SE-503 THE TECHNOLOGICAL/INFORMATION DIMENSION
PURPOSE:
To understand how technology and information has revolutionized the international
environment. Technology and information has created a dynamic environment that can enhance
interaction but also create instability that can eventually lead to conflict.
LESSON OUTLINE:
Thesis: Technology and the mobility of information that technology engenders directly affects how states and groups interact with one another. Since advances in technology will proceed unevenly, the nature of global group interaction will likewise change asymmetrically. Modern, technology-based societies depend on timely access to and movement of massive amounts of information and knowledge. The ability of state and non-state actors to adapt culturally, economically, and ideologically in the face of new sources of information will determine their place in a New World order. The media is playing an increasingly central role in shaping perceptions of the international environment. The media can shape attitudes and influence public opinion.
Main Point I: Technology can enhance interaction, stability, and cooperation among states.
a. Long term technological advance can be the foundation for international cooperation.
b. Technology can increase life expectancy and improve quality of life.
c. Technology has the potential to improve interaction via advances in communication and transportation.
Main Point II: Technological advances can create disparities among states and be the basis for conflict.
a. Uneven technological development can create relative advantage and ultimately instability.
b. Uneven diffusion of technological can create disparities and potential for conflict.
c. Technological advances favoring offensive military capability can create instability.
Main Point III: Our ability to adequately manage information can give us a critical advantage in the strategic environment.
a. We must be able to acquire timely information.
b. Use computers and software to enhance our ability to process information.
c. Need to develop sophisticated systems to distribute information to those who need it.
We need to be able to defend our information.
Main Point IV: The media is playing an increasingly central role in international relations.
a. It can play a significant role in how people perceive the world.
b. It can shape opinions.
c. The media's ability to disseminate information quickly can have a direct impact on decision makers.
d. It has the capability to shape perceptions of reality.
LESSON INTEGRATION AND RATIONALE
This lesson explores how information and technology can have a direct impact on the
strategic environment. Information and access to information has socioeconomic impacts. It
has the ability to shape perceptions and decentralize decision making. Technology and the
increasing ease with which it can be transferred between societies can be a potential
source of instability. The transfer of dangerous technology is difficult to control and
has the potential to spark conflict.
LESSON OBJECTIVES:
Before we get to the objectives, it's important to understand the five precepts upon
which these objectives are written (according to the Hughes article). Proposition 1 &
2 are based on what the author calls the "globalist" perspective, the last three
are based on a "realist" perspective.
503.1 Comprehend how technology can be the basis for cooperation and integration
among state actors.
503.11 Discuss how technology can enhance life expectancy and quality of life.
Life expectancy has risen drastically over time. (Hughes) Much of this can be attributed to:
503.12 Describe how technology can enhance human interaction.
No one country could unilaterally have accomplished the progress made globally on these four indicators (medicine, agriculture, income, and energy) in the last 200 years. Globalists point out that the spread of agricultural, industrial, and health technology around the world made possible this collective global success (that the spread is incomplete explains many of the great inequalities still existing globally). Do not individuals from around the world who are better fed, clothed, housed, and educated increase their own contributions to technological advance and thus our collective well-being? Impoverished and hungry Russians and Japanese might not threaten our military security, but they would also make limited contributions to global fusion or electronic technology. Richer and better-fed Indians might compete with us in world markets, but they would also push back technological frontiers and improve our own lives in ways we could never anticipate. (Hughes)
Human interaction requires transportation and communication. Although the word "revolution" is overused, no other word can adequately describe nineteenth-and twentieth century developments in these arenas. A trip around the world in 1800 required several years by sailing ship. Jet aircraft can now circle the earth in one day and an orbiting spacecraft can do it in ninety minutes. Before the invention of the telegraph in 1840, nearly all messages traveled with human beings so that communication speeds were the same as those found in transportation. Today communications satellites transmit information between any two points in the globe almost instantaneously. (Hughes)
While building global community, modern transportation and communication simultaneously
make contemporary states permeable and increase penetration by external actors. Yet
societies can cut off transport much easier than they can restrict communication. (Hughes)
503.2 Comprehend how technology can be the basis for conflict.
503.21 Explain how uneven technological diffusion can create inequality and
conflict.
Medical, transportation, communications, and production technologies developed anywhere on the globe eventually come into use everywhere in the world. In the short and mid-runs, however, realists point out that all of these technologies confer to particular states advantages that translate into relative power. (Hughes)
While globalists may argue that technological advance will ultimately diffuse throughout the world and help all of humanity, the last section indicated that a problem lies in the geographic unevenness of that advance. (Hughes)
Many economists have noted what they call Kondratieff (or Kondratiev) cycles of approximately fifty to sixty years in the world economy. Joseph Schumpeter made distinctions among invention (identifiable technical change), innovation (the "introduction of new products, techniques and systems into the economy"17), and diffusion. (Hughes)
503.22 Describe how certain technologies can favor offensive military weapons and
how this can lead to conflict.
Thus individual countries seek to develop a wide variety of technologies, especially those with military application, before their acquisition by other states, and act to maintain their monopoly as long as possible. The struggle for relative advantage gives rise to considerable interstate rivalry. (Hughes)
Military technology also shrinks and integrates the world. All states must
now attend to the military capabilities and intentions of many other states scattered
around the globe. It is less clear, however, whether this force will develop global
community and institutions, or whether it will reinforce states in their unilateral
efforts to provide security. As we have seen, technological advantage can also be the
object of interstate competition. Thus some modernists are realists rather than
globalists and foresee an indefinite continuation of interstate rivalry. (Hughes)
503.3 Comprehend the implications of the information revolution on the Strategic
Environment.
503.1 Give examples of how the rise of the "Global villager" may impact
security interests.
What turns the world into a global village, with everyone capable of looking over each others' shoulders, may also promote the creation of global villages-communities of interest and inclination that span the globe but let members isolate themselves from others outside. (Libicki)
The ascendance of net over nation could alter what people would fight over. Historically, wars have involved challenges to territorial control- since it is the source of wealth. The Industrial Revolution made factories, infrastructure, and resources-all of which could be physically seized-the source of wealth. Even today's postindustrial service economies are tied to place. Otherwise why would so many put up with Manhattan when Maine or the Ozarks would be much more pleasant? Yet, the true assets of Wall Street-the knowledge, connections, and legally valid financial claims-are, themselves, place-independent . (Libicki)
The 20th century has seen large wars result from the alignment of national communities with the state violence. Millions died when Germans fighting for the Fatherland fought Russians protecting Mother Russia. The net works against such correlation by making it easier for people to be different, letting them pick and choose among communications flows and thus messages.
The increasing importance of spanning communities over local or national ones may be
a harbinger of less war-but not necessarily less violence.
503.32 Describe the impact of information revolution on communities according to
Martin Libicki.
The Libicki article was pretty interesting. It described the impact of the Internet on
national security. Apparently written just a couple of years ago, many of the
"future" capabilities he mentions have already come to fruition. Much of what he
describes is included in what the military now refers to as either information warfare or
information operations.
Libicki argues: The impact of information technology can be discussed in terms of five broad trends: the erasure of distance, fixed and floating networks, universal translatability, the mutability of truth and, as a consequence of all this, the rise of the global villager.
Technology has impacted all conflicts, but information technology has made the greatest impact on national security affairs in the past 20 years. Offers these examples: The use of cassette tapes in the 1979 Iranian revolution; fax machines getting word out to protestors/sympathizers/news media during the in Tiananmen Square uprising, the use of CNN as a means of communications between world leaders (Iraq, Panama, etc). Coins the term CNNization (ubiquity of broadcast media), which is a two edged sword: separates people because they can live any where and still maintain contact with home, and joins people because like minded people are no longer separated by geography. Argues that "The state is not ready to wither away, but its suzerainty (dominion) over a world of global villagers (despite some resurgence of nationalism in the Second World) will be redefined."
Erasure of distance: The cost of doing business over wide distances (especially overseas) will keep dropping dramatically.
The Mutability of Truth:
Other points:
Three problems frustrate any effort to deny technology to specific states. (Hughes)
Collective goods and free riders. Example: NATO members collectively benefited from a militarily weaker Eastern opposition and such weakness thus constituted a collective good for the alliance. Yet each individually could benefit by expanding trade ties with the East. Cheating did not take the form of blatant shipments of military goods, but rather of trading in categories that were in the large gray area. Consider, for example, the ambiguity of technology for a truck factory or oil refinery. Similar problem for nuclear proliferation, as such items are called "dual use" technology like supercomputers and vacuum pumps.
Technology is sometimes difficult to identify by origin. Thus technology that the Iraqi nuclear program obtained from the West has often been nearly untraceable. This has encouraged cheating on the nonproliferation of nuclear weapons regime.
Would-be proliferators of this technology have circumvented restrictions with an extensive network for economic and military technology espionage, using diplomatic missions, exchange students, and other personnel. Example: Iraqi weapons deliveries.
As third wave (information age) war-form takes shape, a new breed of "knowledge warriors" has begun to emerge-intellectuals in and out of uniform dedicated to the idea that knowledge can win, or prevent, wars. (Toffler)
Duane Andrews former Assistant Secretary of Defense for, underlined the difference when he termed information a "strategic asset." That means it is not just a matter of battlefield intelligence or tactical attacks on the other side's radar or telephone networks, but a powerful lever capable of altering high-level decisions by the opponent. More recently, Andrews spoke of "knowledge warfare" in which "each side will try to shape enemy actions by manipulating the flow of intelligence and information."
Cyberwar implies "trying to know all about an adversary while keeping it from knowing much about oneself. It means turning the 'balance of information and knowledge' in one's favor, especially if the balance of forces is not." And exactly as in the civilian economy, it means "using knowledge so that less capital and labor may have to be expended."
Certain things are nevertheless clear. Any military-like any company or corporation-has
to perform at least four key functions with respect to knowledge. It must acquire,
process, distribute, and protect information, while selectively denying or distributing it
to its adversaries and/or allies.
READINGS:
Hughes, Barry B., "Economic Development and Distribution of Wealth"
Toffler, Alvin and Heidi, "The Knowledge Warriors"
Libicki, Martin C., "The Net and Its Discontent"
Reading Rationale:
The excerpt from Continuity and Change in World Politics provide the basis for discussion of the concepts of the role of technology in the modern era, technology transfer between international actors, and concerns about dual use technologies. The excerpt from War and Anti-War suggests that information proliferation and information dependence presents opportunities as well as security challenges for Third Wave, technology-based societies in the areas of command and control and the media. Martin C. Libicki's article "The Net and Its Discontent" provides an overview of how information is reshaping the strategic environment.