Jeff's review of: | |||||||
The World's Foremost Military Historians Imagine What Might Have Been |
|||||||
Edited by Robert Cowley | |||||||
Have you ever wondered "What if things were different, if events had transpired differently," how would the world be now? Your imagination is rewarded, as the "What If?" question - professionally regarded as a "counterfactual" - is the basis of a book consisting of essays written by some of the top historians of our time, WHAT IF?: THE WORLD’S FOREMOST MILITARY HISTORIANS IMAGINE WHAT MIGHT HAVE BEEN, edited by Robert Cowley, a renowned World War I expert, who also writes an essay in the selection.
What they mean, however, is that having a "“What If?" discussion is fun! It’s great to speculate about what might have been, and WHAT IF does so, ranging from conclusions as extreme as the non-existence of Western civilization as we know it, Christianity never reaching the masses as Islam spreads, or a Communist Europe where the U.S. is the weak superpower. That is, if the Confederacy didn’t successfully split the Union in 1863. Such "What If?" scenarios are endless, and spirited conversations can carry on for weeks on just one of the counterfactuals. On the web billboard I frequent, I’ve had a now-20-page discussion on merely "what if England and France had entered the Civil War on the side of the Confederacy in 1862?" And we have yet to work out all the details on the synopsis. As Cowley writes, "For historians, as the maxim goes, the dominos fall backward. In WHAT IF? We will attempt to make them fall forward." When reading WHAT IF?, it is amazing how centuries can be decided by random luck due to weather, precious milliseconds of actions in battle, or the fallacies of ambitious men. From the first WHAT IF? where a plague may have saved the Jewish faith in 701 B.C., thus the future of Christianity as well, to the gamble of Chinese Nationalist leader Chiang Kai-shek that heightened tensions in the Cold War for decades and the uneasiness with Red China that permeates our government today. Then there are the "second-order counterfactuals," in which the events may have transpired differently, but the end result would remain the same. For example, if the United States had lost Midway in 1942, leaving the Pacific fleet in dire straits, that might have only driven us to use different means in defeating Japan. The use of the atomic bomb may have been used sooner, or used multiple times rather than just two in order to make our point to Japan and the Russians that Americans are no weaklings. The historians don't overreach their subjects, suggesting improbable scenarios as "What If? World War I never began?" It was inevitable, so better to ask "What If? the British hadn't entered?" Only outcomes that were entirely possible are acceptable, such as a fog lifting for Washington at Brooklyn Heights, Robert E. Lee's Special Orders No. 191 never lost before Antietam or Alexander the Great saved from death by his aide in the second before an ax would have fallen on his skull in battle. You see, WHAT IF? can keep history buffs busy for days, plotting different outlines of our existence, from an Islam-dominated planet to a Communist takeover of the U.S. or a Mexico still run by the Aztecs. That is, if the New World were discovered at all!
Back to Jeff's Book Reviews   |   Home |