In some of our schools the price of tuitions
has been too low. This has in many ways been detrimental to the
educational work. It has brought discouraging debt; it has thrown
upon the management a continual suspicion of miscalculation,
want of economy, and wrong planning; it has been very discouraging
to the teachers; and it leads the people to demand correspondingly
low prices in other schools. Whatever may have been the object
in placing the tuition at less than a living rate, the fact that
a school has been running behind heavily is sufficient reason
for reconsidering the plans and arranging its charges so that
in the future its showing may be different. The amount charged
for tuition, board, and residence should
be sufficient to pay the salaries of the faculty, to supply the
table with an abundance of healthful, nourishing food, to maintain
the furnishing of the rooms, to keep the buildings in repair,
and to meet other necessary running expenses. This is an important
matter and calls for no narrow calculation, but for a thorough
investigation. The counsel of the Lord is needed. The school
should have a sufficient income not only to pay the necessary
running expenses, but to be able to furnish the students during
the school term with some things essential for their work.
Debts must not be allowed to accumulate term
after term. The very highest kind of education that could be
given is to shun the incurring of debt as you would shun disease.
When one year after another passes, and there is no sign of diminishing
the debt, but it is rather increased, a halt should be called.
Let the managers say: "We refuse to run the school any longer
unless some sure system is devised." It would be better,
far better, to close the school until the managers learn the
science of conducting it on a paying basis. For Christ's sake,
as the chosen people of God, call yourselves to task and inaugurate
a sound financial system in our schools.
Whenever it becomes necessary to raise
the prices at any school, let the matter first be laid before
the patrons of the institution, showing them that the fees have
been placed at too low a figure and that, as a result, debts
are accumulating upon the school, thus crippling and hindering
its work. Properly increasing the tuitions may cause a decrease
in the attendance, but a large attendance should not be so much
a matter of rejoicing as freedom from debt.
One of the results of low tuition at Battle
Creek has been the gathering together in one place of a larger
number of students and a larger number of families than was wise.
If two thirds of the people in Battle Creek were plants of the Lord in other localities, they
would have room to grow. Greater results would have appeared
if a portion of the time and energy bestowed on the large school
in Battle Creek to keep it in a healthy condition had been used
for schools in other localities where there is room for agricultural
pursuits to be carried on as a part of the education. Had there
been a willingness to follow the Lord's ways and His plans, many
plants would now be growing in other places. Over and over again
the word of the Lord has come to us that plants both of churches
and of schools should be made in other localities, that there
were too many weighty responsibilities in one place. Get the
people out of the large centers and establish interests in other
places, is the instruction given. Had this instruction been heeded,
had there been a distribution of means and facilities, the money
expended on the extra college buildings at Battle Creek would
have abundantly provided for two new plants in other localities,
and the tree would have grown and borne such fruit as has not
been seen, because men choose to follow their own wisdom.
Our brethren say the plea comes from ministers
and parents that there are scores of young people in our ranks
who need the advantages of our training schools, who cannot attend
unless tuitions are less. But those who plead for low tuitions
should carefully weigh matters on all sides. If students cannot
of themselves command sufficient means to pay the actual expense
of good and faithful work in their education, is it not better
that their parents, their friends, the churches to which they
belong, or large-hearted, benevolent brethren in their conference,
should assist them than that a burden of debt should be brought
upon the school? It would be far better to let the many patrons
of the institution share the expense than for the school to run
in debt.
Methods must be devised to prevent the
accumulation of debt upon our institutions. The whole cause must
not be made to suffer because of debt which will never be lifted
unless there is an entire change and the work is carried forward
on some different basis. Let all who have acted a part in allowing
this cloud of debt to cover them now feel it their duty to do
what they can to remove it.