|
|
CAT Tracks for May 24, 2006
GOVERNOR'S EDUCATION BUDGET PROPOSAL |
...is making waves among Illinois lawmakers and in the media.
Below is a "heads up" from IEA President Ken Swanson...
Colleagues:
IEA staff and governance have been in the thick of discussions that could have a tremendous impact on IEA members statewide. This newsletter is a quick update on what's been happening.
On Tuesday afternoon in Chicago, Gov. Blagojevich unveiled his proposal to generate more than $6 billion over the next four years for elementary and secondary education. As you have probably heard, the plan involves the leasing out of the Illinois State Lottery.
While we learned the full details of the plan at the Tuesday news conference, the governor briefed Executive Director Jo Anderson, three IEA managers and me on his program during a meeting on Monday afternoon.
Our initial reaction to the plan is positive, with reservations. Here are some of the highlights of the proposal:
* Full-day kindergarten and universal preschool
There is much to applaud in this plan. We particularly are impressed by the positive approach to improving student achievement and by the goal of directing significant resources to schools with the greatest need.
Overall, the governor is proposing a plan for enhancing the quality of education in Illinois by providing significant resources to classrooms statewide.
I mentioned "reservations." Some of these are:
* Concerns about funding stability
Let's remember this is a proposal, one that can certainly change before it is considered and voted on by the General Assembly. The legislature will return to Springfield after the fall elections.
The governor's plan ensures a spirited debate over how best to strengthen public education and how education quality can be enhanced for our students.
We await the proposal of new, alternative ideas, and we look forward to the debate.
As always, I'm very interested in your thoughts. Please share them with me at iealistens@ieanea.org.
Ken
News coverage from the Chicago Sun-Times...
Gov's $10 billion jackpot for schools
BY KATE N. GROSSMAN AND ROSALIND ROSSI Education Reporters
Gov. Blagojevich pushed a plan Tuesday to make Illinois the first state to put its lottery up for sale or lease, a move that could generate $10 billion -- including a $4 billion, four-year windfall of new dollars for an A to Z laundry list of school programs, ranging from a longer school year to merit pay for teachers and full-day kindergarten.
Educators embraced most of the proposals; they are popular items teachers and administrators have wanted for years. But questions were immediately raised about the wisdom of leasing the lottery, and whether the plan truly solved a decades-old problem of inadequate state funding for schools.
A sale or lease could generate $10 billion. But only $4 billion of that would amount to new dollars for schools -- and that money would be gone after four years. The other $6 billion would go into a trust expected to generate about $650 million annually through 2025 to replace the money schools get from the lottery now.
In addition, the governor hopes to pump in another $2 billion from other sources over the four years for a total of $6 billion in new funding.
"What happens after year four?" said Bindu Batchu of A+ Illinois, a school finance reform group. "We need to sustain an investment in education. We can't rely on one- time sources."
Dawn Clark Netsch, the 1994 Democratic gubernatorial candidate who made school finance reform her campaign centerpiece, was leery of giving up valuable state assets.
"I'm concerned about this idea that we're going to sell or lease most of our major state assets," Netsch said. "It seems we're continuing to push the responsibility for funding our services off into the future and taking away assets we may need in the future."
Blagojevich's budget director, John Filan, downplayed the risks. The plan sets up a task force to address long-term funding strategy.
Plan 'has something for everyone'
"We have four years of certainty here," he said. "In year five, we'll look for revenue sources."
Added Supt. Blondean Davis of Matteson School District 162, who worked with the governor's staff on Meeks' behalf: "Four years is a lifetime in the education of a child." The plan "has something for everyone," she said.
The governor wants the state Legislature to take up the proposal in the fall veto session, after the gubernatorial election.
"It's a bold new plan to fundamentally change our schools," Blagojevich said Tuesday at a news conference at Healy Elementary School in Bridgeport. "Yes, there is a lot more funding in this plan, but it's a combination of funding, accountability, performance and an intolerance of failure."
The smorgasbord of education ideas in the plan is so broad, it might appeal to rich and poor districts, and high-achieving as well as struggling schools.
Chronically low-achieving districts would be offered a "turnaround team" and resources for a longer school year, after-school tutoring, summer school, libraries and expanded technology. If they refused state help and showed no uptick, they could face a state takeover.
Any district also could apply for funds to help create small schools; "identity'' schools featuring a theme, such as agriculture or the arts; or merit pay for teachers whose kids show improving test scores. All districts also should benefit from more money for principal and superintendent mentoring, officials said. Poor districts would likely get help in updating textbooks; middle class districts could see help in expanding preschool offerings.
The plan also includes selling $1.5 billion in bonds for new school construction.
'Now the work starts'
Illinois Federation of Teachers spokeswoman Gail Purkey noted that merit pay was tried unsuccessfully in two IFT school districts. Even so, she was ready to hear more.
"There are a lot of things in here we support -- expanded school year, summer school, early childhood, raising the foundation level," Purkey said. "This was an idea briefing. Now the work starts."
For decades, advocates have argued for basic reform in the way Illinois pays for its schools. They want to reduce reliance on property taxes while increasing income and sales tax. They've butted heads with Blagojevich, who pledged not to raise taxes.
Two of the strongest tax swap backers, Sen. Miguel del Valle (D-Chicago) and independent Sen. James Meeks of Chicago, stood with Blagojevich Tuesday to support his plan.
"You can't fix every problem in one swoop," Meeks said. "I'm still concerned about the imbalance in property taxes. We have four years to work on it."
News coverage from the Chicago Tribune...
Blagojevich: Lease or sell lottery to fund schools
By John Chase and Rick Pearson
Democratic Gov. Rod Blagojevich on Tuesday proposed selling or leasing the state lottery to fund school reforms, a plan Republicans said would squander a dependable source of cash just to boost his re-election campaign.
Blagojevich's proposal, which would have to be approved by the legislature in the fall, counts on a $10 billion windfall from shedding the three-decade-old Illinois Lottery.
Some $4 billion of that would be spent over the next four years for classroom programs, school construction, expanded preschool and full-day kindergarten, merit pay for teachers and new textbooks. That money would also be used to help failing students and schools.
Another $6 billion would be invested. The income from those investments would bring in $650 million each year through 2024, making up for the loss of the money the lottery now brings in for schools, Blagojevich said.
"This education plan is historic," Blagojevich said in unveiling the proposal at Robert Healy Elementary School in Bridgeport. "It's ambitious, and it fundamentally will change the way we educate our kids in Illinois and fundamentally change the way we fund our schools in Illinois."
But critics said the governor's plan, shown to members of the education community on a PowerPoint demonstration, consisted more of themes than details. Some reform activists said it failed to go to the heart of resolving the disparities in funding among local school districts caused by their dependence on local property taxes.
"We have serious concerns about the plan put on the table, because it does nothing to reduce the reliance on property taxes," said Bindu Batchu, campaign manager for A+ Illinois, a statewide organization pushing for reform of school funding.
The governor negotiated the school plan with state Sen. James Meeks, a Democratic-aligned independent lawmaker who had considered a third-party challenge that could have threatened Blagojevich's re-election. Republican governor candidate Judy Baar Topinka has complained that Meeks was bought off the November ballot with the education proposal, and the South Side lawmaker did little on Tuesday to dispel that notion.
What Blagojevich told Meeks
Meeks said that during his negotiations with Blagojevich, the governor "looked me straight in the eye, and he said, 'I can't do 'em if I'm not re-elected.' And so I said to him, 'OK, fine, I know what you're trying to say.'"
Blagojevich aides, however, said the governor had been working on an education plan long before Meeks had issued his threat to enter the race for governor unless Blagojevich came up with a comprehensive four-year plan for schools. Blagojevich accused those who questioned the timing of the proposal�which was announced the day before Meeks was to have begun gathering candidacy petition signatures�of being "cynical."
Several leading Democrats appeared with Blagojevich to support the proposal, including Senate President Emil Jones (D-Chicago) and key members of legislative education panels.
When Blagojevich was asked if he would call the Democratic-dominated General Assembly into special session to consider the proposal, Jones issued an emphatic "no." Instead, Blagojevich and his aides said the package would not be ready until the fall veto session�which is scheduled to begin one week after voters decide Blagojevich's re-election fate on Nov. 7.
"Undoubtedly there will be those who will criticize this plan," Blagojevich said. "But in the final analysis, being a leader means offering ideas and offering solutions. And being a leader means being willing to take the criticisms and the risks."
State Sen. Miguel del Valle, vice chairman of the Senate Education Committee, called the proposal "probably the largest step [in reform] I've seen since joining the Illinois General Assembly."
Blagojevich's plan would pump as much as $4.5 billion into schools from the sale of the lottery over the next four years, compared to the roughly $2.6 billion that would have been generated by the lottery as a state-run entity.
What happens after 2024
But Blagojevich did not address how the state would make up the potential $2 billion falloff in revenue for schools after his four-year plan had ended. At the same time, getting rid of the lottery would mean the state would no longer see growth in revenue from ticket sales. If sold outright, the state would not see another dollar from the lottery after 2024, according to the plan.
Republicans, seeking to boost Topinka's candidacy and discredit Democratic lawmakers, seized on Blagojevich's proposal as representative of a governor known for offering grandiose programs with little follow-through.
"We know it's not real," said state Sen. Dan Cronin of Elmhurst, the ranking Republican on the Senate Education Committee. "If it were real, it would have been proposed several months ago, involved civic leaders, Republicans, Democrats and business and labor leaders."
Other Republicans contended Blagojevich has mortgaged the state's fiscal future to escape raising taxes.
"The history of this administration has been to kind of try and grab something today and not worry about tomorrow, and someday we're going to have to start worrying about tomorrow," former Gov. Jim Edgar said outside a Topinka fundraiser. "In the heat of a campaign, when he's trying to get the attention off other issues, you know, I'm just fearful that it's going to put the state even more and more behind the financial eight ball."
Blagojevich's proposal called for paying teachers based on their performance�an item considered anathema to teachers unions. It would also add at least an extra month to teachers' contracts in poor performing school districts to help failing students.
"We believe that any rush to judgment on this important issue would be a mistake," said James Dougherty, the president of the Illinois Federation of Teachers, a union that includes members of the Chicago Teachers Union.
Ken Swanson, president of the Illinois Education Association, said the proposals for merit pay and extending teacher contracts are issues of negotiation between local school districts and teachers.
Tribune staff reporters Diane Rado and Ray Long contributed to this report.
* New school construction
* Replacement of outdated textbooks
* Help schools afford special education teachers
* Increase voluntary school district consolidations
* More and better mentoring for teachers, principals and superintendents
* Improving school libraries
* Underfunding of pensions not addressed
* Local property tax relief not included
* No additional money for higher education
Tribune staff reporters