Referat af mřdet med CONTIERRA d. 14. august 2001

 

Oplćg ved koordinator, pĺ regionalkontoret i Coban,  Erick González.

 

En lille redegřrelse af de forskellige organisationer, som arbejder med jordproblemet.

           FONTIERRA: Land fund. Helps peasants who do not have access to land. Even though every family gets money (Q 900 from the Government) to the community’s land it will not pay the whole land and the community has to pay back in crops.

           CONTIERRA: Solves land conflicts. Does investigations to find the owner of a piece of  land. Regulation of land.

           PROTIERRA: Land survey, land registration. Co-ordinating the land problems. Technical work.

 

All three organisations are funded by the Government, but they are all seriously lacking money. Denmark is the only foreign donor country, donates money through UNDP.

 

A way to achieve better results with the land conflicts has been to decentralise CONTIERRA to different regions. The office in Cobán is the second headquarter, it is responsible for 5 regions: Alta Verapaz, Baja Verapaz, Livingston, El Estor & Quiche(?)

These regions are among the most conflictive in Guatemala.

The office in Cobán has existed for 3 months and has 5 employees.

 

Consultation and negotiation seem to be easier with decentralisation and  local offices. All parts of the conflict can then participate in solving the conflict. The past 3 months have shown an increase in cases – 75 new ones have been reported. At present CONTIERRA has about 260 cases in process. 60 cases (out of 300) have been solved. Event though it is difficult to see straight results because the cases are so complex. there has definitely been an increase in solved cases since the decentralisation of offices, but simultaneously there has been an increase in the number of new cases.

It is a very difficult process, and patience is one of the most important ingredients in the process of making all parties satisfied. A huge problem is that almost the entire indigenous population is in need of land, but there are simply not enough resources to supply land to all.

To decide who should gain access to the resources, it is necessary to gather all kinds of information: historical, geographical, anthropological etc. CONTIERRA then makes an analysis in order to decide who will be able to make the best profit from the land. However, every case starts with a request from a comunidad that wants access to land. If the land then is privately owned, the first step is to make both parties accept that this land is privately owned. Then they find an agreement to buy the land of the finca owner. It is also the job of CONTIERRA to judge how much land the comunidad needs.

Most comunidades do not come directly to CONTIERRA with their cases, instead they come through a peasant organisation such as CUC or CONIC. CONTIERRA feels overburdened with requests from these organisations.

It is very individual how long it takes to solve a case. Some of the cases date 130-140 years back, and are thus very complex and hard to solve. Some cases are very close to being solved, and then suddenly the process starts to go backwards or nothing happens for a long time.

There are conflicts in which the landowner does not want to cooperate, and then the case has to be taken through a legal process.

 

CONTIERRA as well as FONTIERRA are seriously underfunded; to a degree that to solve all presently existing conflicts concerning land would last more than 100 years!

Solving the conflict is a great challenge, and even between the regions e.g. between Alta and Baja Verapaz there exist great differences, though the regions generally are characterised by the big German landowners. The cases that do not come out with any solution can result in a trial before the Supreme Court.

 

Even though CONTIERRA now works more decentralised they do not reach all people in the rural areas. They have not built up capacity themselves yet but they train people in the office so they can be more capable at their job and assist more people. Furthermore, they receive training from organisations like PROPAZ and INTRAPAZ.

Rural education is not a part of CONTIERRA’s program, yet, but if it were they would try to give people knowledge about their rights. Many people in the area think that dialogue can solve the conflict in Guatemala.

 

CONTIERRA’s goal for the future is mediation through conciliation. Whether they will reach it or not is hard to say. CONTIERRA evaluates the program every year. It is difficult to evaluate on these often complex cases which are quite sensitive, as well. CONTIERRA hopes that the amount of new cases will decrease in the future.

 

In most cases the great landowners have been pleased to sell out land as long as they got reasonable fair prices. Many of these landowners have taken advantage of the fact that the state is financing the buying of the land, and they have offered to sell land to overprices. However, now when they are aware that FONTIERRA is lacking money, they are not so willing to sell anymore.

 

CONTIERRA is funded by the Guatemalan Government. However, this fact does not mean that they are met with rejection among the population, and they do not have a close collaboration with the FRG president, Alfonso Portillo.

The president of CONTIERRA is an ex-guillero. In the start, this caused many finca owners to fear that he would favour less fortunate groups in society. Nevertheless, he has been able to solve many conflicts and is now being met with a considerably positive attitude.

 

A typical case from Cobán

Tierra Blanca, approximately 14 Caballeras (1 Caballera ~ 54 Hectar)

 

Problem: Doubt about ownership of land between a finca owner and the comunidad. The finca owner claims property of the land and makes the comunidad pay for renting the land. CONTIERRA made an investigation to find the ‘real’ owner and started a reconciliation process between the finca owner and the comunidad.

The finca owner had a document on the land. However, there were three comunidades living on the land, and the finca owner finally realised that he could not claim all that land.

 

This and many other cases is directed at supporting the capacity of peasants to buy/overtake land.

1