The Story of Ozone is a collection of important medical ozone documents
that explains what ozone is, its uses and misconceptions. Bookmark this page now.
Click here to go to The Story Of Ozone
"TO EXPOSE AND ASSIST"
Last updated January 11, 2009
Topics: Cures that work for Cancers, HIV, MS,
and other so-called incurable diseases. Pharmaceutical murder by drug companies and their friends, the FDA. Wide-spread medical corruption/malpracise. Holding my lantern high, looking for the honest doctor willing to expose the health racket and refuse drug company kick-backs and benefits. Blocking of alternative medicine such as Laetril (yes, it works, it's just a cover-up) and proven cures by government and industry and other rip-offs
WATCH THE BIGGEST THREAT TO YOUR NUTRITIONAL FREEDOM FROM ABROAD! (see video at right)
Treat your own cancer - your doctor doesn't have a cancer cure for you. All he can do is try to poison it out before he poisons YOU, and sometimes it works.
Food Irradiation - WHO and FDA say it is safe. What do organic food consumers say? WHO also permits dangerous chemicals (e.g. neurotoxin polyacrylamide, which was used by the nazis to kill people) to be used in agriculture and personal care products. The Bush family is connected back to the Nazis and this chemical industry, and they probably have a lot to say about the drug industry in general. So who is protecting us the consumer? Hydrophilic skin lotion made of poison
See book at right:America Betrayed and read several pages.
Epigenetics - scientists find a link between some of your diseases and genetics - and - they are onto how to turn the genes on and off at will. Many are transgenerationally transmitted markers for diseases. This is stuff of science fiction, but it is happening.
Acrylamide: (Monsanto) in your fries, in your plastic, fertilizers, GMO...its everywhere, and its TOXIC.
FDA and Codex attack Alternative Medicine and nutritional supplements. National Health Federation - while permitting dangerous untested (FDA gives them a number they can use) and tested DRUGS on the market, which kill and maim millions, in fact more than recreational drugs.
Dr. Lorraine Day, Whistle Blower - Former top mainstream doctor is now one of the greatest advocates for alternative medicine from personal experience with the Cancer Industry and Breast Cancer which she cured without Chemo and Radiation - nor the Mastectomy promised by her doctors. She says each mammography increases cancer risk by 2%.Listen to her interview. Go Dr. Day!
Do you know how your donations to cancer "research" are being used, and why there is no cure on the horizon?
AMA and FDA are criminal organizations - they are approving your drugs prematurely, which kill thousands while preventing life-saving natural cures such as Laetril (apricot seeds) from being sold! FDA thugs do raids, with guns, flak jackets, and terrorize religious groups, vitamins and non-pharmaceuticals for their drug buddies - to protect their profits. They nabbed Jason Vale, and threw him in jail for 5 years for what - distributing apricot seeds that cured his cancer, to people dying of cancer. Jason
They cross international boundaries (e.g. Mexico) to bring back those who have found alternatives to drugs that cut into the cancer drug industry. They are a mercenary arm of the drug industry funded by the government. They supposedly exist to "help" you, to keep those bad natural cures from killing you. But any government agency that has so much power is dangerous to our freedom. When I say FDA, I also imply that what FDA does is echoed very soon in Canada. They are above the law, and that is why they are dangerous to a free society. If you want to eat seeds, you should be allowed to. Drug companies have been successful in making laws to prevent you from healing yourself, for "your own protection." If you want to smoke or eat them, you should be allowed to, IT'S NONE OF THEIR CONCERN! They don't care about how many people pharmaceutical drugs kill, which is over one hundred thousand per year in the USA. They could stop it. This is why they are criminals who care only about money.
Hypertension, the silent killer. Pritikin Resort: a plan to reverse disease.
Eat like an Okinawan, live to be 100. Okinawa diet
Eat vegan if possible. Give up fatty foods. Remember food comes from the field, garden, river, ocean, lake, forest - not a box! That's not food. Meat: eat fish from outside 200 km off shore to avoid mercury etc.
Nothing can make you "ready" for chemo!
Cures that may work for Cancers, HIV, MS, and other so-called incurable diseases.
Pharmaceutical murder by drug companies and their friends such as FDA and self declared "expert witnesses" for pharmaceuticals, who protect their huge profits.
Did you know water cures asthma and many other "incurable" diseases?
Wide-spread medical corruption/malpractice. The arrogance of a medicine that says it is OK to mask symptoms. (Like when a warning light goes on and you pull out the bulb!)
Invisible danger in your cell phone. Also Danish study fraud.
Blocking of alternative medicine such as Laetril (yes, it works, it's just a cover-up) and proven cures by government and industry.
Here you will find that one bit of information that will make the difference for you!
Male Circumcision: cleaner? Africans say female circumcision is cleaner! No scientific or Christian reason for it. Violates your child's human rights. Stop it!
The sad truth about fund raising, and where the money goes. Their "don't ask don't tell" attitude hides the terrible truths about how their money is spent on something that doesn't do you or anyone else any good at all.
If you need iron, take organic Manganese, if you need Calcium, take organic Silica. The movement of life proceeds from the constant changing of one element into another!
(Louis C. Kervran)
Time to get back to some original medicine such as Garlic, Oregano Oil
Save yourself from a heart attack or stroke! Chelation Therapy removes arterial plaque.
Listen to the story of nanobacteria, which lives inside the calcium buildup in your arteries, which must be killed during the Chelation process. Listen Nanobacteria.
Welcome to the alternative health site that could save your life,
prevent orthodox "crazy medicine" from killing you, or at least improve your
life greatly. If you would like an opinion on health related topics from someone with a degree in life sciences, who is not financially connected with the health industry, you have come to the right place. If you have a mobile/cell phone turn it off now, I'll tell you why later. Hi, my name is Osmo Joronen, and I have always been interested in how people
themselves come up with ways to get and stay healthy, (i.e. folk medicine) especially when
they see what happens to their friends at the hands of traditional medicine. And most of all, I have always been interested, fascinated by the truth about everything. For example, I have often wondered what happened to Laetrile. The last I heard, the news was that it was a hoax, the results were negative. But, the truth is that the researcher was silenced and only the official version was told: Laetrile was a failure. When this news was released, the person who did the tests wished to announce his results. Unfortunately his cry in the wilderness was drowned out by the big guns. The press did not report the researcher's positive results. Why? If you stick around, I would like to share some insights about your health from a fresh angle; there is no gimic, no cost to you now or ever. There is nothing to sell because everything you need to be healthy is available to you almost free; I mean we all have to eat.
Doctors are
wonderful in emergencies, don't get me wrong. But from there things just get more
complicated. Specifically I am referring to the unholy relationship between FDA, drug companies
and doctors; the drug companies corrupting the doctors by offering money and other benefits to this front line sales force. As a result, the patient cannot rely on doctors to be totally objective and on their side in the quest for better health. It is therefore dangerous to conclude that traditional medicine is the best way to go in every case. We have to be knowledgeable ourselves since the doctors mostly go by what drug companies say which supposedly have done the controlled studies and that checks and balances are working. If a doctor is thinking about the next all expenses paid conference or whatever, could it affect which drug is administered to the patient? The evidence says yes. Bush is trying to change that, and many doctors and drug companies are fighting back. They claim the relationship is part of the medical culture and should not be tampered with. We beg to differ.
"Scientifically tested" medicine
is supposed to be the only medicine, since "there is no such thing as two
medicines." Arnold Relman, M.D. former editor of The New England Journal of Medicine:
"There are not two kinds of medicine, one conventional and the other unconventional,
that can be practiced jointly in a new kind of "integrative medicine." Nor, as
Andrew Weil and his friends also would have us believe, are there two kinds of thinking,
or two ways to find out which treatments work and which do not. In the best kind of
medical practice, all proposed treatments must be tested objectively. In the end, there
will only be treatments that pass that test and those that do not, those that are proven
worthwhile and those that are not." This page will show how totally fallacious this
statement is, because it is executed incorrectly with money involved, and because it is
wrong, millions of people suffer death and debilitation.
Osmo's Theorem of medicine: IF IT CAN'T BE PATENTED OR OTHERWISE PROVIDE A SUSTAINED PROFIT, REGARDLESS OF HOW GOOD IT IS, THAT MEDICINE WILL NOT SEE THE LIGHT OF DAY.
Whether you believe that the drug industry and their partners, the doctors and FDA are there to look after your interests or not, will determine one day if you live or die from the treatment some doctor prescribes. But the death will be slow - only after you have provided this bunch with their cut of the drug pie. You may need to get on drug rehab...a slow supervised withdrawal. Death from prescription drugs is the number four killer, behind heart disease, cancer and stroke. It is estimated that between 100,000 and 1,000,000 people die or are seriously injured every year by the correct administering of prescription drugs. The drug industry is second only to oil in revenue. No one in the mill dares to speak out, even in the biggest Cancer agencies and charities, because they know what will happen to them. So why has the above system failed?
Obviously in theory the one medicine idea
has merit, but not in practice. I know we don't like to think of money when we are sick and at the mercy of the drug/doctor cartel, but money IS what it is all about. You are a cog in this money machine, and so is the doctor. There is no money in cures, especially inexpensive, natural ones! The money is in maintaining sick people - keeping them on handfuls of pills and spreading fear, that if you don't take their medicine, something bad will happen to you, like you may die. You should begin from the assumption that FDA does not care about your health, and then you can make some sense of the whole mess. A lot of the medicine promoted by FDA is just plain hogwash, but some of the natural cures they deny, (e.g. Laetril) on behalf of their drug buddies, could very well be miracle cures. But they can't be patented, so they do not get into the system. The same people who work for the drug companies, work for FDA and they are not to be trusted. They move back and forth. There is no difference - the FDA is a criminal organization bent on prosecuting little vitamin people, who peddle natural substances (food such as apricot pits known as Laetril) that they (FDA) label as "drugs," and which the Canadian government now recognizes as "food" - not drugs. The FDA acts like KGB, while protecting their drug buddies. The "criminals" get thrown into jail for years, while the real criminals are sent in for a slap on the wrist, and they are out again before you can say Jason Vale. Have you noticed, governments protect industry, not people; criminals, not victims? If it were not so serious, I would say it is a joke. Still, many believe in this system religiously - even to the point of considering everything else as "of the devil."
My coworkers were lining up for a flu shot. Asked if I was getting mine, I answered "no" I don't believe in them. Why?
Well, I'd like to refer to a headline in my local newspaper dated February 5, 2004:
"Doctors link child vaccines to autism." (In these pages which were begun
approximately 6 years previous, I state that children are at risk from vaccines.) A subheading
under a picture of a school girl getting a flu shot reads: "The additive suspected as
the "smoking gun" linking vaccines to autism was contained in the flu vaccine
given to Canadian children this winter." That additive is mercury, which was already
known to cause problems years ago, even by the companies producing them, but this
information was hushed. Is it really worth the health risk to get a flu shot for a tiny reduction in the likelihood that you will get the flu? I don't think so! So why is everyone lining up for one, and even crossing the borders to get shot up? I have tried to spread the word in my own way, but it has taken
this long to get a response. How many children and families have been affected in that
time? Last week there was a list of antidepressants which were listed as being dangerous,
most of which I have condemned on this site also, and which you will be reading about.
Perhaps this page is working, I don't know, but everything helps. I believe eventually
everything on this page will come out in the news, one by one, and the world will be the
better for it. What's more, I am doing it free. Thank you doctors, who have taken notice
and begun acting on this grass-roots information. Oh, and I didn't take the flu shot, but I did try to get lots of rest, eat well with as little meat as possible, drink lots of water, and I haven't had the flu for years. I get enough protein from vegetable sources, I know because my work is demanding physically. I work mostly outdoors and can report that my diet is keeping me quite healthy, meatless and milkless.
Dr. Lorraine Day states that milk can decalcify bones by providing excessive calcium, and meat is only required to rebuild muscle, while our bodies are fueled by carbohydrates with lots of fiber. (One theory is that to prevent excessive calcium in the blood, it is stored temporarily in the bones, but excreted later, and this repeated process is the culprit)
To calcify bone, your hormone and enzyme systems, which may be slipping, must be activated first. The surrenal gland produces hormones that help maintain your bones and immune system. These glands reduce their activity especially after menopause. It's not just Dr. Day, who by the way reads voraciously all the literature that most doctors don't have time to. That is one reason she quit her practice, so she can spend more time reading and telling us about it! It is the studies themselves that reveal the truth - that just get filed somewhere because doctors don't care or they don't have time. Quackwatch yells "foul" when Dr. Lorraine Day repeats what the studies show! Now will the real quack please stand up! How dare this woman say that milk does not prevent osteoporosis! How dare she! Well, let's see what one of these studies shows, that she probably read, that these others did not bother to do. Dr. Day promises consequences for her critics! Furthermore, a milkless, meatless diet is the best and may be a woman's only hope in being free from breast cancer.
It's from 2000 Pediatrics, a MAJOR research study. "...getting extra calcium from milk or anything else - does not make any difference in bone density. And evidence shows that dairy product consumption contributes to obesity, ear infections, constipation, respiratory problems, heart disease, and some cancers.
For strong bones, kids need exercise, sunlight, and a diet rich in fruits and vegetables. And there's healthy calcium in fortified juices, soymilk, greens, beans, and many other foods that avoid milk's problems." - Physician's committee for responsible medicine. So how come we are told to drink milk and eat calcium supplements?
How dumb can a watchdog outfit get. The least these groups that claim to give accurate information, contradicting to Dr. Day and others, can do is site a reference!
I try to eat the things I feel relatively confident about and do the other things too. I do like some cheese though, but probably I should be avoiding that as well. Moderation is the key to eating things you feel might not be good for you. I walk at least 5 km, and expend perhaps 2000 calories or more every day, derived mostly from whole grains, fruits and vegetables. My thermos contains herbal teas, such as nettle, caribou weed (native medicinal weed from northwest BC) which I pick and dry myself and which I enjoy; I drink a minimum of 2 Liters of water during the work day. Our ancestors did something similar, so why not us? They dried meat of course, but it was not contaminated and concentrated with chemicals and pollutants, which depress the immune system. So you see, drugs don't prevent disease, a correct life style does, which is what is SUPPOSED to keep us healthy - NOT drugs. We like to live a life-style that is sold to us my the media, then when we get sick, we want the drugs, we demand them from our doctors. Then we just continue doing what we did before we got sick until the next time. It is a vicious cycle and bad life-styles drive the whole drug economy. If they were to stop, goodness knows what would happen to Squibb and Eli Lilly. So eating according to God's plan goes against this "evil" system. I think it is all starting to make sense. The system wants to get even worse. See the clip on Codex.
If what Dr. Arnold says is true, then the treatments for cancer must work. But we know
that they do not, for many many people, too many for my liking. Chemo kills all cells not
just cancer, burning destroys tissue around the cancer, and cutting just removes the
visible tumor. So how has this objective way of thinking benefitted say breast cancer?
Objectively speaking, much of the medicine does not work, it is still burning, cutting and
poisoning. What is meant by "worthwhile?" Is Prozac worthwhile if it works in
some cases but causes addiction and bad reactions in 10% of the population, and some of
these have ended up as tragedies of suicide and murder, only to be settled out of court
for millions of dollars with gag clauses? Eli Lilly knew Prozac was dangerous. These gag settlements should be illegal! Recently, most of the other antidepressants received warnings regarding their tendency to increase suicidal behavior, but somehow Prozac escaped. But drugawareness.com says it is just as dangerous. In fact this family of drugs is known as Prozac 1, Prozac 2 etc.
I recently visited drugawareness.com to see what was new. This was just after the W5 report on oxycontin/oxycondone. What I saw when I searched the site was an add offering it for sale. Does this site realize how dangerous and addictive this drug is? Not apparently. Never let your doctor prescribe this drug for you.
Mobile Phones: these are very dangerous and should be turned off when not in use! You must do everything in your power to protect yourself against this harmful RADIATION that shakes your cells about 2 million times a second and causes permanent damage. The reason for this is that they are transmitting all the time, not just when you dial a number or receive a call. Their frequency is so high that they cause cell damage, not just to the cell but the DNA as well. DNA is a double helix, and this radiation can easily snip both strands causing permanent damage. This is magnified inside a vehicle, so you are cooking yourself while you drive. Cows have been found dead near microwave towers and physical and mental problems have been linked to them as well. And BTW, this can be used against a population by governments and companies alike, and covert operations are under way as we speak. If there are children in the car, their brains and little bodies will be hurt by you who does not know any different. Class action suits are on the increase against cell phone companies due to brain cancer. See Helsinki study So, keep your cell phone for emergencies, but keep them turned off, and never carry them on you with them turned on. If you do not follow this advise this page will be of no value to you. See
William Thomas Futhermore, you should never cook your food in a microwave oven. Studies show microwaves of any kind cause cellular changes, which in turn cause disease. The government or enemy can use the microwave towers and devices to control or hurt people. Has your doctor warned you of these dangers? Take care of yourself by shielding yourself from radiation.
A system that uses the scientific method in medicine is obviously a valid system. However what looks good on paper and what gets translated into practise are two different things. In practise, money rules, not if it
"works" or not, the criteria being set arbitrarily not scientifically. The
testing may have been done scientifically, (with bad data thrown out) but what is done with the retained data and how it is
interpreted is not, it is done by policy, lobby and paid political connections. So I take
you back to my proposition, that there could be two medicines, one that works but poorly
on most if not all cases while doing a lot of damage, killing between one hundred thousand to one million people a year, but making lots of money, and the
other working equally well, or poorly as the case may be, and not making a lot of money.
Which one fits the system best? The one that, although it doesn't work that well, still
makes a lot of money. Someone said recently that a cure will NEVER be found for cancer, because there is no money in it. This is an accurate statement showing great insight. Speaking about objectivity, are not all those people who are dying
despite the treatment, or having terrible side effects, indicating that the treatment is a
failure? Not to the FDA apparently, until it has killed or injured enough people for someone to say enough. Then maybe FDA will put something in fine print to point out "possible" side effects. Why then is it continued? Why are other treatments not tried in cases where those
"objectively tested" have failed? Failed "worthwhile" medicines are
routinely introduced, having such bad side-effects that each one has to be undone by
another pill. Yet they are deemed worthwhile. Maybe they are not failed by their
definition, but they are by mine. Whose definition is best? The really useful medicines
are a mere handful, several dozen of them.
There is only one medicine, they say. So ancient Chinese medicine is not medicine at all
then. If this medicine did not work, why are there 1.2 billion Chinese? The herbs that various native people have used for millennia is no medicine. No,
there is only one. That's why we have people popping a dozen pills a day or more. Real
medicine drives the whole medical system by the fuel called MONEY. It is like a religious fanaticism showing no mercy or quarter to anyone.
How does my attitude differ from that of doctors? Well, I don't care how many
patients I have; doctors do. I don't care if I get any benefits from drug companies;
doctors do. Doctors don't want a healthy population, but a steady flow of patients; I do. In short I have no ulterior
motive in wanting to see you totally cured, except one: I don't want doctors to kill me and my family for the goddess of money. The reason should be obvious, but maybe for some of
you it isn't. When I hear of or see people get
cured by natural means it makes me happy and validates my own instincts about natural medicine. My ideas have nothing to do with the New Age movement, they have more to do with what God's plan for man is all about - nutritionally and behaviorally. I believe that when we are in such harmony, health will be the natural result. Our bodies were designed to self-heal if conditions within are the way they are supposed to be. "Sin" to me is doing something against God's will for us, which changes the internal conditions and causes disease. This we must reverse, then "go, and sin no more." If we are not willing to change, how can we expect our health to change? It takes a lot of courage to try and reverse all the bad diets and behaviors and these people deserve the life extension that
comes with their will to learn and live. It is sad to see people raising money in vain, even kids, which results only in stoking the money machine, and death of the patients trying to get a cure - that the industry does not want. Learning about the benefits of herbs, (alkaline)
fruits and vegetable, avoidance of animal (acid) foods, and lifestyle changes such as
regular exercise and avoiding the Standard American Diet (SAD) are good points of
departure on the quest for ethical, natural medicine that works. The drug industry tries
to malign anything natural as effective for curing diseases, which is nonsense because all
it does is reverses the cause, which is often a result of some dificiency. In the final
analysis, that is the only real way to cure anything.
One often hears the statement
"there is no good scientific evidence". That does
not mean one would not be found if a test were run. But probably, there never will be a
test run on something that does not give a payback for the effort, especially by
pharmaceutical companies. They don't want to see nature, your own body, cure you! So,
don't let that statement discourage you. Let the experiences of others be your guide. If doctors all knew what they were doing prescribing drugs, we wouldn't have the over prescription epidemic we are having now. Sadly, a lot of the drugs over prescribed are, like VIOX, causing hundreds of thousands of unnecessary deaths. Thousands more are damaged with uncontrolled blood pressure, pain, it's terrible, a crime really. All because we trust our doctors. The
internet is full of testimonials
of people pleading for others not to make the mistake of turning themselves over to the
cancer industry. They genuinely care. The cure for everything is out there in nature, our
job is to find it, (and we have already found one of the main causes to be reversed: acid conditions of our bodies from all the junk we eat) to combine it with the proper mental attitude and lifestyle. The number of people killed by not knowing the dangers of modern foods, is staggering: the cook is slowly killing the family with the food. The fast-food outlets are poison dispensaries, and so are most schools.
Foods that protect against cancer with their enzymes and nutrients, could well be the very
ones that can beat it as well. This contrasts with the government, drug industry and FDA,
who practice legalistic nonsense against alternative/complementary medicine, a game of
"keep away" of efficacious cures that could save lives. Recently for example,
Health Canada has made selling the herbal La Pacho tea illegal and are teaming up
with drug companies to try and limit all health products. Naturally, the drug companies want a
slice of the action. Most of us now know it's all about Money! Substances such as these have been used
for centuries and, taken with common sense, cannot hurt anybody. But even with natures cures, there is the right
and wrong way. Of course lifestyle changes (drinking water, getting rest, sunlight etc.) that promote immune system health are vital. The tea has probably played a role in curing many as evidenced by numerous case histories in "Second
Opinion" by Bill Wead. Health food stores keep this book on their shelf in a
surprising number of cases. One of them loaned me the book. I wasn't sure if the book was
available to you so I copied a few excerpts for your benefit. Apparently the book is not
offered on Amazon.com. When and if it becomes available, I will post a link here.
In the book, La Pacho tea plays a key role in curing cancer. In every case that radiation or chemo is used, says Wead, the patient got worse. In every case but
one, (she discontinued the tea when she was cured) Lapacho tea cured the patient. Imagine
the effect if you used this tea (which obviously supplies the body with some key nutrients) with a complete change in lifestyle according to Dr. Day's 10 natural laws of
health which reverse the cause. Cancer is a deficiency disease - and it is not a
deficiency in radiation (which causes cancer) nor chemical poisons that cause trauma to
even normal cells as evidenced by hair falling out and terrible pain, blindness, paralysis
etc. It may be possible to plug in a deficiency through for example drinking carrot juice
or other sources of nutrition. A case in point is out of Bill Wead's book: "...The
only hope left for Todd (brain tumors) was chemotherapy. (Radiation did no good, but did a
lot of harm, affecting the boy's petuitary gland and growth. The doctors did not feel the
side affects were important enough to warn the Crests about beforehand. They were wrong!)
...There was a new drug the doctors said, with which they had had a 50 percent success
rate in children. They wanted to try this drug on Todd. Liz and Bill were willing to try
anything to see their son well. They agreed with the doctors to the chemotherapy
treatments...She remembers it as one of the most horrible experiences of her life. In a
panic she watched as her child went into violent hallucinations and became sick. The drug
was so greatly affecting Todd's respiratory system he could not breathe. The eight year
old child fell into a panic of fright and horror.
The Crests were furious with the doctors. Giving their child a drug which produced such a
violent reaction, simply was unconscionable. The drug itself had created an almost
intolerable situation for Todd. After all, these drugs are poisonous to normal cells.
Soon after taking the chemotherapy Todd lost his sight completely. It was heartbreaking to
his mother to watch her beautiful young child feeling his way around in darkness. At this
same time, Todd began to drag his right leg and encounter other difficulty in walking.
Liz and Bill Crest were not sure what had happened to their son. They did not know or
understand the medical reasons for what was going on. They did not know that the latest
treatment for their son's cancer had, as far as they were concerned, cost Todd his
eyesight and appeared to be causing him to lose the use of his right leg. The chemotherapy
that was to heal their child had done harm and induced in Todd a terror that had never
been there before.
The angry parent confronted Todd's doctors. The doctors had told the Crests that they had
a 50 percent success rate with the drug that they were using on Todd. Mr. Crest asked the
doctors just how many children had taken the drug. What was the 50 percent success based
on? A rather embarrassed doctor shamefacedly told Liz that the total figure had been six.
Todd was only the seventh child to whom the hospital had administered the drug.
In a flurry of disillusionment and anger the Crests informed the doctors that Todd would
no longer be used as a guinea pig." The rest of the story ends like most of the
others in the book. The search for alternatives was with no background in alternatives to
fall back on, as the Crests had always followed the structures of orthodox medicine. A
nurse who had seen Todd's charts sent a messanger with information about Lapacho tea. The
nurse was right in being careful, for if the doctors found out, she would lose her job.
Todd refused to drink the tea, so Liz found a concentrated form of it and added it to his
orange juice... and everything else he drank." The doctors told the Crests that Todd
had only six months to live. A few months of the tea and Todd's eyesight began to return
and a general improvement in his health was noticed. Between May and October, Todd's
health totally returned as far as the couple could tell. So much for chemo and radiation,
and lying doctors! The brain scans costing $600 each and the treatmenst are all things of
the past. Lapacho tea is now served as coffee once was, as the beverage of choice in the
Crest family.
It is sad that the Canadian government prodded by the drug companies and their cronies, so
called doctors, wants to take away this and other natural products. It is illegal to sell
in Canada, so the name has been changed and it is still available. It must be embarrassing
for those doctors who are supposed to be almost gods, to be put to shame by a South
American tree bark called Lapacho. How can these doctors look at themselves every day in
the mirror?
The nurse who spread the word did so underground. This is the only way the information can
spread. The internet must be a real bee in the drug companies' bonnet. That is why they
are paying government officials to change the laws. Anyone who opposes this system is
labeled a fanatic, a dangerous rebel.
Once a cure has been achieved, the causes must be
addressed or the disease could return. Lifestyle and eating habits are important since we
cannot keep repeating the same things that caused the illness to begin with. More
important than "right to die" is "right to live." That is what this
page is all about.
I have a bachelor's degree in biology and psychology from the University of Victoria BC,
but work as "engineer" on multimillion dollar civil construction projects,
directing or monitoring, which I learned by observation and experience with some formal
education. I started out as a rodman and never saw any reason to quit. Now surveying is
done by consultants and the owners (government) which I represent, and any surveying such
as quality assurance and remeasures are done by one person, like myself, using high-tech robotic
instruments and fancy software/computer terrain modeling. I love the outdoors and this job
takes me there: for example Alaska Highway and Highway 37 - great fishing, grizzlies and
wild wilderness. Oh, and Caribou Weed, a native medicinal plant that I picked and dried. I love it. It is a lifestyle choice. Sometimes I live beneath a beautiful mountain or beside a lake. I winter down south (at my
home) in a Canada-US border town on the coast. This is my hobby that developed from my degree in biology, a sort of passion for helping
people who are looking for health without paying an arm and a leg for it, (or me) and
without being damaged for life. If it can't hurt you, and may do some good, WHY NOT? The wimps down at the pharmaceuticals go whining to their FDA buddies to go after everyone who might take a piece of their pie. We must have the right to choose between natural cures and pills that don't cure, but leave you dependent on drugs for the rest of your natural life. Your money can't buy your health back. If
you could buy your health back, all the richest people we know in history would not have died untimely deaths from cancer.
It's time to quit pretending. Just as an example, Jerry Lewis has spent his whole life
working to collect money for research. His appeal to pity raises huge amounts of cash, is
not even supported by most sufferers, and the efforts benefit mostly the whole Muscular
Dystrophy money making machine. Results: no cure for billions of dollars raised. Where did
all this money go? The same thing applies to the other diseases such as cancer. By the
way, when I graduated and received my degree, I distinctly remember them telling me
about..."duties and responsibilities" that go with the title. Didn't doctors too
have these, plus their Hippocratic Oath? I am doing the best I can, how about the others?
How about you?
So why should I care about a rotten, money-grabbing system that kills millions of people
who would have been better off not going to their family doctor? It all started when I
witnessed my friends dropping dead from cancer all around me, and the medical system was
helpless or doing things that actually shortened their lives. I was determined that it
would not happen to me or my family. These people were cut, poisoned and burned with a lot
of collateral damage, and finally they died. I believe God has already given us everything
we need, including His will for us to be healthy. He does not produce disease for your
enlightenment or anything else - you should be healthy if you are living correctly
according to the plan. We like to blame bugs and everything else out there for our
illnesses, but seldom do we look at ourselves, what we are doing to ourselves for the
answers. The bugs have always been there in one form or other, they are opportunistic
clean-up crews waiting for the signal to do their work. If your lifestyle sends them the
wrong message, you get sick. Acid conditions of the body tell bugs that the body is dying,
time to start cleaning up. Every year we have hearing tests. This time it was in the
boonies - and I got into a discussion with the technician. He showed me a bag of caribou
grass he had gotten from indians. I asked him if I could do a quick test on him. I grabbed
my litmus paper and ripped off a piece which he put under his tongue. I checked it a
minute later and told him he has cancer. "I know I have cancer," he said in
amazement. Before I left the Cassiar Highway, I asked an Indian friend to show me where the caribou grass grew. I have zip-lock bags of the grass now at home in my natural medicine cabinet.
By testing pH you can get a good clue; a low reading is both a symptom and a
cause. Control pH0 (pdf) Perhaps this page and links will help to point us in the right direction to restore the
natural healthy balance in our bodies and minds. This is not a scientific paper or essay,
but a discussion in layman's language about what I have learned about the dirty side of
the disease business and life saving alternatives...yes, by observation and experience. It
is not intended to run down the dedicated open minded doctors (victims of the system too)
who use all their talents to help the sick, but rather to assist them in looking outside
their sometimes limited viewpoint to the possibilities in more natural methods for the
benefit of their patients. Its intention is to "expose and assist."
Case of Dr. Burzynski vs. FDA
Cancer is the scourge of mankind, a disease that, like the other
major killers, still has not been beaten by traditional medicine. The same old therapies
kill the immune
systems of millions of people, after which the patient dies or is left horribly
damaged. How can doctors subject their patients to these therapies without seriously
sitting down for a month and studying every possible alternative on the internet with an
open mind, reading testimonials and so forth. You really have to be lucky to survive these
traditional medical ordeals such as those in cancer treatment. Are cancer patients merely
fodder for the cancer business, stoking the mammoth money-making machine? The one thing
all doctors should avoid is automatically prescribing chemo and radiation therapies and
investigate other modalities such as Dr. Burzynski's
breakthrough (effective for 65% of cancers) which the U.S. government tried to destroy
with massive lawsuits. The cancer took years to develop and there is time to check out
some alternatives before scheduling drastic measures that may be harmful. In fact
statistics prove that people live longer without these immune system destroying cures that
the FDA is trying to promote. Of course the accusations were fabricated, or mere
technicalities with prosecution and FDA (holier than thou high priests of medicine)
collaborating. The prosecution, which did not deny the cures work, did everything in its
power to keep efficacy out of the cases, but they failed. The government lost, (6-6 split)
but FDA still spreads lies about Dr. Burzynski to try and shut down his clinic. And even
if the doctor's medicine doesn't cure everyone, (and it doesn't) who's does? Let's be
reasonable, some orthodox cures have a terrible track record. This is the only treatment
for brain tumors that I know of that actually works. Incidentally the lies by doctors and
FDA in attempting to prosecute Dr. Burzynski underscore how the medical system in America
operates. Why would the government try to prevent you from getting a treatment that they
know works, but lie about anyway? This web site will answer that question.
Thomas D. Elias, who wrote the book Burzynski Breakthrough
(see links section below) states that FDA is prejudiced against the small entrepreneur,
and protects the interests of the pharmaceutical companies. His breakthrough was an
embarrassment to FDA and their "partners in crime" pharmaceutical giants,
proving that cures do exist for anyone seriously searching.
National Cancer Institute
The National Cancer Institute is supposed to be working towards a
cancer cure. NCI,
(please read) which supposedly seeks to cure cancer is no better than the FDA. Think of all the fund raisers for cancer - that money is
largely wasted on administrative costs, thrown away because most people just trust these
agencies. There is nothing new coming out of it all. Isn't this a crime? What has happened
to mankind, that people have allowed themselves to be controlled in this manner by
the government and giant companies?
The authorities say we are healthier today, living longer and we have conquered many
diseases. Then how come so many parents of my kids' friends have died despite the best
medical care available? Cancer hasn't been cured; heart disease is not beaten; AIDS; come on, we aren't that stupid. We can see for ourselves what is happening in our community with all the casualties of these and other diseases. We CAN'T be living longer! We simply have not conquered the major
diseases of the last generation. If there is any longer life, it is ONLY because some people have begun to eat properly, not because drug companies have improved our lives. No, they keep millions hooked on drugs which they cannot stop, because it could mean instant death due to the body's built-up dependence. They are trying to say that all the research has paid off in life extension and
work is going ahead to find a cure, which is just around the corner, if they get more
MONEY. On January 2005 an TV ad stated "one out of three will get cancer" soon it will be one out of two"...give us money. Run, run, run, for Cancer, or whatever. "Run suckers, to keep us employed." That's what it's all about: the inhumane greed for the green stuff - and I don't mean barley green. New ways of cutting, burning and poisoning are not cures, which are the only things even considered. If a person survives these cures, it is because of something that has been done to boost the immune system such as rest, water, sunshine etc. The others don't cure anything. Today there are new diseases - more, not less, such as the March 2003 SARS, a new Asian pneumonia, and
many others coming down the pipe. Some of them are deliberately sprayed on us from the air. As if we needed more poisons and viruses. I suppose the government thinks we like all the crap they send us, we paid for it. The only chance for surviving all the plagues could be
in thinking outside the box, studying the many options, not falling into the trap of
believing somebody is going to give you something for nothing and they are all there to
help you. Not all of them are, but you might get lucky. They are out to help themselves.
They say, "there is no valid scientific evidence" for the efficacy of most if
not all alternative treatments. In most cases, they haven't even bothered to look, or they
have been listening to other doctors who haven't or have an axe to grind. The medical
groove has worn so deep that it would take a major force to move from it. There are some
very good doctors out there, but not all have the time to read the research, and they
simply aren't taught everything they should be in medical school. So many rely on the drug
companies to keep them informed. Reading the journals, if they do at all gives them mostly
drug company advertising. With this inadequate background and without doing basic research
into the subjects a few outspoken MD's proceed to promulgate their opinions just because
they are doctors. The medical system is like a machine, it requires all the cogs to be
working properly to function. A hospital's function could be impaired if revenue from the
pharmacy is cut off, for instance. This has happened during the recent SARS outbreak, when
patients were being screened and the flow of patients and money was impaired.
Add this to your arsenal to fight the war against microbes and viruses and for the
improvement of your healing immune system. Here you will find the latest amazing
developments, not just in ozone therapy but also in natural cures that replace cutting,
poisoning and burning tumors as taught by world famous cancer survivor, Dr. Lorraine Day and natural efficacious remedies such as Lapacho
tea. Howard Lyman , the Mad Cowboy, (He
was on the Oprah Winfrey show - then the lawsuit! He is still telling people the truth.)
will open your eyes about the dangers of eating meat and how the government covers up the
danger. This is the other voice, countering the voice that says: "don't listen to the
eco-freeks, there's no threat to your health from chemical pollution, or from what you eat
or drink, nor from the doctors. Don't worry about anything. Doctors know best, and the
government has everything under control." Medical ozone (in minute quantities) can
reverse the symptoms of MS, and many other "incurable" diseases with its unique
ability to carry oxygen to the cells. AIDS and cancer doctors/researchers hate ozone,
which represents a real threat to their monopoly.
No amount of money will protect you from dying from cancer, but the truth may well cure
you. If you are so preoccupied with other things that you cannot investigate the truth
about the cancer industry, you are in danger. How could it be that people with as much
money as George Harrison, Paul Mcartney's wife Linda and Ringo Starr's first wife Maureen,
could be killed by cancer/cancer treatments? With all their money, still the doctors could
do nothing but the same old mainly worthless stuff, which shows the sad state the cancer
industry is in with their so called "progress." It fed off their dying bodies
until the end. Why hasn't a cure been found? I have personally read many stories of dying
people being introduced to such herbs as Lapacha begin an immediate road to recovery.
Could it be that we believe in medicine to such an extent that we allow ourselves to slide
down towards death all the time believing in modern medicine, over and over again gambling
our lives that medicine is better than any natural alternative that provide the body with what it needs, but cannot get. People are brainwashed into believing that medicine has made great
strides and that is their best bet! Why even going into a hospital is dangerous, because they feed you a diet that the Cancer Society says causes cancer!
Some people are wondering if they are really looking for a cure very hard, and many people
are now saying it is criminal what is going on. George H. Malkmus' mother died of colon
cancer. When he got it, he refused to undergo the horrors her mother went through before
she died. He took another
route and lived. You should investigate this path further. There is a common thread
going through natural cures, which reverse the cause and which return the body to its
natural healthy state.
Nearly 100% of the doctors in every AIDS and CANCER agency strongly deny that ozone, and
most other "cures" for that matter, has been proven to be safe and effective
against anything, let alone cancer. Check
the facts
A merican M edical A
ssociation (who protect doctor's rights, not yours) blocks anything
that might reduce the income of doctors, including cures that are working. FDA does not want a healthy population, based
on their actions to block cures that work and endorsement of bad drugs. They like
everything the way it is: the drug companies and their investors are thriving, the
hospitals are full, doctors are busy, what more could society ask for?
We need to know what conventional treatments might very well do more harm than good, and
do not treat the underlying cause of disease. What caused it? Diseases don't just happen.
Are the causes still there after the "treatment" or were they removed? Drugs
typically do not remove the causes of disease, in fact they just cover up the symptom and
may well kill the
patient. Your doctor may disagree. He may say the bug was the cause - bad bug! We know
from experiments that bugs are all around us and can test this hypothesis in the lab. Not
all people become infected with most if not all bugs, many of which we need to survive.
When you kill them, soon other symptoms may appear. Therefore, Dr. Lorraine Day, who does
not believe in the germ theory, believes that the reason is in the differences in our
immune systems. Destroying the germ completely with antibiotics may precipitate other
conditions protected by that very bacterium as in the case of H. Pylori which
protects the esophagus. Totally eliminated, you may get cancer or acid reflux.
Perhaps the immune system is the main factor in disease prevention, everything else being
equal. For a healthy internal environment, a proper balance must exist, for example the pH
must be slightly alkaline.
For one thing, this retains oxygen, while acid conditions drive it away. This is why
organic Calcium has health benefits, it neutralizes acid conitions of the body. According
to Cell Society, by Dr. S. Okada, cancer cells grow well in a culture solution produced by
the metabolic wastes of regular cell cultivation. Since the metabolic waste material of
regular cells is acidic, cancer cells, then, like this acidic environment. We must reduce
the conditions that help cancer cells to thrive i.e. acidic, anaerobic conditions. Calcium operates as a buffer against acid conditions, and so does organic silica because it helps the body produce and absorb calcium. (Louis Kervran)
We also know
that the common denominator in most if not all disease is lack of cellular oxygen, which works with the acid condition. To
achieve this you must eat no more than 20% acid forming food. The rest must be alkaline,
mostly vegetable sources. See Alkalize
or Die by Theodore A. Baroody
Why am I interested in this kind of alternative medicine? For one thing, Several
"incurable" diseases that afflict millions might be helped or cured by some of
the protocols on this page. Many of the afflicted are spending their life savings just to
stay alive. If there is any hope in alternatives, especially if they can do what doctors
can't, or do it for pennies instead of thousands of dollars, they are worth considering.
There are some things that a patient can do immediately to greatly help their bodies begin
to heal itself, such as cleansing and correcting acidic
conditions. Some doctors know fully well their patients will die using the present
treatment, so why not try something different. Doctors today need courage to defy
traditional medicine when they see their patients dying from the therapy rather than the
disease. (but the "cause of death" is always reported as the disease, not the
therapy)
If it's so good I'm sure every doctor and
media person would jump at it. (ha!)
Infant routine circumcision
MIT Research - calorie restriction and life extension.
Drug
Awareness: Important News - See how antidepressants are turning some gentle people:
kids, mothers, fathers, siblings, into killers. Ten percent have "psychotic
breaks." Postpartum: 1 in 1000 (normal) becomes 1 in 100 for psychotic episodes on
antidepressants - increases tenfold - the patient gets worse, by the manufacturer's own
admission.
HIV may not be the cause of AIDS
according to the best researchers. If you have a reference pointing to HIV as the cause,
please let us know, and we will publish it here.
Mission:
To go bravely where few have gone before, to expose strange new diseases and useless
research and cures, medical frauds, such as the $9 Billion per year AIDS research program
and the cancer research scam, and offer common sense alternatives. (What, no cure and all
that money? Oh, but this is a tough one, right? All scientists look to the scientist to
their right and nod and then left, and nod and say together: "Right! This is a tough
one!" Repeat several times. Like a bunch of little munchkins.) ...To let the people
know the truth, that the value of life now is measured in dollars, and if you follow the
money trail, it will take you to an army of highly paid experts (or should we say
munchkins).
Further, this whole process is being
accelarated by the drive towards globalization where profits are put ahead of humans. The
multinationals (like the military) had a great idea: let's use people as guinea pigs. As
you know, the larger the test sample, the better. To the military, soldiers are nothing
more than rats and guinea pigs to test procedures and drugs. To the drug companies, people
are nothing more than means of achieving a larger bottom line, nothing more or less.
They don't want you off their drugs e.g. Eli Lilly's "Welcome Back"
to Prozac. And this is what the drug companies want if we will sit back and do
nothing. And governments are going along with it. They don't want to tamper with
"success." The attitude now is that we don't have to properly test drugs because
we can take care of any problems later when we discover the disaster they caused. Industry
will then be only too happy to cooperate with more drugs. So you see, we have drawn a
line in the sand with governments and big business on one side and the people on the
other. Where the doctor chooses to be, is the question. You are lucky if he is on your
side. This is not to say that profit is bad, but profit should not be the top
consideration.
Fast Tracking Drugs in Canada
The Canadian government recently tried to push an antibiotic drug through the system for
approval, (no need to test it because it has been already in the United States) but one
person, an employee, made a big fuss to try and prevent it from being used in Canada. He
succeeded to some extent at great personal risk and it turned out he was right to
question, and the drug was pulled in the U.S. - after the damage had been done. Remember
that antibiotics, whether animal or human, are the drugs that create super bugs and we cannot allow that. When you eat chicken, and it doesn't help your arteries or anything else, you are getting antibiotic resistant bacteria into your system. So if you get sick, most antibiotics will not help. There is no difference between chicken and red meat as far as your heart is concerned. (And eggs are not dangerous for your heart eaten moderately.)
The drug approval process in the US by FDA is becoming a scandal fanned by globalization and large multinationals that would rather fix it later than do it right and delay the flow of money
Ron Gale: Fitness and Alternative
Medicine Consultant
An article in Newsweek magazine (April 27,
1998) stated "a new study says some medicines, even if properly prescribed, may kill
as many as 100,000 Americans a year." This study was published in the Journal of the
American Medical Association. It described the deaths as the result of "toxic
reactions to medications that were administered properly with more than two million
suffering serious side effects."
That places death from prescription drugs as the number four killer, behind heart disease,
cancer and stroke. This is twice the number that are killed in motor vehicle accidents-an
average of 275 per day.
No other industry kills and maims more people annually. When Dr. Lucian Leape of the
Harvard School of Public Health was asked about these figures, he stated, "When you
realize how many drugs we use, maybe those numbers aren't so bad after all."
Another article in Business Week (May 11, 1998) was entitled, "Danger: Read the
Label." It stated, "Doctors are prescribing drugs for unapproved uses and
patients are at risk. Medical experts worry that far too many off-label prescriptions are
written without the science to back them up. Perhaps the most glaring example is the huge
amount of antibiotics, up to one-fifth of all prescriptions, according to one study, that
are uselessly handed out to cold sufferers."
The problem with drugs is not new. An article in the Vancouver Sun (August 31, 1998)
stated, "Napoleon may have been killed inadvertently by a British doctor who
prescribed a fatal dose of a useless drug, according to the most thorough investigation
yet into the emperor's death."
Will doctors follow the same advice they give their patients? An article in the
Alternative Medicine Digest (September 1997) shed some light on this question. Dr. Kenneth
Forror was a surgeon who worked with cancer patients. He had made a career of routinely
recommending chemotherapy to other cancer patients, yet on being diagnosed with cancer, he
refused to follow his own advice! His wife asked him why.
"Because I'm the patient now and I don't have to follow that routine. It never did
that much good. I had to keep prescribing it to keep my hospital privileges."
Dr. Andrew Weil, Harvard-trained physician and author of Spontaneous Healing, states,
"the body has an innate ability to fight germs and infections and heal itself.
Western doctors are frozen in a disease-oriented mode, concentrating on curing disease
with drugs and surgery rather than on prevention and stimulating the body's natural
healing power.
Deepak Chopra, MD, world renowned best-selling author and Harvard-trained Endocrinologist
states, "Inside your body is a wonderful pharmacy. You name it, the human body can
make it-tranquilizers, sleeping pills, anti-cancer drugs; the right dose at the right time
for the right organ, with no side effects."
Why has the information of natural alternatives been kept quiet? Could the fact that drug
companies earn over $300 billion a year have anything to do with this?
Dr. Robert M. Kradjian, MD, in his book, Save Yourself From Breast Cancer, stated,
"In 1988, the US Surgeons General released a massive report on the relationship
between diet and health. It took more than 200 experts over two years and quite a few
million dollars to assemble virtually all of the world's scientific data on this critical
issue. This was by far the most ambitious study in medical history. They stated that 60
per cent of all cancers in American women were mostly or partially attributable to diet!
This 727-page volume is a gold mine of information on the vital subject of health and
nutrition. In my opinion it is the most important medical document ever produced in this
country. Yet a request for the book in May 1992 to the US government printing office in
Washington resulted in a terse reply: "Out of Print," rubber stamped in red ink.
This emphasizes the low regard our scientific and government communities hold for
nutritional news.
When it comes to alternative medicine, there are several sites that supposedly stand up for your "rights" - and again these are sites that supposedly know what is going on with stuff they were never taught in medical school. Some alternative medicine has to be quackery of course, as in anything else, but not all. Quackwatch.com and Saul Green Ph.D. ("Healthcare Reality Check" - I suppose that is money, for that is the only reality these people know.) are two of the sources of many attacks on alternative medicine - as if AMA or CMA was paying them. Saul Green attacks Alternative Medicine on philosophical grounds, ideology, backing himself up with technical talk, condemning all alternative medicine to the garbage heap. His vitriolic attacks aroused my curiosity and I found that he really was on a crusade against everything but orthodox medicine. Then I found out why; he is one of the cancer researchers that are presumeably preventing a cure from being discovered - a researcher in good standing - he found no cure. I recently checked and sure enough, he is attacking Burzynski, picking at his published work, word by word, comma by comma, as if it were a peer review article but is actually a criticism aimed at discrediting him. All his essays sound so solid to the unwary. But they are so full of holes that I just shake my head at this ignorant but probably very rich person. It would be funny if it weren't tragic, for who knows how many agencies Dr. Green is an expert witness for. I have seen his name on at least one cancer agency reference list. Dr. Burzynski's patients raised him $700,000 to fight the FDA and 500 of them testified in his behalf. How much would they pay Dr. Green who supports radiation, chemo and cutting? Zero. I have crosschecked some of these claims and found many of them to be inaccurate to put it mildly, though they sound solid enough to fool the average doctor. Sure he was a cancer researcher, at the trough at Sloan-Kettering Hospital in New York, and he identified some blood proteins and whatever, but he didn't find a cure for cancer. Researchers there resigned in disgust at the politics behind the research, but not Saul Green. In other words, he failed. So I suspect he has made it his job to dress down every researcher who inevitably he finds wanting in their research methodology or results. American Medical Association (who protect doctors' rights, not yours unless you are a doctor, publish studies for doctors to protect them) blocks anything that might reduce the income of doctors, often including cures that are working.
When doctors routinely treat the symptom, not the cause, how can they claim that the drug has cured the patient? Drugs don't cure the patient, although they may remove the symptom. But they kill thousands every year.
Ron Gale is a fitness consultant and researcher on health alternatives in
Vancouver.
Warning: Antidepressants are linked to suicides and Murders. The companies settle out of
court so you, and doctors, never hear about it.
The author of this page is not an MD. To have
common sense, you don't have to be. He is a biologist, and all opinions are based on that
background. But also, the writer's Finnish/Karelian father was a trained and gifted
practitioner of, among other things, some ancient arts of accupressure, which helped
thousands of doctors' rejects. He was an expert in referred pain, and had developed his
own theory. He related that his patients called him "doctor" instead of Andy,
which he preferred. When some refused to call him by name, he would politely say "My
name is Andy" - to which they would reply "yes doctor." One of the most
amazing cases I recall was a girl with a particular type of epilepsy. The mother had heard
of my father's work and asked him if he could cure epilepsy. My father said he didn't know
because he had never tried. A cranial examination revealed lesions at certain places where
calcium had deposited. He gently worked those areas with his amazing hands, and the
patient passed out. The mother said not to worry because it had happened before. The
treatments continued and the girl was cured. So that is why the limitations of standard
medicine is well understood and why I have a unique perspective on alternative medicine.
Most of the alternatives given here were killed as infant protocols at various stages of
development by men who grew to be some of the richest men in the world. Often we hear
medical "authorities" on the radio or TV saying that if such and such were
proven, they would be selling or promoting it. Mostly, they are speaking from the
perspective of their medical training which knows nothing of these methods, because they
are developing in the grass roots, or are imported. You then go to the Internet and what
do you find, information on double-blind studies on just that subject, proving its
validity (eg. magnetic therapies)! Don't discount anything unless you have thoroughly
investigated it.
The concern is the increase in drug-resistant bugs, increasing epidemics, pandemics, mysterious illnesses and high cost of medical care, drugs and the fact that cheaper efficacious treatments are often blocked by powerful conflicting interests. Scientists try to convince us that their research will produce long lives and happiness everafter. Well, you need to know the truth. See article on oxygen and aging for an eye-opener.
Dr. Lorraine Day - Madame Doctor/Whistle Blower
I have added this section after viewing Dr. Day's video. She is the medical profession's
loudest whistle-blower I have ever witnessed, and whose views you should study in depth if
you wish to understand, not only how to get well, but the whole Pharmaceutical/Medical
systems under which we all live or die.
In Dr. Day's video "Cancer Doesn't Scare Me Anymore" she explains how the system
works. American Medical Association, one of America's strongest unions, works for the
benefit of, not the people, but doctors. They lobby for their best interests, not yours.
American Cancer Society is no better: just get a check-up and give us a check. The
$400,000,000 collected from the people annually goes not to medical research, but mostly
to keeping the huge organization's employees on the payroll. A fraction goes to
prevention, showing where their priorities are. I'll bet you thought it went to research.
Only a small amount of it does. National Cancer Institute: they are supposed to be
involved in cancer research, but we get nothing but the old cutting, burning and poisoning
- and suppressing cures such as those of Dr. Burzynski. Nothing changes. Did you know that
if they found an inexpensive cancer cure tomorrow, all of the above would have to pack up
and close shop. So why would they do that? Why would they want to lose their jobs? The
answer is, they are scared of losing their jobs to some natural, inexpensive cure. They
protect themselves with lies and attack those who cure cancer with natural cures by saying
they don't work or are not proven. Whatever you have heard of these natural cures from any
media source, is suspect. Why? Because the pharmaceutical companies control the media.
They either own them or are major advertisers. So you never hear about these cures, or if
you do it is in the negative. We only know these facts from defectors from this unholy
system, like Dr. Lorraine Day and others.
For those who don't know, Dr. Lorraine Day faced cancer of the breast, which had spread
throughout her lymphatic system and muscles of her chest. As a leading surgeon, she knew
what they did to people with cancer and she refused to go along, even when the cancer
doctor refused to treat her unless she complied with either 1)mastectomy 2)radiation or
3)chemotherapy. She asked the doctor: my immune system is the most important factor in my
fight against cancer. Why should I let you destroy it?
In the British Medical Journal Lancet, 1975, a report compared the survival rates of:
1)Single Chemo
2)Multiple Chemo
3)No Chemo
What do you think had the best chance for survival and quality of remaining life? No chemo
of course. Dr. Allen Levin states: "Most cancer patients die of the chemo."
The American Cancer Society charter says they must disband when they find a cure. This
means there is a negative incentive to find a cure, which explains why one has not been
found. So how has alternative medicine made any headway at all?
It is often through congressmen who have been cured by these alternative means. Take
ex-congressman Berkley Bedell. Cedar Rapids Gazette, Iowa: Congressman Bedell "blasts
medical establishment, credits alternative medicine for his cure from prostate cancer and
Lyme disease." He warns there are powerful forces in the government and corporate
medical monopolies that are making unconventional medicine inaccessible to the general
public. Bedell, a member of the ad hoc advisory committee the new Federal Office for
Alternative Medicine also called for the dismissal of Joseph Jacobs, who is the director
of the Office for Alternative Medicine, citing his lack of commitment needed to challenge
these powerful forces in the National
Institute of Health, the National Cancer Institute and others that oppose alternative
medicine. See Chemotherapy
(June 10, 2002 - Discussion of "Cancer Doesn't Scare Me Anymore" by Dr.
Lorraine Day to be updated - please check back in 7 days)
DANGER: BAD DRUGS
Child, Husband, Wife Killers - drugs that will probably put you on a "bad trip."
The "anitdepressant Drugs: Prozac, Zoloft,
and Paxil (and others)
belong to a group of drugs called selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). Dr.
Anne Blake-Tracy has done a lot of research on the effects of antidepressants. Not
everyone has a toxic reaction to these drugs, but a significant number of people do,
perhaps 10% of the population.
Their livers are not able to metabolize these drugs. The results are often disasterous.
This is Dr. Tracy's warning to the world. It is best to stay away from them, but most
doctors do not know about the dangers because the drug companies are so good at keeping it
secret. The drug companies usually settle out of court and place a gag order on the
survivors.
Typically, it begins when someone visits their trusted doctor as in the case of this one
woman in question. The doctor says, "gee, why don't you try some Zoloft." Six weeks later the patient and
her son are dead. In three weeks, she started to have some serious adverse reactions to
the drug, so he cut her dosage in half. Of course that wasn't enough. She was having a
compulsion for alcohol that often comes with these drugs. If you have a tendency to low
blood sugar, you have a craving, not only for sweets, but also alcohol. Then you have a
magnification effect by using those two together.
If the drug is not having the desired effect (the patient gets worse), the doctor then
increases the dose in many cases, doubling or trippling the dose and the danger. In one
such case, a police officer's dose was trippled. Two weeks later, he ran into a police
sub-station in plain clothes, shooting. He did not come out alive. That case has been
settled by the drug company. They paid off the family of the police officer and the
officer he shot.
These drugs do the same thing to the brain as LSD and PCP, which
cause psychotic breaks with reality. All of these drugs, regardless of their chemistry, do
the same thing: they cause a dangerous increase in brain Seratonin. Prozac, which was tested for only about 5 -
6 weeks of animal studies. It was not tested for addiction
and withdrawal effects. It was thought to have only minor side effects. Now 575 side effects, 28,000 complaints and 130,000 deaths (Dr. Anne Blake-Tracy)
to FDA have been
recorded, the most in the history of drugs. And of course the most disastrous side effect
is suicide and murder. And this drug is supposed to be a miracle cure; but it causes the
very symptoms it is supposed to cure.
The drug's description: "Fluoxetine (Prozac family of drugs) is extensively metabolized by the
liver to norfluoxetine." This is not always so. It has been estimated that perhaps
90% of mothers that murdered their children, who initially only had a minor problem, were
on a Prozac family of drugs. They often act out their worst fears. If that fear is that
something terrible will happen to their children, their children could end up dead. A lot
of money is being made from the misery of innocent people. Because of these and other
serious drawbacks to these drugs, they should be outlawed right along with LSD, PCP and
the rest of these dangerous drugs.
(June 15, 2002 - Discussion of Anne Blake-Tracy to be updated weekly - please check back
in 7 days)
When choosing your medicine and listening to "experts" you should be cautious
and know as much or more about various treatment options than your doctor; your life could
depend on it. Use anecdotal information about treatments the same way you would anecdotal
information about a good doctor, or dentist. You can't necessarily scientifically prove
(and you may be dead before such proof) they are good doctors, but word of mouth evidence
is powerful. If doctors got paid for actually curing a person, I bet they would change.
Doctors simply do not want to stray
into doing something the herd of doctors don't do.
Bottom Line: cheaper, safer, more effective
therapies are out there - leave your " holistic - example
" options open. Consult your doctor, work with him if possible. Your birthright is to
know what is out there. A billion dollars a day around the world is spent on cancer alone.
Cancer still has not been cured. Figure it out, what do you think drives this whole
business? Putting profits first (and I believe in free enterprise, but not at the cost of
lives) is the greatest crime against humanity, and it was started by the Rockefeller
Foundation, which funds only medical research that pays back, such as drugs, and blocks
other protocols. What chances do cheaper and better medicines have of getting grants with
people like that on University boards? With regards to electrical stimulation, the
Rockefeller/Flexner Report of 1910 attempted to discredit electromedicine in order to
increase pharmaceutical profits, and many other protocols got similar treatment.
Pharmaceuticals' appeal is in that a diagnosis can be easily paired with a drug, with
"known" results and there is a feeling that all diseases can be cured if we only
had the right drug. Ozone, magnetics and electricity probably mean sending a patient to a
practitioner - a little more complicated.Ozone, magnetics and electricity probably mean
sending a patient to a practitioner - a little more complicated. Here are Dr. Day's 10
Steps to healing from Cancer or any other disease:
Dr Lorraine Day's 10 steps to Wellness - 10 Natural Laws
1. Proper Nutrition - 30% of all cancer could
be prevented through good diet, preferably Vegan. Fruits, grains, vegetables - 3 meals
fresh, unprocessed, organic + 8 carrot juices (add apple for flavour) throughout day - in
between meals - get a juicer that presses the juice out. Herbal teas like taheebo or
essiac. Not too much protein. Try sprouting and eating more raw. Cooking food kills
enzymes.
2. Exercise - 4 hours per week - reduces 66% incidence rate for breast cancer.
3. Water - We are 75% water - dehydration, major cause of disease. Water is best
detoxifier. Use chlorine-free water only.
4. Sunlight - boosts immune system, reduces size of tumors, not too much though.
5. Temperance - elimination of all harmful chemicals - carcinogens, gum food, processed
foods, drugs, all medications but not instantly, gradually - step by step
6. Fresh Air. Indoor air doubles cancer growth speed. Hospital air not good - full of
germs, little if any fresh air. Cancer doesn't like oxygen. Do deep breathing exercises
7. Proper sleep. By 9:30 pm at least. Body needs to recuperate
8. Stress Relief, stress major cause of disease, read the Bible. God promises to heal all
your diseases if you keep His commandments.
What you put in your mind is as important as your food.
Every negative thought must go.
9. Attitude of gratitude - learn to Trust in God. You need to change everything, need
faith in God. Sickness does not glorify God. He wants you well.
A person who is enthusiastic and committed to a recovery program is much more likely to
survive.
10. Have a Spirit of benevolence - don't focus on self too much, pray for others.
All 10 steps are free, except food which we need anyway.
Drugs never cure disease - we do, (With God's help)cancer is not chemo deficiency. Dr. Day
believes that to be cured we must reverse the cause. We cannot cure a disease therefore by
doing something completely unrelated to the cause. If we do, the cause may still be there
so think before you allow anyone to do anything to you. Chemo and Radiation destroy your
immune system, which you need to be healed. You must start to investigate for yourself.
Doctor do not know how to cure cancer.
Feeding Meat to Cows
in Britain, 'til they go Mad
Wasn't it the British Government that allowed cows to be fed back to cows, causing Mad Cow
Disease? So to say that the government is your friend is an exaggeration when it comes to
your health and safety. They basically back the drug companies, not you.
Mad Cow Disease
Mad Cow Disease may be here - Province, June 3, 2001
The Vancouver Province reported that "Health Canada warns humans and animals may be
quietly incubating deadly plague." If they say "may be" it means they
"are."
Ex-cattle rancher Howard Lyman believes that Mad Cow Disease is in America, and Canada, so
it is no surprise that Ottawa now reports its existance. Today many cattle ranchers do not
eat meat, like Mr. Lyman. The government says BSE (bovine spongiform encephalopathy)
"could be" quietly incubating among cattle and unsuspecting humans as CJD
(Creutzfeldt-Jacobs Disease). This is not a strong enough statement. It all boils down to
risk-benefit analysis, which causes the government to down-play the risk, knowing they
don't have to worry about its effects, which could take 10 years or more to develop into
symptoms similar to Alzheimer's Disease and nobody will touch such a brain to see if it
was CJD. They can never clean their equipment or their premises - that is how infectious
it is. Once a blade, including a band saw at the slaughter house, has touched an infected
brain, and saws cut through the brain, it is permanently infected, and continues to infect
all meat passing that point. Hamburgers are often made of 100 cows, any one of which could
be infected. Also there are many products out there made from bovine sources including
vitamin capsules. All are potentially sources of Mad Cow Disease. Try to avoid them at all
cost. If you are raising beef cattle, check the feed bag to ensure it does not contain
animal protein. If it says protein is added, there is a good chance it is bovine source.
Dog and cat food also may contain remains of dead animals such as cows, cats and dogs.
Feed your pets vegan diets, but add torine to the cat's diet.
Alternative Therapies and Case
Histories
Preface
I don't know about you, but in my neighbourhood I have seen too many
people dying of cancers (and circulatory diseases) of various kinds. Before you accept
treatment for say Cancer, HIV, or Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, (catch phrase for "we
don't know the cause") ask the doctor what his batting average is. The cure rate
where we live is terrible. My son's friend's father, dead from colon cancer; daughter's
friend's mother, dead from breast cancer, another of her friend's father, dying (update:
dead) of brain cancer; wife's friend battling uterine cancer for the second time, and on
and on. (And, on Christmas Eve 2000, my son's friend's dad, who had been treated for heart
problems before, dropped dead of a massive heart attack leaving a wife and two nice
teenaged twin boys behind.) Although I hate to be negative, I am wondering why these
people were not cured. We are told that life spans are increasing, but my senses tell me
this is not so since all diseases have increased, not decreased. So they are just playing
with statistics and all the increased survival rates are at the front end. There are fewer
babies and mothers dying at childbirth. You would expect at least half to be cured, with
all this talk of modern drugs and methods. The simple fact is, there are protocols that
work better than drugs for the top killers. Is it time to take charge of our health by
researching alternatives? Certainly.
A relative recently got a disease for which the doctors could find no cause, because as it
turned out, they were negligent in testing. She worked with the Canadian RCMP, a high risk
group for various diseases. It turned out to be Hep C contracted while tending to
prisoners in police custody. When she found that out, she was angry, justifiably. Now,
unless your "liver count" is at a certain high level, she was told that her
medical would not cover the medicine (Interferon) required to cure her. She would not be
deterred: she bugged them until they agreed to put her on, at her own expense. Now, a year
later she is hep C negative! The doctors were amazed; none of their other patients were
cured! But they were started when their liver counts were high. Hmm! Take charge of your
health; to see who can make the difference between life and death, just look in the
mirror. Will you go the drug and surgery route or one of the alternatives such as
Interferon, ozone, or returning to eating and living as nature and God intended? Keep in
mind that diseases can only be cured by reversing the cause, which is never the
difficiency of drugs.
Just a brief word about AIDS, which has become a big business. The
AIDS researchers are basically at the public trough, and you can't get them away.
Unfortunately it too has become a scam with AIDS patients as the victims. The problem is
that many second-rate researchers found themselves in an excellent position to suck a
living from the dying bodies of poor AIDS victims. There is a lot of evidence the HIV
virus is not the cause, or the main cause, of the disease - and the fact that key persons
have chickened out from discussing the topic publically, is enough to implicate them. You
see, they claim there is this other herpes virus that has been found in the organs
affected in the disease - and the HIV was not there at all. Top Researcher in AIDS
$Ozone, Politics and Money$
by Geoffrey Rogers
Geoffrey Rogers filmed the investigative
documentary, Ozone and the Politics of Medicine, in five different countries over seven
years. gathering clinical and scientific evidence supporting the use of ozone in medicine.
It has since won awards at three international film festivals. The Academy of Motion
Picture Arts and Sciences recently selected it as one of the outstanding documentaries of
1994. It has also been refused by CBC, CTV, PBS and other networks and has yet to be
broadcast.
The above Networks have many drug companies as
clients.
I began researching ozone therapy almost 10
years ago, after my father became the first doctor in Canada to use the treatment. It has
fascinated me primarily because of the staggering implications for modern medicine, but
also because it has been largely ignored in North America.
For almost a century, ozone has been used to safely
sterilize water. Today it is acknowledged as the very best method available. And for
almost 100 years, doctors and scientists have been discovering benefits from its use in
medicine. Yet why has it taken so long for ozone to come to the attention of the modern
medical mainstream?
Because ozone is invisible and highly unstable, early
research was difficult. It is a natural gas and easy to make, thus lacking appeal as a
proprietary medicine. As a result, it has been championed by doctors (good for you docs)
and not by drug companies, and the majority of the data represents doctors' findings
rather than derived from scientific or sponsored studies. Peer-reviewed journals are the
gatekeepers of information for the scientific mainstream and many will only accept data
from controlled studies. Doctors' findings are routinely dismissed as
"anecdotal" unless the data was gathered in a controlled repeatable manner. No
other medications can be used by the patients. There must be a consistency in the
condition being treated and there must be enough patients to indicate a pattern.
In Germany where doctors are allowed to use any
treatment they wish, ozone has not had to pass the scrutiny of federal regulatory
officials. Consequently only a handful of the hundreds of medical papers from Germany have
been based on controlled studies none of them by the government.
But it would be a mistake to discount the extensive
experience of so many doctors. A 1980 survey, reyiewed by the German Society of
Pathologists, found that 90 per cent of therapists that treated 384,000 different patients
reported "good" to "'very good" results. The incidence of side-effects
was .0007 per cent per treatment, one of the lowest for any medical treatment!
Several hundred delegates attended the 12th World
Ozone Congress in France in May, 1995, coordinated by the International Ozone Association.
Held every other year, the congresses are primarily concerned with commercial purification
of water with ozone, although medical applications are also addressed.
This year doctors and scientists from Germany, Cuba,
Russia, Italy and other countries presented studies indicating benefit in the treatment of
glaucoma, brain strokes, ischemic and cardiopathy, sports and preventive medicine, cancer,
circulatory disorders. orthopedics, pediatrics, intestinal immune system disorders,
disease of the joints, rheumatoid arthritis, neurodermatitis, genital diseases,
dermatological conditions, threatened pregnancies, deafness and other conditions.
The director of the Cuban Centre For Ozone Research
estimated more than 30,000 people have now been treated in government hospitals and
clinics. A Russian delegate estimated more than 100,000 people have been treated there
with ozone. Millions have been treated in Germany, where thousands of machines are being
used daily. And yet in North America. the treatment is available only in the underground.
In 1987 the Canadian military began research into
ozone's potential to sterilize blood with very exciting results, including inactivation of
the HIV virus, without harming healthy white blood cells in-vitro. A 100 per cent safe
sterilization of contaminated blood transfusions in a major monkey study was completed in
1993. A second monkey study was completed this year at Cornell University, financed by the
Canadian government. The International Red Cross has known for years about the Canadian
research and yet has released no information publicly.
In the United States, the story is more ominous. The
US National Institutes of Health have so far failed to research ozone, and even the NIH
Office of Alternative Medicine has neglected to include it in its modest but eclectic
studies of alternative therapies.
Despite extensive data submitted to the US Food and
Drug Administration, in May 1993 the FDA Director for AIDS Coordination testified before a
US Congressional sub-committee and stated that ozone had no medical value and was instead
an example of medical fraud. To date there has been no public retraction from the FDA on
the matter. Disturbing too has been the refusal of the national media to properly
investigate the situation. Even after reviewing Ozone and the Politics of Medicine,
producers at CBC and NBC both came out with stories that completely ignored the scientific
evidence and instead questioned ozone's validity.
Here in Canada and the United States, doctors risk
their licenses for using unapproved therapies. Although Ottawa will grant approval for
experimental usage on the patient-by-patient basis, the process is unwieldy and clearly
inhibits doctors from considering alternative therapies. Ozone will remain unapproved in
both countries until expensive studies are done proving safety and effectiveness for a
particular ozone protocol. No one knows when that may happen.
Year after year, the medical and scientific evidence
accumulates, presumably until the sheer weight of it will burst the bubble of ignorance
and the mainstream will eventually "discover" it, research it and absorb it.
Meanwhile, ozone use is mushrooming in the
grassroots, both in Canada and the United States, as desperate people search for hope.
It's time to recognize the treatment and establish standards.
Alive Magazine
Editor's note:
The cycle of drug funding, development, and payback was begun early
in the last century. Rockefeller benevolently funded medical research, put his men on the
University boards, and so no other protocols regardless of efficacy were ever funded. Now,
things are changing slowly, and there are many places in Canada and the United States
where you can get ozone therapy.
FOCUS
The Breath of Life
Ozone is probably not something you think about very often. It probably only crosses your
mind when you open a can of deodorant or furniture spray and briefly worry about that hole
in the 'ozone layer' - the protective layer of gas surrounding the earth which
environmentalists are always telling us about.
But ozone is also the vital element in a therapy now being used to treat a wide range of
conditions - heart and circulatory diseases, cancers, immune disorders and infections.
Over here it's still relatively unknown - but in Germany alone there are over 5000
regulated practitioners.
Ozone is an 'unstable' form of oxygen which can be created using an
electric charge, or naturally in the atmosphere. As well as being found in the upper
atmosphere where it shields us from harmful ultraviolet radiation, ozone is also used to
purify drinking water in cities around the world: Montreal, Paris, Moscow and Los Angeles,
to name a few. But because of ozone's high profile as either water disinfectant or
eco-headache, its theraputic properties are still overlooked.
Oxygen and Ozone Benefits
Oxygen is both the giver and sustainer of life. Our bodies use oxygen
through the process of oxidation, breathing it in and breaking it down like any other
nutrient into a form which can be used by the blood cells. About 90 per cent of the body's
energy is created by oxygen. It regulates every activity of the human organism, from brain
function and digestion throught to the ability to think and feel. Many diseases -
including the ones mentioned above - are thought to have their root cause in an
insufficiency of oxygen.
Ozone therapy uses a mixuture of normal oxygen and its unstable form, ozone. Ozone
dissolves 15 times faster in the blood than normal oxygen, so the mixture improves the
blood's viscosity and enhances the circulation. Once it's in the blood, the ozone's extra
molecule oxygen sticks to anything without antioxidant protection. Healthy cells have this
protection built in, but viruses, funguses and bacteria do not. Weakened by the ozone,
they become susceptible to the body's natural defences.
The most common way of introducing ozone into the blood is by a process known as 'major
autohemotherapy'. The treatment is remarkably simple. One hundred millilitres of blood -
about a teacup's worth - is removed from the patient and stored in an infusion bottle.
Then, a mixture of oxygen-ozone (99.95 % oxygen to 0.05 % ozone produced by passing oxygen
through an electric field) is forced into the the bottle and mixed by gentle shaking. As
ozone molecules dissolve into the blood they give up oxygen atoms, which attack viruses
and bacteria - anything without antioxidant protection - but don't harm the blood (when
administered according to a strict protocol). The strengthened blood is reintroduced
intravenously into the patient and imparts some of the disinfecting properties to the rest
of their blood as it's circulated.
In 1989 GP Dr. Simi Khanna, felt so ill that she was forced to give up her medical
practice and spent nine months in and out of hospitals fighting a fever and arthritis
which left her almost completely immobile. She was so ill that at one stage she was
diagnosed with lymphoma - mis-diagnosed, as it turned out. Oxygen-ozone therapy was
brought to her attention by a colleague, so Dr. Khanna sent a blood sample to a clinic in
Germany. Soon, she received word that oxygen-ozone therapy would help her get well, and
was helped onto a plane. It was a last resort.
'When I went to Germany I thought I was dying,' says Dr. Khanna. 'I was in a lot of pain,
and I could barely move. My programme of therapy included diet, supplements, physiotherapy
and ozone therapy. All the things helped but the oxygen-ozone therapy made the difference
- on days when I didn't get it the pain and fever would come back.
Dr. Khanna began to feel better after a month of treatment, and with three months she
returned to Britain feeling greatly improved. Later she returned to Germany for another
month of treatment, but also to begin training in oxygen-ozone therapy herself. Today, she
practises the therapy at her clinic in Richmond, Surrey. 'There's no doubt in my mind that
oxygen-ozone therapy saved my life.' says Dr. Khanna, 'and it helps many of my patients
too. It's a very versatile therapy.'
Over 23,000 licensed health practitioners on the continent now use autohemotherapy and
other applications of oxygen-ozone in their practices, either alone of as a complement to
other therapies. They treat patients for circulatory and heart problems, colonic
disorders, caancers, auto-immune diseases, burns, ulcers, arthritis, and fungal, bacterial
and viral infections - including HIV. Oxygen-ozone therapy remains largely unknown in the
UK. Why?
One conspiracy theory is that drug companies ensure that the public
is kept in the dark. After all, no one can patent oxygen, it can't be stored, and the
equipment needed to produce it is relatively cheap. But a more likely reason for the low
profile of oxygen therapies is that the treatments are not offered by many UK therapists.
There were only 13 clinics listed by the first British conference on oxygen therapies in
1994.
Bad press is also cited by doctors and naturopaths as being partly responsible for ozone
therapy's low profile - some accuse the British media of scaremongering. On June 5, 1994,
The Independent on Sunday ran an article headlined 'Health fears over doctors' use of
ozone,' which claimed the Department of Health (DoH) had begun an investigation into
oxygen therapies. However, DoH spokesperson Susan Givens called it 'puzzling.' 'We don't
investigate people or therapies,' she told HH. 'General clincians can prescribe what's
required and DoH doesn't attempt to prejudice clinical decisions.'
Treatments are given on an out-patient basis. Very mild side effects - skin reaction -
have been reported, but are very rare. People who shouldn't use oxygen-ozone therapy
include those who've recently had a heart attack or internal bleeding; people with
hyperthyroidism, and those whose platelet count is low. 'Oxygen-ozone therapy is part of a
holistic approach and each person is treated according to their needs,' says Dr. Khanna.
Symptoms of MS Cured
Paula, 43, discovered
oxygen-ozone therapy relieved the symptoms of multiple sclerosis (MS).
'Three years ago I began experiencing numbness and tingling in my
hands and feet, vision problems, loss of power and coordination, and had difficulty
working. I knew it was multiple sclerosis even before it was diangosed, because my dad
died from MS and I saw what he went through.
I didn't accept my neurologist's opinion that I could do nothing, so I began investigating
possible treatments. Eventually, I read about oxygen-ozone therapy and contacted Dr.
Khanna. After a thorough examination, Dr. Khanna explained what was wrong and recommended
oxygen-ozone because, among other things, it's an immune stimulant which is also virucidal
and enhances the circulatory system, which seemed ideal.
I began weekly autohemotherapy treatments, improved my diet and took daily mineral
supplements. At first the oxygen-ozone stirred up the toxins in my body and I felt awful.
But within four weeks I had more energy than I'd had in years. Gradually, the numbness and
tingling stopped, my vision improved and within two months my left leg, which had been
almost useless, was working again.
I am convinced that if it hadn't been for Dr. Khanna's expertise and my hard work, I'd be
in a wheelchair today. As it is, I'm feeling fit and well and lead a full and active
life.'
In response to your request for my opinion on ozone
therapy as it relates to the medical management of AIDS patients, the attached is
forwarded for your information and further use as required.
It is respectfully requested that, should this
material be passed on to other media groups, it be reproduced in its entirety.
Please feel free to contact me at any time regarding
our progress with the Cornell Study.
Best wishes
M.E. Shannon, Cmdre Deputy Surgeon General
Notwithstanding the negative findings of Dr. Garber's
1991 clinical trial, I firmly believe that ozone therapy has potential to play a valuable
role in the medical management of AIDS. From a regulatory point of view, it is clear that
not all forms of ozone therapy will be considered sufficiently safe and/or efficacious in
this regard; however, there is no doubt in my mind that a protocol will eventually emerge
with proven benefit.
Looking back at my past experience with minor
autohemotherapy in the treatment of AIDS, there still remains a discrepancy between the
Phase 1a and 1b trial results, which may, in part, relate to the lack of sophisticated
technology to control for O3 concentrations in both trials. Given the lack of any
significant therapeutic breakthroughs in the treatment of AIDS since that ill-fated trial
and the growing testimonial support for its efficacy, the need for further clinical
research with Ozone is certainly indicated. It is indeed unfortunate that the North
American medical community and its funding agencies could not take a more neutral stance
on this subject; tragically, professional opinion has been somewhat polarized on this
issue. I believe that it is time to take the emotion out of the arguments, both pro and
con, and commence a systematic examination of the evidence currently available on the
merits of this therapy. Where information gaps exist (particularly in peer-reviewed
scientific studies) which might preclude any regulatory decision on the validity of
certain claims, properly designed research initiatives should be encouraged with the same
kind of public support normally afforded any other scientific endeavour of this import.
Although I have my doubts that ozone will ever be
shown to have certain curative value on AIDS, I am certain that its well-documented
analgesic effects and hence, its potential impact on patient well-being and quality of
life, will someday be recognized. In this regard, I understand that both the FDA and the
National Institute of Health are presently reviewing the therapeutic merits of ozone as
part of their program to investigate a number of "alternative approaches" to
AIDS therapy. I have the utmost confidence that in their continued pursuit of an answer to
this problem, ozone will receive the scientific attention and support it rightfully
deserves.
More Evidence for Bacterial and Viral Causality
Dr. Gabe Mirkin stated on January 28, 1999 that
preliminary studies have shown that MS is associated with a virus. If this is true it
seems that more and more diseases are shown to be bacterial or viral in origin. So there
is hope that any efficatious therapy that kills viral particles and bacteria would be
valuable. Drug companies have their place, but they should put people first, not profits.
Evidence shows that ozone research has been blocked by threat of withdrawal of research
funds.
Cardio Renew Oral Chelation - Saves you from Heart Attack and Stroke.
I do not agree with Dr. Mirkin's opinion that
EDTA Chelation Therapy is of no use. Dr. Mirkin goes by journal references, and if there
are none, he can't recommend it. There are enough patients who tried it while awaiting
amputations and heart surgery who did not require them after chelation that it is
convincing to me. I have listened to radio shows as well and people phoning in telling of
their experiences. I am listening to a show right now, and a patient is saying that he was
a mess and now he is totally healthy. He is saying that a by-pass operation costs 5 or 6
times as much as Chelation. There you go back to money again.
$ Bioethics of vaccination $
$ Immunization is big
business and the world is divided into two types of people: those who believe in
immunization and those that don't. What is the case for each? Do the kids in the Canadian
band Moffats really understand what they are promoting? (Hep B vaccine)
The 20/20 TV broadcast of January 22, 1999
confirmed the worst fears of many people, that there was definitely something drastically
wrong. Apparently, the parents are not told of the risks of vaccination, or even the risks
of getting the disease. Why fix it if it ain't broke? Nor do children have the choice in
36 states, under threat of being expelled from school. The parents of the children hurt by
the vaccine want a choice. France has withdrawn compulsory vaccination after evidence of
neurological damage. The best way to handle compulsory vaccination refusal is to bring a
form with you for the school etc. to sign that says they take
full responsibility if there is a problem . They usually back
off. Oh by the way, while the Mad Cow Disease scandal rocked the world, England was
shipping bovine vaccine base to America and other countries. By the time it became known
in America, they did not simply recall it. They let everyone use up stocks.
Most people know of someone who has been affected by not being
immunized, and therefore many believe in it without question. This is understandable. Most
doctors believe in it. So why is there a controversy? Should people have a choice whether
or not to immunize with a particular vaccine with a poor record of side-effects? There is
a growing army of objectors who want to use natural methods such as exposure* who do not
feel the risk of the disease is great enough to justify the risk of the vaccine. Plus,
many people feel that our kids are getting enough shots already, and they don't want more.
There is also the question: will vaccination be the next tragedy, like tainted blood?
Did you know that if the vaccine is given to a baby, and he or she
dies, you have no recourse, and no support? Many say investigators do not blame the
vaccine, but blame the parents; and of course cause and effect are impossible to prove.
Have all the deaths even been documented? 20/20 mentioned several post-vaccination infant
deaths, which were labelled SID (Sudden Infant Death syndrome) deaths, but which upon
further inspection, were caused by the vaccine. How many more are there? (cause and effect
are mainly researched by drug companies, who report no connection - hmm, so did the
tobacco companies with respect to cancer.) Also, a frightening statistic is looming:
millions of kids who have possibliy acquired a food allergy from a vaccine! (eg. eggs)
Some teachers are telling children they could die if they don't get
the vaccine. Is it ethical for a teacher to give children medical advice? Could she be
sued?
Fact: There were 12 incidents of polio in Canada
since 1980, and 11 have been from the vaccine itself, and one was imported. In the US,
there are 10 polio cases per year, all associated with the vaccine, which is now the only
way to get the disease. Did you know that the makers of the polio vaccine wished to hurry
up the vaccination program before the disease died out naturally? What do these statistics
mean to you? Would we be better off without it?
How I Discovered Miracle II
I am sure there are still lots of people who have never heard of Miracle II products. Here is how I found out about them. I was working in Northwest British Columbia on a road engineering job. It was June and there is not much to do in the middle of the wilderness. One day on my way to Dease Lake to do some shopping, I noticed a sign that said something about a gospel music festival. So I turned off the Cassiar Hwy 37 south of Dease Lake into a long driveway, that later opened up to reveal beautiful fields with well-kept cabins and house. It was the home of a native who held the event every year. There was a chapel, cookhouse and dining area with more food than I had seen for months. Smoked salmon, chicken, you name it, it was piled high. A huge pot of coffee simmered on a wood stove just outside in the back. I noticed someone had set up a display in the corner, and I wondered what it could possibly have to do with a gospel music festival. That's when I discovered Miracle II. I learned that the fellow who makes it in the USA got the formula through a miracle. I had to have a bottle of the soap regardless of price. You can use it as the gentlest shampoo you will ever find. That was about two years ago from this writing. You can use it as the most gentle shampoo you will ever find. I still use the soap because it does not contain any chemicals and my hair stays clean longer. If you try it you will know what I mean. It also has some miraculous activity as reported by many people. I have told many people about it and they are now using it. I am not a distributor so they get referred to my Yukon distributor who I met on that summer day. I was happy to learn Amazon.com carried this great product, because now I can recommend it to you. Try it. I have provided a link below.
Bibliography: (bookmark page first)
Hyperbaric
Oxygen Therapy (Walker, Morton. Dr. Morton Walker Health Book.) by Morton Walker,
Richard Neubauer (Contributor)
AIDS Under
Pressure: Hyperbaric Medicine in the Management of Hiv Disease by Michelle Reillo
DISCLAIMER: All writings are purely the opinion of this author, and although
meant to offer help and guidance, should not be considered as medical
advice or in lieu of the recommendations of an attending physician or
other health care professional. The information in links are not necessarily
the opinions of the writer. Look for our new domain at uralica.com.