Marek Vit's Kurt Vonnegut Corner
War in Slaughterhouse-Five
Michael S. Miska (2002)


     War can affect and inspire people to many degrees. Kurt
Vonnegut was  inspired by war  to write Slaughterhouse-Five,
which is  a unique book  referred to sometimes  as a science
fiction  or semi-autobiographical  novel. But,  if facts are
inferred in  the novel, like  the similarity of  Vonnegut to
Billy  Pilgrim, facts  about other  characters (specifically
the Tralfamadorians),  and the themes  and structure of  the
novel, another way of viewing ;this book can be seen that is
as  an  anti  war  piece   of  writing.  In  fact,  Vonnegut
demonstrates  his  own  antiwar  sentiments  throughout  the
novel.
     This  novel's  main  character,  Billy  Pilgrim is like
Vonnegut in many ways. Kurt Vonnegut is an American novelist
from Indianapolis,  Indiana, born in 1922.  A very important
part of Vonnegut's life was when  he served in WWII, and was
a prisoner  of war  (POW) in  Dresden, Germany.  During that
time  he  experienced  the  firebombing  of  Dresden,  which
affected  him   greatly.  This  event   had  around  135,000
causalities,  which  is  about  twice  the  number killed in
Hiroshima   by  the   atomic  bomb   (1969  Kurt  Vonnegut's
Slaughterhouse-Five). Many claim that his involvement in the
war  is  what  made   him  write  Slaughterhouse-Five.  When
Vonnegut created Billy Pilgrim, he made Billy subject to the
experience  of war.  In  fact,  Billy experiences  it almost
exactly  the same  as  Vonnegut  himself had,  including the
experiences  of  being  a  POW  and  in  the  firebombing of
Dresden.  But  in  Billy's  case,  Vonnegut  writes  it with
a particular  point  of  view,  which  is  against  war. For
example,  when  Vonnegut  writes  of  the  ways  Billy views
things,  especially  in  the  war,  he  makes  Billy's  view
"slanted,  which  makes  the  reader  perceive  the  war  as
something absurd, grotesque, macabre--in any case, not quite
real" (Mayer  6 March). Making  Billy so much  like himself,
Vonnegut  uses Billy  to "tell"  the reader  his own  views.
According to Vonnegut, " I  have always rigged my stories to
include myself" (American Writers 753).
     Vonnegut  not  only  talks  about  Billy Pilgrim's life
during the war, but also  Billy's post-war life on Earth. It
is known that Billy does struggle  after the war to start up
his life, which indicates the hurtfulness of war, but if one
looks further, to Billy's profession as optometrist, a theme
can be  seen: the importance  of sight (Lichtenstein).  This
theme  relates to  the idea  that Billy  has sight before he
goes to war,  then goes to war and  goes insane, thus losing
his own "true-sight." But he ironically tries to correct the
vision of others in his  profession as an optometrist. Along
those  lines  Jesse  Lichtenstein  says,  "Vonnegut  may  be
commenting on  the futility of life  and the destructiveness
of war: the  one employed to correct the  myopic view of all
his patients  may be the most  blind of all" (Lichtenstein).
With  this,  the  use  of  irony  shows  Vonnegut's anti-war
feelings.
     Kurt  Vonnegut  also  incorporated  elements of science
fiction into this book with  the Tralfamadorians, who act as
another way  for Vonnegut to show  his feelings against war.
The Tralfamadorians are aliens  that abduct the protagonist,
Billy  Pilgrim. They  can observe  a fourth  dimension, free
from  time  itself,  which,  "contains  all  moments of time
occurring  and  reoccurring  endlessly  and  simultaneously"
(Lichtenstein). Because of this ability, they have a totally
different mentality  from those on earth,  and criticize the
beliefs' of those on earth. This unique concept of time that
the  Tralfamadorians possess  has been  described by  Jerome
Klinkowitz  in Reforming  the Novel  and the  World as  "the
overthrow of  nearly every Aristotelian  convention that has
contributed  to the  novel's form  in English  over the past
three   centuries"   (Novels    for   Students   269).   The
Tralfamadorians are another way Vonnegut tells his feelings.
     With their unique views, the Tralfamadorians comment on
all  that  is  awry  on  earth,  and  mention  war  in these
comments. They say how, "only on earth is there talk of free
will" (Novels  for Students 265).  That then relates  to the
notion  that  since  earthlings  believe  in  free will, not
fatalism  (the  belief  that  there  is  no  free  will  and
everything that happens is fate) like the Tralfamdorians do,
they  believe that  earth is  corrupt (Classic  Notes). Free
will,  the  Tralfamadorians  explain,  is  on  earth because
humans  believe that  time progresses  in a  linear fashion,
rather than having already occurred, as it has in the fourth
dimension for the Tralfamadorians. Thus, the Tralfamadorians
believe  that free  will is  non existent.  According to  an
article  on  this,  the  Tralfamadorian's  idea  of fatalism
"attempts  to  justify  the  irrationality  of war" (Classic
Notes).  The Tralfamadorians  also believe  that there  will
always be war on earth,  since humans are designed that way.
With  that, Vonnegut  uses the  Tralfamadorians to criticize
the fact that there is war on earth.
     The  existence  of  the  Tralfamadorians  themselves is
another way  Vonnegut shows his feelings  against war. In an
article about the novel,  Jesse Lichtenstein comments on how
the  abduction of  Billy Pilgrim  by the  Tralfamadorians is
a hallucination  that  could  be  "a  way  to escape a world
destroyed by  war" (Lichtenstein). Similarly,  Classic Notes
says that Billy Pilgrim "escapes" there when he is stressed,
from  his  experiences  of  war  on  earth. These aliens, as
a "product  of  an  escapist  mind"  (Mayer  6  March),  are
a vehicle for  Billy's mind to  escape upon, out  of a world
plagued  by  war.  In  many  ways,  Vonnegut's  own personal
feelings  in  opposition  to  war  are  translated  into the
Tralfamadorian  views.  For  example   these  views  of  the
Tralfamadorians   are   said   to   also  reveal  Vonnegut's
fatalistic views,  which are naturally against  the ideas of
free  will. Vonnegut  shows how  free will  is mistaken with
Billy  Pilgrim's life  experiences, like  being rescued from
the  bottom of  the pool   against his  free will  and being
drafted into war. Or, as his survival as a soldier, that is,
"a testament  to the deterministic  forces that render  free
will and  allusion" (Lichtenstein). Also,  the incorporation
of the  abduction into the  story shows Vonnegut's  feelings
against  war, as  "many of  Vonnegut's books  employ science
fiction and  fantasy techniques to  communicate his concerns
about the destructive capabilities of technology" (Encarta).
This demonstrates how the  Tralfamadorian views can be taken
a step further  to show how their  feelings actually reflect
those feelings of their creator, Vonnegut.
     The novel Slaughterhouse-Five is  truly unique in style
and structure, which ends  up further upholding the anti-war
theme.  This  book  employs  many  elements  of  literature,
including black  humor, or dark  comedy, which is  a type of
humor  that amuses  the audience  with something  that would
normally  be inappropriate  to laugh  at. In  this case, war
would serve as the means.  Black humor is seen in describing
the  main character  as a  "filthy flamingo"  or when  Billy
attempted to publish his encounter with the Tralfamadorians.
Both are slightly satirical, and when this style is employed
in parts  of the book  about war, it  enforces a sense  that
these  ideas  are,  "nothing  tragic,  but  inexplicable and
absurd" (Novels for Students 270). On the same token, Donald
G.  Marshall, a  professor of  English at  the University of
Illinois,  Chicago,  claims  that  Vonnegut  uses this black
humor to, "satirize the self-satisfaction they felt resulted
from the war." Consequently,  the slightly sarcastic element
of dark humor is yet another way for feelings against war to
be shown.
     The novel,  "about war and the  cruelty and violence in
war" (Vit), is written in  no particular flow from one event
to the  next in reference to  time, which can also  serve as
a metaphor  for Vonnegut's  feelings against  war. Billy  is
"unstuck in time," and the novel jumps from one event to the
next,  in no  particular  order  (Novels for  Students 264).
According to Novels for Students, this being unstuck in time
is "a  metaphor for the sense  of alienation and dislocation
which follows the experience of catastrophic violence (World
War  II)"  (264),  and  also  is  "a  metaphor  for  feeling
dislocated after  war" (264). The feeling  of alienation and
loneliness is just one of the many themes in the book. These
multiple themes are said to be linked together by one common
theme: "the  common thread between all  of Vonnegut's themes
is war"  (Dunstan). Since the predominant  theme in the book
is  war, it  is evident  that "the  theme that Kurt Vonnegut
wanted everyone who  read his book to know  just how bad war
is" (Quinn).
     Vonnegut's writing in the  novel has been criticized as
hard  to understand  and bewildering,  but Vonnegut  himself
feels  that  this  shows  his  feelings  against war. In the
article "Critics on Slaughterhouse-Five," it claims that the
novel is  confusing and lacks  smooth transitions. But,  the
article  goes on  to relate  these faults  with modern man's
life, being confusing and lacking smoothness. Also, F. Brett
Cox, an English professor at Gordon College, claims Vonnegut
uses Slaughterhouse-Five  to come to terms  with his own war
experiences,   the   firebombing   or   Dresden.   And  more
importantly,  he  quotes  Vonnegut's  comments  on the novel
being  that, "it  is so  jumbled and  jangled, Sam,  because
there  is  nothing  intelligent  to  say  about  a massacre"
(Novels  for Students  270).  Even  the novel's  faults show
Vonnegut's anti-war sentiments.
     The anti-war message is upheld further with the ironies
that Vonnegut provides in the book. For example, when one of
the  soldiers, a  POW, survives  the fire-bombing,  but dies
afterward from  the dry heaves  because he has  to bury dead
bodies, Vonnegut  uses irony to give  show a message against
war  (Classic  Notes).  With  this,  we  can  also  see how,
"Vonnegut wants  people to know  the atrocities of  war, and
that it should never  happen again" (Quinn). Another example
of irony is when Billy Pilgrim and Ronald Weary join the two
infantry scouts.  Classic Notes again points  out that it is
ironic that the trained infantry  scouts are killed, but not
the untrained  Billy or Ronald. Perhaps  the best example of
an irony is shown in the words of a bird. When the bird says
"poo-tee-weet?" to  Billy, it serves a  big purpose, in that
it shows that "there is  nothing to say about an unnecessary
massacre as in Dresdon, and  that war is illogical, like the
bird's words. This is ironic,  since the theme of the novel,
which should be the clearest message derived from the story,
is  summed up  in the  incoherent words  of a bird" (Classic
Notes). This shows an irony  that not only can provide comic
relief, but acts as a vessel for Vonnegut's feelings.
     Kurt Vonnegut was subject  to the life-changing effects
of WWII, as a soldier and  POW in Dresden, Germany. The many
aspects   of  war,   namely  the   firebombing  of  Dresden,
influenced Vonnegut  greatly. Because of  these events, Kurt
Vonnegut was inspired to write Slaughterhouse-Five, where he
explains his feelings against  war. Vonnegut transmits these
feelings to  his audience through  many methods, but  mainly
through  the  novel's  main  ;;character,  Billy Pilgrim the
Tralfamadorians  and  in  the  themes,  writing  style,  and
structure of the book.
     Vonnegut's feelings  against war seem  to be consistent
both in the book and in  his life. For example, according to
Novels for Students, Vonnegut  claims that "anyone who seeks
glory and heroism in war  is deluded" (265). Also, according
to Brittany Dunstan, Vonnegut's war experience has given him
a caution against unchecked science  and technology, and led
him  to ponder  the very   value of  science. That  value he
stated  as, "I  am the  enemy of  all technological progress
that threatens mankind" (Dunstan).  Dunstan also quotes from
Vonnegut that  he told his sons  that " 'they are  not under
any circumstances  to take part  in massacres, and  that the
news  of  massacres  of  enemies  is  not  to fill them with
satisfaction  or  glee,'  and  they  should  not  work  for,
'companies  that  make   massacre  machinery'  "  (Dunstan).
Through these quotes it is evident that Vonnegut carries his
anti-war  feelings  shown  in  his  writing  through  to his
personal and moral values.
     Vonnegut's  Slaughterhouse-Five can  be viewed  in many
ways.  It  can  be  seen  as  a semi-autobiographical novel,
science fiction novel, and as  an anti-war piece of writing.
Or,  it  can  be  seen  as  a  unique combination of science
fiction  and   autobiographical  elements  to   support  the
author's own anti-war feelings. In any case, many agree that
war  influenced Vonnegut  to write  this book,  and that its
message is not based solely  upon only WWII, but rather many
wars and the  thinking of the time. This  also suggests that
the contentions  of the book  about war can  also be applied
for wars to come.


Works Cited:

1969  Kurt  Vonnegut's  Slaughterhouse-Five.  21  Feb. 2002.
http://www.fortunecity.com/tinpan/quickstep/1103/book107.htm

Critics on Slaughterhouse-Five. 12 Feb. 2002.
http://www.digischool.nl/en/files/slaughter5.htm

Dunstan, Brittany.  "Destruction of Dresdon,  Destruction of
Vonnegut's  Dream." Marek  Vit's Kurt  Vonnegut Corner.  Ed.
Marek Vit. May 1999. 22 Feb 2002
http://geocities.datacellar.net/Hollywood/4953/kv_dream.html

"Insanity of  War in Slaughterhouse-Five."  Classic Notes by
Grade Saver. 2000. Grade Saver. 11 Feb. 2002
http://www.gradesaver.com/classicnotes/titles
/slaughterhousefive/essays/insanitywar.html

"Kurt  Vonnegut." American  Writers. Vol.  2 Supplement  II,
Part 2. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1981.

"Kurt  Vonnegut, Jr."  Contemporary Literary  Criticism. Ed.
Sharon R. Gunton and Jean C. Stine. Volume 22. Detroit: Gale
Research Company, 1982.

Lichtenstein,  Jesse. "Slaughterhouse-Five:  Themes, Motifs,
and Symbols."  Spark Notes. 2002.  Spark Notes LLC.  29 Jan.
2002
http://www.sparknotes.com/lit/slaughter/themes.html

Marshall,  Donald  G.  American  Literature.  21  Feb.  2002
http://www.doser.org/eng12/am_lit.htm

Mayer,    Kurt   A.    "AW:   Slaughterhouse-Five."   E-mail
Communication. 6 March 2002.

Mayer,    Kurt   A.    "AW:   Slaughterhouse-Five."   E-mail
Communication. 11 March 2002.

Quinn, Lewis. "A  Critical Analysis of Slaughterhouse-Five."
Marek Vit's Kurt Vonnegut Corner.  Ed. Marek Vit. Jan. 1998.
22 Feb 2002
http://geocities.datacellar.net/Hollywood/4953/kv_slaughter.html

"Slaughterhouse-Five." Novels for Students. Ed. Diane Telgen
and  Kevin  Hile.  Vol.  3.  Detroit:  Gale  Research, 1998.
264-70.

Vit,    Marek.    "The    Themes    of    Kurt    Vonnegut's
Slaughterhouse-Five."     Marek    Vit's    Kurt   Vonnegut
Corner. Ed. Marek Vit. Sept. 1997. 21 Feb. 2002
http://geocities.datacellar.net/Hollywood/4953/themes.html

"Vonnegut,  Kurt."  Microsoft   Encarta  Encyclopedia  2000.
CD-ROM. Microsoft Corporation, 1999.


How would you rate this essay?
O% 100%
Any comments:

Go back to

Kurt Vonnegut Essay Collection

HomeE-MailGuestbook
SearchWhat's New?
Last modified: June 6, 2002
1