FAQ
|
|
The following
are some frequently asked questions about the issue of child labour, based on
a case study done on India - country with the highest number of child labourers.
Please
refer to the following Web site for more information to child labour in India.
Source:
Mitesh's Mecca http://geocities.datacellar.net/CollegePark/Library/9175/index.html
Frequently Asked Questions
What
are child labourers doing in terms of work?
How
necessary is child labour to families in India?
What
role does poverty play?
What
is the Indian government policy on child labour?
Is compulsory education the answer?
Summary of India Case Study
What are child labourers doing in terms of work?
Refer to
Child Labour.
How necessary is child labour to families
in India?
Child labour is a source of income for poor families. A study conducted by the
ILO Bureau of Statistics found that "Children's work was considered essential
to maintaining the economic level of households, either in the form of work
for wages, of help in household enterprises or of household chores in order
to free adult household members for economic activity elsewhere" (Mehra-Kerpelman
1996, 8). In some cases, the study found that a child's income accounted for
between 34 and 37 percent of the total household income. This study concludes
that a child labourer's income is important to the livelihood of a poor family.
There is a questionable aspect of this study. It was conducted in the form of
a survey, and the responses were given by the parents of the child labourers.
Parents would be biased into being compelled to support their decision to send
their children to work, by saying that it is essential. They are probably right:
for most poor families in India, alternative sources of income are close to
non-existent. There are no social welfare systems such as those in the West,
nor is there easy access to loans, which will be discussed. What is apparent
is the fact that child labourers are being exploited, shown by the pay that
they receive.
What role does poverty play?
The percentage of the population of India living in poverty is high. In 1990,
37% of the urban population and 39% of the rural population was living in poverty
(International Labour Organization 1995, 107). Families need money to survive,
and children are a source of additional income. Poverty itself has underlying
determinants, one such determinant being caste. Scheduled caste (lower caste)
children tend to be pushed into child labour because of their family's poverty.
Nangia (1987) goes on to state that in his study 63.74% of child labourers said
that poverty was the reason they worked (p.174).
The combination of poverty and the lack of a social security network form the
basis of the even harsher type of child labour -- bonded child labour. For the
poor, there are few sources of bank loans, governmental loans or other credit
sources, and even if there are sources available, few Indians living in poverty
qualify. Here enters the local moneylender; for an average of two thousand rupees,
parents exchange their child's labour to local moneylenders (Human Rights Watch
1996, 17).
Since the earnings of bonded child labourers are less than the interest on the
loans, these bonded children are forced to work, while interest on their loans
accumulates. A bonded child can only be released after his/her parents make
a lump sum payment, which is extremely difficult for the poor (Human Rights
Watch 1996, 17). Even if bonded child labourers are released, "the same conditions
of poverty that caused the initial debt can cause people to slip back into bondage"
(International Labour Organization 1993, 12).
Even though poverty is cited as the major cause of child labour, it is not the
only determinant. Inadequate schools, a lack of schools, or even the expense
of schooling leaves some children with little else to do but work. The attitudes
of parents also contribute to child labour; some parents feel that children
should work in order to develop skills useful in the job market, instead of
taking advantage of a formal education.
What is the Indian government's policy
on child labour?
From the time of its independence, India has committed itself to be against
child labour. Article 24 of the Indian constitution clearly states that "No
child below the age of fourteen years shall be employed to work in any factory
or mine or employed in any hazardous employment" (Constitution of India cited
in Jain 1985, 218). Article 39 (e) directs State policy such "that the health
and strength of workers . . . and the tender age of children are not abused
and that citizens are not forced by economic necessity to enter avocations unsuited
to their age or strength" (Constitution of India cited in Human Rights Watch
1996, 29).
All of the policies that the Indian government has in place are in accordance
with the Constitution of India, and all support the eradication of Child Labour.
The problem of child labour still remains even though all of these policies
are existent. Enforcement is the key aspect that is lacking in the government's
efforts.
Is compulsory education the answer?
The concept of compulsory education, where all school aged children are required
to attend school, combats the force of poverty that pulls children out of school.
Policies relating to compulsory education not only force children to attend
school, but also contribute appropriate funds to the primary education system,
instead of higher education.
An example of a country where compulsory education has worked to reduce child
labour is Sri Lanka. The Sri Lankan government decided to enforce compulsory
education in the 1920's and 1930's (Weiner 1991, 173). With this compulsory
education policy, school participation rates rose from 58 percent in 1946 to
74 percent in 1963 (Weiner 1991, 173). The corresponding result has been that
the employment rate of children in the ten to fourteen age group has shown a
substantial decline from 13 percent in 1946 to 6.2 percent in 1963 (Weiner 1991,
174).
The Indian state of Kerala distinguishes itself from the rest of India with
its educational system. The government of Kerala allocates more funds to education
than any other state, with a per capita expenditure of 11.5 rupees compared
to the Indian average of 7.8 rupees (Weiner 1991, 175). It is not only the expenditure
of more funds, but where the funds are used that makes the difference. Kerala
spends more money on "mass education than colleges and universities" (Weiner
1991, 176).
No correlation exists between expenditure on education and literacy when comparing
different countries because some countries, such as India, spend more funds
on higher education than primary education (Weiner 1991, 160). Kerala's emphasis
on primary education has lead to a dropout rate of close to 0%, a literacy rate
of 94% for males and 86% for females (The World Bank 1995, 113), and a low child
work participation rate of 1.9% (in 1971) compared to the Indian average of
7.1% in 1971 (Weiner 1991, 175). Weiner (1991) points out that "The Kerala government
has made no special effort to end child labor. It is the expansion of the school
system rather than the enforcement of labor legislation that has reduced the
amount of child labor" (p. 177).
Summary of India Case Study
The major determinant of child labour is poverty. Even though children are paid
less than adults, whatever income they earn is of benefit to poor families.
In addition to poverty, the lack of adequate and accessible souces of credit
forces poor parents to engage their children in the harsher form of child labour
- bonded child labour. Some parents also feel that a formal education is not
beneficial, and that children learn work skills through labour at a young age.
These views are narrow and do not take the long term developmental benefits
of education into account. Another determinant is access to education. In some
areas, education is not affordable, or is found to be inadequate. With no other
alternatives, children spend their time working.
The state of education in India also needs to be improved. High illiteracy and
dropout rates are reflective of the inadequacy of the educational system. Poverty
plays a role in the ineffectiveness of the educational system. Dropout rates
are high because children are forced to work in order to support their families.
The attitudes of the people also contribute to the lack of enrollment -- parents
feel that work develops skills that can be used to earn an income, while education
does not help in this matter.
Child labour cannot be eliminated by focusing on one determinant, for example
education, or by brute enforcement of child labour laws. The government of India
must ensure that the needs of the poor are filled before attacking child labour.
If poverty is addressed, the need for child labour will automatically diminish.
No matter how hard India tries, child labour always will exist until the need
for it is removed. The development of India as a nation is being hampered by
child labour. Children are growing up illiterate because they have been working
and not attending school. A cycle of poverty is formed and the need for child
labour is reborn after every generation.