PRE-DISCUSSION MAILOUT
Doing your part for conservation.
We continue to explore the various avenues to conservation open to orchid
hobbyists. I recommend that chatters take the opportunity to read the
Executive Summary of the Orchid Action Plan at the IUCN Site.
One of the two conservation strategies advocated is the "promotion of
trade of artificially propagated plants." Just how can we accomplish this?
How can we go about supporting the artificial propagation of rare or new
species in those countries where the species are native?
I look forward to this Wednesday, March 11, for an interesting and
thought-provoking session.
TRANSCRIPT
by Marilyn H. S. Light Present were 19: James marilyninOttawa marilyninOttawa 55SS (James in Fresno ) marilyninOttawa NativeOrchid (Carol, Darnestown, Maryland) marylois ABU CALANTHE marilyninOttawa nodosa (Ed in SAT) paulav (Paula in Boca Raton, Florida) marilyninOttawa NativeOrchid (Carol, Darnestown, Maryland) nodosa (Ed in SAT) marilyninOttawa ABU CALANTHE 55SS (James in Fresno )
marylois sparkysteve (of Boca Raton Florida) nodosa (Ed in SAT) sparkysteve (of Boca Raton Florida) JCY8S (John in Arcadia, CA) 55SS (James in Fresno ) ABU CALANTHE marilyninOttawa marylois nodosa (Ed in SAT) paulav (Paula in Boca Raton, Florida) sparkysteve (of Boca Raton Florida) NativeOrchid (Carol, Darnestown, Maryland) nodosa (Ed in SAT) sparkysteve (of Boca Raton Florida) sparkysteve (of Boca Raton Florida) foxtail2 paulav (Paula in Boca Raton, Florida) marylois ABU CALANTHE marilyninOttawa marylois paulav (Paula in Boca Raton, Florida) nodosa (Ed in SAT) paulav (Paula in Boca Raton, Florida) nodosa (Ed in SAT) sparkysteve (of Boca Raton Florida) marilyninOttawa paulav (Paula in Boca Raton, Florida) ABU CALANTHE sparkysteve (of Boca Raton Florida) foxtail2 nodosa (Ed in SAT) marilyninOttawa marylois marilyninOttawa marilyninOttawa sparkysteve (of Boca Raton Florida) marilyninOttawa nodosa (Ed in SAT) ABU CALANTHE marylois marilyninOttawa paulav (Paula in Boca Raton, Florida) sparkysteve (of Boca Raton Florida) nodosa (Ed in SAT) sparkysteve (of Boca Raton Florida) marilyninOttawa marilyninOttawa sparkysteve (of Boca Raton Florida) nodosa (Ed in SAT) Ruckster1 (Sharon from Tejas) marilyninOttawa nodosa (Ed in SAT) ABU CALANTHE marilyninOttawa sparkysteve (of Boca Raton Florida) Ruckster1 (Sharon from Tejas) ABU CALANTHE marilyninOttawa nodosa marilyninOttawa marilyninOttawa Ruckster1 (Sharon from Tejas) marilyninOttawa ABU CALANTHE nodosa ABU CALANTHE marilyninOttawa nodosa sparkysteve (of Boca Raton Florida) ABU CALANTHE nodosa ABU CALANTHE marilyninOttawa sparkysteve (of Boca Raton Florida) paulav (Paula in Boca Raton, Florida) ABU CALANTHE nodosa marilyninOttawa nodosa
Marilyn Light
WBS, Wed 11 Mar 98
marylois
sparkysteve
marilyninOttawa
Sharon
Ed
ChuckMyr
maurelius
paulav
foxtail2
gaillevy
prankster d
Abu
Andy NVA
John
Carol
MaryLou
Peter
Susan
This session is going to be about how to promote trade of artificially propagated
orchids. One of the situations in dealing with trade in new or unusual species
is ensuring that some revenues return to the range state. That way, local
conservation groups may have funds to protect habitat, or do other worthwhile
projects. Any comments on this. Abu?
Do any of you have show policies controlling the sale or display of wild
collected material?
Is that meant to be between hobbyists, commercial growers, or countries?
Between hobbyists and commercial growers or between commercial growers.
Marilyn, I don't think we do at NCOS.
Marilyn, just found six pages re this subject in my email from Abu..far too much to handle here.
Marilyn, Revenue to the State is not an issue - The right interpretation
of the CITES by the Govts and the Wildlife Depts of every country is.
Abu. Could you summarize the points that you have made in what you have
just sent to Lois please?
Marilyn, I'd like to say from the commercial side that we are absolutely
against 'Bare Root Charlie' and his ilk selling unestablished plants to
an unsuspecting public. Not against species sales, necessarily, just against
the rip and vend group.
Ed, who would you consider to be 'Bare Root Charlie'? There are several
vendors from Brazil and other countries in S.A. coming to a big orchid fair
in Homestead in May ... should we be cautious about purchasing bare root
plants from them?
CITES is an international agreement. Laws of sovereign states are their
concern. I agree that many countries have more exacting interpretations
of CITES. Could you hive us an example from your experience please so that
we can discuss it further?
Paula, that is a good question. How do we tell a legit import from an illegal
one?
Paula, Bare Root Charlie is many people. They put up a sales table and cover
it with plants that have been ripped from nature, bundled and shipped. These
plants have had no care and have never been grown by a pro. Bare Root Charlie
is at every orchid show and people line up to buy his tawdry goods. THAT
is desecration of orchids and the legitimate orchid business. We, as buyers,
can stop it.
Agreed, Ed. The argument is not against species trade but wild-collected
species trade. That is one reason why plants in flask are treated differently
from those out of flask. The flask is proof that the material arises from
artificial propagation. One burgeoning problem is however, that it may be
required to establish the legitimate CITES status of the seed parent or
tissue culture source.
Marilyn, I have found through personal experiences that the Wildlife Depts
in most countries do not know exactly what the CITES is or what it stands
for. How do you enforce any rules from a convention or treaty which you
do not understand in the first place. How many of our members here today
knows exactly what is CITES?
Convention of International trade of endangered species, I think?
Exactly - how can the show chair decide who can show and who cannot and
not risk litigation?
Miami show says NO BARE ROOTS
You miss my point, Lois. BUYERS can stop improper plant sales. We, each
of us, can refuse to buy anything we suspect has been harvested illegally.
Once the buck dries up the problem will cease to exist.
But, Ed--it's all ready too late!! Plants are ripped off the trees!
I agree Ed, but realistically isn't that a little too much to expect?
Should we look for broken roots and such?
In most countries Government officials and Academicians are invited to sit
on committees to deliberate on the CITES and the Quarantine regulations
which goes hand in hand.
At the Ottawa Orchid Show, we choose which vendors to invite. Space is limited
as well. Our goal is to provide healthy, established stock to those who
visit the show.
Sparky, that's a darn good start! Put it in the show schedule and police
that. Must be announced when show is announced though, not just fine print
in the show schedule.
Sparky, I applaud Miami for taking a stand. Years before CITES, I was partner
in a firm well up in the top ten per cent of orchid importers. We never
bought a plant from a source other than a commercial nursery and we never
sold a plant that wasn't well established in a new growing environment.
AND we never had a year we didn't make money. It can be done if one is determined.
Ed, would it be prudent to NOT buy bare roots from a vendor if the plants
appear in less than perfect condition (e.g., raggedy, obvious torn areas,
weedy, buggy, etc.)?
But, Marilyn, you never know where they buy plants from.
A more reasonable approach is to get propagated species in the trade. We
as orchid hobbyists will naturally be drawn to a well grown plant over one
that looks horrible and is bare root. I am seeing this in Angraecums. More
species are in the trade now than three years ago. ...and they sell out
in a heart beat!
Paula, would you buy any other orchid plant that was weedy, buggy and had
torn areas?
I still feel that by the time they get to the selling place it's too late---they
should cover the areas where they are grown?
Paula buys ANYTHING!!!!!!!
Question: who should or is the one to establish or say who sell 'proper'
plants and who is 'Charlie'? Is there a parameter that we call adhere to?
Ed, I have purchased plants like that, but usually from commercial growers
going out of business, or private collections being sold due to lack of
care. But these were all potted, of course.
Steve, we cannot control what is going on in other countries, but we can
control our personal buying habits...if the market dries up, there will
be no incentive to harvest the forests.
Nodosa, Ever since I joined Orchid Safari the chats have most of the times
been focused on orchid species. Little does everyone knows that the original
plant or plants imported were through the blackmarket or illegally imported
into the country. If the demand is so high for species the illegal import
will continue. We in the orchid community has a say in this. Make sure that
species bought are sibling or selfed crosed plants. Never ask for the original
species for your breeding program.
I agree, Sparky. Most of the vendors at our show deal in seed-raised material
(mostly their own) or in blooming hybrid orchids that appeal to the public.
We simply do not invite or invite back, vendors who sell primarily bare
root plants that appear collected. We do of course permit unpotted but carefully
packaged plants from e.g. the UK or from New Zealand where the material
is clearly artificially propagated and merely removed from pots to accommodate
shipping, handling and phytosanitary restrictions.
oops! Yes, Marilyn - those are good plants out of pot...how to word a show
schedule?
And Steve is right - I do buy almost anything - I'm known in these parts
as an orchid wh-re...!
Think a minute, Steve. If bare root plants cease to sell, the system dries
up right back to the source - in a hurry. None of these guys have production
greenhouses. They can't hold the stuff and wouldn't know how to grow it
if the did. CITES hasn't cured the problem in umpteen years but lack of
sales will cure it in six months.
Thank you for such a thought provoking suggestion, Ed. Although the bare
root tables are sold out quickly at the Redlands Orchid Fair, I won't be
buying from them.
Abu, the orchid community is the whole say in this thing. Maybe some of
the CITES committees should get some professional growers on their panels.
I believe I can spot a seed-raised plant vs a jungle rip-off from any distance
up to 100 yards.
Ed---I have to disagree---all they have to do is lower the prices and people
will buy them---bare root damaged, buggy or whatever.
In our show schedule we state:
The Show Chairman has the option to remove any plant or exhibit that shows
a lack of respect for orchids, their environment or their range state. This
will include: 1) Plants taken from their natural habitat solely for exhibition
purposes and without due regard for their successful cultivation after the
show; and 2) Plants that can be proven to have been legally imported without
due adherence to CITES import regulations and/or the laws of the country
of origin.
Steve, you may be right about the lower prices, but we, as 'enlightened'
growers, should spread the word via shows, orchid societies, sales, etc.
Contd. These CITES committes are ignorant of what the CITES is and decisions
made at these committee meetings are without reference to the floriculture
industry without representation from the Orchid Bodies~Associations or Societies
in each country. The committees main concern is that the integrity of the
country's quarantine to protect everything under agriculture is not compromised.
When I go to the Everglades and see someone with the 'intention' I just
tell them that the rangers are checking camera bags, coolers, etc---had
some strange looks!!!!!!
Education is the key tool, however, how does one overcome personal greed of
others when staying at low price?
Lois, I think a fresh division is a whole lot different than a bare root
plant. One glance should tell you which is which. By the same token, I think
the division, too, should be passed by. If it is good, the vendor should
respect the plant and the customer enough to establish the plant and present
it properly.
Abu, I understand what you have experienced. When we purchase plants from
other countries, we must respect our own country's requirements and those
of CITES. For Canada, we require an Export Permit from the country of origin
in order to import plants. This is not needed for flasked material.
Hmmmm, Marilyn - I believe we would find it hard to make people adhere to
that statement...or to find someone willing to make those decisions.
When we discuss species, I believe that we are talking about species versus
hybrids and not necessarily species collected from the wild. Species remain
species even though they are sib-crossed.
Abu, Are you advocating that we encourage trade in hybrids rather than species?
I have a plant collected from the wild---it received an AM---does that mean
I'm a bad person? (the plant was collected 15 years ago)
Good point, Ed. How do you think we could dry up the trade?
I've had some private messages re this: yes, everyone in the trade gets
an overture from a foreign shipper to fudge on documentation. Yes, we could
have thousands of plants here in 30 days despite CITES controls. Yes, people
still buy cheapies regardless. OK, but we are talking personal integrity
and regard for orchids, not laws or CITES or government intervention. If
the public has no concern about conservation, we can do nothing. They will
get the plants. I hope some of us set a different standard and encourage
a different message. Remember, however, CITES is just another form of prohibition
and it didn't work, either.
Contd. With this in mind they had in the past recommended a total ban on
export of orchid specis under Appendix I and II of the CITES, which is
not correct. The CITES DOES NOT PROHIBIT EXPORT OF ORCHID SPECIES IF THEY
ARE COLLECTED, PROPOGATED, IMPROVED UPON, MERISTEM AND THEN EXPORTED. CITES
I and II ONLY PROHIBITS THE DIRECT EXPORT OF JUNGLE COLLECTED PLANTS OF
WILD ORIGIN.
Bravo, Ed! Well said. Again, the place to start is always with oneself!
This coming March 17, I as Canadian Orchid Congress Conservation Chair (representing
hobbyists and member orchid societies, have been invited to address CITES
related regulations being suggested for our country. I asked to be heard
some time ago and they listened. We have to speak up.
I think that circumstances should affect one's decision to purchase a wild
collected plant... for example, I collected a clump of Enc. tampensis from
a tree that was destined to be torn down for development. Do I regret it?
No... that plant is now safe in my collection, naturalized on a tree on
my property. I will never sell it. And, I drove by the spot where I collected
it a few years ago, and it now is completely cleared of ALL trees.
ABU---and if they plaque them and grow them for six months = then the export
them and all's OK????
Marilyn, I think we can substantially reduce illegal trade by informing
the orchid public about what is legal or illegal. CITES simply took the
position of saying everything is illegal, so people have ignored it and
the public pressure on commercials is enormous.
Paula---I'm tellin' on you!!!!!! Park rangers at your door in the morning!!!!!
I believe that some good progress is being made through the auspices of
the Plant Committee - Orchids IUCN. They have been successful in having
flasks delisted. Moves are afoot to have supermarket plants (hybrid phalaenopsis,
etc) de-regulated much as has recently been done for potted Cyclamen, grafted
cacti and Christmas Cacti. There is progress but I admit that it is slow.
We initially wanted to discourage cyps being lifted and forced for spring
shows. Now that seed-raised material is coming to be available this may
not be as much of a concern. I agree that it is difficult to make a stand
but we are all in this together.
Compare the taking of orchids to taking rocks from National parks----will
it ever end---NO---only when ALL the rocks are gone!!
Marilyn, I'd like to see felled trees harvested under controlled conditions.
Slash and burn is being done because people are hungry and that is a hard
thing to control, but we could permit harvesters who would then be required
to grow the material six months or so before resale. Yes, experienced people
can tell whether plants are established, and the guy who sells the plant
better have a permit showing where and when it was collected. This should
apply to many CITES plants, not just orchids.
Sparky, I agree, but I think Ed has the right idea...
All orchids in cultivation other than hybrids, arose from wild-collected
stock. We are more concerned with recent collection of native material.
Marilyn, you're saying then that anything discovered after say 1990 cannot
enter commercial channels and cannot be legally sold?
Contd. From our research experience we found out that the only way the Govt
of any country controls the export of prohibited plants is through legislation
in the the Customs Act. The Customs are not plant friendly in relation to
enforcement of the Law on prohibition of exports including orchids. this
is where the present PROBLEM LIES. If you try to export species even meristem
species you will if caught by the Customs will be classified as a Smuggler
and the shipment destroyed. there is no argument in the interpretation
of this Customs Regulations. It is already out of the hands of the Wildlife
Department or the Quarantine Dept. the Customs Dept and its officers on
duty which is ten times out of ten does not know what CITES IS NOR DOES
HE CARE EXCEPT THE ORCHID PLANTS YOU ARE EXPORTING ARE PROHIBITED ITEMS.
The public, at least the average visitor at our show, wants inexpensive,
showy or perhaps odd-looking plants. They are not really interested in botanicals
although they will buy cheap ones if presented with them. The money is to
be made on flowering orchids whether they be Phals, Cymbids, Cattleyas or
nobile-type Dendrobiums. It is the hobbyist that can be interested in the
rare or unusual, the botanical. I know. I am one of those hobbyists who
likes something different. The market is relatively small in the overall
show context.
Abu---and AGAIN I SAY---MORE PLANTS ARE REMOVED!!!!
Marilyn, is it the hobbyist or the serious collector who is going to pay
a smuggler or risk the customs man?
No, Steve, even after 6 months it is still a plant of wild origin as classified
under CITES. THEY CAN ONLY BE EXPORTED IF THEY ARE COLLECTED AND MERISTEMED.
Since one of the objectives of CITES is to monitor trade, permits are required
for all orchid plants traded. Artificially propagated plants are certainly
not banned from trade but some countries do ban all or most trade. The reasons
remain obscure.
Marilyn, most custom inspectors look only as far as the word orchid on
the way bill. When that is seen, the shipment is suspect and if species orchids
are identified, the shipment is illegal. Tough sledding for the honest shipper.
Each of us must make decisions that reflect our own moral code. I understand
where you are coming from Paula. One of my first orchids was a Schomburgkia
sp. which I removed from its tree support shortly before the whole property
was bulldozed. It was merely moved from danger to a tree down the street.
I had no moral dilemma with this.
How many of us have CITES or Orchid Conservation exhibits at our shows?
We should make this a priority especially seeing that the next WOC in 1999
(Vancouver) has conservation as its theme.
Marilyn, can lobbying be done to get things 'changed' to reflect the 'saving'
of plants here and abroad. I realize common sense and government do not
co-exist, but...
Good suggestion, Ed.
Marilyn, the reason is not obscure. It is the inclusion of the recommendations
of Govt Officials to the Quarantine Committee of each country that is misleading.
The Customs Dept merely enforces the act. The CITES is not wrong and their
findings correct. It is at the stage of implementation that something had
gone wrong.
Marilyn, I hear you on CITES exhibits at shows and magazine article and
all that good news. Still, the bottom line is CITES is not saving our native
orchids from extinction. Leave them in situ is not a viable policy when
in situ is being restructured. Orchids do not adapt in one growing season.
Letting them die in a bonfire is NOT better than many alternatives, some of them commercial.
Ed. I have read this interpretation recently. It comes out of the Biodiversity
Convention I believe. I may hear more next week at our local meeting. I
believe there was something on this subject recently in ORCHIDS. I do not
know how they intend to monitor, prove, grandfather, etc. As with most of
these conservation laws, the primary target is animals, reptiles and birds.
Orchids get caught up in the net.
Ruckster, THE ORCHID COMMUNITY NEEDS A VOICE THAT CAN BE HEARD THE WORLD
OVER TO TACKLE THIS ISSUE.
Abu. Are referring particularly to exports from Malaysia?
Marilyn, I don't want to belabor the point, but we must set a goal of saving
orchids - not enforcing CITES. We're paying homage to the paper gods, not
to the plants. An orchid in a jar of alcohol is just as dead as an orchid
in a bonfire to me.
An open question: In 1000 years where will there be a place for native orchids
is situ be??????
Marilyn, I am not referring to exports from Malaysia only but also from
other third world countries including Europe and even Holland where the
Customs officer accused me of trying to smuggle orchids into Holland when
I was taking my award plants from Orchidee 98 in Geneva home on transit
through Amsterdam. Switzerland does not issue CITES permits or certifications.
Sparky, re the millennium: check our greenhouse, we'll still be there with
our grand little bunch. I remember the last millennium.........
Not much left, Steve, if we do not do something now.
Sharon. I believe that most people want to be honest. They visit a show
say in Florida. They know they need a permit to get the plant back into
Canada but there is no permit issuing person at the show. They take a chance
and maybe the plant pays the price by being confiscated and destroyed. We
are trying to encourage streamlining of documentation so that hobbyists
do not have to break laws and plants are not confiscated. certainly there
will be a few individuals, and I believe it is a small minority, that have
the money and wish the status that goes with an unique specimen. It is they
who will smuggle or cause to be smuggled, what they earnestly desire. Again
the plants pay the price if they are confiscated and destroyed. They also
could pay the price if they are wild-collected and the grower does not know
how to take care of them. The plant dies, they get another one.
Like I said, Ed----in due time---it's inevitable!!!!!!
Ed, perhaps wild orchids collected from slash and burn areas can be sent
to the newer zoos around the world and 'naturalized' in trees there for
everyone to see and appreciate, just as the newer zoos display animals in
'natural' roaming exhibits today. Zoos have definitely undergone 'enlightenment'
for the benefit of the animals there, so why can't orchids destined for
destruction find sanctuary in zoos and botanical parks also?
Marilyn, The Cites and quarantine may be exceptional in Canada and USA.
but they are not in the rest of the world.
Marilyn, there are alternatives to the destruction of confiscated plants.
When we managed the orchid collection at the San Antonio Botanical Garden,
we helped to set up a rescue program where confiscated orchid plants were
sent to us for the collection. The plants remained in bond, as it were,
but could be conserved and displayed to the public.
I agree that customs agents can be difficult. Perhaps it is because they
are trained to be suspicious. I have never had major problems travelling
with plants between countries although I strive to always have the correct
documentation. Even then, the inspectors look for other illicit material.
That is the way of our system. All we can do is be as correctly and completely
documented as possible before transiting plants.
Paula, the San Antonio Zoo has an impressive collection of naturalized orchid
plants. We were not involved in that project, but it is an excellent one.
sparkysteve (of Boca Raton Florida)
Ed and Paula---that's a good idea, but if there was a way to stop the poaching.....
paulav (Paula in Boca Raton, Florida)
Well, Steve, just as banning the sale of ivory has greatly reduced elephant
poaching, banning the import of wild-collected orchids could reduce the
demand for them too.
nodosa
Marilyn, the customs people are not without their moment. Years ago, I carried
a Laelia autumnalis in full bloom through airport customs and showed the
agent a letter I had received - but not read - from an alleged friend at
the University of Mexico. He had assured me that the customs man would pass
me through on the strength of my academic credentials. They did, too, but
the agent in parting felt constrained to say, 'By the way, that letter is
in Spanish and advises the reader that under no circumstances should money
be loaned to the bearer.'
marilyninOttawa
Abu. I believe that each of us should do what lobbying we can within our
own countries. Regulations are an individual country's concern. Lobbying
for change at the international CITES level can be done and is best passed
through the IUCN orchid committee. They meet regularly to discuss proposals
such as downlisting from Appendix I to II as in the case of Cattleya skinneri,
or in the case of flasks not requiring CITES export permits.
ABU CALANTHE
Steve, slow down the demand for orchid species and the poaching and smuggling
will also slow down. If its not lucrative enough, it will eventually stop.
WE THE ORCHID COMMUITY HAS THE FINAL SAY IN THIS MATTER. THE GROWERS WILL
NOT GROW IF THE ORCHID COMMUNITY DOES NOT BUY. HYBRIDS ARE ALWAYS BETTER
THAN SPECIES.
marilyninOttawa
Ed. If you look back at transcripts of earlier conservation discussions
(August and on) you will see what has been proposed.
nodosa
Abu, I agree on customer responsibility but there is absolutely no reason
to keep species orchids out of the hands of collectors. Collectors don't
buy them to kill them. The only hope many species have is to be taken into
cultivation and nurtured there against the storm that is howling in situ.
sparkysteve (of Boca Raton Florida)
The time will come and you will see guards armed to watch the last remaining
specimen in the wild, just like rhinos.
marilyninOttawa
Ed. We must live with CITES and other internal laws. If we are to practice
conservation, i.e., making wise use of the orchid resource, locally and
worldwide, then we need a comprehensive approach. I think that this has
been well set out in the Plant Action Plan - Orchids. I posted the URL in
the pre-chat material.
Ruckster1 (Sharon from Tejas)
Ed, have you ever thought of running for govt office? We need more minds
like yours...
paulav (Paula in Boca Raton, Florida)
Good suggestion, Sharon... I'd vote for Ed!!!
nodosa
Marilyn, I hope you are right. I just wish the Plant Action Plan didn't
sound so like its initials!
nodosa
Sharon and Paula: you are very kind, but I fear if is perhaps thirty years
too late for me to live up to the Clinton standard of public service.
marilyninOttawa
Abu. We may be developing a model here in Canada (maybe this is also happening
elsewhere) whereby show plants will be issued a sort of passport. We asked
for this type of device a few years back and now it is close to fruition.
The key would be to have this internationally recognized. recognition between
two countries is possible but it gets more complicated beween many countries
as I am sure you understand. Still, it is a start. I will report back on
this after our meeting next week.
ABU CALANTHE
Marylin, What I meant is exactly that. If the orchid community in each country
will do what ever is necessary in their respective country and join hands
with the rest of the world then we have a voice that is loud enough to be
heard. Being isolated in your own country and not knowing what is happening
in other parts of the world is also not good enough. The IUCN Orchis specialist
group is still groping. The issue that they had brought up at the Lecture
Program in Geneva is 'WHAT IS NEXT AFTER THE IUCN' Where do we go from here?
Moderated by Eric Hagsater, Vinciane Dumont and Philip Cribb.
nodosa
What was the input of the commercial orchid community to these deliberations.
Surely we have not always been the greedy enemy.
marilyninOttawa
Ed. This is another issue that we are about to address next week. Botanical
gardens are overflowing and until these new proposals, were required to
keep the plants given to them for safe-keeping without any opportunity for
recompense or any right to propagate and sell to support what they had been
given. I believe that this is about to change. We strongly feel that confiscated
material must not be destroyed. It can be returned to the sender or it could
be placed in a 'home'. This could be a public or private facility based
more upon the plant requirements than on favoritism. After a period of say
3-6 months, the ownership would be transferred and the plants could be propagated,
meristemmed or whatever is appropriate to ensure their multiplication and
improve upon their survival.
nodosa
Well, folks, I believe I'll stroll out and look at some of the plants we
rescued from Agent Orange or maybe the ones we got out of Burma before the
revolution. CITES might do a lot more for conservation if they quit using
so many trees for paper to write up their proceedings. Please try to keep
a native orchid or two alive until common sense gets a turn. Good night,
all, and thank you for a pleasant chat.
marilyninOttawa
Abu. How do you suggest that species are conserved? It is wise to maintain
a gene pool. How should we approach this?
ABU CALANTHE
Nodosa, It is sad that the orchid growers in the USA are not united under
one Association. The commercial growers would have a strong voice to approach
Congress as the issues here affect a USD260 million industry in USA. We
have such an association here in Malaysia and we have been able to convince
our government to make the necessary changes which will be implemented this
year (1988).
marilyninOttawa
Are you asking me, Ed? If so, our commercial orchid community is not large
here in Canada.
ABU CALANTHE
Marilyn, my proposal is inside the six pages of extracts to Lois. We do not believe that leaving the orchids in their natural habitats will help totally. Habitats of species within a permanetn forest reserve gazatted by the govt is quite safe. But orchids in habitats within reach of development should be collected and replanted in suitable agricultural parks, botanical gardens, and lowland forest reserves. The most imprtant is that the growers be allowed to collec these species, imporve on the, propagate though hybridization or meristem them for sale to the local and would orchid community. In this way, the orchid species will never become extinct.
paulav (Paula in Boca Raton, Florida)
Abu, I agree completely. But who will monitor the collecting?
marilyninOttawa
Abu. I believe I understand what you propose. Epiphytes are generally more
amenable to re-establishment than terrestrials which are the major concern
of Europe, much of North America, etc. The conservation approach is therefore
somewhat different.
ABU CALANTHE
Marilyn, what we have done here is to take CITES Appendix I and II out of the customs prohibition order and leave it on its own two feet under the quarantine regulations act. In this way, the customs dept no longer has jursidiction over the orchid plants under CITES I and II, only the quarantine and wildlife dept to regulate the issuance of the CITES certificate and the phytosanitary certificates. There will be freedom of trade and export of orchid species which has been manipulated by humans in accordance with CITES requirements. I will provide you with the details when the new regulations have been gazatted.
marilyninOttawa
Thank you everyone for a most interesting discussion. Lots of good ideas
to mull over and hopefully integrate in local initiatives. Hope that everyone
will try to have a conservation-oriented exhibit at their show. Good night.
sparkysteve (of Boca Raton Florida)
Marilyn - a super round of applause for you!!!!
marilyninOttawa
Thank you, Steve!
sparkysteve (of Boca Raton Florida)
Abu, see you on Saturday? Open chat night
ABU CALANTHE
Yes, Steve.
sparkysteve (of Boca Raton Florida)
See ya then! I'll turn the lights out *click*
- 30 -