"We are all born for love. It is the principle of existence, and its only end." Benjamin Disraeli
"Love is an enduring emotional state characterized by: compassion, charity, empathy, fairness, caring, altruism, and forgiveness." Diogenes Bob
Ethologist Konrad Lorenz described and demonstrated a phenomenon called imprinting in birds. Many birds experience a critical or sensitive period for imprinting which begins several hours after hatching. During this period the young birds become physiologically aroused, and attempt to follow the first large moving object that they see. When allowed to do so, they develop an irreversible bond to this object.
Ordinarily the first large moving object that they encounter is their mother, and proper species identification occurs. If, however, the young bird should accidentally follow a person, a dog, or a remote control toy car, for example, an improper identification will result.
These sensitive periods are very short in duration, and the identifications they produce are permanent. If the bird should imprint on something other than its own kind, these birds will always prefer to be with the object to which they bonded during the sensitive period.
When these birds become reproductively mature, they will be sexually responsive only to this object. These identifications will remain no matter what corrective therapy is attempted. If the young bird encounters no suitable object for imprinting during the sensitive period, they will become an isolate--a bird without identification, incapable of social and reproductive relations with its own kind.
As a child I first observed occasions of improper imprinting on the farm of my aunt and uncle. On their farm my aunt and uncle raised chickens, turkeys and ducks. Occasionally an accident of imprinting resulted in a turkey who preferred to flock with the chickens, or a chicken who thought it was a duck.
Years later I incubated fertile duck and quail eggs and allowed the young birds to imprint on me. For the rest of their lives they demonstrated a preference to be with people.
Puppies and kittens must at least partially imprint upon people for them to become good pets. If a dog or cat is raised to adulthood having never been exposed to people, it will be more difficult for them to become good human companions.
The effect of bonding in primates was dramatically demonstrated by the very famous research of psychologist Harry Harlow, et al. Harlow provided newborn rhesus monkeys with two types of inanimate substitute mothers. One substitute was constructed of wire with a milk bottle embedded in its chest. The other was similarly constructed, but covered with soft cloth and was not equipped to provide milk.
When not nursing the infant monkeys chose to spend most of their time clinging to the cloth-covered mother substitute, whose softness more closely resembled the affectionate comfort of a real mother. This occurred despite the fact that only the wire substitute fulfilled their biological need for food.
However, neither of these inanimate substitute mothers provided the affection, security and stimulation that would normally be provided by a real mother. Harlow noticed that the infant monkeys raised with these inadequate substitutes did not develop normally.
When placed in a social unit with other monkeys, these monkeys were sexually inept and social isolates. Many were incapable of engaging in reproductive behavior. If a female monkey did become pregnant, she would often reject her young. And while therapy could reverse some of these adverse developmental effects, some developmental potential was permanently lost.
In the early part of the twentieth century, some orphanages raised human infants in an environment that was not that different from the experimental environment of Harlow's monkeys. These institutions provided infants with only what they needed to survive. They did not provide the love, affection and stimulation which are developmental needs of children.
As reported separately by researchers Margaret Ribble and R. A. Spitz, these children experienced a high death rate. Sometimes they appeared to die from the lack of the will to live. These children experienced retarded physical growth, and poor development of language and of intellect. They developed the symptoms of depression and were socially withdrawn. Without loving intervention these adverse developmental effects became permanent.
In much of the animal kingdom there are critical or sensitive periods during which experience is required to permanently wire the brain in a way that will result in proper affiliation and socialization. In general, the more advanced the animal the longer the duration of these critical periods.
This is why for Harlow's monkeys, and for the orphans observed by Ribble and Spitz, therapeutic intervention was somewhat effective in reversing some of the adverse developmental effects. However, in birds the critical periods have a duration of only a few hours. Once this time has passed, therapy will have no effect at all.
The architecture of the human brain holds the potential for high level intellectual, psychological and social functioning. However, this capacity can only be realized if we are provided with and environment of love, affection, and stimulation in early life. Such an environment results in the brain becoming wired in a way which is conducive to loving character and moral conduct. This kind of environment maximizes the brain's potential for thinking and problem solving. For people, childhood is a time in which much of our potential for love, as well as our intellect, become permanently wired into the circuits of our brains.
Love is an emotion. Our emotions are related to motivation--what we want or need. If we did not want or need anything, the emotional circuits of our brain would be very quiet.
If, for example, we did not want or need money, but were given a million dollars, we would have no reason to become emotional about this money. If we did not want or need for our car to have a windshield, we would not respond emotionally should someone smash it with a brick. If parents did not want or need their children to arrive home safely, they would not experience anxiety when their children were late in arriving home. If we did not want or need for our favorite team to win, there would be no emotional response to victory or defeat.
Generally speaking, the more motivation we have the more emotional we will be. Because the human brain is conducive to a myriad of wants and needs, we may be the most emotional of all animals.
However, we can also experience emotions when our emotional brain circuits become activated independent of wants and needs. Psychologists Stanley Schachter and Jerome Singer demonstrated this tendency experimentally in the 1960's. If our emotional circuits are artificially activated, or spontaneously activate, we experience a subjective emotional feeling independent of external motivation. We then have the tendency to look for something to which we can attribute this subjective feeling.
Psychoactive drugs chemically activate our emotional circuits causing us to become emotionally involved in what otherwise might be unemotional activities. Most psychoactive drugs affect the emotional centers of the brain. This artificial activation leads us to attribute these induced feelings to something.
Many writers, for example, have attributed this artificial activation to some wonderful and insightful idea, only to examine this idea later and find it to be quite absurd. Under the influence of drugs, many people think that they love the whole world and everyone in it. But when the drugs are no longer activating their emotional circuits, this fondness disappears.
Low levels of brain chemicals, called neurotransmitters, can create depression which may be independent of what is actually occurring in the life of that person. The person then attributes their depression to something or someone.
Some drugs, as well as malfunctions of brain circuits, create anxiety and panic which have no basis in the external environment. This fear will likely be attributed to the places or the circumstances in which these panic attacks happened to occur. Other drugs stimulate the brain to anger, which is then attributed to an innocent person, or to an innocuous situation.
Almost every person can show gratitude which manifests some of the qualities of love in response to the satisfaction of their wants and needs. However, enduring feelings of compassion, charity, empathy, fairness, caring, altruism, and forgiveness are probably dependent on having our circuitry for love developed during some critical or sensitive period (or periods) in our maturation. Such optimal development likely results in brain circuits of love which show high levels of spontaneous and continual activity. The optimal development of the brain circuits for love during this/these critical period (s) result in love becoming a personality trait. It is like there is a permanent drug in our brain which predisposes us to enduring feelings of compassion, charity, empathy, fairness, caring, altruism, and forgiveness.
Love is not alone in this regard. So many brain circuits will achieve complete maturity and a maximum level of functioning only when proper experience occurs during some critical or sensitive period in our maturation.
Language, for example, develops best if experience with language occurs early in life. It has long been known that when young children are exposed to a second language, they tend to learn the language quickly, and speak it fluently without accent. If, however, one is exposed to a second language later in life, they require more experience to both learn the language, and to avoid an accent.
If a child is born deaf they do not develop normal speech. This happens because they cannot experience speech. However, some deafness can be corrected surgically. If deafness is corrected surgically at an early age, normal speech develops. If, however, this is done later in life, speech is slower in developing and is impeded. Normal, fluent speech is dependent upon experience during a critical or sensitive period in early life.
Vision is also dependent upon experience during a critical period in our maturation. If children are deprived of sight during the first few months of their lives, they will forever lose the chance to have their brains wired for normal vision.
Educators and educational psychologists have good evidence that there are critical periods for the development of various educational skills, such as reading and mathematical manipulations. This evidence indicates that the brain circuits involved in these skills develop best when experience begins at the right time. If the necessary experience should occur later than the optimal time, these skills may develop, but they will not develop to the same level that they would have if the experience had occurred during the critical period.
In 1994 the Carnegie Foundation issued a report on the scientific research that demonstrates that children will not develop their complete neurological potential if they do not experience a loving and stimulating environment during the first three years of their lives. This evidence indicates that the first three years of life is a critical period to maximize the learning and decision making capacity of the brain.
The same is almost certainly true of the brain circuits for love. If these circuits are not stimulated by some amount of love in early life, the window of opportunity will close and the development of these circuits will suffer some amount of permanent retardation. And while love may exist in such a deprived person, it will not exist at the level which it could have if they had received the benefit of a loving environment during the critical period(s) in which these circuits were primed for maximum development.
Consequently, such a deprived person will have a diminished capacity to exhibit compassion, charity, empathy, fairness, caring, altruism, and forgiveness. The quality of their life will suffer because they will be unable to fully experience this high quality human emotion. They will not have a strong attitude of love. They will be deficient in love as a personality trait.
As is characteristic of most human skills, the amount of experience needed to achieve maximum development in the circuitry for love probably varies from person to person. Maybe because of genetic differences, some people will develop a strong capacity to love even if they receive very little love in their upbringing. Other people will develop a weak capacity to love, even if they are raised in a very loving environment. However, for most people the capacity to love will be closely correlated to the quality and quantity of love that they experienced in early life.
If we exclude philosophies based upon magic and myth, the meaning of life is the pleasure derived from it. If carnal pleasure can be described as hedonism- a, and the pleasure derived from acts of love as hedonism-b, we see that these two exist as something like mathematical complements. To the extent that our capacity to love is developed, the good feelings provided by these brain circuits will guide our behavior. To whatever degree these circuits are incomplete in their development, hedonism-a will grow to fill this void.
"We are all born for love." Hedonism-a is necessary for survival and a very important part of human living. However, it may also function as compensatory motives which expand to fill the vacuum which exists when loving character is deficient.
Hedonism-a, by itself, will not provide us with progress and satisfaction in our living. Love is the best rudder for the ship of humanity. It is a human need, the fulfillment of which allows us to become moral and humane. Loving character in mankind encourages our continued existence, and forms the basis for the cooperation which is essential for progress.
Love is almost a mystical concept. I say this because we think that love should not be the key to happiness. We think that money, power, fame, and the satisfaction of lust will lead to lives of quality and contentment. There is much logic which tells us that it should be this way.
But all who have pursued happiness through these have found that it was not that way. These people either turned to philanthropic activity to achieve quality and contentment, or they never found quality and contentment.