There has been a lot of controversy on which supplement is best for xenia growth, iodide (often potassium iodide) or iodine (Lugol's Solution or Strong Iodine Tincture). But just how necessary is it to dose one of these in your reef aquarium? Many of us have seen the positive effects of either iodide or iodine supplementation (I'll just call it iodide from here on out). Xenia tends to grow faster with it, and other soft corals do too. Mushroom anemones like it and expand better with it. Some even see better color in their mushroom anemones when using Lugol' solution rather than iodide. Some people have seen bad effects with xenia when they use Lugol's, but not when they use iodide. Others disagree with this! Sure, many of us have seen the positive effects of iodide dosing on xenia and other soft corals, but...
ABOVE: Valerie Miller's tank-raised "xenia forest", shown about 6 months before this article was written. It has GROWN since this picture! There are four types of xenia shown above in her 75-gallon reef tank. Also note: The large concrete rock is kept nearly clean of coralline algae, looking dull gray-green. Other rocks are lacking in really good coralline growth too, a classic sign that certain hermit crabs are present which eat more coralline than you might like them to. Coralline would normally be quite obvious and starting to flourish on new concrete rock by the end of two months in a reef tank like this rock has been. The other tank-raised rocks are a year old. Coralline growth is still somewhat lacking, even with just a modest number of Mexican red leg blue spot hermit crabs present (C. digueti) which are cleaning the rock of alga, including coralline algae. In the past six months the number of hermits has decreased due to natural die-off and cannibalism. The pink, mauve and purple coralline algae is growing better now. In another test I performed, I put two small uncured concrete rocks in two HANDY Reef tanks with identical dosing and care. One tank had a very modest number of C. digueti hermit crabs in it and the other tank had none. The concrete rock in the tank with none of these hermits became almost totally covered in coralline on top and sides within just 2.5 months! The new concrete rock in the other tank, with C. digueti hermits, was still struggling to grow coralline algae, with very little coverage of coralline algae even after 6 months! The gray concrete changed colors, to a dominant gray-green look, like the picture above. The C. digueti hermits tend to keep new rocks cleaned of coralline algae the best. Another interesting observation was made. As expected and often observed elsewhere the coralline growing on the glass of the tank with C. digueti hermits was slightly less dense than in the tank without these hermits which had much more coralline already growing everywhere since there were no coralline "preditors" present. Remember, the more coralline in a tank the faster it spreads to new rocks and the glass. The coralline growing on the glass of the tank with the hermits eventually grew so thick that the hermits were finally able to climb the coralline covered glass and start stripping it too! All of this should come as no surprise since these hermits have been extensively observed to eat coralline algae in addition to their diet of snails and even coral polyps. They are omnivores of course and this should also be no surprise. In live rock farming it is critical to NOT include certain hermit crabs which eat coralline algae like candy. Claims to the contrary should be a red flag as to the honesty or knowledge of such claimants.
This might come as a shocker to some, when I point out three cases that indicate the reduced necessity of iodide dosing to grow good xenia and other corals. First, just incase you missed the article by Julian Sprung in a recent FAMA issue (March 1998 pg 38), he discussed iodide and growing xenia. I'll go over part of it here. Julian suggested that iodide dosing is not necessary for growing xenia. At the same time, Julian, many others and I have seen xenia display greater expansion and faster growth when dosing iodide. He did point that out too. He also pointed out the usual, that good lighting was helpful for growing xenia. But his main point is not often discussed. He said that a depressed pH was more of a drawback than anything else for xenia growing. He said that elevated pH would help it grow better. He said that elevated Ph from KW (kalkwasser) use can aid xenia in obtaining proper nutrients from the water. He also pointed out that excessive protein skimming might even eliminate some of these needed nutrients from the water too. Julian noted that all xenia tend to like high pH and that if the pH is too low, the polyps will not pulse as well and will even develop ragged pinnules on the tentacles. He said that use of KW or C-Balance would boost the pH, improve xenia health, including improved or more coordinated pulsing, and it would improve protein skimming too. (More on protein skimming in a minute.) He pointed out that KW might promote the formation of micelles, tiny packets of organic compounds that clump together in aquarium water, that could be a good source of food for corals like xenia. Xenia can absorb these through the polyps and skin as they catch these organic compounds with their mucus.
Others have noted that iodide additions tend to make xenia produce more slime. Does this promote the capture of more of these food packets? Could this be one of the reasons that iodide helps xenia growth? At the same time Julian said that Peter Wilkens had been studying the effect that KW has on the formation of micelles (also called "coral food packets"). He believes that the formation of micelles, induced by KW, helps to improve protein skimming efficiency when using KW. Therefore, Julian also recommended that you NOT overdo it with really heavy protein skimming or you could deprive your xenia (and soft corals) of this feeding opportunity. He also suggested another possibility. If you do skim heavily, feed your fish more, so as to leave more of these compounds in your water to feed the corals before skimming can take them all out. Although this whole pH scenario appears to work, Julian noted that it is still his own conjecture and that KW and two part calcium additives like C-Balance may have these effects. Well, it all sounded pretty reasonable to me, so I took him up on it and added a small uncured cement rock to buffer my 29-gallon aquarium. New cement rock leaches calcium hydroxide and calcium oxide (kalkwasser or KW) as the cement cures. After boosting the pH a little bit this way, I took cuttings from one certain xenia to propagate in this lightly buffered tank now. I used this particular xenia because it was my "problem child" xenia. I have had problems growing and especially propagating just this one type of xenia. Others tend to loose this one type of xenia first if they do loose a xenia. My other types of xenia all grow prolifically and propagate like weeds, with or without my help! The most beautiful xenia I have, the Fiji pom pom, has a slight violet cast to it, and it pulses like a dream! It's almost too simple to grow. But, the one particular problem xenia, a Bali xenia, is really pretty with a white trunk and branches and brown polyp faces. It has problems taking off in my more natural style tanks that receive calcium and buffering only from thick aragonite sand beds. I didn't associate regular pH levels (around 8.2) with a possible problem in growing this one type of xenia since the others flourished so well under these same conditions. So, after adding the small cement rock to buffer the tank's water lightly, I used scissors and a turkey baster to cut a bunch of individual xenia polyps off of the Bali xenia mother colony from another tank. Using the baster, I put these single polyp cuttings in the gravel bowl, in the 29-gallon tank, for the polyps to attach to aragonite gravel inside the bowl. After attachment to the gravel (a few days to a week - xenia is fast), I can easily super glue these new cuttings to other rocks by gluing their attached gravel to the other rocks. Typically my other xenia cuttings, done this way, all work out and attach easily, or most polyps attach and grow on the gravel. The Bali xenia had been a contrarian. Most polyps cut and placed in a rubble bed or gravel bowl would just wither away instead of attaching to gravel and growing more polyps, like the other xenia do. However, this time they almost all made it! They attached and grew, with new polyps forming quickly. It worked! I made another batch and they worked too! Then after the cement rock had run out of buffering power (after it was cured) I decided to use baking soda to lightly buffer the tank and try it again. It didn't work this time or on the next attempt either! Maybe there really was something to the use of KW here, rather than just using the simplest buffer? However, I have recommend staying away from KW use for the most part. If you don't know just what you are doing with KW, it is so easy to use too much of it since it most easily precipitates calcium out of your water which results in low calcium levels. Overdosing of KW also binds aragonite sand when the calcium precipitates from your aquarium water and forms calcite crystals in your sand, limiting aragonite sand's dissolving potential. Otherwise, aragonite sand can buffer your aquarium and provide calcium. After all, aragonite sand is what allows me to run reef aquariums so easily, until you mess it up by adding "excess" KW, buffers or two part calcium additives. I do suspect that it is more than JUST the high pH that did the trick for growing the touchy xenia cuttings when I used the cement rock to boost the pH and lightly buffer the water. Cement also adds other things besides just KW to your water. Cement rock also leaches silicates until it is cured. I need to isolate what it is that did this. I WILL try some light nighttime drip-dosing of regular KW to see if it alone will do the same trick. I will also compare the results of using some other more complete buffers on other batches of xenia cuttings too. By the way, I also had the best results getting this particular xenia to attach and not wither away when I used a finer sand like Reef Sand or GeoMarine grade aragonite sand rather than larger chips and chunks of aragonite. If anyone else also wants to try some testing like this, I would like to compare our test results. Furthermore, I talked to Dick Perrin and found that he was no longer dosing any iodide in his propagation tanks (vats) at Tropicorium. He said that his cleanest tanks are reserved for SPS and xenia coral growing - combined in the same tanks. He said that the iodide would of course help the xenia a little bit, but at the same time the xenia would put off a substance in the extra slime produced that holds thwarts the growth of SPS corals. He says that omitting the iodide supplementation allowed the SPS corals to grow faster again and the xenia grew just about as well anyway. He does not add ANY trace element additions or ANY additives or supplements! He only uses aragonite sand to provide all calcium and buffering needs. He does use some forced aragonite dissolution besides the natural dissolution of aragonite in very thick sand beds in the vats. He does not use KW or kalkreactors. He says that the elements and trace elements that dissolve from the aragonite sand helps keep calcium, KH (alkalinity), pH, major element, minor element and trace element conditions proper. He says this is plenty to keep everything healthy. I asked about water changes providing supplementation. He does a 10% water change every six weeks, but just in the SPS xenia vats in which he wants to have the best water quality. He does use the 10% refuse water from the first tanks and does a trickle-down water change to his other tanks. He uses the 10% that he takes out of the first tank and puts it in the second most important tank and then exchanges the refuse water from that tank with the next tank and so on down the line... Public aquariums and zoos do this too. He said that octopus tanks get the first water change and best water quality at public aquariums. He uses Reef Crystals salt mix now. Reef Crystals does have a higher dose of vitamins and various supplemental elements/trace elements than the Instant Ocean salt mix that he used to use. This would still not be considered a major contributor for supplementation though, not even in the SPS/xenia tanks that he puts the 10% water change in first. Dick Perrin has not only been keeping reef tanks much longer than most of us (since the 1970's), but he has been actively propagating corals since 1973! Most think that reefkeeping is very new and do not realize this. The real popularity of reefkeeping did arrive until the mid 1980's. Dick believes in using the simplest means possible that will effectively grow very healthy reef livestock. In 1973 he started out with 40 watt shop light fixtures and cool white shop lights over aquariums. He says they work, but he likes the better lighting we have today. Sunlight in modified "greenhouses" is now his mainstay, with 400 watt German 10,000 K and Iwasaki 6500 K metal halides providing supplemental backup lighting, one of each bulb in each custom built fixtures.
Growing corals with sunlight at Tropicorium in Romulus Michigan. View of two large coral and live rock propagation vats. (water flow turned off for the picture) The white metal halide lighting fixtures can be pulled out of the way when there is ample sunlight.
Soft coral vat with water flow turned off for the picture - Tropicorium.
Stony coral cuttings, with water flow turned off for the picture - Tropicorium.
Close up of stony coral cuttings from the vat shown above at Tropicorium.
After talking to Dick Perrin about iodide being a double edged sword, with respect to SPS coral growth when kept with xenia, I decided to cut my own triple dosing of iodide down to a half dose. IN other words, I now only use 1/6 of the previous heavier dosage amount. The xenia still do just great! The SPS corals? They have grown a little better since the reduction in iodide dosing. There IS quite a bit of xenia in this one tank with SPS corals also (my daughter's tank, shown above). Iodide dosing does appear to have more effect on SPS corals when more xenia is present in the tank in which you are dosing iodide.
Xenia and most SPS corals enjoy intense lighting and are often kept together in the same well lit reef tanks for this reason. Do not let your xenia touch your SPS corals, if you keep them together. The thoughts above, about low (or NO) iodide and trace element dosing may contradict much of what is commonly circulating in the reef hobby today. While more testing of these practices would be nice, I still think it demonstrates a reduced need of iodide and trace element dosing for all corals, especially when using aragonite sand to provide all or most of a tank's buffering and calcium needs. Interesting thoughts to ponder...
***
***
***
***
***
***