Marc H. Gerstein: Qabala for Beginners

3. The Nature of God

Who is God? That's what Moses asked when he encountered God in the desert through the vehicle of the burning bush. Moses asked what he should answer when the Israelites asked who sent him (Moses) to redeem them from slavery. God's answer: AHYH AShR AHYH, or phonetically, Ehieh Asher Ehieh (Exodus 3:14). Some qabalists use AHYH as a God name for one of the spheres on the Tree of Life. But in fact, AHYH isn't really a name at all. It's a statement. It has been variously translated as "I am" or "I will be." The entire sentence translates to "I am that I am" or "I am who I am" or "I will be what I will be" etc. But whatever translation is used, AHYH is not really a name. It's a statement merely of being.

The absence of a name is an important thing. When we name a thing, a person, or any sort of being, we automatically define it. Not only do we say what it is; by implication, we say what it is not. My name is Marc H. Gerstein. That's very limiting. You can list billions upon billions of people you know who are not writing these words. Marc is generally a male name; so you already have a good idea of something about Marc. The name Marc is likewise incompatible with many ethnicities. So there are more things you can assume I probably am not. There's much limitation that is expressed by nothing more than a name. (Note, too, that a graven image, prohibited in the Ten Commandments, is still more limiting.)

But you may respond that God does have a name; lots of them. Even if Ehieh isn't really a name, what about YHVH, or Adonai, etc. These are other God names that are attributed by some qabalists to various spheres of the Tree of Life. What about Elohim? That's the one who is identified in Genesis 1:1 as the creator of the heavens and the earth. (For the record, in Hebrew, the suffix "IM" means plural, the way "s" does in English. So Elohim really means "the Gods." The Gods? How many are there? Isn't Judaism supposed to be monotheistic?)

For a clue as to what's happening here, we can look to the Zohar's description of creation - the Big Bang, so to speak. Zohar I, 15a starts by telling us that "At the very beginning the King made engravings in the supernal purity. A spark of blackness emerged...." Skipping some complex description about the progress of this spark, we'll fast forward to a statement that "it was not known at all, until from the pressure of its penetration a single point shone, sealed, supernal. Beyond this point, nothing is known, and so it is called reshit (the beginning): the first word of all." So a point, a "zohar" (a brilliance) emerged from something unknowable. Then, the text moves quickly to a fascinating proposition.

The first sentence of the Torah, BRAShYTh BRA ALHYM ET HShAMYM VET HAyRTz has been long translated in the King James Bible as "In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth." The word BRAShYTh is, indeed, held to have some relationship to the idea of a beginning, although proposed translations have changed since the days of King James. Modern alternatives include "When the beginning" or "With beginning". The second word, BRA, does mean created. And of course, ALHYM means "the Gods." What about BRA ALHYM? In some languages, the subject normally precedes the verb, while others are more flexible. Traditional translations simply assume flexible verb/subject sequence and assume the BRA ALHYM really means "God (or, the Gods) created" But in a portion of the Zohar, the sequence is read more strictly: BRA ALHYM means "created the Gods." So BRAShYTh BRA ALHYM now means, "With beginning created the Gods." Just a bit more linguistic smoothing give us the following translation of Genesis 1:1: "With beginning, __ created the Gods, the heavens and the earth." Who created the Gods? It's never stated. It's not knowable.

This is a very radical proposition: That which most in the Judeo-Chrisitan world thought of as the supreme being, the prime creator, the source, is no such thing. Instead, Elohim is something that was created by someone/something else. This is a theme we'll come back to later in the Tree of Life. For now, it would be a good idea to start getting comfortable with these ideas: You cannot conceive the true God. No human mind can do that, and no human language can describe it. The best we can do is conceive of aspects of the true God. Qabalists often refer to the prime source/creator as AYN SVPh (ain soph) which means "without limit" or "limitless" or "infinite." (The "King" described by the Zohar as making the first engravings in the supernal purity is held to refer to as AYN SVPh.)

There's another qabalistic phrase dealing with God: AYN SVPh AVR (ayn soph aur), which means "limitless light." Remember gematria from Chapter 2? Lets try some. AVR = 207 (A=1 plus v=6 plus R=200). AYN SVPh is also = 207 (A=1 plus Y=10 plus N=50 plus S=60 plus V=6 plus Ph=80). Hence we have a gematria-based mystical link between the idea of infinity and light. For the record, we have another modest linkage based on the code 207: RBH (R=200 plus B=2 plus H=5), which means "much" or "is great." What we now have is light. A lot of light. LOTS and LOTS of light! Infinite light. So what does this infinite light do? Just hang around being bright? Let's try some more gematria.

ARAH = 207 (A=1 plus R=200 plus A=1 plus H=5). Translation: "I will appear" or with different vowel markings,"I will see." ADBR = 207 (A=1 plus D=4 plus B=2 plus R=200). Translation: "I will speak." VNQVMH = 207 (V=6 plus N=50 plus Q=100 plus V=6 plus M=40 plus H=5). Translation: "And let us arise." So it's not in the nature of this infinite light to sit around just being. It will see, it will appear, and it will speak. In other words, this light is inherently active.

Digressing for a moment, various new-age channeled teachings see the prime source/creator (what qabalists refer to as "infinite light") as a universal consciousness, and running throughout this modern material is the idea that it is the very nature of this consciousness to create, to evolve, to grow. It cannot stagnate; such a condition is alien to its nature.

Back to the infinite light. Notice that the creative expressions are in the future tense. I will do this. Let us do this. Always in the future. But this infinite light is, by the very quality of its infinity, beyond time. It always was. It is. It will always be. And yet, it's always looking ahead. "I will...." Rabbi David Cooper, in God is a Verb (Riverhead Books, ISBN 1-57322-055-8), explains that God isn't a static thing that launched creation and then stayed behind at the starting line. God is a process of never-ending creation. God isn't a noun; it's a verb; the idea of "God-ing."

The above exercise in gematria shows us that one of the creative things this infinite light will do is "speak." As we'll see later on, when we go further into Genesis 1, when infinite light speaks, it's not idle chatter. The ten sayings of creation are the ten spheres of the Tree of Life.

Before closing this section, I'll offer some food for thought that will be explored further in later posts: (1) Back to ALHYM, and the other god names. These are attributes of AYN SVPh. Working with attributes of the unknowable is something we'll return to with the spheres of the Tree of Life. (2) The number 207 is a recurring one when describing this "Godly" source. Reducing the number to a single digit, as numerologists are inclined to do, leaves us with 9, corresponding to the ninth sphere of the Tree of Life, which is named "Foundation" and is associated with the human reproductive organs, the sources from which physical life springs.

I won't necessarily go into this much detail in all future QB series posts. But I did want to do so here, to follow up the last post on methodology, to show how the raw materials of qabala, the Torah, the qabalistic texts, the Hebrew alphabet, and the numbers can be tied together to produce the various qabalistic ideas and doctrines, and even how centuries-old qabalistic ideas can mesh with late-20th century new-age thought (there will also be occasion to spotlight similarities between qabala and classic Eastern teachings).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

E-mail Marc H. Gerstein

This page is hosted by
Get your own Free Homepage
This course is being posted in installments on the mailing list QBLH-L.
Copyright © Marc H. Gerstein 1998. Posted on March 8th, 1998.
Editing, HTML-coding, and Web-pages design: Piotr Zembrowski.
1