So It Goes Leslie Phillips At first glance Slaughterhouse-Five appears to be a simplistic story. It is a short account of a man’s experiences in World War II and the effects the war had on his life. But by taking a deeper look into Slaughterhouse-Five we see intricately woven themes, contrasts, and morals. Vonnegut has disguised a great lecture against war and an acceptance of death through the idiocy and simplicity of Billy Pilgrim. Vonnegut begins the novel with a warning. His first chapter subtly warns us that Slaughterhouse-Five has been difficult for him to produce. "This one is a failure," he writes, "since it was written by a pillar of salt" (22; ch. 1). The irony of this statement is that by looking back in time Vonnegut accuses himself of idiocy, like Billy Pilgrim. Yet one of the main themes of the entire work is the "bugs in amber" or the existence of the past, present, and future all at once. In the opening chapter he also humbles his work by telling us how it begins and ends, stressing the succeeding theme. Billy Pilgrim is a master of disguise. He serves as a superb mask that Vonnegut hides behind in order to get his messages across without scaring readers away with boring lectures. Vonnegut wants us to accept life as it is and to understand that death is inevitable and something we must not fear. He indirectly lets us know that this is a realization that he has come to in his own life, most likely through the war experience, and invites us to follow in his footsteps. Through his humor and lightheartedness he does not force these ideas on us but helps us to open our minds to new ways of perceiving our lives. As the king of repetition, one of Vonnegut's various echoes throughout Slaughterhouse-Five is the prayer "God grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change..." (60; ch. 3, 209; ch. 9). Religious themes are woven in here as an invitation to face and reconcile ourselves with death. He offers us religion, science, fantasy, and human experience as doors for us to open. It also opens our minds to another theme: the concept of time. We are immediately told that Billy Pilgrim "has come unstuck in time" (23; ch. 2). He moves backward and forward through time throughout the novel as if time itself were some sort of photo album. He goes from the war to Tralfamadore and back again to his childhood. We begin to wonder if Pilgrim is sane or if his experiences could be reality. Are we really "bugs in amber"? Billy's time lapses also present us with the cyclical feeling of Slaughterhouse-Five. There is a continuing cycle of death and renewal throughout Billy's story. “So it goes”, found over one hundred times, plays an important role in the continuation of the novel. Each time a death occurs "so it goes" helps us to accept the death, that there is nothing we can do about it, and move onto renewal and reentry into the living. This expression ties many aspects of the story together, helping the entire work to keep dying and renewing itself again. Billy learned this from the Tralfamadorians. They saw the world as a portrait, laid out and finished with all experiences present at once. "All time is all time. It does not change," they tell him (211; ch. 10). They believed that death is predestined and cannot be avoided. Billy also learned this acceptance from the Tralfamadorians. Just as Vonnegut has come to see death in a new light, we too are witnesses to Billy's changing perception of life. "I, Billy Pilgrim,...will die, have died, and always will die on February thirteenth, 1976" (141; ch. 6). Billy dies and renews his life repeatedly, enforcing the cyclical nature of the book. Another aspect of this cycle is Vonnegut's use of repetition. "So it goes" is the most used phrase in the book. Pilgrim is often saying "um" while Vonnegut's personal narration repeats phrases such as "mustard gas and roses" and "listen". Ideas are also repeated in order to stress morals and messages that the author wants to convey. The "pillar of salt" emphasizes and mirrors Vonnegut's own recollection of the war as well as his reflection on the stages he went through in order to achieve his current perceptions that "all time is all time." The "poo-tee-weet" of the birds found in the beginning and end of the book reflects Vonnegut's own "so it goes." He tells us that after massacres there are only the sound of birds. There is nothing to say about the death, only the birds can say "poo-tee-weet" (19; ch. 1). Later in the novel Pilgrim is accused of having echolaia, a "mental disease which makes people immediately repeat things that well people around them say" (192; ch. 9). The audience could also accuse the author of the same disease in a metaphorical sense. This is just one of the incidents connecting the two narrations and perspectives in the novel: Vonnegut’s and Pilgrim's. As Vonnegut tells us in his introductory chapter: "All this happened, more or less. The war parts, anyway, are pretty much true" (1; ch. 1). Vonnegut uses Billy as a spokesman for his experience and often Billy reflects Vonnegut's progression through time and understanding of self. Both continually reinvents themselves through writing Slaughterhouse-Five. Each are able to manipulate their realities in order to grow and to cope with the past, present, and future. Vonnegut connects himself to Pilgrim through the presence of Kilgore Trout, a science-fiction writer. Trout writes about similar experiences that Pilgrim has had, such as his visit to Tralfamadore. Vonnegut is doing the same thing. Kilgore questions Billy's time travels just as Vonnegut questions the very theories of time and death that he presents to his own audience (174; ch. 8). "Am I as irrational as Billy?" he asks us. Billy thinks the world of Trout though many others do not. Trout's unpopularity parallels Vonnegut's humble perception of his own abilities. He continues to write despite the fact that he doesn't think highly of his works. Just as in the introduction, he tells us that this book is a failure. Vonnegut's humbleness implies another underriding theme of religion and humanity. Vonnegut is inspired by the Biblical story of Lot's wife looking back at the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah. He loves "her for that, because it was so human" (22; ch. 1). He begins to teach us a moral lesson of war: it's wrong and stupid but we must accept it in order to go on with our lives. Just looking at the subtitle of the book, "The Children's Crusade: A Duty-Dance with Death" we peer into Vonnegut's personal view of life, death, and war. Soldiers are not soldiers but children that have an obligation, or "duty", to go to war, the "dance of death." "We were baby-faced, and as a prisoner of war I don't think I had to shave very often," Vonnegut tells us. God and Jesus Christ are mentioned from time to time throughout the novel. They help us to justify and understand the awful situations that we put ourselves into. The Tralfamadorians serve as a surrogate God, teaching Billy and the reader that war and death are meant to be. God does not leave us but has planned these things in order for us to learn. We are also taught by the Tralfamadorians not to be proud, a sin associated with Christian belief. They tell Billy that earth is just a small bit of the universe and we shouldn't take ourselves so seriously (116-7; ch. 5). Applying this to the reader, Vonnegut reminds us not to think too highly of ourselves either, just as he continually humbles himself and his work. Tied in with Vonnegut's religious themes is the time structure of the entire book. He questions us, as well as himself. What really does life look like from a bird's eye view? Are we and the events that occur in our lives already planned out? Are we part of that big portrait that the Tralfmadorians believe in? The entire text is scattered, shifting from one place and time to another, giving us a feel of this new "bugs in amber" concept. We have trouble discerning just what is happening in the story. Vonnegut's subtlety shows us glimpses of the randomness of our own lives. We have no control over our past, present, and future and at times do things we feel we are drawn towards. Billy samples his own predestination through his unwanted marriage to Valencia. He didn't want to marry her but he felt compelled to do so. "Everything is supposed to be quiet after a massacre," is another example of predestination concepts throughout the work. Vonnegut often used phrases such as "supposed to be" and "had to be" to back up his concept. The author himself tells us he had to write this book. His subtitle "A Duty-Dance with Death" also takes on a personal aspect. Vonnegut had to reconcile himself with the war, the death, and its impact on him. What exactly propelled him to do so, is a question that remains unanswered. The Tralfamadorians play a big role in Billy's thought development. Not only do they teach him the phrase "so it goes", but they also help Billy to come to grips with the war. "When a person dies he only appears to die. He is still very much alive in the past," they teach him (26; ch. 2). Billy becomes an educational tool for the Tralfamadorians. By caging him up the creatures begin to study human behavior. Humans are very animalistic in nature. This may be another of Vonnegut's subtle lessons in morality. He may be warning us of our self-destructive pride while helping us to ask ourselves some questions. Could Earthly life simply be an experiment made by God? Could God be putting us in cages and observing us too? Kilgore Trout's novel The Gospel from Outer Space tells the story of an alien who visited Earth and "made a serious study of Christianity, to learn, if he could, why Christians found it necessary to be cruel" (108; ch. 5). Again we see Vonnegut's use of Trout as a tie-in to his personal presence in the book. Vonnegut too is writing of a journey to understand Christianity, to understand life. The caging of Billy in outerspace mirrors Vonnegut's own caging as a prisoner of war. They experience the devastation of being restrained animals yet both have invented a pleasant reflection on it: the Tralfamadorian cage. As the aliens taught Billy we can "look at any moment that interests [us]" so are these former prisoners reinventing their pasts (26; ch. 2). Throughout Slaughterhouse-Five Vonnegut used many symbols to hint at notions he has on those ideas he subtly wants to share with the reader. Note the character's names. Billy Pilgrim is really a man on a journey through time, a pilgrim. His wife Valencia's name comes from a few sources, all adding to her character. Valencia is rooted in the name valerian, a flower known for its sedative properties. Billy often finds her boring and put to sleep by her. Her name can also be rooted in the word valence, having to do with the combining capability of atoms. Billy feels drawn to marry her, though he does not know why. Could it be her "valency"? Billy's hometown of Ilium can be linked to the word ileum which labels the lower part of the intestine. Billy never did have a strong bond with his hometown. It can also be rooted in a Latin word having to do with illusion. Billy's entire life is an illusion. If said slowly Roland Weary can sound like "roll on weary". Roland was a sad, pathetic man who kept plugging away despite his weariness. Montana Wildhack adds to our image of her "mountainousness" like the state of Montana. Her last name is an obvious compound word describing her as a free spirited person in search of work (i.e. an actress). Not only are names but other images in the text are symbolic. The destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah can be linked to the destruction of Dresden. Both were blown up with "brimstone and fire" (21; ch. 1). Vonnegut's repetition of the phrase "mustard gas and roses" echoes the mixture of the horrors of war and the beauty of humanity, a consistent theme throughout the novel. Billy's career reflects truths about his own state of mind. Ironically his optometry enables others to see when he can't see for himself. It also parallels his need to "comfort so many people with the truth about time" (28; ch. 2). Like the catcher in the rye, Billy wants to save people by helping them see. Vonnegut's true motives for writing Slaughterhouse Five may be remain unanswered. We could say he is being that catcher in the rye, trying to save us from our own limited thinking or our loss of humanity at times. Whatever the reasons, Vonnegut has produced a powerfully neurotic novel that has proven itself to be both timeless and amusing.