|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chapter Three
Population
A random sample for this study was taken from the whole population; it consisted of (140) students who came from different colleges at An-Najah National University, Nablus. Almost one third of the sample was from the Faculty of Engineering, the rest of it came from different faculties at the An-Najah. Students ages ranged from 19- 21 years, with an average of 20. See, Table ( 1 ) . Table (1) shows the number of students who participated in the study and the name of the college which students are affiliated to.
Experimental Design TOP The experimental design was the posttest - Only Control Group Design.
The diagram for this design appears in the following figure:
= = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Statistical Design
TOP
A Three - Way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) factorial design (2 x 3x3) was used for analyzing the data of the study by using general F-test. The first factor was the type of questions (essay versus multiple-choice questions), the second factor was the level of questions ( RI, RG, and UG), and the third factor was students’ abilities (high, medium, and low). See, Table ( 2 ). Table( 2 ) shows the three variables of the study: question types, question
levels, and student’s ability.
One Way Analysis of Variance will also be used ( 1x7 ) to compare the experimental groups with the control group (See, Table 3 ). Table ( 3 ) shows the experimental groups and the control group which were used in the study.
RIM = Remember-
an - Instance Multiple-choice.
If the general ‘F’ shows significance at (.05) priori level of significance, then a Post - hoc Analysis of Variance will be used by using a Scheffe test at ( .05 ) level of significance. Instructional
Task TOP
The
Experimental and Control Groups TOP
The other three experimental groups were directed to read the same passage and answer the same levels of questions which the above mentioned experimental groups have read and answered, but the questions were given to them in an essay type. The only difference between two of them was that the first three experimental groups received questions written in a multiple- choice form, whereas the second three experimental groups received the same questions but they were written in an essay form, that is, one group read the passage and answered (7) essay questions on Remember - an - Instance (RI) level, such as: What causes cold?). Another group read the passage and answered (6) essay questions on Remember - a - Generality level ( RG), such as: What is a contagious disease?). The third experimental group read the passage and answered (6) essay questions written on Use - a - Generality level (UG), such as: Medicine can be given to patients in different compositions like injection. Name another way of taking medicine that is commonly used by people. The control group was directed to read the same passage once without receiving any type of questions. Each booklet was given a number to keep the track of the experimental and control groups when they took the posttest. Measures
TOP
The remember - level test items (RI and RG) were those which students have manipulated during the experiment, whereas the application level test items (UG) were different from those questions which students have manipulated during the experiment, otherwise they will be measuring the remembrance of application rather than the application level itself. The test tried to measure all the specific and general information that came in the passage. Table (4) shows the number of question types and levels which were used in the achievement test.
= = = = = = = = = = The reliability of the test was computed by using "Kuder Rirhardson 21".
x - { k - x }
where : x = mean
k = number of items on post- test
In order to use this formula, we computed the following: X= students’ scores = 1822.5 X¯ = 1822.5 ÷ 140 = 1 (x - x¯ ) ² = 4716.5 4716.5 ÷ 140 = 33.7 S . D. = -/ ¯33.7 = 5.8 Thus, the reliability of the test is computed by the following steps 13 - ( 19 - 13 )
78
Rx x = 1 - .12 = .88 Procedure
TOP
This study was conducted in the second semester of the academic year
1996/97, at An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine. The following
procedure was followed:
2. The researcher took the random sample of his study which consisted of (140) students and assigned them randomly into 7 groups: 6 experimental groups and one control group, each consists of 20 students. 3. For the six experimental groups, the researcher designed six booklets each consists of six to seven questions written in either an essay type or a multiple-choice type covering all specific and general information that came in the passage, and measuring three levels of learning based on Merrill’s taxonomy: Remember - an - Instance, Remember - a - Generality, and Use a Generality. For the control group, the same passage was only used with no post-passage questions (See, Table 5). Table ( 5 ) shows the seven booklets which were designed for each of the experimental and control groups.
The seven booklets were shuffled together randomly before the experiment started in order to assure the random assignment of the sample of the study. 4. The researcher had also composed an achievement test to measure the students’ learning. The test consisted of 19 items that covered all specific and general information and that were written on three levels of learning based on Merrill’s taxonomy (RI, RG, and UG). These items were the same as the post-passage questions, except the Use - a - Generality questions which were different in order to avoid measuring the remember of application rather than the application level itself. Table (6) shows the number of question types and levels which were used in the achievement test.
5. For the suitable time needed for the experiment, the researcher consulted the English teachers who teach the required course "University English I" to estimate the length of time that students at freshmen levels need to read the passage and answer the post questions, then the posttest. The researcher also conducted a pilot study to ensure the amount of time required by freshmen students. The time of the experiment was limited as shown in Table (7). Table ( 7 ) shows the time distribution during the experiment .
The experiment took place during four consecutive session; 90 minutes
for each, starting from 8:00 a.m. until 2:00 p.m., in one day.
After the first 25 minutes, the researcher collected all the booklets within 5 minutes. Then, the researcher distributed the test within 5 minutes and reminded the students to read the general instructions which were written on the front page of the test. Students were instructed several times to write the numbers of the booklets on the top left side of their tests’ papers which they have just manipulated. Students were given 30 minutes to answer the posttest. After students finished answering the test, the researcher collected the papers test from all students at once. The same procedures were followed in the next three classes. Most students finished the experiment within 90 minutes. Scoring TOP
Table ( 8) shows the scores which were given to each sub-test questions.
|