Unarchy,


and a varietie of divers thoughts...


from Donald's head.

TEMPORARY NOTE, DEC 2008: Has Indiana's law whereby one cannot sue his employer been tested for constitutionality? If you are a lawyer who would throw yourself into taking that one up to the Supreme Court, please contact me. I know how weird this sounds in view of the comments just below, but one must work within the system currently in place.

IF YOU NEVER LOOK PAST THIS HOME PAGE, PLEASE READ AND THINK ON THIS:

Proposal: Replace our current justice system, which is based on dishonesty and legalistic word games, with a new system based on common sense and conscience. For the time being, this new system is called unarchy.

There are no written laws, just the understanding that you shouldn't mistreat others; or, put another way, don't do to others what you wouldn't want done to yourself.

Juries would be selected completely randomly. Juries would be big enough to ensure that they accurately represent the views of society at large. There would be no judges or lawyers. Accuser and accused would present their own cases. No evidence would be inadmissable. Jurors may ask questions.

Simple majority vote determines guilt. Simple majority vote sets the punishment.

Thanks.

Donald Sauter.

What's new(est):

MAIN INDEX

NOTE: THIS WEB SITE BEST VIEWED WITH TEXT-ONLY LYNX BROWSER VERSION 000.01 (or less.)

 

 

 

 


I hold the copyright to the material in this website. As such, I grant you permission - heck, I encourage you - to disseminate anything you find here. Go ahead and make money off of it, even. (There are two exceptions: the Beatle Significa game, and the rules for Transcendental Scrabble.) Just give me whatever credit I deserve. Thanks.


CLICK HERE to send me an email; view my guestbook; or sign my guestbook.
Back to the main index.
Back to the top of this page.
. . . . .  1