There is an argument, popular among scientifically minded Christians, and indeed other Theists, called the "Argument from Design". Its earliest version is that, if you see a watch, it implies the existence of a watchmaker. Thus the watch-like precision of the astronomical heavens implies the existence of a Divine Watchmaker. At one time, when biology was the study of how wonderfully the living world had been made to serve humanity, a similar argument existed for biology. Kepler's, Newton's, and finally Darwin's researches showed that these were a trifle simplistic, but the Argument from Design merely needed to be recast. All the phenomena of science are governed by laws. The laws of celestial mechanics are simple, astrophysics is more complicated, and biochemistry and ecology are stunningly difficult. Nevertheless, the Argument from Design need only state that if there are Laws, there must be a Lawgiver. Or indeed in these days of cyber-everything, how about a Divine Programmer?
There is an interesting consequence of this Argument, which is generally overlooked even in those segments of the popular press which esteem their readers enough to present anything so sophisticated.
Obviously, the answer in all three cases is that a Divine Designer would do work of such quality that adjustments and changes were unnecessary. But the popular concept of a miracle, involving as it does some astonishing deviation from the known laws of nature (nobody considers television and automobiles miraculous) consists precisely of such a change, suspension, or adjustment by God of his own laws. The idea would be recognised as blasphemous if people took seriously the proposition that God decreed the laws of nature, and is not merely our agent for fixing tickets issued under these laws. So the next time you see a statue weeping, there are these alternative explanations: