CONSTITUTIONAL & CIVIL RIGHTS / RULE-OF-LAW / REIGN IN JUDICIAL IMMUNITY / JUDICIAL ACCOUNTABILITY /

Welcome
 

The victims of unethical and corrupt lawyers, judges and employees of the state and federal judiciary demand accountability from those who abuse the power of office while they remain absolutely immune. The media as well as the legislative and executive branches of government traditionally ignore these abuses. The judicial branch itself hurls insults at the victim claiming they are nothing more than a 'disgruntled litigant' while ignoring the substantive allegations.
 

It is essential to empower the victims of legal abuses. Our strength is in our numbers thus the more people that demand their constitutional and civil rights the quicker they will be attained.
 

 What most people do not comprehend is that judges are immune from civil lawsuits. If a judge unlawfully imprisoned someone or maliciously denied due process in a case that cost a litigant millions of dollars, it doesn't matter. There is no redress for the aggrieved person.

The emotional and physical health problems inherent in these abuses are now coming to light but the judicial branches throughout our country continue to avoid or deliberately ignore what they have helped to create.

This website hopes to publish documented proof of many of the deliberate violations of the 'rule of law, the doctrine upon which our Constitutional Republic is based.
 

What is the "Rule of Law"?

Equality and the Law
 

The right to equality before the law, or equal protection of the law as it is often phrased, is fundamental to any just and democratic society. Whether rich or poor, ethnic majority or religious minority, political ally of the state or opponent--all are entitled to equal protection before the law.

The democratic state cannot guarantee that life will treat everyone equally, and it has no responsibility to do so. However, writes constitutional law expert John P. Frank, "Under no circumstances should the state impose additional inequalities; it should be required to deal evenly and equally with all of its people."

No one is above the law, which is, after all, the creation of the people, not something imposed upon them. The citizens of a democracy submit to the law because they recognize that, however indirectly, they are submitting to themselves as makers of the law. When laws are established by the people who then have to obey them, both law and democracy are served.

Reprinted from the National Constitution Center

The Supreme Court
The Framers considered the rule of law essential to the safekeeping of social order and civil liberties. The rule of law holds that if our relationships with each other and with the state are governed by a set of rules, rather than by a group of individuals, we are less likely to fall victim to authoritarian rule. The rule of law calls for both individuals and the government to submit to the law's supremacy. By precluding both the individual and the state from transcending the supreme law of the land, the Framers constructed another protective layer over individual rights and liberties. --
Reprinted from U.S. Dept. of State.
 

Judicial Immunity is Absolute

In an unprecedented degree of 'abuse of power' judges decreed themselves absolutely immune from civil suit when they are  "acting maliciously and corruptly." In 1996 the 104th Congress passed the Federal Courts Improvement Act amending  the Civil Rights statute to give further immunities to malicious and corrupt judges.

The Judicial Doctrine of Immunity
"Immunity applies even when the judge is accused of
acting maliciously and corruptly." -- United States Supreme Court

See Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800, 815-819 (1982) Pierson v. Ray, 386 U.S., at 554,
Mireles v. Waco, 502 U.S. 9, 9-10, 112 S.Ct. 286, 287, 116 L.Ed.2d 9 (1991).

Federal Courts Improvement Act of 1996
Public Law 104-317, 104th Congress

Sec. 309. Prohibition against awards of costs, including attorney's fees, and injunctive relief against a judicial officer.

    (a) Nonliability <<NOTE: 28 USC 2412 note.>> for Costs.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no judicial officer shall be  held liable for any costs, including attorney's fees, in any action  brought against such officer for an act or omission taken in such  officer's judicial capacity, unless such action was clearly in excess of  such officer's jurisdiction.

    (b) Proceedings in Vindication of Civil Rights.--Section 722(b) of the Revised Statutes (42 U.S.C. 1988(b)) is amended by inserting before  the period at the end thereof ``, except that in any action brought  against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such  officer's judicial capacity such officer shall not be held liable for any costs, including attorney's fees, unless such action was clearly in  excess of such officer's jurisdiction''.

    (c) Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights.--Section 1979 of the Revised Statutes (42 U.S.C. 1983) is amended by inserting before the period at the end of the first sentence: ``, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer's judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable''.