"Psycho" Series
A film review by Andrew Hicks
Copyright 1996 Andrew Hicks / Fatboy Productions
PSYCHO
(1960) **** (out of four)
No movie critic worth his fat wouldn't give this Alfred
Hitchcock masterpiece a four-star rating. I appreciated it even more
after seeing the three sequels (look down for reviews of those). I
just wish I hadn't known every little secret of this movie's plot before
seeing it. I can only imagine how much I would have liked PSYCHO
without knowing beforehand the details about Norman Bates and
his mother.
And if you haven't seen PSYCHO yet, forget about being
surprised when you find out Norman's been dressing up as his dead
mother and committing the murders himself. Hey, someone ruins it
for me, I ruin it for someone else.
The set-up: A beautiful (by 1960 standards) secretary is
entrusted with taking $40,000 to the bank. She bypasses the bank
and heads home instead, where she packs and skips town. The guilt
gets to her, though, and when night falls, she makes one final (fatal)
mistake--checking into the Bates Motel. Shoot, even I wouldn't
check into a motel with an outdoor sign reading "Color TV, Heated
Pool, Round-the-Clock Stabbings."
Norman's mom is a little jealous of this beautiful woman
stealing Norman's attention, so once she hits the shower, mama
comes down with a kife and... well, wouldn't want to give _too_
much away. Needless to say, the shower scene is one of the most
memorable in cinematic history, even more memorable than the fat,
vomiting guy in MONTY PYTHON'S THE MEANING OF LIFE.
And don't forget the three lackluster sequels...
PSYCHO II (1983) **1/2
That psycho Norman Bates (Anthony Perkins) is back
again, fresh out of the asylum in this, the first of three sequels to
the 1960 Hitchcock classic. Bates is given a job in a diner as the
cook's assistant (You've gotta be crazy to work in a diner!), where
he meets an attractive young waitress with no place to stay. Say, I
do believe I can recommend a place. Why not the Bates Motel? Yes,
Norman takes the girl back to his old digs, but changes his mind
when he finds the manager has turned the Bates into a dive for
fornicating druggies. Norman protests, saying he won't stand for
such immorality. Why, he remembers the good old days, when the
Bates Motel was a place for peeping toms to watch women taking
showers and later stab them to death.
After firing the manager, Norman and the waitress head
up to the ramshackle Bates mansion, which now has no trace of
"mother." Norman tries hard to be sane, but how can he when he
keeps getting notes and phone calls from mommy dearest? As the
girl stays a few more nights (they're platonically shacked-up, you
might say), Norman begins to relapse. Soon, the old hotel manager
turns up dead and guess who they point the finger at. The man
dressed up as an old woman carrying on both sides of a
conversation with his mother? No, the waitress.
PSYCHO II is by no means on the same level as the
original (God rest its soul), but it's better than most horror movies
with a Roman numeral II in the title, including the second Friday
the 13th, Halloween, Texas Chainsaw Massacre,
Nightmare on Elm Street and CHILD'S PLAY movies.
Still, Norman Bates has to be the wimpiest horror movie killer
ever.
PSYCHO III (1986) *1/2
What's that sound I hear? Oh, that's just Alfred Hitchcock
turning over in his grave. Yes, Norman Bates is up to his old (yawn)
tricks again. He's been exonerated for all that went on in the second
PSYCHO and is trying to make an honest living in the motel
business. But he's set off again by a woman, this time a guilty
ex-nun (the best-looking nun I've ever seen) who bears a striking
resemblance to Norman's first shower victim from the original
PSYCHO.
Also along for the ride this time are Norman's rude new
assistant manager, a reporter digging up history on Bates and a
group of partying co-eds (no 80's horror movie would be complete
without them). As with any horror movie series, the PSYCHO films
have outlived their usefulness. There's only so long we can watch a
man dress up as his mother and carve people up with a butcher knife
before we get bored.
PSYCHO IV: THE BEGINNING (1990) **1/2
This one, a low-budget made-for-TV effort, is actually an
improvement over the strictly blood-and-guts mentality of the third
movie. Part IV provides an origin for Norman Bates (Anthony
Perkins), with most of the movie centered around Bates' call to a
radio talk show (yes, there still is such a thing as a radio show), the
subject, of course, being men who have killed their mothers (and,
naturally, bad sequels to classic movies).
Through flashbacks we learn Norman's mother was kind of
weird, not to mention overbearing, with little Norman. Though the
relationship was never sexual (There is a part where Mrs. Bates
makes Norman take off his clothes and get in bed with her... but that
doesn't mean anything), there was an abnormal level of affection
with those two, so when Mother brings home a boyfriend and heads
straight for the motel room with the peephole, young Norman
decides something has to be done -- and fast.
Hey there, Norm, you can't solve all of life's problems with
sharp knives. There are also machine guns and hand grenades to
think about.
--
Visit the Movie Critic at LARGE homepage at
http://www.missouri.edu/~c667778/movies.html
Serving America For Over 1/50 of a Century!
Have I seen this movie: Yes
And what did I think: This is probably the most classic horror movie of all time. Alfred Hitchcock created a timeless masterpiece with this, that film students still study today. Perhaps the most famous movie scene of all time, is the shower scene where Marion Crane meets her doom. Hitchcock led the viewer to believe he was seeing more then was actually shown. that's the brilliant part. Also, its quite rare to see the lead character killed off in the middle of the film. The late Anthony Perkins is brilliant as crazy Norman Bates and comes up very sinister and crazy. From when we first meet him to the climax scene in the basement, he plays the part very well. Janet Leigh is also very good as Marion Crane, and will always be remembred for that role. Psycho was shot with a very small budget, but it doesn't matter, the story and acting doen't need it. Nearly 40 years later, a remake of it was made, and I don't know why. This is sheer perfection.
I give Psycho 5 out of 5 stars
Review written July 1, 1999