Creating a More Humane Environment 

By Islamic Humanist

The most central human issue in our lives involves creating a more humane environment.
Creating a more humane environment begins by affirming the need to make significant choices in our lives. Spiritual life is rooted in self-reflection, but can only come to full flower in community. This is because people are social, needing both primary relationships and larger supportive groups to become fully human. The democratic process is essential to a humane social order because it respects the worth of persons and elicits and allows a greater expression of human capacities. Democratic process also implies a commitment to shared responsibility and authority. Although awareness of impending death intensifies the human quest for meaning, and lends perspective to all our achievements, the mystery of life itself, the need to belong, to feel connected to the universe, and the desire for celebration and joy, are primary factors motivating human "religious" response.


"The great use of a life is to spend it for something that outlasts it," wrote Bertrand Russell. Wise and thoughtful men and women in all ages have agreed that the greatest lives are those given to the well-being of others. In promoting human understanding and happiness, we discover our own deepest and most enduring values. In the best sense, religion may inspire dedication to the highest ethical ideals. The cultivation of moral devotion and creative imagination is an expression of genuine "spiritual" experience and aspiration.

We must begin our quest for spiritual understanding on the basis of sharable human experience--the foundation of all genuine knowledge of the world--clearly observing the characteristics and limits of that experience. Only then can we even begin to address intelligently the conundrum of the existence and nature of God or "ultimate reality."
No matter how far our observations and discoveries extend from the presently understood cosmos into the unknown, our knowledge must remain always within the bounds of "nature"--that seemingly trackless cosmos of events, relationships, and processes in which we exist. This is what the relativity of knowledge consists of--the relational composition of all perceiving and knowing. The means by which we comprehend the world, organized within the logical structures of thinking and knowing, necessarily shapes our knowledge and sets limits to its reach.


Thus we can never penetrate "pure being" or know ultimate reality "under the aspect of eternity," to borrow Spinoza's telling phrase. But even within the limits of incomplete and fallible human understanding, we can live compassionate, meaningful lives of love and caring.

Our sense of right and wrong emerges out of the process of living together as social beings. Humanity's social nature is the product of a long evolutionary development having its roots in the gregarious behaviour of the species from which human beings descended. Yet in human beings the development of language and symbolic thought has given a whole new dimension of meaning to social feeling.

We learn to accept our lives with serenity. Inner peace is the distilled essence of reflection on our profoundest experiences, separated from the illusion and superstition that unfortunately are so often associated with ideas of the spiritual.

That unvarying principle asserts that the individual human being is of infinite value and must not be degraded or abused. "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you," leaves room for the temptation to remake others in our own image, to impose what we think is best for them. As Bertrand Russell would later quip, do not do unto others what you would have them do unto you, because their tastes may be different! Felix Adler believed we can avoid the problem of projecting our personal moral egocentricity upon others--compelling them to conform to our expectation--by recognizing the unique personal difference of each and so conduct ourselves as to encourage the fullest development of the special gifts and distinctive positive attributes of others. By living in this creative relationship, he believed, we would also actualize our own highest moral potential.

Whether or not God exists may be an interesting question. But the answer to that question--if answerable at all--should make no crucial difference in how we ought to live, how we ought to treat our fellow beings. My ethical obligations and potentialities--and yours--remain exactly the same. Our shared task is to live decently, compassionately, and caringly in the world we inhabit.

This article was originally published in The Society For Islamic Humanists (message #1144) 

Content

We Welcome Your Suggestions, Comments Or Articles. 

Email

  1