Setting and achieving high standards is a goal we must set for all students; however, this is best done by the parents and teachers who are most familiar with the children. Additionally, many states and some localities already have successful testing procedures. New plans for national testing will duplicate some of these efforts, and in the process spend dollars that would be better used in other more productive ways.
The U.S. House of Representatives voted 295-125 in favor of Rep. Bill Goodling's (R-PA) amendment prohibiting any funding in fiscal 1998 for development, planning, implementation, or administration of national testing in reading or mathematics. Rep. Goodling is Chairman of the House Committee on Education and the Workforce, and is a former school principal, superintendent, and school board president.
Sen. John Ashcroft (R-MO) had gathered the support of 37 Senate colleagues in his effort to find enough votes to sustain a filibuster if the final Appropriations bill did not adopt the Goodling Amendment against funding for national testing.
A compromise between Congress and the Clinton Administration has been hammered out in Conference Committee and was voted on November 5. The House passed the Labor/HHS/Education Appropriations bill by an unofficial votecount of 352-65 on Nov. 7. The bill now goes to the Senate, where a vote is expected as early as Nov. 8. "President Clinton's plan for new national tests is dead for a year," said Rep. Goodling.
Please review the Washington Post reference cited below for up-to-date reporting on these developments.
Compilation of Washington Post reporting on National Testing
U.S. Department of Education
House Committee on Education and the Workforce
National Assessment Governing Board
This page hosted by Get your own Free Home Page