(i) Catherine Allday Davis
Catherine Allday Davis, a college friend of Monica
Lewinsky's,(53) testified that Ms. Lewinsky told her in late 1995
or early 1996 about Ms. Lewinsky's sexual relationship with the
President.(54) According to Ms. Davis, Ms. Lewinsky told her that
the relationship included mutual kissing and hugging, as well as
oral sex performed by Ms. Lewinsky on the President. She also
stated that the President touched Monica "on her breasts and on
her vagina."(55) Ms. Davis also described the cigar incident
discussed above.(56) Ms. Davis added that Monica said that she had
"phone sex" with the President five to ten times in 1996 or
1997.(57)
(ii) Neysa Erbland
Neysa Erbland, a high school friend of Ms. Lewinsky's,(58)
testified that Ms. Lewinsky told her in 1995 that she was having
an affair with President Clinton.(59) According to Ms. Erbland,
Ms. Lewinsky said that the sexual relationship began when
Ms. Lewinsky was an intern.(60) Ms. Lewinsky told Ms. Erbland that
the sexual contact included oral sex, kissing, and fondling.(61)
On occasion, as Ms. Erbland described it, the President put his
face in Ms. Lewinsky's bare chest.(62) Ms. Erbland also said that
Ms. Lewinsky described the cigar incident discussed above.(63)
Ms. Erbland also understood from Ms. Lewinsky that she and the
President engaged in phone sex, normally after midnight.(64)
(iii) Natalie Rose Ungvari
Ms. Lewinsky told another high school friend, Natalie Rose
Ungvari,(65) of her sexual relationship with the President.
Ms. Lewinsky first informed Ms. Ungvari of the sexual
relationship on November 23, 1995. Ms. Ungvari specifically
remembers the date because it was her birthday.(66) Ms. Ungvari
recalled that Ms. Lewinsky said that she performed oral sex on
the President and that he fondled her breasts.(67) Ms. Lewinsky
told Ms. Ungvari that the President sometimes telephoned
Ms. Lewinsky late at night and would ask her to engage in phone
sex.(68)
(iv) Ashley Raines
Ashley Raines, a friend of Ms. Lewinsky who worked in the
White House Office of Policy Development Operations,(69) testified
that Ms. Lewinsky described the sexual relationship with the
President. Ms. Raines testified that Ms. Lewinsky told her that
the relationship began around the time of the government furlough
in late 1995.(70) Ms. Raines understood that the President and
Ms. Lewinsky engaged in kissing and oral sex, usually in the
President's study.(71) Ms. Lewinsky also told Ms. Raines that she
and the President had engaged in phone sex on several
occasions.(72)
(v) Andrew Bleiler
In late 1995, Monica Lewinsky told Andrew Bleiler, a former
boyfriend, that she was having an affair with a high official at
the White House.(73) According to Mr. Bleiler, Ms. Lewinsky said
that the relationship did not include sexual intercourse, but did
include oral sex. She also told Mr. Bleiler about the cigar
incident discussed above, and sexual activity in which the man
touched Ms. Lewinsky's genitals and caused her to have an
orgasm.(74)
(vi) Dr. Irene Kassorla
Dr. Irene Kassorla counseled Ms. Lewinsky from 1992 through
1997.(75) Ms. Lewinsky told her of the sexual relationship with
the President. Ms. Lewinsky said she performed oral sex on the
President in a room adjacent to the Oval Office, that the
President touched Ms. Lewinsky causing her to have orgasms, and
that they engaged in fondling and touching of one another.(76) The
President was in charge of scheduling their sexual encounters and
"became Lewinsky's life."(77)
(vii) Linda Tripp
When she worked at the Pentagon, Ms. Lewinsky told a co-worker, Linda Tripp, that she had a sexual relationship with
President Clinton.(78) Ms. Tripp stated that Ms. Lewinsky first
told her about the relationship in September or October 1996.
Ms. Lewinsky told Ms. Tripp that the first sexual encounter with
the President had occurred on November 15, 1995, when
Ms. Lewinsky performed oral sex on him. Ms. Lewinsky told
Ms. Tripp that, during the course of this sexual relationship,
she performed oral sex on the President, the President fondled
Ms. Lewinsky's breasts, the President touched Ms. Lewinsky's
genitalia, and they engaged in phone sex.(79)
(viii) Debra Finerman
Ms. Lewinsky's aunt, Debra Finerman, testified that Monica
told her about her sexual relationship with President Clinton.(80)
Ms. Finerman testified that Ms. Lewinsky described a particular
sexual encounter with the President.(81) Ms. Finerman otherwise
did not ask and was not told the specifics of the sexual activity
between the President and Ms. Lewinsky.(82)
(ix) Dale Young
Dale Young, a family friend, testified that Ms. Lewinsky
told her that she had engaged in oral sex with President
Clinton.(83)
(x) Kathleen Estep
Kathleen Estep, a counselor for Ms. Lewinsky,(84) met with
Ms. Lewinsky on three occasions in November 1996.(85) Based on her
limited interaction with Ms. Lewinsky, Ms. Estep stated that she
considered Ms. Lewinsky to be credible.(86) During their second
session, Ms. Lewinsky told Ms. Estep about her sexual
relationship with President Clinton.(87) Ms. Lewinsky told
Ms. Estep that the physical part of the relationship involved
kissing, Ms. Lewinsky performing oral sex on the President, and
the President fondling her breasts.(88)
6. Summary
The detailed testimony of Ms. Lewinsky, her corroborating
prior consistent statements to her friends, family members, and
counselors, and the evidence of the President's semen on
Ms. Lewinsky's dress establish that Ms. Lewinsky and the
President engaged in substantial sexual activity between November
15, 1995, and December 28, 1997.(89)
The President, however, testified under oath in the civil
case -- both in his deposition and in a written answer to an
interrogatory -- that he did not have a "sexual relationship" or
a "sexual affair" or "sexual relations" with Ms. Lewinsky. In
addition, he denied engaging in activity covered by a more
specific definition of "sexual relations" used at the
deposition.(90)
In his civil case, the President made five different false
statements related to the sexual relationship. For four of the
five statements, the President asserts a semantic defense: The
President argues that the terms used in the Jones deposition to
cover sexual activity did not cover the sexual activity in which
he engaged with Ms. Lewinsky. For his other false statements,
the President's response is factual -- namely, he disputes
Ms. Lewinsky's account that he ever touched her breasts or
genitalia during sexual activity.(91)
The President's denials -- semantic and factual -- do not
withstand scrutiny.
First, in his civil deposition, the President denied a
"sexual affair" with Ms. Lewinsky (the term was not defined).
The President's response to lying under oath on this point rests
on his definition of "sexual affair" -- namely, that it requires
sexual intercourse, no matter how extensive the sexual activities
might otherwise be. According to the President, a man could
regularly engage in oral sex and fondling of breasts and genitals
with a woman and yet not have a "sexual affair" with her.
Second, in his civil deposition, the President also denied a
"sexual relationship" with Ms. Lewinsky (the term was not
defined). The President's response to lying under oath on this
point similarly rests on his definition of "sexual relationship"
-- namely, that it requires sexual intercourse. Once again,
under the President's theory, a man could regularly engage in
oral sex and fondling of breasts and genitals with a woman, yet
not have a "sexual relationship" with her.
The President's claim as to his interpretation of "sexual
relationship" is belied by the fact that the President's own
lawyer -- earlier at that same deposition -- equated the term
"sexual relationship" with "sex of any kind in any manner, shape
or form." The President's lawyer offered that interpretation
when requesting Judge Wright to limit the questioning to prevent
further inquiries with respect to Monica Lewinsky. As the
videotape of the deposition reveals, the President was present
and apparently looking in the direction of his attorney when his
attorney offered that statement.(92) The President gave no
indication that he disagreed with his attorney's straightforward
interpretation that the term "sexual relationship" means "sex of
any kind in any manner, shape, or form." Nor did the President
thereafter take any steps to correct the attorney's statement.
Third, in an answer to an interrogatory submitted before his
deposition, the President denied having "sexual relations" with
Ms. Lewinsky (the term was not defined). Yet again, the
President's apparent rejoinder to lying under oath on this point
rests on his definition of "sexual relations" -- that it, too,
requires sexual intercourse. According to President Clinton,
oral sex does not constitute sexual relations.
Fourth, in his civil deposition, the President denied
committing any acts that fell within the specific definition of
"sexual relations" that was in effect for purposes of that
deposition. Under that specific definition, sexual relations
occurs "when the person knowingly engages in or causes contact
with the genitalia, anus, groin, breast, inner thigh, or buttocks
of any person with an intent to arouse or gratify the sexual
desire of any person."(93) Thus, the President denied engaging in
or causing contact with the genitalia, breasts, or anus of "any
person" with an intent to arouse or gratify the sexual desire of
"any person."
Concerning oral sex, the President's sole answer to the
charge that he lied under oath at the deposition focused on his
interpretation of "any person" in the definition. Ms. Lewinsky
testified that she performed oral sex on the President on nine
occasions. The President said that by receiving oral sex, he
would not "engage in" or "cause"(94) contact with the genitalia,
anus, groin, breast, inner thigh, or buttocks of "any person"
because "any person" really means "any other person." The
President further testified before the grand jury: "[I]f the
deponent is the person who has oral sex performed on him, then
the contact is with -- not with anything on that list, but with
the lips of another person."(95)
The President's linguistic parsing is unreasonable. Under
the President's interpretation (which he says he followed at his
deposition), in an oral sex encounter, one person is engaged in
sexual relations, but the other person is not engaged in sexual
relations.(96)
Even assuming that the definitional language can be
manipulated to exclude the deponent's receipt of oral sex, the
President is still left with the difficulty that reasonable
persons would not have understood it that way. And in context,
the President's semantics become even weaker: The Jones suit
rested on the allegation that the President sought to have
Ms. Jones perform oral sex on him. Yet the President now claims
that the expansive definition devised for deposition questioning
should be interpreted to exclude that very act.
Fifth, by denying at his civil deposition that he had
engaged in any acts falling within the specific definition of
"sexual relations," the President denied engaging in or causing
contact with the breasts or genitalia of Ms. Lewinsky with an
intent to arouse or gratify one's sexual desire. In contrast to
his explanations of the four preceding false statements under
oath, the President's defense to lying under oath in this
instance is purely factual.
As discussed above, Ms. Lewinsky testified credibly that the
President touched and kissed her bare breasts on nine occasions,
and that he stimulated her genitals on four occasions.(97) She
also testified about a cigar incident, which is discussed above.
In addition, a deleted computer file from Ms. Lewinsky's home
computer contained an apparent draft letter to the President that
explicitly referred to an incident in which the President's
"mouth [was] on [her] breast" and implicitly referred to direct
contact with her genitalia.(98) This draft letter further
corroborates Ms. Lewinsky's testimony.
Ms. Lewinsky's prior consistent statements to various
friends, family members, and counselors -- made when the
relationship was ongoing -- likewise corroborate her testimony on
the nature of the President's touching of her body. Ms. Lewinsky
had no apparent motive to lie to her friends, family members, and
counselors. Ms. Lewinsky especially had no reason to lie to
Dr. Kassorla and Ms. Estep, to whom she related the facts in the
course of a professional relationship. And Ms. Lewinsky's
statements to some that she did not have intercourse with the
President, even though she wanted to do so, enhances the
credibility of her statements. Moreover, the precise nature of
the sexual activity only became relevant after the President
interposed his semantic defense regarding oral sex on August 17,
1998.
By contrast, the President's testimony strains credulity.
His apparent "hands-off" scenario -- in which he would have
received oral sex on nine occasions from Ms. Lewinsky but never
made direct contact with Ms. Lewinsky's breasts or genitalia --
is not credible. The President's claim seems to be that he
maintained a hands-off policy in ongoing sexual encounters with
Ms. Lewinsky, which coincidentally happened to permit him to
truthfully deny "sexual relations" with her at a deposition
occurring a few years in the future. As Ms. Lewinsky noted, it
suggests some kind of "service contract -- that all I did was
perform oral sex on him and that that's all this relationship
was."(99)
The President also had strong personal, political, and legal
motives to lie in the Jones deposition: He did not want to admit
that he had committed extramarital sex acts with a young intern
in the Oval Office area of the White House. Such an admission
could support Ms. Jones's theory of liability and would embarrass
him. Indeed, the President admitted that during the relationship
he did what he could to keep the relationship secret, including
"misleading" members of his family and Cabinet.(100) The President
testified, moreover, that he "hoped that this relationship would
never become public."(101)
At the time of his civil deposition, the President also
could have presumed that he could lie under oath without risk
because -- as he knew -- Ms. Lewinsky had already filed a false
affidavit denying a sexual relationship with the President.
Indeed, they had an understanding that each would lie under oath
(explained more fully in Ground VI below). So the President
might have expected that he could lie without consequence on the
belief that no one could ever successfully challenge his denial
of a sexual relationship with her.
In sum, based on all of the evidence and considering the
President's various responses, there is substantial and credible
information that the President lied under oath in his civil
deposition and his interrogatory answer in denying a sexual
relationship, a sexual affair, or sexual relations with
Ms. Lewinsky.(102)
II. There is substantial and credible information that President
Clinton lied under oath to the grand jury about his sexual
relationship with Monica Lewinsky.
A. Background
>In January 1998, upon application of the Attorney General,
the Special Division of the United States Court of Appeals for
the District of Columbia Circuit expanded the OIC's jurisdiction
to investigate, among other matters, whether Monica Lewinsky and
the President obstructed justice in the Jones case. The criminal
investigation was triggered by specific and credible evidence
that Monica Lewinsky denied her relationship with President
Clinton in a false affidavit in the Jones case, that she had
spoken to the President and Vernon Jordan about her testimony,
and that she may have been influenced to lie by the President
through the assistance of Vernon Jordan and others in finding her
a job. After the President, in his January 17 deposition, denied
any sexual relationship with Monica Lewinsky and otherwise
minimized his overall relationship with her, the President's
testimony became an additional subject of the OIC investigation.
The threshold factual question was whether the President and
Monica Lewinsky in fact had a sexual relationship. If they did,
the President would have committed perjury in his civil
deposition and interrogatory answer: The President, as noted in
Ground I above, had denied a sexual affair, sexual relationship,
or sexual relations with Monica Lewinsky, including any direct
contact with her breasts or genitalia. The answer to the
preliminary factual question also could alter the interpretation
of several possibly obstructionist acts by the President -- the
employment assistance for Ms. Lewinsky, the concealment of gifts
he had given to Ms. Lewinsky, the discussion between the
President and Ms. Lewinsky of her testimony or affidavit, the
President's post-deposition communications with Betty Currie, and
the President's emphatic denials of a relationship to his aides
who later testified before the grand jury.
During the investigation, the OIC gathered a substantial
body of information that established that the President and
Monica Lewinsky did, in fact, have a sexual relationship. That
information is outlined in Ground I above. In particular, the
information includes: (i) the detailed and credible testimony of
Ms. Lewinsky regarding the 10 sexual encounters; (ii) the
President's semen stain on Ms. Lewinsky's dress; and (iii) the
testimony of friends, family members, and counselors to whom she
made near-contemporaneous statements about the relationship. All
of this evidence pointed to a single conclusion -- that she and
the President did have a sexual relationship.
B. The President's Grand Jury Testimony
The President was largely aware of that extensive body of
evidence before he testified to the grand jury on August 17,
1998. Not only did the President know that Ms. Lewinsky had
reached an immunity agreement with this Office in exchange for
her truthful testimony, but the President knew from public
reports and his own knowledge that his semen might be on one of
Ms. Lewinsky's dresses. The OIC had asked him for a blood sample
on August 3, 1998 (two weeks before his grand jury testimony) and
assured his counsel that there was a substantial predicate for
the request, which reasonably implied that there was semen on the
dress.
As a result, the President had three apparent choices in his
testimony to the grand jury. First, the President could adhere
to his previous testimony in his civil case, as well as in his
public statements, and deny any sexual relationship. But he knew
(or at least, had reason to know) that the contrary evidence was
overwhelming, particularly if his semen were in fact on Ms.
Lewinsky's dress. Second, the President could admit a sexual
relationship, which would cause him also to simultaneously admit
that he lied under oath in the Jones case. Third, the President
could invoke his Fifth Amendment privilege against compelled
self-incrimination.
Confronting those three options, the President attempted to
avoid them altogether. The President admitted to an
"inappropriate intimate" relationship, but he maintained that he
had not committed perjury in the Jones case when he denied having
a sexual relationship, sexual affair, or sexual relations with
her.(103) The President contended that he had believed his various
statements in the Jones case to be legally accurate.(104) He also
testified that the inappropriate relationship began not in
November 1995 when Ms. Lewinsky was an intern, as Ms. Lewinsky
and other witnesses have testified, but in 1996.
During his grand jury testimony, the President was asked
whether Monica Lewinsky performed oral sex on him and, if so,
whether he had committed perjury in his civil deposition by
denying a sexual relationship, sexual affair, or sexual relations
with her. The President refused to say whether he had oral sex.
Instead, the President said (i) that the undefined terms "sexual
affair," "sexual relationship," and "sexual relations"
necessarily require sexual intercourse, (ii) that he had not
engaged in intercourse with Ms. Lewinsky, and (iii) that he
therefore had not committed perjury in denying a sexual
relationship, sexual affair, or sexual relations.(105)
A more specific definition of "sexual relations" had also
been used at the civil deposition. As to that definition, the
President said to the grand jury that he does not and did not
believe oral sex was covered.
53. Catherine Davis 3/17/98 GJ at 9-10. Ms. Catherine Davis
talked to Ms. Lewinsky by telephone an average of once a week
until April 1997 when Ms. Davis moved to Tokyo; thereafter she
and Ms. Lewinsky remained in touch through e-mail. Id. at 14,
27.
54. Id. at 19-20.
55. Id. at 20.
56. Id. at 169.
57. Id. at 37.
58. Erbland 2/12/98 GJ at 9-10. Ms. Erbland testified that
she spoke on the phone with Ms. Lewinsky at least once a month.
Id. at 18-19.
59. Id. at 24, 30, 31.
60. Id. at 27.
61. Id. at 26 ("She told me that she had given him [oral
sex] and that she had had all of her clothes off, but that he
only had his shirt off and that she had given him oral sex and
they kissed and fondled each other and that they didn't have sex.
That was kind of a little bit of a letdown for her."); id. at 29
("He put his face in her chest. And, you know, just oral sex on
her part, you know, to him.").
62. Id. at 29.
63. Id. at 45.
64. Id. at 39 ("They were like phone sex conversations.
They would, you know, talk about what they wanted to do to each
other sexually.").
65. Ms. Ungvari spoke with Monica Lewinsky on the telephone
an average of once a week, and visited her in Washington in
October 1995 and March 1996. Ungvari 3/19/98 GJ at 9-11, 14-15.
66. Id. at 18.
67. Id. at 23-24.
68. Id. at 81.
69. Raines 1/29/98 GJ at 11. Ms. Raines and Monica Lewinsky
have become "close friend[s]" since Ms. Lewinsky left the White
House. Id. at 19.
70. Id. at 35-36, 38.
71. Id. at 30, 43, 48.
72. Id. at 51.
73. Andrew Bleiler 1/28/98 Int. at 3.
74. Id. at 3.
75. Ms. Lewinsky gave this Office permission to interview
Dr. Kassorla.
76. Kassorla 8/28/98 Int. at 2.
77. Id. at 2-3. Dr. Kassorla advised Ms. Lewinsky against
the relationship, stating that she was an employee having an
office romance with a superior and that the relationship would
cost Ms. Lewinsky her job. Id. at 2.
78. Tripp 7/2/98 GJ at 104.
79. Id. at 97-105.
80. Finerman 3/18/98 Depo. at 29-33.
81. She testified that the encounter concluded with the
President masturbating into a bathroom sink. Id. at 30-31.
Ms. Finerman indicated that "it was something I didn't want to
talk about," and Ms. Lewinsky "sort of clammed up" thereafter.
Id. at 35. See also Lewinsky 8/26/98 Depo. at 18.
82. Finerman 3/18/98 Depo. at 33-35.
83. Young 6/23/98 GJ at 37-38.
84. Estep 8/23/98 Int. at 1. Ms. Estep is a licensed
certified social worker; Ms. Lewinsky gave this Office permission
to interview her.
85. Id. at 1, 4.
86. Id. at 3. Ms. Estep also thought that Ms. Lewinsky had
her "feet in reality." Id.
87. Id. at 2.
88. Id.
89. The President and Ms. Lewinsky had ten sexual encounters
that included direct contact with the genitalia of at least one
party, and two other encounters that included kissing. On nine
of the ten occasions, Ms. Lewinsky performed oral sex on the
President. On nine occasions, the President touched and kissed
Ms. Lewinsky's bare breasts. On four occasions, the President
also touched her genitalia. On one occasion, the President
inserted a cigar into her vagina to stimulate her. The President
and Ms. Lewinsky also had phone sex on at least fifteen
occasions.
90. This denial encompassed touching of Ms. Lewinsky's
breasts or genitalia.
91. He provided his responses during his August 17, 1998
grand jury appearance; those responses are separately analyzed in
Ground II.
92. Chief Judge Norma Holloway Johnson, United States
District Court for the District of Columbia, and Judge Susan
Webber Wright, United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Arkansas, each has one copy of the videotape, and the
Congress may see fit to seek the videotape from either court.
The videotape is valuable in facilitating a proper assessment of
the facts and evidence presented in this Referral.
93. Clinton 1/17/98 Depo., Exh. 1.
94. Clinton 8/17/98 GJ at 151.
95. Clinton 8/17/98 GJ at 151 (emphasis added).
96. The definition used at the President's deposition also
covers acts in which the deponent "cause[d] contact" with the
genitalia or anus of "any person." When he testified to the
grand jury, the President said that this aspect of the definition
still does not cover his receiving oral sex. The President said
that the word "cause" implies "forcing to me" and "forcible
abusive behavior." Clinton 8/17/98 GJ at 17. And thus the
President said that he did not lie under oath in denying that he
"caused" contact with the genitalia of any person because his
activity with Ms. Lewinsky did not include any nonconsensual
behavior. Id. at 18.
97. She testified that she had orgasms on three of the four
occasions. We note that fact because (i) the definition referred
to direct contact with the genitalia with the "intent to arouse
or gratify" and (ii) the President has denied such contact.
Ms. Lewinsky also testified that on one occasion, the President
put his hand over her mouth during a sexual encounter to keep her
quiet. Lewinsky 7/31/98 Int. at 3.
98. MSL-55-DC-0094; MSL-55-DC-0124.
99. Lewinsky 8/20/98 GJ at 54.
100. Text of President's Address to Nation, reprinted in
Washington Post, August 18, 1998, at A5 (emphasis added).
101. Clinton 8/17/98 GJ at 107.
102. Following the President's public admission of an
inappropriate relationship, Judge Wright stated sua sponte in an
order issued on September 1, 1998: "Although the Court has
concerns about the nature of the President's January 17, 1998
deposition testimony given his recent public statements, the
Court makes no findings at this time regarding whether the
President may be in contempt." Jones v. Clinton, No. LR-C-94-290
(September 1, 1998), Unpublished Order at 7 n.5.
103. Clinton 8/17/98 GJ at 9-10.
104. Id. at 9-10. See also Excerpt from President Clinton's
Televised Address to the American People, 8/17/98, reprinted in
The Washington Post, at A5 (8/18/98) ("In a deposition in
January, I was asked questions about my relationship with Monica
Lewinsky. While my answers were legally accurate, I did not
volunteer information.").
105. Clinton 8/17/98 GJ at 23-24.