( - Details of court sessions which have not been publicized yet. )

(-updating: the code of trial D/C CrF-93/79; the
appeal in HC is CrAp -870/79; the judgment of district
court there, has not been publicised anywhere)

-Dr. Frumkin has been charged by governmental
prosecutor with taking a bribe for illegal
release from compulsory military service of some
young men and because of illegal hospitalization
in closed psychiatrical hospital of one women.


-I have heard about this trial when I visited
the library of District Court in Haifa.
- When I entered the court room, the young
men were giving their testimony.

-The prosecutor charged them with desertion
from army service and with bribing Dr. Frumkin.


-In this occasion the interrogated men, one
by one, changed their previous testimony.

-When under police inquiry, the defendants 
explained when and what of their family jewels were 
given, as a bribe to Dr. Frumkin (-this testimony
helped the police: -with their testimonies were 
found the proofs used to charge the psychiatrist),
-now they all changed their previous testimonies
given in police, as obtained under violent
power and threatens by police.

- I listened to the hearings with much interest...
-One man who was present in the court room came to
the public prosecutor and asked to give a testimony
as a victim of doctor Frumkin's attempt to lock him
in a psychiatrical hospital without any reason.

-The prosecutor did not agree to inquest him during
that session, but they advised this man to appeal to
the Tel-Aviv's central police office with a complaint.

- The famous inspector Zigel was leading this
special inquiry of the serious crime of a
senior governmental officer taking bribe...

-I know that this man came to Tel-Aviv's
 police, but there has not been found
 anyone who wished to interrogate him.


Click here for Topics


-The illegal imprisonment the women from Russian
    and governmental expert's testimony.

-Regarding the charge of an illegal imprisonment
of one women in the close psychiatric ward by
Dr. Frumkin's order, -I heard personally the
testimony of the governmental expert, a famous
psychiatrist, as he explained before the famous
district judge that a general physician can't
state the psychiatric condition of his patient;

-the governmental expert carefully explained that 
a diagnosis of a patients' psychiatric condition 
can be given only by an expert psychiatrist
after a special examination of the patient.

-All the hearing were recorded by a tape-recorder


When Dr Frumkin gave testimony...

I would told that at time of his testimony
Dr. Frumkin was very nervous, his fingers
were held crossed as in a prey.


In the court room during this trial there always
were 4-5 colleagues of Dr. Frumkin present;

-Maybe if he did not known before, what he has
going to be asked by the prosecutor. -He would have
selected a better answer. However, he didn't .

- When the accused man was on the witness stand
at the time of inquiry, his colleagues sometime
signed to him what he should answer to questions
of the governmental prosecutor who led the inquiry.

The man who wished to give testimony against Dr.
Frumkim tried few times to signal by hand signs to
judge that a strange connection between the people
present in the session and the witness was going on.

All the people present (as prosecutor and all
other) gave the impression that they did not
see any wrong doings in this spectacle.

-At the end Dr. Frumkin was acquitted by this court.
(The judgment in CrF 93/79 is not publicized were).

- Then the yesterday's defendant wished claim
compensation for the damage allegedlly caused to him
with un-necessary imprisonment and the trial; -then
the prosecutor submitted an appeal in High Court.

href="#topics">Click here for Topics


-The judicial "sacramental simplicity"!?

The appeal was heard by the chief of our
Supreme Court, Moshe Landoy. Under media notice
we knew that the High Court incriminated the
district psychiatrist, Dr. Frumkin in bribee,

but the highest judge exonerated him from the
charge with virtually illegal imprisonment of
the woman in closed psychiatrical hospital. 


The chief of the Supreme Court argued his
liberal decision to discharge Dr. Frumkin from
accusation of illegal imprisonment of the woman.

The highest judge established as though the
district psychiatrist can not be responsible
(accused) in this case of illegal imprisonment,
because.. the husband (!) of this woman had
handed a false complaint against his wife.. 


-As though there was not a testimony of
governmental expert.. in this same trial!!
-His testimony denied the judge's arguments
explaining the discharge from the heaviest crime..


-I would like to present a question to all quint
who had part in this criminal trial: -Wherefore we
need the post of a District Psychiatrist, if it is
possible to imprison every person on the basis of
only a false complaint by the husband?!

Don't You see an absurd in the conception, that
we have a post of District psychiatrist that he
can imprison each citizen under a false complaint?
And that is about a man that is accused with bribee!!

Click here for Topics


-We can not know how many there were "husbands"
and the number of the victims that were
hospitalized like this woman from Russian.


 -Look, -after all the evidence, written in
proceedings and recorded on a tape recorder,

-Sir M. Landoy would like to explain, tor a
clever public, that the mentioned criminal act
was due only because the husband's lie !(?)
-Were there "sacramental simplicity" ?!?

-What is surprising in this story??! -That no one
 was surprised! It was a consensus of silence.

-All citizens were delighted by the genius verdict.

-The scandalous trial was publicized, -but our
gazette lawyers did not given the details, then
the public couldn't read what he needs to know.

-But the public and your virtual correspondent
couldn't know how many other citizens were
victims of any psychiatrist, being declared
insane and illegally imprisoned in the closed
psychiatrical clinics, as they did not get a
possibility to apply to officials or deliver their
complaints to inspector Zigel as did my friend.

- As it were seen in action, -the police prevented
inquire of other criminal cases of Dr. Frumkin.


As was proven in the case of one victim, where the
witness testified against the learned criminal man,
the Public can not know how many victims of this
man and other corrupted psychiatrists are there.

-How much citizens could be imprisoned in psychiatric
 clinics on false declarations of officials or
 other cases that we even cannot to forecast.

-So exonerate the felony. So does the mutual guarantee.

-We can not know how many crimes and felonies were
not brought with charges just because the district
psychiatrist can write a fabricated report, as though
these crimes were illy and can not be claimed..etc.

It is known that before this crime trial all judges
believed in expertise of this district psychiatrist.
The judge that held this trial, -also he some times
could use the experts testimony of the crime doctor.

(-updating: the code of trial D/C CrF-93/79;
-the appeal in Supreme Court is CrAp -870/79;