Why oral cancer is
spreadingFriday, October 04, 2002This is Oral Health Month.
For at least a hundred years, medical students have been
taught that cancer of the mouth — oral cancer — is a disease
of older people, and that men develop it very much more often
than women.
It was perceived as a scourge that
affected those who had both drunk and smoked too much for too
long. It was also thought that poorly maintained, rough and
ragged teeth contributed to the problem, but it is now several
years since dental causes were believed to be an important
aetiological factor.
The pattern of oral cancer is
changing. No longer do five men develop it for every woman:
now it is only twice as common in men, and the gender gap is
closing. Nor is oral cancer still overwhelmingly a disease of
late middle age and beyond. In the past ten years in Scotland,
for instance, there has been an almost 50 per cent increase in
incidence among the under-45s, and in the past 40 years a
fourfold increase in younger patients suffering from it.
There has also been a change in the part of the oral
cavity most commonly affected. Cancer of the tongue, once
rare, has increased in the under-40s by 60 per cent in 30
years. When I qualified, the classic lesion in oral cancer
involved the lip, an unsightly advanced ulcer that had grown
on a lip that had clasped a Woodbine or a pipe for years.
Although the incidence of lip cancer has fallen, this has been
more than compensated for by an increase in tongue cancer —
particularly in men — and of the floor of the mouth in women.
Oral cancer used to be much more common among the poor
and disadvantaged, yet it is now seen increasingly in the
professional classes. This shift has not been fully explained.
No longer can it be assumed that the stereotypical oral cancer
sufferer is an elderly, poor man, addicted to his pipe and
whisky, who was a reluctant visitor to the dentist. This
cancer now affects all classes, both sexes and all age groups
— one of the reasons why dental check-ups should be routine.
The key to treating oral cancer successfully is early
diagnosis. Anyone who has a white sore or a lump, or any
persistent sore or ulcer in the mouth, should tell their
doctor or dentist.
In 1996, a research trust was
established in Peeblesshire in memory of Ben Walton, who had
died in his twenties from cancer of the mouth. Earlier this
year the Ben Walton Trust and the Scottish Oral Cancer Action
Group held a sympos-ium at the Royal College of Surgeons in
Edinburgh at which Professor Saman Warnakulasuriya, of King's
College London, and David Soutar, a consultant plastic surgeon
at the Canniesburn Hospital, Glasgow, discussed the results of
a three-year study into mouth cancers in the under-45s.
Warnakulasuriya has also recently reviewed the risk factors
for cancers of the oral cavity in young people in the journal
Oral Oncology.
The review confirmed the importance of
smoking, particularly when combined with excessive drinking,
in the causation of oral cancers. This combination increases
the risk dramatically, whereas an excessive alcohol intake
alone is not so dangerous. Three quarters of the cases could
be attributed to this cause. Twenty-five per cent of the
patients were non-smokers who had not persistently drunk to
excess. And in the study, as many as 30 per cent of the
younger people had never smoked, and only six of these
non-smokers could have been described as heavy drinkers.
Research workers studied the lifestyles, diet, sex
life, medical history and family history of the patients whose
cancer could not be attributed to tobacco and alcohol.
The patient's previous general health, and in
particular any oral problems, was important. There was a
statistically significant association with anaemia and
glandular fever, as well as with sexually transmitted disease.
Oral thrush and lichen planus were oral diseases which also
seemed to be relevant.
This survey, unlike research
done at the Sloan-Kettering Cancer Centre in New York,
revealed no association between oral cancer and cannabis
smoking, whereas the American survey showed a dramatic and
disturbing link between cannabis smoking and oral cancers.
Andrea Thompson wrote in the journal Scottish Dentist
about the discussion at the symposium that followed the
contributions of Warnakulasuriya and Soutar. The latter
attracted the attention of, and even alarmed, some of the
audience by his suggestion that one area which needed further
research was the possible connection between oral cancer and
oral sex.
He said that unfortunately it was difficult
to find people who were willing to discuss their sexual
behaviour, but that even so, we had to consider the
possibility of viruses, including those associated with
sexually transmitted diseases, in its causation, as there was
an increase in oral cancer in women who neither drink nor
smoke. HPV (the wart virus) is a possible candidate, as it
already known to cause cancer of the cervix.
However,
Soutar thought that much of the increase in the incidence of
the cancer in women could be attributed to changing social
patterns, as women nowadays not only visit pubs as often as
men, but drink and socialise as much as they do. They also
smoke more than they used to. |