(The following was first printed in the 3/98 Nordic Saga of the Barony of Northkeep, Kingdom of Ansteorra)

The Plain FAQS

by Berengaria Ravencroft (Berengaria@hotmail.com)

"That he is gentil that doth gentil dedis."

"Is there any medieval/Renaissance basis for the current Ansteorran trend of insisting that ladies be escorted into court?" -- HL Livia Madeline Montgomery

        You know, Livia, when I got this question, I was a little confused since I really hadn't noticed anything about this kind of "trend".  So I tootled over to my research staff and asked them what the deal was.  I was knocked on my behind by the intensity of the opinions both for and against the practice of escorting people into Court.  I'd really feel safer answering questions on *religion* or *politics*.  But hey, answering the questions that people really want to know about is what we're here for, and that's going to mean getting hit with questions about unhappy subjects.  It's way too easy to get bogged down in the muddy debate between the various viewpoints that arise when this question comes up.  I'm goint to try to avoid that by just telling you what the basic positions are, as I understand them, and then just answer the question you asked.  Escorting people into Court is just a gallant way to show that we honor and respect the person going before the Crown.  It shows everyone that we are defending and protecting them as Chivalry demands.  It is degrading to both men and women since it forces them to be presented by a social superior.  It is a way to draw attention to yourself, to horn in on the limelight of the  person actually being called up.
        After examining the materials, the legal documents, the drawings of the time, as well as annoying historians and cultural anthropologists all over the world in search for the answer to this question, I feel really safe in saying: No, there is not one overall custom that says that before 1600, women, or anyone, had to be escorted into the presence of the Crown. Of course, there are some exceptions, most notably where a social superior, like a father or a husband, was presenting a social inferior, like a wife or daughter, to the Court; where a prisoner was being presented before a Court; or the "escort" in fact was serving as intermediary speaking for the person they were escorting, such as a husband or translator.  Women appear in the materials at hand both escorted and not.  I find it interesting that when they ARE escorted, women are most often escorted by other women when they are not in the company of their Husbands.  It does make a certain amount of sense that to be seen being escorted by someone other than your husband could call your virtue into question.
        As an example, where "Courtly Love" was the norm, attention was sometimes lavished on women, and a woman might well have men vying for her attentions.  But even with all that, the point of the concept was not to usurp the appropriate public roles of the woman's Lord and Husband, or to tarnish her reputation.  She might, though, choose to be escorted, but that's altogether a different thing.
        However, and I can't stress this hard enough, different places and different people do things differently.  It is impossible to say that "They" did such a thing, although there are some general points that can be made.  In those places and times where women might need to be escorted at all times, women had no place at Court at all, and weren't seen much outside the home.  In those times and places where women had political power, even unofficial power, they weren't required to be escorted.
 It is interesting to note, as a bit of a side bar, in modern Royal Courts, when a person, male or female, is called to receive an honor or award, they are escorted by Heralds or other functionaries only as far as the doorway leading in, and and they make that last, long walk by themselves.
        I am told by my protocol expert this is because the Crown wants to see *them*, and not anyone else.
        This does not mean that I feel the Ansteorran Tradition is a bad one, or that the Crown shouldn't insist on it.  I'm just answering your question about history.

Some Suggested Reading on just Part of this question:
Bornstein, Diane.  The Lady in the Tower, Medieval Courtesy Literature for Women. Hamden, Conn.: Archon Books, 1983.
Gies, Frances and Gies, Joseph.  Women in the Middle Ages.  New York: Crowell, 1978.
Harksen, Sybelle.  Women in the Middle Ages. New York: A. Schram, 1975.
LaBarge, Margaret Wade.  A Small Sound of the Trumpet, Women in Medieval Life. Boston: Beacon Press, 1986.
Levin, Carole, and Watson, Jeanne.  Ambiguous Realities, Women in the Middle Ages.  Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1987.
Nicholas, David.  The Domestic Life of a Medieval City, Women, Children, and the Family in 14th Century Ghent.  Lincoln:  University of Nebraska Press, 1985.
Rose, Mary Beth.  Women in the Middle Ages and the Renaissance, Literacy and Historical Perspectives.  Syracuse:  Syracuse University Press, 1986.
Uitz, Erika. The Legend of Good Women, Medieval Women in Towns and Cities. Mt. Kisco, NY: Moyer Bell Ltd, 1988.
Wheeler, Bonnie.  Representations of the Feminine in the Middle Ages. Dallas: Academia, 1993.
  1