Referat af mødet med Ibis d. 8. august 2001
Se i øvrigt www.ibis.dk
Ibis er en dansk solidaritets- og bistandsorganisation, som har eksisteret siden 1966. Ibis var oprindeligt en del af World University Services men har været selvstændig siden 1983.
Målgruppe: Fattige og marginaliserede mænd og kvinder
Mål: At arbejde for at menneskerettighedsituationen bliver forbedret, dvs. ret og adgang til uddannelse, sundhed og andre basale behov, igennem kapacitetsopbygning (empowerment) af organisationer især civilsamfunds organisationer.
Områder: Ibis arbejder i to regioner i Latinamerika
Centralamerika: Honduras, Nicaragua, El Salvador og Guatemala
Sydamerika: Bolivia. Peru og Ecuador
Vision 2012:
Indsatsen frem mod år 2005 ligger inden for strategien frem mod 2012 og har 4 hovedområder:
1. Styrke civilsamfundet. Organisationsudvikling, så organisationerne kan klare sig også efter Ibis har trukket sig ud af området
2. Folkelig deltagelse i god regeringsførelse, decentralisering. Støtte til kommuner, civilsamfundsorganisationer og de fattige, så de bliver bevidste om deres behov.
3. Uddannelse i et forandringsperspektiv. Tosprogethed, interkulturelt samfund.
4. Globale strukturelle årsager til fattigdom. Hvordan bryder man ud af fattigdommen?
Alle projekter har tværgående elementer
1. Køn
2. HIV/AIDS
3. Miljø
4. Fortalervirksomhed (på to måder: ved at lave lobbyarbejde og ved at styrke organisationerne, så de lærer at klare sig selv)
Ibis’ rolle i Guatemala: Faciliterende rolle. Har ikke projekter, der laver serviceydelser med mindre det er nødvendigt, for at komme videre i processen.
Tidligere har Ibis været meget projektorienteret, nu har de projekter med forskellige samarbejdspartnere, fokuseret på ovenstående temaområder.
Ibis er Danidafinancieret. De arbejder derfor inden for Danidas udviklingsstrategier og rammeaftaler. Evalueres fra Danidas side. desuden har Ibis tæt kontakt til den danske ambassade i Nicaragua
Projekter i Guatemala:
15-20 projekter og 5 rådgivere.
Ibis samarbejder også med MINUGUA, men mener ikke det vil have nogen større effekt på Ibis’ projekter, når MINUGUA trækker sig ud af Guatemala.
Om fredsaftalerne og besvarelse af
forskellige spørgsmål, v. Mario Silvestre.
Peace Accords:
General framework: The Peace Accords in
Guatemala were an instrument to initiate structural changes They were the
result of various dialogues between the Government and the civic society. Some
of the suggestions that were included are concerned with changes with respect
to the function of the military, recognition of the indigenous peoples, more
participation by the population. In 1998, the first forum was held to confirm
or reject constitutional reforms suggested in the Peace Accords. however, two
weeks prior to the votation the Evangelical churches and some business people
publicly recommended a “no”. This was probably the determining factor for the
result of the votation.
Ever since then, many organisations have felt frustrated because the
reforms could have made their work a lot easier.
The only thing that the new government has done concerning the Peace
Accords is to agree with MINUGUA on a date for a new votation in 2004. meaning
that by 2004, the new Government will have to begin talks about the Peace
Accords anew.
There has been very little progress in the peace process, mainly due to
the incapacity and unwillingness on behalf of the Government, and the
incapacity on behalf of the civic society.
In Guatemala there are 4 ethnic groups: Garifuna, Xinka, Maya (22
linguistic communities) & Ladino.
Mayan people want to preserve a Mayan identity and culture and to keep
respect between multicultural groups.
The Ladino population has mainly rejected the suggested constitutional
changes because they fear that the Mayan community which size-wise is a
majority will overtake them.
Society is very fragmented and what is needed is reconciliation.
Democracy is much harder that most Guatemalans think.
The Peace Accords enforced an educational reform with the right of
bilingual education for the Maya. Dialogues between civil society and
Government on municipal and civil level have started with the purpose of seeing
the agreements can be implemented, so e.g. the indigenous can get bilingual
books.
People are afraid. Reconciliation and democracy is still far away and
people still flee Guatemala because they feel threatened and insecure.
Some efforts on behalf of civil society have been gathered to secure the
fulfilment of the Peace Accords but problems such as drugs, money washing etc.
make the work complicated.
Organisations are calling for dialogue. And the new Archbishop has
called together 40 sectors of society. They are discussing how to fulfill the
Peace Accords but the problem is that
almost all organised sectors are against each other.
They should stay here to watch/supervise the process. Ibis’ work to strengthen civil society is hard and takes a long time.