Frock Coats from the Little Rock Quartermaster


Arkansas was poorly prepared to raise and equip an army of its own in the early spring and summer of 1861. While the General Assembly had provided for a State Militia, this was a loose grouping of individual companies, each responsible for its own selection and procurement of uniforms and weaponry, and a small administrative staff at the state level.

Thus Arkansas was even more ill-prepared to clothe and equip an army when secession became a fact in the first week of May, 1861. Nearly completely a rural state and wholly dependent on agriculture, Arkansas's only clothing manufactory was at Nashville, in the southwestern corner of the state. Virtually all of the clothing supplied to the first companies to answer the call to arms was improvised, and mostly homemade, or consisted of the militia uniforms unique to each company.

On May 15, 1861 the Secession Convention, acting in a legislative capacity for the new Confederate state, created the Army of Arkansas and established the Arkansas Military Board to serve as a sort of war department for the state. Consisting of the Governor as chair, and two appointed board members, the Military Board had the power to mobilize the State Troops and volunteer forces, to launch military expeditions as needed to defend the state, and to manage and control the forts, arms, and munitions of the state as an auxiliary to the Confederate authority. The Convention appropriated two million dollars to the Board for its operations.

While most of the historical interest in the activities of the Military Board have focused on the political maneuverings of its members and the general officers appointed to the State Troops, the Board also took measures to establish manufactories for military arms and supplies for the troops. Armaments came primarily from weapons seized from U.S. Army arsenals at Little Rock, Fort Smith, Pine Bluff, and Napoleon. Repair shops were established at the Little Rock arsenal and at Hopefield (present day West Memphis) to convert these weapons, primarily flintlocks, to percussion ignition and to attempt to repair the large number of "junker" weapons from the arsenals as well as others purchased or collected from private sources.

As the Arkansas troops were transferred to Confederate service, the central government in Richmond began providing funds to or reimbursing the states for their expenses in arming and clothing the troops. During the first year and a half of the War, the Confederate government did not furnish uniforms to the troops upon their entering the service, but paid them or provided funds to their state for their uniforms and equipment. This was known as the "commutation" system, and in Arkansas, the Military Board took these funds and used them to establish a clothing and equipment manufactory at the Arkansas State Penitentiary in Little Rock.

Arkansas had joined a number of other states in the early 1840s in establishing penitentiaries in the belief that criminals could be reformed and returned to society. The Arkansas State Penitentiary was located in a set of buildings atop a hill just outside the western edge of the city. Operated by contractors, the State Pen offered inmates vocational training in wagon-making, carpentry, and tailoring. With approximately a hundred inmates incarcerated in 1860, the penitentiary offered the Military Board an ideal, captive labor force with the needed skills to clothe and equip a state army.

Patterning its uniform after the pre-war uniform of the U.S. Army, the Military Board established a frock coat, trousers, and a forage cap, all made of gray woolen jeans material, as its basic ensemble. A.J. Ward, the penitentiary's superintendent, reported to the state legislature on November 18, 1861 that by that time the penitentiary shops had completed 3,000 sets of uniform, 8,000 pairs of shoes, 250 wagons, 100 sets of wagon and artillery harness, 500 drums, 200 tents, 600 knapsacks, and 500 cartridge boxes for the Arkansas regiments.

Issuance of the uniforms seems to have gone first to the regiments sent to the "seat of the War" in Virginia and the Mississippi River. Fagan's 1st Arkansas reported getting a new issue of uniforms while in camp around Fredericksburg, VA, and the regiments in the Mississippi valley were likewise issued uniforms in the early fall of 1861.

The clothing records of many of the Arkansas units serving in the Mississippi Valley show that they received an issue of new uniforms from the State between October and December of 1861, and it is likely that this is the style of the state "commutation" uniform thus issued. Phillip Dangerfield Stephenson of St. Louis, MO described the uniform he was issued upon his enlistment in Co. K, 13th Arkansas Infantry near Belmont, Missouri, in mid-September, 1861:

"I was about the last recruit for the regiment, at least for a season. When they fitted me out in soldier clothes, it was rare work. All the uniform shoes, hats, etc., had been picked over and only odds and ends were left. Lieutenant Bartlett roared as I tried on one thing after another. I finally emerged - and was a sight! I had on a long frock coat of coarse brown cloth, butternut color, very tight, buttoned up to the chin on my long rail-like body. My pants, of the same stuff, were a mile too big, baggy as sacks, legs rolled up at the bottom. Our uniforms were mostly the same dirt color, the coats having brass buttons and black cuffs and collars. My hat, a common light colored wool, was passable to fit, but my shoes, coarse brogans, were a No. 9 and a No. 8! I laughed it off and was proud of being in uniform."

Clothing records of the 34th Arkansas Infantry of Hindman's 1st Corps, Army of the Trans-Mississippi, show the issuance of a quantity of "coats", jackets, and caps in November 1862, and these items appear to have been from the Military Board's stocks.

Tintypes and ambrotypes of Arkansas soldiers taken during late 1862 and especially in the first half of 1862 frequently depict these frock coats. One of the most widely known features brothers James May of the 22nd Arkansas Infantry and George May of the 2nd Arkansas Mounted Rifles.

Private L. Yates of Company B, 18th Arkansas Infantry had his image taken in one of these jackets during the late spring or early summer of 1862. Private Yates enlisted in the 18th Arkansas on March 12, 1862, and fought with the regiment during the Corinth, Mississippi Campaign the following fall, and surrendered at Port Hudson in July, 1863.

The photograph of Yates gives us a lot more details about this uniform. It is a single-breasted frock coat of gray jean-wool, with an 8-button closure. The collar and cuff trim is a medium to dark blue, and the cuff trim are cut in a straight line rather than the pointed fashion seen on most reproduction coats.

McCulloch's troops in northwest Arkansas, which became part of Van Dorn's "Army of the West" received uniforms before the Pea Ridge Campaign early in 1862, and finally Hindman's troops in the 1st Corps, Army of Trans-Mississippi were issued new uniforms in November, 1862 just before setting off on the campaign which led to the battle of Prairie Grove. This basic style of uniform remained in use at least through the summer of 1863; when Little Rock fell to General Frederick Steele's Arkansas Expedition, and Confederate quartermaster and ordnance operations in Little Rock ceased and moved to southwest Arkansas and Texas.

 

Contemporary Images of the Arkansas Frock Coat

James M. May, of the 23rd Arkansas Infantry is shown with his brother George, a member of the 2nd Arkansas Mounted Rifles in late March or April of 1862. Both brothers wear the gray jean cloth frock coat manufactured by the Arkansas State Penitentiary, indicating this uniform was issued to both units.

Unidentified soldier with D-Guard bowie. (Image has been reversed from the original)

 

Private L. Yates, Co. B, 18th Arkansas Infantry. Mustered into service March12, 1862, image struck in late March or April, 1862.

Corporal William A. Halliburton of Co. G, 7th Arkansas Infantry. Halliburton finished the War as a private in the 6th & 7th Arkansas, Consolidated. Wounded at Murfreesboro, Halliburton recovered and was was captured along with the rest of the regiment at Jonesboro, GA in September 1864. Note that the cuff trim on this jacket has a slight chevron shape.

 

Private William Shores, (Co. H, 6th Arkansas.Infantry). Aged 17 at the time of this picture, Shores was mortally wounded at the battle of Murfreesboro.

 

Lt. Mark Noble, 2nd Arkansas Cavalry in a coat with collar trim, but no cuff trim. (Note also his Arkansas belt plate.)

Images of a Surviving Little Rock Frock Coat

AN ADDITIONAL WINDFALL in our ongoing research into what Arkansas Confederates really wore came from John
Schwarz of the Dixie Guard. This came in the form of nearly twenty photographs of a surviving frock coat presumed to have been made by the Little Rock Arsenal in late 1862 or early 1863.

This garment is in a private collection in Minnesota, and is believed to be an enlisted issue product from the Little Rock Penitentary, circa. 1863. The owner reports that the coat was brought home by a sergeant from the 3rd Minnesota Infantry Regiment, which was the first federal unit to enter Little Rock upon its fall on September 10, 1863.

The coat was found several years ago with a large number of items from the estate of Captain Otto F. Dreher. Captain Dreher was the last commander of Company A, 3rd Minnesota Volunteer Infantry. He died in 1889. During the Little Rock Campaign in the summer of 1863, Dreher was a lieutenant in Company A. The 3rd Minnesota was the first Federal infantry unit to enter Little Rock, crossing the Arkansas River on a pontoon bridge thrown across near the present-day location of the Main Street Bridge.

The owner notes that the buttons are unmarked (possibly Confederate copies of the) brass enlisted eagle general service buttons. The cloth used is a light grey jean cloth similiar to that seen on surviving “Columbus Depot” jackets (gray wool weft on a brown cotton warp). It is now a light butternut color. The coat is lined inside with undyed osnaburg, which has also oxidized over time to a brownish color.

The coat appears to be entirely hand sewn. The owner notes that its construction is similar to that of a Federal enlisted frock coat, however the cuffs in this garment are absolutely plain, and the tails are hemmed. There seems to be some cotton batting in the chest and shoulder areas, but the coat is not padded as much as a Federal frock coat.

Unlike the jackets worn by Yates and the Mays brothers, this coat has no cuff trim. This may be because the coat, still in very good condition, was still fairly new when captured, and the blue cloth for collar and cuff trim may have been in short supply. Regardless of the cuff trim, this coat is very similar to the coats in the Yates and May images.

Chris Fischer from Waco, Texas, is currently working at Fort Snelling and provided these pictures. For further information, Chris can be contacted at: christopher_fischer@juno.com.

 

Rear view of the coat. One button is missing.

Closer  view of the rear of the coat, which better shows its construction (six-piece body, two-piece sleeves) and the color of the cloth.

 

Detail of the cuffs. The cuffs have no vent or cuff buttons, but come to a simple opening like that on the Richmond Depot-style jackets, and have a single line of topstitching around the edge of each cuff.

 

View of the coat tails. 

 

A look into the pocket in the coat tails.

 

Interiorof the tails. Note that the lower edge of the tails has been turned up and hemmed; and the coat is lined (osnaburg) all the way down to the bottom edge.

 

Details of the collar and upper button. The outer part of the collar is made of a dark to medium blue wool kersey or flannel; the inside of the collar is made of the same gray jean as the body of the coat. The buttons are an unmarked copy of the coat-sized Federal eagle buttons, or a Confederate copy of this style of button.

 

Close-up view of the collar closure and buttonholes. Note the rounded edge on the left (buttonhole) side of the front facing, and the single line of topstitching around the edges of the collar and down the button edges.

Another view of the collar, as well as the joining of the lining to the front facings.

 

View of the lining and the armsceye.

 

A look at the lining inside the coat.

 

View of the joining of the lining to the collar. A tear in the lining also shows the back side of the center seam in the coat body.

 

Inside view of the right (button side) front facing.

 

Inside view of the left (buttonhole side) front facing.

A look at the back of the buttons shows no manufacturer's markings on the buttons.

 

A closer view of the lining material, the main cloth of the jacket, and a buttonhole. The main cloth is gray wool-jean, with a gray wool weft on a brown cotton warp.

 

Another look at the material showing two moth holes, which allows you to see the brown cotton warp threads.
   

Updated March 12, 2003

The picket says that you're Visitor #.

[ Home | Standards | Events | History | Research | Links | Message Board | Newsletters ]
1