Its Executive Board report issued in Washington on Wednesay said that while
the controls
introduced in September last year were greeted with considerable scepticism
internationally, the
breathing space they accorded had allowed Malaysia to implement measures
for its economic
recovery.
"Directors therefore commended the authorities for using the breathing
space, to push ahead with
a well-designed and effectively implemented strategy for financial sector
restructuring."
There were concerns initially that the "breathing space" offered by the
controls and the pegging of
the ringgit to the US dollar might lead to a delay in addressing problems
in the financial and
corporate sectors.
The report was a result of consultation with Malaysia, in which the Fund's
staff visited the country
for an information gathering exercise on financial and economic matters.
The consultation, done annually, was intended to strenghten IMF surveillance
over the economic
policies of member countries.
The report said the Executive Board welcomed the changes on the controls
in February,
describing them as "pragmatic and flexible", especially in replacing the
restrictions on the
repatriation of portfolio investments by an exit tax levy on profits.
Some of the 24 directors expressed support for Malaysia's intention to
maintain the control
measures while preparing for an orderly exit from them.
But others were more sceptical about the capital controls, as they felt
that the costs, in term of the
adverse impact on the prospects for recovery, might become more visible
in the future.
They therefore recommended that the exit levy on profits for portfolio
investments be removed.
Since Malaysia is in a position of strength, an early exit from the controls
would boost investor
confidence and attract long-term capital.
It said while Malaysia's economy was severely affected by the Asian crisis,
its traditional
strengths, including low external debt, strong fiscal position, a well-developed
financial regulatory
framework, and a history of low inflation, had helped it avoid more extreme
financial difficulties.
"... the same strengths should facilitate a sustainable economic recovery," it said.
With regard to macroeconomic policies, the Executive Board supported the
current expansionary
stance, which they considered appropriate to reverse the sharp contraction
of economic activity.
The directors also commended the improvements in the prudential and supervisory
frameworks
for the financial system, adding that the continuation of the financial
system reforms and corporate
sector restructuring would help the recovery process.
They also welcomed the progress made in relieving the banking system of
non-performing loans
(NPL) and in providing needed capital to viable institutions in the banking
system.
However, they stressed the need to dispose quickly of acquired NPLs and
to consider the sale of
Government stakes in recapitalised institutions.
The directors noted that thus far the pegging of the exchange rate to the
US dollar had been
positive for the economy. Nevertheless, they observed that the undervaluation
of the exchange
rate had implications for the inflation outlook over the medium term.
Some directors considered that the current monetary framework, based on
the currency peg, was
more appropriate for Malaysia than one based on a more flexible exchange
rate, as it provided a
clearer nominal anchor for inflation expectations.
Many other directors, however, recommended that Malaysia consider seriously
the need to
develop a monetary policy conducive to a sustained low inflation environment,
combined with a
more flexible exchange rate regime that would help insulate the economy
from external shocks.
"Clearly, this was a key issue that needed to be kept under review," it said.
While welcoming the various measures taken by the authorities to speed
up the use of budget
allocations and expedite project implementation, a few directors cautioned
against overreliance
on large projects with long gestation periods.
"Directors encouraged the authorities to continue to give high priority
to enhancing social
expenditures in order to mitigate the impact of adjustment on the most
vulnerable groups of
society."
For the medium term, most directors emphasised the desirability of introducing
greater flexibility
in fiscal policy in order to be able to respond more rapidly to changes
in economic conditions.
The IMF report also said that for the medium-term, directors recommended
the introduction of a
value-added tax to improve the tax system's efficiency.