Oregon State Laws

The following is from the 1997 Oregon Revised Statutes
609.140 Right of action by owner of damaged livestock.
(1) The owner of any livestock which has been damaged by being injured, chased, wounded or killed by any dog shall have a cause of action against the owner of such dog for the damages resulting therefrom, including double the value of any livestock killed and double the amount of any damage to the livestock.

(2) If one or more of several dogs owned by different persons participate in damaging any livestock, the owners of the respective dogs shall be jointly and severally liable under this section. The owners of dogs jointly or severally liable under this section have a right of contribution among themselves. The right exists only in favor of an owner who has paid more than the pro rata share of the owner, determined by dividing the total damage by the number of dogs involved, of the common liability, and the total recovery of the owner is limited to the amount paid by the owner in excess of the pro rata share of the owner.

(3) An action brought under this section may be tried as an action at law in any court of competent jurisdiction.

(4) As used in this section:

(a) "Owner" means the head of the family of the home where the dog is cared for at the time of the damage.

(b) "Head of the family" means any person who has charge or manages the affairs of a collective body of persons residing together, the relations between whom are of a permanent and domestic character. [Amended by 1973 c.655 s.7; 1975 c.749 s.1]

609.150 Right to kill dog that kills or injures livestock.
(1) Except as provided in subsection (3) of this section, any dog, whether licensed or not, which, while off the premises owned or under control of its owner, kills, wounds, or injures any livestock not belonging to the master of such dog, is a public nuisance and may be killed immediately by any person. However, nothing in this section applies to any dog acting under the direction of its master, or the agents or employees of such master.

(2) If any dog, not under the control of its owner or keeper, is found chasing or feeding upon the warm carcass of livestock not the property of such owner or keeper it shall be deemed, prima facie, as engaged in killing, wounding or injuring livestock.

(3) No person shall kill any dog for killing, wounding, injuring or chasing chickens upon a public place, highway or within the corporate limits of any city. [Amended by 1975 c.749 s.6]

609.155 Impounding dog that kills or injures livestock; testing dog; killing dog; release.
(1) In a county with a dog control program, upon finding a dog engaged in killing, wounding, injuring or chasing livestock or upon receipt from a complainant of evidence that a dog has been so engaged, the dog control officer or other law enforcement officer shall impound the dog.

(2) If there is reason to believe that reasonable testing of a dog impounded pursuant to subsection (1) of this section, including but not limited to a fecal examination or examination of the teeth of the dog, will provide substantial further evidence as to whether the dog has been engaged in killing, wounding, injuring or chasing livestock, the county governing body shall provide for the administration of the tests by a licensed veterinarian.

(3)(a) After completion of such tests as are administered pursuant to subsection (2) of this section, the county governing body shall determine whether the dog has been engaged in killing, wounding, injuring or chasing livestock. If the county governing body determines that the dog has been so engaged, the dog shall be killed in a humane manner and costs of keeping and testing of the dog during the impoundment shall be paid by the owner of the dog. If the county governing body determines that the dog has not been so engaged, the dog shall be released to its owner and, if the dog had been impounded upon receipt of evidence from a complainant, the complainant shall pay the costs of keeping and testing of the dog during the impoundment.

(b) Notwithstanding ORS 609.090, a dog impounded pursuant to subsection (1) of this section shall not be released until a determination is made by the county governing body pursuant to this subsection. [1975 c.749 s.4; 1977 c.802 s.9]

609.157 Disputable presumption that dog kills or injures livestock.
A disputable presumption shall arise that a dog has been engaged in killing, wounding, injuring or chasing livestock within the meaning of ORS 609.140 and 609.155 if:

(1) The dog is found chasing livestock not the property of the owner of the dog in an area where freshly damaged livestock are found;

(2) The dog is found feeding upon a warm carcass of a livestock animal;

(3) An examination of the dog's feces indicates ingestion of portions of the anatomy or covering of the anatomy of livestock by the dog; or

(4) Portions of the anatomy or covering of the anatomy of livestock is found on the teeth of the dog, unless the dog is regularly used for the purpose of herding sheep. [1975 c.749 s.5]

609.160 Keeping dog with knowledge that it has injured livestock.
(1) No person shall own, harbor or keep any dog with knowledge that it has killed or wounded any livestock or, with knowledge that, while off the premises owned or under the control of its owner and while not acting under the direction of its master or the agents or employees of such master, it has killed or seriously injured any person.

(2) However, no person shall be liable for harboring or keeping such dog, with knowledge that it has killed or wounded chickens, unless the owner fails to pay full damages for the chickens killed or wounded within three days after receipt of a demand for such damages from the owner. [Amended by 1975 c.499 s.2]
 

609.170 Claim by owner of livestock.
In a county with a dog control program the owner of any livestock killed, wounded, chased or injured by any dog may, within 10 days after the killing, wounding, chasing or injuring occurred, or became known to the owner, present to the dog control board or county governing body a verified statement containing a full account of the incident, stating in detail the amount of damage claimed on account thereof, and the name and address of the owner or keeper of the dog, if known. The claim shall be supported by the affidavit of at least one disinterested person as to all material facts contained in it. [Amended by 1953 c.640 s.2; 1975 c.749 s.7; 1977 c.802 s.10]

609.180 Hearing and payment of claims.
All claims presented as provided by ORS 609.170 shall be heard at the first regular session of the dog control board or county governing body after their presentation, or as soon thereafter as may be practicable. If the board or governing body determines that any livestock has been damaged by being injured, chased, wounded or killed, it shall file and enter a record of the value of the livestock and order a warrant drawn for the amount of damages thus found, or any portion thereof that it considers just, to be paid by the county treasurer out of the dog fund. If it considers the claim unjust, it shall disallow it and enter that fact upon its record. No claim shall be allowed where it appears that the injury or damage complained of was caused by a dog owned or controlled by the claimant or the agent of the claimant. [Amended by 1975 c.749 s.8; 1977 c.802 s.11]

609.190 Subrogation of county paying claim; collection by district attorney.
In each case where a claim against the dog fund of any county has been paid by the dog control board or county governing body, the county shall be subrogated to all the rights of the owner of the livestock killed, wounded, chased or injured against the owner of the dog for damages. The district attorney shall proceed promptly, in a lawful way, to collect it. Any money so collected shall be paid over immediately to the treasurer of the county and credited to the dog fund. [Amended by 1975 c.749 s.9; 1977 c.802 s.12]

BACK

This page hosted by Get your own Free Home Page
1