|
LinkExchange Member | Free Home Pages at GeoCities |
My activities at this web site are in the process of being incorporated into two other sites, TalkAboutSleep at http://www.talkaboutsleep.com, and Suite101.com at http://www.suite101.com/sleep_apnea.cfm. As of March 19, 2001, you will find my new summaries of research articles appearing on Suite101 at least once a week. Eventually, I will be answering questions through an "Ask the Experts" section at TalkAboutSleep.com. Meanwhile, I cannot respond to e-mail, but you can find me hosting a sleep apnea chat at TalkAboutSleep on Mondays, from 9-11 p.m. Eastern Standard Time.
|
go to Suite101.com/welcome.cfm/sleep_apnea |
Curious to know more about me?
Visit my new "HomePage Site" at http://home.mindspring.com/~kerrinwh
|
Interested in Chatting with Me About Sleep Apnea?
On Monday Evenings, 9-11 p.m. EST Registration for TalkAboutSleep is free!
|
But please, on the subject line of your e-mail, include brief reference to the article title! My E-Mail Address is:
|
|
I am a person who suffers from severe, at one time disabling sleep apnea. I am also a physician.
In my own search for help, I have turned to the large literature of research reports on sleep apnea and its treatment. There I have learned much of relevance to me.
I have myself done medical research, so I have experience reading this type of report. Even so, I often find them tough going.
A few years ago, it occurred to me that most people with sleep apnea would have great difficulty reading and understanding such primary research reports. For the most part, they must rely on what they read about this research in newspapers and magazines.
This type of "news report on recent research findings" often bears little resemblance to the original report. Writers and publishers want to attract attention and get people interested, excited if possible. Often they make too much out of too little. Usually they lack the expertise to make comments of their own about the research. Instead, they turn to some other expert in the field for commentary, usually brief and delivered from the perspective of another researcher, not an ordinary person involved with the disease.
Such news media reports have some value: they let the public know of new developments. But they don't tell enough for the the reader to know what to make of the "new discovery."
Does it have real relevance to patients? Or does it merely represent one of many conflicting findings on the issue? Was the research done well, better than prior research on the subject? Is it all still in the realm of speculation, far from current realities and options?
Most importantly, the question on the minds of most people reading such new stories must be:
"What does this mean for me?"
The typical news report about new research leaves these questions unanswered. Many answers might lie in the original research report itself, but how many readers can gain access to these in their entirety, and them read them in a balanced, understanding, but critical way?
That is why I set up this website: to help fellow sufferers get a closer view of what is coming out of recent research on their condition and its treatment. I read closely the original report, try to summarize it in understandable language, and then make some comments about it. I have the advantage of being not only a physician experienced in conducting research and writing such reports, but a fellow patient and sufferer looking at these new findings in much the same way as anyone trying to find answers to questions important to health and functioning.
|
|
Discussions The Web |
Noam Chomsky
This site was most recently updated on: January 1, 2001