22 September 1993
52 Buswell St # 7
Boston, MA 02215
To the editor:
As I read the rather murky editorial endorsing
Northeastern University's
new policy providing coverage of abortions, I got a chilling glimpse into
the ignorance and naivete that gives rise to
situations like the torching
of an abortion clinic briefly mentioned on page
two of the same issue. The
editor's waffling, upon closer examination,
was actually a thinly disguised
piece of "pro‑life" rhetoric and
displayed a phenomenal lack of knowledge
about the realities behind the abortion issue.
I have been fortunate enough never to have been
faced with an unwanted
pregnancy,
but several of my close friends were not so lucky. The editor's
fears that "partners may become careless
and casual when having sex if the
'security' of an inexpensive abortion"
becomes available are completely
unfounded.
Everything I have heard about such a procedure leads me to
believe it is a most unpleasant experience, not something one would use "as
a form of birth control". The editor further reveals his bias by
raising
the issue of parental consent. Does someone old enough to help choose our
nation's leaders really need her parents'
permission to have an abortion?
I think not.
The editor also raised the question of whether
it's fair to make "pro‑life"
students fund their fellow students'
abortions. Maybe not, but in the
course of one's life, one must pay for many things to which one is opposed.
Tax dollars are used for many controversial
causes, from the NEA to the
Gulf War to welfare. I'm sure vegetarian students who live on campus don't
like subsidizing the meat offered in meal plan
financed cafeterias, but one
does not see them whining and complaining
because they appreciate that others
disagree with their views and tastes. The bottom line is that "pro‑life"
proponents love telling others how to live their
lives. That is why they
resort to malicious vandalism like that
described in "Fire Guts Abortion
Clinic" after twelve years of packing the
Supreme Court with sympathetic
judges still failed to make their minority
opinion the law of the land.
And to those despicable souls who claim to
perpetrate their violence
(i.e., harassment, arson, and even an alleged
murder) in the name of God,
I quote the Gentle Nazarene: "If any one of you is without sin, let him
be the first to throw a stone ... " (John
8:7,NIV).
I do agree with the editor's statement that
"NU should be commended for its
decision".
Boston University would do well to follow NU's enlightened
example.
Sawina R. Eller
COM '94