Smith River Fisheries and Ecosystem Report

Table of Contents

Chapter 4 -- Watershed processes and aquatic ecosystems (continued)

Landsliding and mass wasting

Sediment is often delivered to streams various types of landslides which are collectively termed "mass wasting." Aside from the gentle coastal plain, most of the Smith River Basin is inherently landslide prone (California Department of Fish and Game 1980). Areas composed of weak rock, such as the Galice and Franciscan formations, are especially subject to erosion, mass wasting, and sediment production.

Mass wasting is more likely when soils have high water content. During heavy storms the pores in the soil become filled with water, increasing the possibility of activating or reactivated landslides. Areas with greater local relief have increased pore pressure of water in the slopes which increases the tendency for mass wasting. Therefore, when other factors are equal, higher rates of mass wasting occur on steeper slopes. Areas near larger streams tend to have greater local relief and therefore greater tendency for mass wasting than tributaries higher in the watershed. Landslides are sometimes triggered by removal of the toe of a slope by flood waters or road building.

Mass wasting also occurs in the form of debris torrents which are essentially wet landslides that move down a stream channel, scouring down to bedrock. The resulting smooth bedrock channel is devoid of habitat complexity and maybe virtually unusable by fish. Debris torrents sometimes occur naturally but may also be triggered by human influence. For example, during a storm, a culvert may be blocked by woody debris causing water to back up. This may cause the road crossing to fail suddenly and initiate a debris torrent that washes down the channel. Debris torrents often deliver large quantities of woody debris to downstream areas.

In January 1970, following rains, a large landslide fell from the northeast face of Rattlesnake Mountain and blocked the South Fork Smith River. Known as the Rattlesnake Slide, it eventually covered nearly a square mile and moved between 1.5 and 2 million cubic yards (California Department of Fish and Game 1980) or 5 million cubic yards (McCain et al. 1995). A contributing factor was road building activity at the toe of the mountain and road construction for logging on the upper slopes. The slide blocked the South Fork for a few hours, creating a lake two miles long and 50 feet deep. When the river breached this blockage, a large wave of water was released. Although this event did not cause memorable damage, flood surges caused by stream-damming landslides are an occasional threat to downstream areas (Burke 1995, California Department of Fish and Game 1980).

Aerial photographs from the 1940s show relatively few streamside landslides. There were a few slides along the North Fork and Middle Fork (McCain et al. 1995). In the entire Smith River basin, there are now over a thousand landslides including hundreds over 200 feet wide (McCain et al. 1995, California Department of Fish and Game 1980). Recent large slides, such as the Rattlesnake Slide on the South Fork and others on the Middle Fork, will continue to influence habitats and stream gradients, both upstream and downstream, for many decades.

 

Geomorphic processes | Table of Contents | Erosion

This document maintained by andybartson@hotmail.com.
Material Copyright © 1997 Andrew P. Bartson

This page is hosted by Get your own Free Home Page

1