An Assessment of Magnet Schools
and Standardized Testing

© 2006 by Peter Jude Fagan

Many states and counties (parishes in Louisiana) have standards for schools and rank the schools by how well their students score on various assessment tests. Many states also assess the principals, administrators and teachers of the schools according to how well their students score on these standardized tests.

But the school boards, administrative personnel and politicians who endorse assessment fail to realize that the principals, administrators and teachers of those schools with high numbers of economically disadvantaged students – those who usually score lower on assessment tests – are teaching their students how to pass tests instead of educating their students.

The test scores go up and the school appears to have more students being educated. But the truth is that the children are not being educated.

Instead, they are being taught how to pass assessment tests and they attend pep rallies to encourage them to do their best on these tests. Then those students who score high or above a certain percentage are rewarded for doing their best. Meanwhile, those students who score low or do not do their best are punished.

The politicians, school board members, and other school board administrative personnel have all failed to realize that if the students are not in their classrooms doing their class work and their teacher is not in the classroom with them then they are not getting a quality education. Attending a pep rally is not educational! Learning how to pass a standardized test is not educational!

As noted previously, taking an assessment test is not giving an accurate picture of a student’s abilities. It is not even going to help the student once he or she gets into adult life and into the work force. The only people who gain from standardized assessment tests are those who have a financial interest in them.

Thus, it appears that the standards set by politicians and school boards based upon assessment tests are just a lot of hot air propagated by these politicians, school board personnel and others who have a financial interest in them and who only want to give the appearance of endorsing quality education, when in fact our children are getting an ersatz education.

It appears that standardized tests help only those who are more interested in paperwork that claims that our children are getting a quality education instead of actually giving our children a quality education.

Raising the quality of education in our schools cannot be done in a few short years of standardized testing, as many politicians, school board members and other school board administrative personnel seem to believe.

If these individuals are sincere in their efforts to raise the quality of education and build quality schools then the first thing that they MUST to do is to lower the teacher/student ratio by hiring more teachers and teacher assistants. (No classroom should have more than 15 students in it and every K-12 teacher should have an assistant.)

Next they can address the underlying cause of an inferior education. This can be done by raising the quality of life in economically disadvantaged neighborhoods. That is, they can start by addressing poverty, unemployment and employment pay differentiation, homelessness and inadequate housing, inefficient health care, ethnic and religious discrimination, latchkey children, dysfunctional families, child abuse and sex, alcohol and drug abuse (SAD abuse).

These politicians, school board members and school board administrative personnel fail to understand that poverty is a leading cause of ignorance and inadequate education, which leads to more poverty! It's a vicious circle. (Thus, getting rid of poverty would take a big bite out of ignorance. It would also take a big bite out of crime.)

Making speeches, giving standardized tests and building magnet and specialty schools is not going to erase these underlying causes. I doubt that it is even going to help students raise their scores on assessment tests but I could be wrong.

Raising the quality of education in our schools is going to take at least 50 years or more of raising the quality of life in economically disadvantaged neighborhoods, not giving standardized tests. Those who endorse any other method of raising the quality of education are just blowing a lot of hot air to make themselves look and sound important.


Many politicians, school board personnel, and other administrative personnel are endorsing the creation of magnet and specialty schools for those students who score well on assessment tests. The building of magnet and specialty schools is an attempt to select the academically advanced student and place him or her in an atmosphere where he or she can excel. This is good. Indeed, it is great! But isn’t that what special education gifted and talented classes are for?

Then there are those students who do excellent in one subject but do poor or average in other subjects. Many of them are not given the opportunity to go to a magnet or specialty school because of their poor or average performance in other subjects.

There are also those students who would do better receiving an education that prepares them for their future in the work force instead of going to college. They do not get the advantage of going to a magnet or specialty school because there are very few special classes for specific job skills or artistic skills. Although there are some states that have specialty schools for some job or artistic skills but these are rare and often not open to all students.

Since it is usually the children of the affluent who score higher on assessment tests, magnet and specialty schools are in effect separating the children of the rich from the children of the poor; they are separating the haves from the have-nots.

It appears that magnet and specialty schools are an attempt to return to the days before Brown v. Board of Educatio n. They are an attempt to return to “separate but equal” schools of the past. Only this time it isn’t just the African American children who are going to be discriminated against. It is the children of all the poor, regardless of race, creed, color, ethnicity, et cetera.

Those who believe otherwise are not looking down the road at reality. An affluent parent with political connections who has a child in a magnet or specialty school is not about to allow the school his or her child attends receive inferior quality computers and computer software, school text books, work books, desks, and other school supplies when there are state-of-the-art supplies available.

An affluent parent will make sure that the magnet or specialty school their child attends will receive the very best school supplies. Meanwhile the regular schools will be left to receive the second-rate school supplies, just like in the days before Brown v. Board of Education.

This disproportionate distribution of supplies will continue until all the regular schools end up with nothing but mediocre and inadequate supplies, while the magnet and specialty schools attended to by the children of the affluent will end up with the new and superior supplies.

Magnet and specialty schools are returning our schools to a separate but equal status, just as it was in the days before Brown v. Board of Education. Again, those who do not believe this are not looking at reality.

This disparity between the two types of schools does not stop at the distribution of supplies. Indeed, it is very subtle. At many magnet and specialty schools the students do not have to take yearly standardized assessment tests. Whereas regular education school students do have to take them.

The reasoning behind this is ostensibly because magnet and specialty school students, by the nature of the education that they are receiving, do not need them. Whereas regular education schools, because of the “poor” performance of many of their students, do need accountability. (Politicians, school board members and other administrative personnel who demand such accountability refuse to admit that a major source of this poor performance is the disproportion in wealth between the two classes of students.)

Students spend many hours preparing for standardized assessment tests and then many more hours taking these tests. But while they are doing this, they are not doing their class work. They are getting an education in how to pass tests – something that will NOT help them in their adult life. Thus they are getting an inferior education!

Teachers in regular schools must fill out numerous reports and education plans so that politicians, school board members and other administrative personnel can have paper work which “proves” that the students of these schools are receiving a high quality education.

But while the teachers are filling out these reports and education plans, they are not teaching their students. Their students are receiving an ersatz education. As I said previously: If the students are not in their classrooms doing their class work and their teacher is not in the classroom with them then they are not getting a quality education.

Meanwhile, magnet and specialty school students spend their time in their classrooms with their teachers doing their lessons. They are getting a quality education.

The students of regular education schools are thus receiving an inferior education, while on paper it appears that the education they are receiving is just as good as that received by the magnet and specialty school students.

Again, it appears as those politicians, school board members and other adminsitrative personnel care more about their paper work than they do about educating our children.

There is no such thing as separate but equal, whether this is black and white students, rich and poor students advance and regular students or any other differences. As long as we have two types of schools for our students then we will have one class of students getting a quality education and the other class of students getting an ersatz education.

If I may paraphrase President Abraham Lincoln: This nation cannot long endure with part of it rich and the majority of it poor. This nation cannot long endure with the rich living off the fat of the land, while the poor must labor night and day just to earn a modest living. This nation cannot long endure with one class of society forcing the other class of society to do all their dirty work, while they themselves live in the lap of luxury.

There is no excuse for a select few to possess the vast majority of the wealth, while others must go without food, clothing, shelter and education. In a nation such as ours, where equal justice for all is supposed to prevail for all, there is no excuse for there not to be a more equitable economic system.

The place to start is in our schools. There is no excuse for there to be magnet and specialty schools for the affluent, while the poor receive an inferior quality education.

Either the rich and the affluent begin to pull their fair share and to share their wealth or Truth will visit its justice upon them.




1