President Kennedy cannot be used as evidence, either in a court of law, to determine the location of the assissan or the ascertain any information about the assassination. This is because there was no reliable “chain of possession” of his body from the time he died in Dallas, Texas to the time of the autopsy in Bethesda, Maryland. That is to say, there is not a demonstrable record of custody by the authorities of either the body of John Kennedy or his coffin from the time he died in the Dallas Parkland Hospital to the time he arrived in the autopsy room at the Bethesda Naval Hospital.

Thus, there is no proof that the wounds to his body were not altered in order to hide the truth concerning the location of the gunmen and other relevant information about the assassination. Indeed, there is very persuasive evidence that the body of President Kennedy was altered before the official autopsy began. This was proven beyond a reasonable doubt by David Lifton in his book Best Evidence.

For a complete chronology of the events surrounding the autopsy see Appendix B

Upon arrival at Bethesda Naval Hospital the first things noted by James W. Sibert and Francis X. O’neill — the two FBI Special Agents assigned to report on the autopsy proceedings — was that there had been surgery on Kennedy’s head prior to the beginning of the autopsy. In their report they noted “it was also apparent that a tracheotomy had been performed as well as surgery of the head area, namely, in the top of the skull,” (Lifton, p.171-172, 624) (emphasis added). Yet, there was no surgery performed on President Kennedy at Parkland Hospital! He died before the surgeons could do anything!

An individual could assume that, due to their lack of medical training, these two agents mistook a head wound for surgery. But J. Edgar Hoover announced on November 25, 1966, that “the FBI reports record oral statements made by autopsy physicians,” (Lifton, p.296).

One must also take into consideration the many differences in the wounds observed by the doctors at Parkland Hospital and Bethesda Hospital. The 2 to 3 centimeter tracheotomy performed by the Parkland doctors (Lifton, 271) was enlarged to 7 or 8 centimeters by the time the body reached Bethesda (Lifton,p.237). The 5 by 7 centimeter head wound seen by the Doctors at Parkland (Lifton, p.310, 313) was enlarged to approximately 17 centimeters by the time the body arrived at Bethesda (Lifton, p.318n, 327). The back wound was not observed by anyone at Parkland (Lifton, p.192-193). Yet the back wound was noticed by Dr. Humes, who was able to put his finger into the hole and discovered that it was only a fraction of an inch deep (Lifton, p.159).

There were at least two ambulances that arrived at Bethesda, the grey Navy ambulance in which Mrs. Jacqueline Kennedy rode and in which the body of John Kennedy was supposed to be in (Lifton, p.402-415), and the other, a black hearse in which the body of John Kennedy actually did arrive (Lifton, p.569-581). There were two caskets, the empty bronze casket that was damaged in transit (Lifton, p.399-400) and the grey metal shipping casket that held the body of John Kennedy (Lifton, p.579, 601).

The bronze coffin in which President Kennedy’s body was originally placed in at Dallas was lined with a plastic mattress cover to protect the satin lining (Lifton, p.599-600n). But when President Kennedy’s body arrived at Bethesda it was in a zippered, plastic body bag (Lifton, p.599-600).

How could the body have changed caskets and appearances between Parkland and Bethesda?

One could claim that Lifton was prejudiced and falsified his research by exaggerating the above figures as some individuals have done. But such does not answer his most telling of all discoveries: that numerous X-rays had already been taken of President John Kennedy’s body, by the X-ray technician, Jerrol Custer, by the time Mrs. Kennedy arrived at the hospital (Lifton, p.620-621).

Custer’s observations were just seconds after Mrs. Kennedy, while walking into the front entrance of Bethesda, stopped and turned for one last look at the bronze casket and grey Navy ambulance which she believed still held the body of her husband (Lifton, p.478n).

Therefore, Lifton had no reason or need to exaggerate his figures. The chain of possession of the body was broken. This is a matter of public record (Lifton, p.414-415). The changes in the appearances of the wounds between Parkland and Bethesda manifest evidence that the body was altered before the autopsy began.

When one takes into consideration all these facts about the changes in appearance of John Kennedy’s body, plus the many peculiarities and additional information uncovered by David Lifton and other investigators who have written about the assassination, one is confronted with the undeniable truth that before the official autopsy was preformed, the body of John Kennedy was somehow secreted away from the official motorcade to Bethesda.

Then just like a magician’s sleight of hand trick, the body was switched from coffin to coffin in the middle of an ambulance chase (Lifton, p.402-405, 409-411, 583). A wound was put in his upper back, other wounds were altered and all the bullets were removed from the body. This was done in order to make it appear as though all the shots were fired from the sixth floor window of the Texas School Book Depository.

David Lifton’s investigation answers the two nagging questions of the assassination: why there were no bullets in the body and how the conspirators could succeed in their cover-up without having to involve hundreds of FBI Agents, Secret Service Agents, CIA Agents, Warren Commission lawyers and countless other investigative and support personnel.

Lifton’s investigation proves that President Kennedy’s body was altered before the official autopsy began and that the rifle and bullets found in the Texas School Book Depository were planted by the conspirators (Lifton, p.183).

Thus, only a few individuals in key positions were needed in order to succeed in the cover-up and they, acting under the disguise of national security, issued orders which were then unsuspectingly obeyed by all those involved.

Since one cannot use the autopsy report of President Kennedy in order to determine the facts surrounding the assassination, the only thing left is the eyewitness testimony. Taken from the 26 volumes of Commissin evidence, this testimony says that there were two gunmen shooting at the limousine that day from two different directions (Lifton, p.8, 13, 19).

Since the Warren Report said that there was only “one lone assassin,” one can conclude that there was a conspiracy in the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. This fact was confirmed by the House Select Committee on Assassinations in 1978 when it concluded that there was a conspiracy in the murders of John Kennedy and Martin Luther King. As to why this committee did nothing about its findings, one can only conjecture.

After all the evidence is examined one is confronted with several undeniable facts. There were at least four shots fired at the President’s limousine from two different directions: one in front of the car and the other above and to the rear of the automobile.

One bullet hit John Kennedy in the front of his neck and ranged downward into his chest and did not exit. A second bullet struck Governor Connally in the back, exited from his chest and lodged in his left leg after striking his wrist. A third bullet hit President Kennedy in the right temporal region and exited from the right posterior of his skull; a piece of his skull flying off and landing in the grass (Lifton, p.316). A fourth bullet struck a nearby curb and a bystander (CE VI p.221, 238; VII p.508-510; XXI p.475-477, WCR p.116-117).

Thus, the Warren Commission lied and aided in a massive cover-up when it stated that only three shots were fired from the sixth floor window of the southeast corner of the book depository warehouse (WCR p.18-19).

One may wonder how the Warren Commission could come to its conclusion since it used the evidence that anyone can find in the twenty-six volumes of Commission Evidence and Exhibits. The answer is simple. There exists evidence in the twenty-six volumes that supports the Warren Commission Report.

However, that evidence is tainted. First of all, the Warren Commission began with a preconceived verdict of Lee Harvey Oswald’s guilt and his alleged method of committing the assassination. In support of this they took statements from some witnesses who clearly lied when giving testimony. They relied on evidence taken from witnesses who were prejudiced against Oswald. The Commission based its conclusions on statements of hysterical witnesses and those seeking self glory.

In order to support their preconceived conclusion they took statements from witnesses who were coaxed in what to say before they gave their testimony. Some witnesses were coerced or frightened into giving false statements. Finally, the Warren Commission Report cited testimony of witnesses out of context. It ignored many relevant facts and important testimony. It reshaped evidence in order to make such parallel its preconceived conclusion. It over simplified evidence and it created its own evidence.

All the evidence that pointed toward its preformed conclusion it accepted, while all evidence that pointed toward the truth it either suppressed or it rejected. Thus, the Warren Commission is guilty as an accessory after the fact in the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.

Those who sought for the truth in the assassination of President Kennedy were discredited, such as Mark Lane, the lawyer hired by Oswald’s mother to defend her son. They were terrorized such as Warren Reynolds, a witness who saw a man flee the scene of the Tippit slaying and was hesitate to identify as Oswald (CE XXV p.731). They died mysteriously or under mysterious circumstances such as Dorothy Kilgallen, the news reporter and TV personality who had a taped interview with Jack Ruby that she said would answer a lot of questions surrounding the assassination.

As to the assassination of Robert F. Kennedy, one can only say that the investigation into his murder was incomplete and cannot be relied upon. By his own admission, security guard Thane Eugene Cesar was in and out of the pantry area, where Robert was shot, before the room was sealed off by authorities.

Nor was his gun checked to see if it had been fired. (Other people have been reported to have also been in and out of the area.) Also, Cesar owned a .22 pistol, the type of weapon used to kill Robert Kennedy.

There is no proof that Cesar or someone else did not shoot Robert Kennedy either by accident or as part of a conspiracy.

Robert Kennedy’s nomination as the Democratic Presidential candidate was virtually assured after he won the California primary on June 5, 1968, the day he was shot. He would then have campaigned against his brother’s 1960 presidential opponent, Richard Nixon. Winning the presidential election would then have allowed Robert Kennedy to continue with his brother’s policy of bringing peace and justice to the world.

This policy was against everything the conspirators wanted and believed in. President Kennedy was going to return control of both the FBI and the CIA to the presidency. He had already replaced the director of the CIA, Allen Dulles, and was going to replace the director of the FBI, J. Edgar Hoover, after the 1964 elections.

He was going to stop the war in Vietnam and in fact had already issued orders to have the first 1,000 troops to be returned home before Christmas, 1963. (This order – National Security Action Memorandum #263 – was rescinded by President Johnson.)

President Kennedy was beginning peace talks with both the Soviet Union and Cuba when he was assassinated. He planned to reduce the oil depletion allowances. Through his brother, Robert Kennedy, he was in the process of destroying Mafia violence and influence in America. Finally, both he and his brother, with the help of men such as Dr. Martin Luther King, were calming racial tensions in America.

All three of these children of God had dedicated their lives to ending the war in Vietnam and the racial prejudice and hate that exists in America. All three of these children of God were preventing the conspirators from controlling the presidency of the United States. The conspirators could not allow this, so they killed them. Then they placed the blame on innocent bystanders, patsies who they controlled and manipulated.

One should note that many do not want to recognize the collective efforts of these three children of God. They do not want to honor them as a team working toward peace. Some want to honor the Kennedys but not King. Others want to honor King but not the Kennedys.

But the three of them should be honored as one, not as separate individuals. For each recognized that racial tensions exist everywhere, not just in any one section of America. All three were loved by all races, ethnic groups and nationalities. To honor one of them and not the others is to be unjust to all three of them.

The assassinations of Dr. Martin Luther King, on April 4, 1968, and Robert F. Kennedy, on June 5, 1968, were also the work of a conspiracy. One only needs to review the political history from 1960, when John Kennedy was campaigning for president, to 1972, during the height of the Watergate investigations, in order to perceive the truth.

As in the killing of President Kennedy, there are many questions still to be answered in both of those assissanations.

For example, one need only ask how Sirhan Bishara Sirhan knew what route Robert Kennedy was going to take through the hotel to his press conference after giving his victory speech upon winning the California primary. Had Sirhan Sirhan been anywhere else in the hotel on June 5, the day he allegedly wrote in his diary that RFK must die, he would not have been in positionto shoot his gun. (He was to the left front of Robert Kennedy while the real murderer shot Robert behind the right ear.)

As with the killing of John Kennedy, here too there are questions about the actual gun used, the number of shots fired (some say eight others nine or more), a “magic bullet,” the distance the murderer was from his victim, the position of Sirhan Sirhan, reports of a second gunman, the FBI and CIA connections, and most important of all, the burned photos, autopsy reports, and lost and destroyed evidence.

Just like Lee Harvey Oswald, Sirhan Sirhan was also manipulated by powerful men from Washington who stopped at nothing to retain control of the presidency.

Similar questions surround the murder of Dr. Martin Luther King. First, there are questions as to where the fatal shot came from — a bathroom window or from another building? This has never been satisfactorily resolved. Secondly, who lured Dr. King out onto the balcony just before the shots were fired? Had Dr. King not gone onto the balcony at the “right” time, then he would not have been in position to be assassinated.

Was James Earl Ray framed for the assassination as he claimed? If not, then he had to have help. This too has never been satisfactorily resolved.

Just a cursory investigation into the facts reveals that there was a conspiracy in the killing of Dr. Martin Luther King and that of Robert F. Kennedy. In both assassinations there were unanswered questions, inaccurate reconstructions of the events, irrelevant evidence and conflicting evidence. In both assassinations evidence was ignored, manufactured and destroyed.

By comparing the assassinations of the Kennedy brothers and Dr. King to three other assassinations one can see that there was something very peculiar about the murders of John, Robert and Martin.

In the assassination of John Lennon and the attempted assassinations of Gerald R. Ford and Ronald Reagan there were no unanswered questions, inaccurate reconstructions of the events or conflicting evidence. Yet, each of these men was shot at or shot by “deranged lone assassins.”

Both Mark David Chapman and John W. Hinckley are mental patients; Chapman was in a mental institution before he shot Lennon and Hinckley was committed after he shot Reagan. While both Lynette Fromme and Sara Jane Moore have exhibited unstable characteristics.

Both Chapman and Hinckley committed their wicked deeds in order to gain public attention for themselves and neither of them has ever denied their acts. Nor do Fromme or Moore deny what they did.

The FBI and the CIA investigated all four of these individuals and nothing of their investigations has ever been withheld for reasons of national security. Yet, the same cannot be said of the alleged assassins of John Kennedy, Robert Kennedy or Martin Luther King, although the government has claimed that each of their alleged murderers were “deranged loners.”

Both Lee Harvey Oswald and James Earl Ray consistently denied killing anyone and Sirhan Bishara Sirhan, while he believes that he shot at Robert Kennedy today, he was in denial immediately after the murder.

If the assassinations of John and Robert Kennedy and Dr. King were random acts of violence and not as part of a wider conspiracy, as the government claims, then one only needs to ask why are there so many differences between their assassinations and the assassinations of Lennon, Reagan and Ford, all of whom were shot at (or shot by) in random acts of violence. Why aren’t there more similarities and why are there so many unanswered questions?

Thus, the second woe is past (Rev.11:14). It comes not only because of the murdering of God’s servants without any recourse to justice but also because of the subsequent lies propagated about their deaths by the various investigating committees.

Then there is the acceptance of these lies as truth by those who were in positions of authority. They did nothing, when the least they should have done was to speak out against these crimes and denounce those who did the investigations as liars. Instead, they allowed the conspirators to go completely free.

As to why the news media did nothing, one can only offer conjecture. They all should have taken a cue from Abraham Lincoln when he said that for one to see a crime and not speak out against the crime is to be a party to the crime. Thus, they are guilty as accessories.

Nor can those individuals in positions of authority claim innocence because many children of God, using their own resources and their own time and effort, discovered the truth about the assassinations and then published their own conclusions. These children of God have proven that the assassinations of John and Robert Kennedy and Dr. King were third rate murders and cover-ups bungled by amateurs.

The third woe, which will come quickly (Rev.11:14), is a Nuclear War. This war will come after the abomination of desolation and will be the worst disaster that has ever come upon mankind. But after the Nuclear War is over God will come and rescue His children. Although no one knows the exact date, it will come. Thus, our Lord warns His children to always be ready for it. One is able to learn this from the gospel of St. Matthew.

The gathering together of the elect is what St. Paul was writing about in his first epistle to the Corinthians.

The seventh and last trumpet started to sound right after the killing of John Kennedy (v.15) by the children of God who sought truth in the assassinations of the sixties. It will continue to be sounded until the seventh vial is finished pouring. Then peace will descend upon the earth. The children of God will undergo a metamorphosis, take on an incorruptible nature and then rise to greet Jesus Christ the King of mercy.

One may look upon their own life as a larva stage in development and their own death as a pupa stage. One may say that the children of God will rise as butterflies, while the henchmen of Satan will disentomb as beetles.

One learns by comparing Rev.10:6-7 and Rev.11:15-19 that the blowing of the seventh trumpet marks the time that our Lord reigns supreme and His mystery is revealed. Thus, verse fifteen says: “. . . the kingdom of this world is become our Lord’s.” This is seen in the final victory of religious truth over heresy. It marks the final defeat of atheism.

The sounding of the last trumpet also marks the beginning of the end of time. This is why the final two verses of chapter eleven proclaim: “Thy wrath is come . . . and the temple of God was opened in heaven . . . and there were lightnings, and voices, and an earthquake and great hail.”

This is a description of a Nuclear War. After the war is over, time, as man measures it, will cease. No one knows when the war will begin and no one knows when it will end. This is because the length of time from the killing of John Kennedy unto the end of time is an indeterminable length of time. It is as though time has come to a stop from the time that the seventh trumpet began to blow unto the end of time.

This may be better understood by observing the final two minute warning given in a football game of the National Football League; the game is stopped while real time progresses. One could also observe a rocket ship that has had its final countdown to liftoff temporally halted so that those in charge of the liftoff can make some last minute preparatory inspections. Time, as mankind measures it, continues to progress onward, while the clock for liftoff is stopped.

Just as only those who control the launch of the rocket ship know when it will resume, so also is it with the end of time. Only God knows when it will come. Only our Lord knows when He will resume the final “sixty second” countdown.

During this time period He is preparing His children for their “liftoff” into heaven. First, the abomination of desolation, prophesied by Daniel, (Dan.9:26-27; Mt.24:15) will come. This will be followed by the great tribulation of a Nuclear War (Mt.24:21). Some areas will also experience a nuclear winter (Mt.24:20,29).

The days immediately following the war will see the death of all the children of God who did not die in the war itself (Mt.24:22). In the weeks and months following that, only Satan’s henchmen will be left alive on earth. The living will envy the dead. Many will seek to commit suicide but will fail in their efforts. Due to all the radiation in the air, many who are with child will give birth to either still born babies or severely deformed babies (Mt.24:19).

In some areas there will be no food, no water, no law and no modern conveniences. Life will be reminiscent of the many futuristic science fiction stories, such as the 1981 movie Road Warrior starring Mel Gibson. In such areas men will be butchered, women raped and children eaten. After the last Roman Catholic priest has died and our Lord has no way to continue the propagation of His Church, God will come (Mt.24:30). His children will rise up, put on an incorruptible nature (1Cor.15:50-52) and greet Jesus Christ their King (Mt.24:31).

Alpha Omega

The Best Evidence