The United Nations

"It is therefore our duty to surround them with its members, so that the profane may have no access to them. Thus we are able most powerfully to promote its interests. If any person is more disposed to listen to Princes than to the Order, he is not fit for it, and must rise no higher. We must do our utmost to procure the advancement of the Illuminati in to all important civil offices.

By this plan we shall direct all mankind. In this manner, and by the simplest means, we shall set all in motion and in flames. The occupations must be so alloted and contrived, that we may, in secret, influence all political transactions." Adam Weishaupt, founder The Illuminati [Jon Robison, Proofs of a Conspiracy, pub. 1798]

"I have heard much of the nefarious and dangerous plan and doctrines of the Illuminati. It is not my intention to doubt that the doctrine of the Illuminati and the principles of Jacobinism had not spread in the United States." George Washington [Nesta Webster, World Revolution: The Plot Against Civilization, ©1921, pub. Boston, Small, Maynard, LCCN: 21-18503]

The reverse of the United States Seal, adopted in 1782, depicts a pyramid with a separated capstone containing an illuminized eye. The eye was previously featured on aprons worn by Freemasons. The Illuminati is a branch of illuminated freemasonry [Official O.T.O U.S. Grand Lodge Website, http://otohq.org/oto/history.html]. Underneath the pyramid, a banner states 'Novus Order Seclorum"; in Latin this means 'New Order of the Ages' [D.A. Kidd, Latin Dictionary: Edited by Joyce Littleton, pub. HarperCollins 1996, ISBN: 000470763X, LCCN: 96-233136]. The eye belongs to Osiris, the Egyptian god of the underworld and judge of the dead [Webster's Seventh New Collegiate Dictionary, ©1963 G&C Merriam Co., 'Osiris...']. The separation of the capstone depicts the incomplete task of the New World Order. The seal is visible on the back of the US $1 bill and was placed there during Franklin Roosevelt's, a 33rd degree Scottish Rite Mason [Official British Columbia Freemason Website, http://www.bc-freemasonry.com/TextFiles/famous.html, note: their logo is the eye in the capstone], administration.

Interestingly within the next 2 years there are plans to plate the capstone of the Great Pyramid at Giza with gold.

The Council on Foreign Relations was formed on July 29, 1921. It is an organization designed to be an:

"...international group which would advise their respective governments on international affairs" [CFR Handbook, pub. 1936]

The organization was originally financed by individuals like: J.P. Morgan, Jacob Schiff, Paul Warburg and John D. Rockefeller, Jr. [Council on Foreign Relations, The Council on Foreign Relations: A Record of 25 years 1921-1946, pub. 1947 New York, LCCN: 47-27524]. Some of its directors along with a few infamous quotes have been:

Zbigniew Brzezinski (1972-1977)

"Soon it will be possible to assert almost continous surveillance over every citizen and maintain up-to-date complete files containing even the most important information about the citizen. These files will be subject to instantaneous retrieval by the authorities." [Zbigniew Brzezinski, Between Two Ages: Americas Role in the Techtronic Era, pub. 1982 Greenwood Press, Westport, Conn., LCCN: 82-15867]

David Rockefeller (1949-1985)

"The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is truly preferable to the national autodetermination practiced in past centuries." [Reported by Gennady Zyuganov of the Russian National Patriotic Front, as witnessed at a Bilderberger meeting, Sovetskaya Rossiya, 10 April 1997]

George Bush (1977-1979)

"...a rare opportunity to move toward an historic period of cooperation. Out of these troubled times...a new world order can emerge." [Towards a New World Order Speech before Congress 11 September 1990]

"The most powerful clique in these elitist groups have on object in common-they want to bring about the surrender of the sovereignty and the national independence of the United States. A second clique of international members in the CFR...compromises the Wall Street international bankers and their key agents. Primarily, they want the world banking monopoly from whatever power ends up in the control of global government." RAdm. Chester Ward, former CFR member.

"We shall have world government whether or not you like it or not-by conquest or consent." James Warburg, CFR member and relative of CFR financier Paul Warburg [Testification before Senate Foreign Relations Committee, 17 February 1950]

During the UN conference of 1945, 47 members of the CFR were part of the US delegation (Adlai Stevenson, Nelson Rockefeller, Alger Hiss, etc.) John D. Rockefeller donated the land for the United Nations building in New York [Encyclopedia Britannica, Micropedia, ©1985, 'Waldheim, Kurt...'].

The Council on Foreign Relations is purely composed of Americans. The Trilateral Commission is the international version of the CFR. It is composed of members from three (tri) regions, i.e., Asia, Europe and North America. The North American Trilateral Commission Chairman is Paul A. Volcker (former Chairman Board of Governors Federal Reserve System) [Official Trilateral Commission Website, http://www.trilateral.org/MembLead/MembLead.html]. The European Chairman is Otto Graf Lambsdorff (German Bundestag member, President Liberal International) [Ibid.]. The Asian Chairman is Yotaro Kobayashi (Chairman/CEO Fuji Xerox, Ltd.) [Ibid.]. David Rockefeller is the Honorary Chairman and Founder [Ibid.].

These odd similarities prompted investigations in the US Congress and not suprisingly more odd occurences. Congressman Larry McDonald took the matter before Congress on 4 February 1981 following up Resolution 773 of the American Legion. He was on the Korean Airlines Flight 007 shot down by Soviet MIGs over Sakhalin Island in the Sea of Japan in 1983 [98th Congress, 1st Session, 15 September 1983, 4:18pm, Pages-12322, Temp. Record., Vote No. 250].

Senator Jesse Helms:

"This campaign against the American people--against traditional American culture and values--is systematic psychological warfare. It is orchestrated by a vast array of interests comprising not only the Eastern Establishment but also the radical left. Among this group we find the Department of State, the Department of Commerce, the money center banks and multinational corporations, the media, the educational establishment, the entertainment industry, and the large scale tax-exempt foundations.

Mr. President, a careful examination of what is happening behind the scenes reveals that all of these interests are working in concert...in order to create what some refer to as the new world order. Private organizations such as the Council on Foreign Relations,...the Trilateral Commission, the Dartmouth Conference, the Aspen Institute for Humanistic Studies, the Atlantic Institute, and the Bilderberger group serve to disseminate and to coordinate the plans for this so-called new world order in powerful business, financial, academic, and official circles...

The psychological campaign that I am describing, as I have said, is the work of the Eastern Establishment, that amorphous amalgam of wealth and social connections whose power resides in its control over our financial system and over a large portion of our industrial sector. The principal instrument of this control over our American economy and money is the Federal Reserve System. The policies of the industrial sectors, primarily the multinational corporations, are influenced by the money center banks through debt financing and through the large blocks of stock controlled by the trust departments of the money center banks.

Anyone familiar with American history, and particularly American Economic history, cannot fail to recognize the control over the Department of State and the Central Intelligence Agency which Wall Street seems to exercise...

The influence of the establishment insiders over our foreign policy has become a fact of life in our time. This pervasive influence runs contrary to the real long-term security of our Nation. It is an influence which if unchecked, could ultimately subvert our Constitutional order.

The viewpoint of the Establishment today is called globalism. Not so long ago, this viewpoint was called the 'one-world' view by its critics. The phrase is no longer fashionable among sophisticates; yet, the phrase 'one-world' is still apt because nothing has changed in the minds and actions of those promoting policies consistent with its fundamental tenets.

...in the globalist point of view, nation-states and national boundaries do not count for anything. Political philosophies and political principles seem to become simply relative. Indeed even constitutions are irrelevant to the exercises of power. Liberty and tyranny are viewed as neither good nor evil, and certainly not a component of policy.

All that matters to this club is the maximization of profits resulting from the practice of what can be described as finance capitalism, a system which rests upon the pillars of debt and monopoly. This isn't real capitalism. It is the road to economic concentration and to political slavery." [Floor Speech, 15 December 1987]

Senator Helms, originally scheduled on Flight 007 but had a last minute flight change, delineated the cosmic design.

What an encyclopedia says about the CFR's Foreign Affairs periodical:

"Foreign Affairs, journal of international relations, published in New York City five times a year, one of the most prestigious periodicals of its kind in the world. It is the organ of the Council on Foreign Relations, by which it was founded in 1922, and is, informally, the voice of the U.S. foreign-policy establishment...The contributors of these authorative and scholarly articles compromise a roster of the nation's most distinguished journalists, scholars, and statesmen. Ideas put forth tentatively in this journal often, if well received by the Foreign Affairs community, appear later as U.S. government policy or legislation; prospective policies that fail this test usually disappear." [Encyclopedia Britannica, Micropedia, ©1985, 'Foreign Affairs...']

What the CFR has to say about confidentiality:

"(i) to publish a speaker's statement in attributed form in a newspaper; (ii) to repeat it in television or radio, or on a speaker's platform, or in a classroom; or (iii) to go beyond a memo of limited circulation, by distributing the attributed statement in a company or government agency newsletter... A meeting participant is forbidden knowingly to transmit the attributed statement to a newspaper reporter or other such person who is likely to publish it in a public medium. The essence of the Rule... is simple enough: participants in Council meetings should not pass along an attributed statement where there is substantial risk that it will promptly be widely circulated or published." [1990 CFR Annual Report, p. 182]

Just like Weishaupt who attempted to surround government officials with his ideas, so does the Council on Foreign Relations.

The infamous "theys!" are duping the American public and have been doing so for a very long time. "They!" have made the dupe virtually unrecognizable. The average American embraces the left and right "they!" have created. Ideals have been replaced with idols. Rush Limbaugh is the idol of Republicanism and so is George Bush. The problem is under close scrutiny of their ideals one can find they are actually New World Order tools.

Proofs of a Conspiracy, Jon Robison, pub. 1798

World Revolution: The Plot Against Civilization, Nesta Webster, ©1921, pub. Boston, Small, Maynard, LCCN: 21-18503

Official O.T.O. U.S. Grand Lodge Website, http://otohq.org/oto/history.html

Latin Dictionary, ed. Joyce Littleton, D.A. Kidd, pub. 1996 HarperCollins, ISBN: 000470763X, LCCN: 96-233136

Webster's Seventh New Collegiate Dictionary, ©1963 G&C Merriam Co., 'Osiris...'

Official British Columbia Freemason Website, http://www.bc-freemasonry.com/TextFiles/famous.html *Note: their logo is the capstone with the eye!

CFR Handbook, 1936

The Council on Foreign Relations: A Record of 25 Years 1921-1946, Council on Foreign Relations, pub. 1947 New York, LCCN: 47-27524

Between Two Ages: America's Role in the Techtronic Era, Zbigniew Brzezinski, pub. 1982 Greenwood Press, Westport, Conn., LCCN: 82-15867

Sovetskaya Rossiya, Gennady Zyuganov, 10 April 1997

Towards a New World Order Speech, George Bush, 11 September 1990

James Warburg testification before Senate Foreign Relations Committee, 17 February 1950

Britannica Encyclopedia, Macropedia, 'United Nations...', ©1985

Britannica Encyclopedia, Micropedia, 'Waldheim, Kurt...', ©1985

Official Trilateral Commission Website, http://www.trilateral.org/MembLead/MembLead.htm

98th Congress, 1st Session, 15 September 1983, 4:18pm, Pages-12322, Temp. Record, Vote No. 250

Senator Jesse Helms on the Senate Floor, 15 December 1987

Encyclopedia Britannica, Micropedia, ©1985, 'Foreign Affairs...'

CFR Annual Report, 1990, p. 182

Federal World Government: What's the Problem?

The self-evident Federalist condition in the US overshadows the New World Order conspiracy's outer layer.

An arms possession right lacks in the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights. Police aren't always where criminals are. Suppose police become the malefactors. Are seemingly benevolent governments trustworthy? No! Government's tyrannical regulations crush unarmed citizens.

Politicians mention children killed in school yards or 'Saturday Night Specials' while neglecting 50 million dissidents Stalin and 6 million Jews Hitler killed – more than a few children. Gun control and senseless acts of violence go hand in hand; firearms are elevated to mysterious and powerful tools, instead of everyday objects -- they are just OBJECTS. Confine their ownership (in other words infringe upon private property) to only a certain segment of the population, e.g., the government, and all of a sudden they become taboo and a symbol of power, not just mere OBJECTS.

Guns don't equal freedom and just because an individual can have one doesn't mean he's internally free if its used to supposedly protect freedom. Likewise, just because 200 years ago some men signed the US Bill of Rights declaring freedom of the individual -- another OBJECT -- waving it in front of the evilcrats doesn't make a dime bit of difference in the grand scheme. Why? Because faith and intention/thought process of the individual self is being transferred to the OBJECT instead of outward in its pure form. The result is ashes and blood.

The bizarre US federal government is unruly. Can a central world government be checked?

The IRS taxes to support 'welfare', imagine this scenario on a world scale. National defense would be unnecessary though. The national defense is an international offense. Defending a way of life differs from forcing a method. Thomas Jefferson advised off foreign entanglements in favor of foreign relations. US troops canvas the globe – who do they really work for? The United Nations, supposedly the peacekeeper; explain Korea and the Gulf War which are still unresolved.

The heavily-populated expansive US includes most climates, minerals and natural resources required for life. A foreign military pillaging across the borders and toppling the government and ARMED POPULACE is a far fetched fantasy. Scrap the government because they conscript people to protect them while at the same time saying they're protecting them.

Nay sayers abound. Why live a fearful life and sacrifice property via taxes? This country was won with revolution, grew with dissenters and prospers with freedom dependent upon ruggedness.

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights is absurd compared to the U.S. Bill of Right's simplicity.

When reading the Declaration of Human Rights, beware the definition of 'arbitrary' and 'statute':

"arbitrary:... depending on choice or discretion; specif.: determinable by judge or tribunal rather than defined by statute... arising from unrestrained exercise of the will, caprice, or personal preference..."

"statute:... something laid down or declared as fixed or established..."

"UNDHR, Article 17: (1) Everyone has the right to own property alone as well as in association with others. (2) No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his property."

Who determines what is arbitrary and what isn't? Most likely the people, after all the United Nations founds its philosophy in 'democracy'. So if 51% of the people want another's money, they get it? Where's the representation on a world scale? The UN's 'property right' is not clear cut. The U.S. Bill of Rights property right is, but it's still slavery, therefore not the answer either because the government can still be a thief so long as they provide "just compensation." I suppose a lawyer will figure out what "just compensation" is.

"USBR, Amendment V: No person shall be... deprived of life, liberty or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation."

'Public use' differs from 'public redistribution to individuals' and 'just compensation' isn't bureaucrats saying, "50 years from now, you'll get it back". Tyrants might evaluate Amendment 10 and Article 17 equal – they're not. The American Founding Father's notion was less government; the UN desires more government.

"UNDHR, Article 22: Everyone, as a member of society, has the right to social security and is entitled to realization, through national effort and international co-operation and in accordance with the organization and resources of each State, of the economic, social and cultural rights indispensible for his dignity and free development of his personality."

Tax, tax, tax... Isn't it a noble ideal to provide for all slaves equally? Why can't the slave be responsible for himself? He can't, because then he'd be a person. Why must we have a conglomeration determining our personal monetary future? How can 'property rights' exist in conjunction with a right to social welfare? The answer is it can't. The higher ideal doesn't disable a person's individual life control. If his income wasn't taxed 24%-67%, imagine the good or whatever individually determined, that money could accomplish or not accomplish. How many people could be helped? More important he helps his chosen area and plans for HIS future needs.

"UNDHR Article 26: Everyone has the right to education. Education shall be free, at least in the elementary and fundamental stages. Elementary education shall be compulsory..."

Notification of the right to education is not required; the US Bill of Rights excludes it. Why include it because then an agency must quantify and regulate it! What is education? Does it encompass and allow all forms of education or just state dictate? Who determines the right education? Can a right to education be granted and at the same time forced? What's the form of compulsory education? What if the education delivered doesn't support the idea of government requiring education in a 'supposed' free society?

These are a few problems with the Univeral Declaration of Human Rights.

"UNDHR Article 25: (1) Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family, including food, clothing, housing and medical care and necessary social services, and the right to security in the event of unemployment, sickness, disability, widowhood, old age, or lack of livelihood in circumstances beyond his control. (2) Motherhood and childhood are entitled to special care and assistance. All children, whether born in or out of wedlock, shall enjoy the same social protection."

Where's the pool of resources draining from to fufill this government mandated right? It's going to come from the public. The government protects citizens! Are the politicians going to do the best job they can? Isn't government efficient? No it's not, and precisely why an individual must control their life.

Ponder the bureaucracy required to guarantee Article 25 on a global basis.

"SOME writers have so confounded society with government, as to leave little or no distinction between them; whereas they are not only different, but have different origins. Society is produced by our wants, and government by our wickedness; the former promotes our happiness positively by uniting our affections, the latter negatively by restraining our vices. The one encourages intercourse, the other creates distinctions. The first is a patron, the last a punisher.

Society in every state is a blessing, but government even in its best state is but a necessary evil, in its worst state an intolerable one; for then we suffer, or are exposed to the same miseries by a government, which we might expect in a country without a government, our calamities is heightened by reflecting that we furnish the means by which we suffer! Government, like dress, is the badge of lost innocence; the palaces of kings are built on the ruins of the bowers of paradise. For were the impulses of conscience clear, uniform, and irresistibly obeyed, man would need no other lawgiver; but that not being the case, he finds it necessary to surrender up a part of his property to furnish means for the protection of the rest; and this he is induced to do by the same prudence which in every other case advises him out of the two evils to choose the least. Wherefore, security being the true design and end of government, it unanswerably follows that whatever form thereof appears most likely to ensure it to us, with the least expense and the greatest benefit, is preferable to all others." Thomas Paine, Common Sense, 14 February 1776

Tyrannical governments promise health care and benefits out of the collective pot. Prepare to pay the price! It will be paid one way or the other. With the United Nations Declaration of Human Right's granted rights you'll accept regulation. Regulation being good for the majority, will be bad for the minority. At some point you'll be the minority in one or more life's areas. Why submit to a government providing for you? Are you incapable of making your own decisions? Government doesn't stop at one agency or area. Its tentacles spread everywhere. Regulation begets regulation. They outlaw marijuana to protect their slaves and then their arms spread into vitamins to weaken their slaves. The protection doesn't stop until a cage surrounds individual choice. The limits of a free government are simple: to protect the citizen, though still a slave, from forceful harm. Not to dictate individual needs. The least expensive government with the most supposed "benefit" is one that recognizes this reality. The no-government approach is to protect yourself from coercion and forceful harm, because in reality government, in any form, is the biggest organized crime racket in existence. Free "limited" governments are open to manipulation just like any other form of government. Tyranny always starts out with a small quasi-legitimate protection, at least to those comfortable with slavery, and turns into something entirely different much like what is evident now. The Beast says they're protecting me from fraud, theft and invasion and promoting the "general" welfare. The price of their protection is equivalent to being mugged every other day! Talk about fraud, theft and invasion!

Can governments become corrupt? Or more appropriately is the idea of organized government corrupt? Which direction is the best when running from a world government? How about changing it in a congress? Fat chance in dealing with representatives for 5 billion people of numerous backgrounds, needs and motives.