From The Press Room: "AL PACINO: LOOKING FOR
RICHARD"
by Leslie Rigoulot Park City, Utah January 28, 1996
Background: Al Pacino is the screen writer and director of "Looking for
Richard" which had it's world premiere at Sundance. Portions of Richard III are
interlaced with discussion about Richard, acting, theater and Shakespeare. It features: Al
Pacino, Winona Ryder, Alec Baldwin, Aidan Quinn, Kevin Spacey, Estelle Parsons, Kevin
Kline, Kenneth Branagh, Sir John Gielgud, James Earl Jones and Vanessa Redgrave. Al Pacino
is here to answer any questions the press may have concerning Richard.
HOW DID IT FEEL TO DO A MOVIE YOUR WAY, VERSUS HOW THE
STUDIO WANTED IT?
I've always been in movies, I never did them on my own. Maybe because I
didn't start out to make a film. It started out as an experiment, an idea I had. It
reminds me of a short Italian film where the mayor comes to lay the first brick in a
building and everyone applauds. So he lays another one. And they cheer. So his assistant
says to do another. And pretty soon he is doing the whole building. And this is the same
kind of thing, one thing led to another. It started as a thing I thought I would do and
send out to schools. I thought it had some kind of educational merit. And because I think
the seed of it started in schools. In the late seventies I went out and was touring some
schools, colleges and I would recite poetry. I would take sections of things I enjoyed
myself and there would be back and forth questions. Everyone of these I would mention
Shakespeare and I was surprised at how few of the kids had even read Hamlet. And I
remember that I would talk about the play and then read an excerpt. By doing that they
would get tuned, they would find the equinox from their world to the Shakespeare world and
make the jump. And I forgot about it. Years later I was asked to do Richard III as a
movie, I had done it on stage, and I though I wouldn't do it as a movie. I couldn't see
myself doing it. Olivier had done it and it was done. Then I got this idea and this would
be a way of doing it. It gradually turned into this. I thought it would be on television
or something. Then six months ago I thought it might get theatrical release.
WAS DIRECTING AN INEVITABLE STEP FOR YOU?
No, I don't think of myself as a director. You see by the film that it came
out of my head, it was my idea and I was just doing it a step at a time. If I were to
direct again it would have to be something that I have a strong feeling about because it
is a whole way of looking at things. And I don't have that as much. But the good thing
about it is the control. (Laughs)
HOW DID THE PROJECT EVOLVE?
I thought I would free associate. You'll notice I have different looks in
the picture, It went on for years. And I had wonderful help from the editors to construct
the story I had in my head. I would take a situation and I would set it up.
HOW DID YOU GET ALL THOSE WONDERFUL ACTORS ON BOARD?
Knowing the right people. (Laughs) Some actors just wanted to watch, it was
such chaos. There are some American actors who would like to do Shakespeare and they could
do it without the onus on it, so much commercial pressure. Some actors did it for nothing.
I know because we didn't pay them much but they sent me the checks to put back into the
movie. It took three and a half years to make it and I made three movies in between and
two plays. And documentaries take that long, but I'm not sure what this is.
WHAT WAS YOUR FIRST EXPERIENCE WITH SHAKESPEARE?
In school we read Romeo and Juliette, I saw Marlon Brando in Julius Caesar.
And all the great English actors. I talk in the movie with James Earl Jones about what it
is like to be able to express yourself through Shakespeare. I enjoyed that.