TIME RELATED JOB STRESS CAUSED BY (NEW) MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES AND HOW TO FIGHT IT

Report of the workshop
18 and 19 September 1999
7th European Work Hazards Network Conference; Edinburgh, Schotland, UK

(The paper for the workshop is also available at the internet.)

Ailko van der Veen   Gisela Dütting

  1. Introduction

During the 7th Conference of the European Work Hazards Network in Edinburgh, Scotland, Gisela Dütting and Ailko van der Veen (both members of the Dutch Work Hazards Network) facilitated a workshop on time-related job stress. The workshop took place on 17 and 18 September 1999. Fifteen people coming from six countries attended the workshop.

The general aim of the workshop was to:
  1. exchange information on time related job stress and compare experiences across Europe
  2. to deepen our understanding of time related job stress, especially how and why
  3. to discuss collective strategies to fight time related job stress
As a starting exercise, participants presented their personal ways to deal with stress and they introduced themselves. After a plenary presentation and discussion of the workshop paper, participants continued working in two smaller groups. In the groups, they answered the basic questions: why do we accept work stress and how can we fight it. At the end of the workshop, a list of conclusions and recommendations was made based on all previous discussions. Finally, all participants were asked what they were going to do with the results of the workshop and everyone was invited to complete an evaluation form.

This report has been compiled by the facilitators and is both a report of the outcomes as they were written down in the workshop, as well as the facilitators' own conclusions and reflections on the workshop. This report has been distributed among all participants of the workshop. Further dissemination is encouraged.

Participants came from Austria (1x), Denmark (2x), England (6x), Germany (2x), the Netherlands (3x), and Norway (1x). There were no participants from Southern Europe. One explanation put forward in the workshop was that in countries like Italy and Spain, stress is more connected with fear for life and health and not so much connected with time-constraints.

Out of the 15 participants, six were women (and this was very disproportionate, as the total conference had about 70% men). Most people in the workshop were wage earning. Most of them worked in the private sector.

Four people described how they quit wage earning and started working on a free-lance basis recently. All of them mentioned work stress as an important factor in deciding to do so.

  1. Starting Exercise: How do you personally deal with stress?

The first part of the workshop focused on personal ways to fight stress and rating yourself as being in the red, yellow or green zone. The exercise was done individually by writing three small notes each and sticking them on the wall. The question participants answered was: 'How do you handle stress at work?' Afterwards the question was not separately debated, but it focused people's mind on the subject. For many people it assisted in introducing themselves. We give the full list below. (NB the number of answers is high as the facilitators and translators joined in)

Replies stuck in the Red Zone: Replies stuck in the Yellow Zone Replies stuck in the Green Zone Observations from the facilitators:
  1. There were 17 notes in the red zone, 24 notes in the yellow zone and 1 in the green zone (and this turned out to be a mistake later). People in the workshop were convinced of the problem and the priority of time related job stress. Most people mentioned during the introduction that they put themselves in the yellow zone, but would put most of their colleagues in the red zone
  2. What people do to combat stress at work is most often an individual strategy. Of the 41 notes in the yellow and red zone, only eight mentioned sharing with colleagues, trade union or employer and four mentioned talking to friends (which could be on the job or outside).

  1. The Discussion Paper

For the workshop, the facilitators wrote a discussion paper titled 'Time related job stress caused by new management techniques and how to fight it'. This paper was distributed to all participants in the workshop. This paper is available at the internet.

In the plenary discussion that followed the presentation of the paper, participants made several observations and additions:

  1. Group discussions

After the general discussion, participants were randomly divided in two groups. Each group debated two questions: a) why do we accept this? and b) how to fight it? The results of the discussions were put on flip charts.

A) Why do we accept this?

Results from Group 1 Results from Group 2

B. How to fight it?

Results from Group 1 Results from Group 2

In the workshops, many personal histories and experiences were exchanged. Both in the workshops and in the discussion following the reading of both groups' flipcharts, the following points were further elaborated:

  1. Many workers experience a continuous but often undefined fear. It is fear of fast changes, fear of loosing your job, fear of failure as it is no longer so clear what exactly is expected of you. This fear is often experienced as a vague background but its basis can be very real. 'Only the paranoid survive' said one participant
  2. One of the major barriers to changing time related job stress is that everyone experiences the problem as an individual problem. No one knows what an acceptable level of work stress really is. Those workers who do try to manage are very influential in setting a company's culture and thus adding to the stress of colleagues. Especially in team work, this becomes a type of moral blackmail, as some people in a team work very hard and the rest feels they must keep up
  3. What is happening in the different organisations and companies can only be understood from a wider perspective. Participants made links to the way that unemployed people are now forced to accept any job, thus enhancing competition between workers and building more stress. All participants saw the need to challenge the current economic system, although they differed in their thinking on strategy (from legislation, building stronger unions, very concrete measures at company levels etc). All agreed that the currently the balance between economics and human values is tipped far too much in favour of economics.

  1. Conclusions/recommendations
Based on all previous debates, the workshop made conclusions and recommendations. These were made on three levels: company level, political level and the level of the European Work Hazards Network. Finally, all participants indicated how/with whom they would share the results of the workshop. Most people planned to debate it among friends, in the different trade unions and some planned to distribute information via Internet.

The facilitators wish to thank all participants most cordially for their trust their thinking and open sharing of experiences and ideas.

Gisela Dütting and Ailko van der Veen 1